Therapeutic Anticoagulation with Heparin in Critically Ill Patients with Covid-19.

BACKGROUND: Thrombosis and inflammation may contribute to morbidity and mortality among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). We hypothesized that therapeutic-dose anticoagulation would improve outcomes in critically ill patients with Covid-19. METHODS: In an open-label, adaptive, multiplatform, randomized clinical trial, critically ill patients with severe Covid-19 were randomly assigned to a pragmatically defined regimen of either therapeutic-dose anticoagulation with heparin or pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in accordance with local usual care. The primary outcome was organ support-free days, evaluated on an ordinal scale that combined in-hospital death (assigned a value of -1) and the number of days free of cardiovascular or respiratory organ support up to day 21 among patients who survived to hospital discharge. RESULTS: The trial was stopped when the prespecified criterion for futility was met for therapeutic-dose anticoagulation. Data on the primary outcome were available for 1098 patients (534 assigned to therapeutic-dose anticoagulation and 564 assigned to usual-care thromboprophylaxis). The median value for organ support-free days was 1 (interquartile range, -1 to 16) among the patients assigned to therapeutic-dose anticoagulation and was 4 (interquartile range, -1 to 16) among the patients assigned to usual-care thromboprophylaxis (adjusted proportional odds ratio, 0.83; 95% credible interval, 0.67 to 1.03; posterior probability of futility [defined as an odds ratio <1.2], 99.9%). The percentage of patients who survived to hospital discharge was similar in the two groups (62.7% and 64.5%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 0.84; 95% credible interval, 0.64 to 1.11). Major bleeding occurred in 3.8% of the patients assigned to therapeutic-dose anticoagulation and in 2.3% of those assigned to usual-care pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill patients with Covid-19, an initial strategy of therapeutic-dose anticoagulation with heparin did not result in a greater probability of survival to hospital discharge or a greater number of days free of cardiovascular or respiratory organ support than did usual-care pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis. (REMAP-CAP, ACTIV-4a, and ATTACC ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT02735707, NCT04505774, NCT04359277, and NCT04372589.).

Antithrombotic Stewardship: Evaluation of Platelet Reactivity-Guided Cangrelor Dosing Using the VerifyNow Assay.

ABSTRACT: Cangrelor may be used as a bridge when temporary interruption of dual antiplatelet therapy is necessary. However, the optimal dose and monitoring of cangrelor in patients remains unknown, especially in the setting of mechanical circulatory support (MCS). We conducted an observational, single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients who had percutaneous coronary intervention within 3 months and received cangrelor while admitted to any intensive care unit. The primary outcome was the incidence of any major adverse cardiovascular event. Secondary outcomes included VerifyNow platelet reactivity units (PRUs) measured while on cangrelor and any bleeding events while on cangrelor. A total of 92 patients were included. The most common reason for cangrelor use was in the periprocedural setting, with or without MCS (42%-45%), followed by NPO status (26%-28%) and MCS alone (22%-24%). The primary outcome of major adverse cardiovascular event occurred in 1 patient (1.1%). Of 92 patients, 77% had a P2Y12 level collected within 24 hours, and 89% of the cohort was able to achieve the goal P2Y12 PRU of <194. The median P2Y12 value within 24 hours of cangrelor initation was 115 PRU (40-168 PRU). We observed a bleed event rate of 23% (21/92). We found a standardized protocol of cangrelor dosing in critically ill patients who received a drug-eluting stent in the past 3 months to be successful in achieving a goal P2Y12 PRU. Although the optimal PRU remains unknown, cardiovascular clinicians may monitor these levels to help guide decisions regarding cangrelor management. Future randomized controlled trials should evaluate the optimal PRU threshold to balance risks of ischemia and bleeding.

Anticoagulant prescribing patterns in patients with primary central nervous system malignancies and secondary metastases.

To evaluate the safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in patients with central nervous system (CNS) malignancies and secondary metastases. All adult patients with CNS malignancies and secondary metastases who were treated with a DOAC or LMWH for any indication from 2018 to 2022 were included. The primary outcome was the incidence of any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) after anticoagulation initiation. Secondary outcomes included non-ICH bleeding events and thromboembolic events. Tolerability was assessed by any changes in anticoagulant therapy during study period. 153 patients were included; 48 patients received enoxaparin and 105 received DOACs, of which apixaban was used most commonly. The population was predominantly White (74%) and male (59%) with a median age of 65. Data was censored for immortal time bias for outcomes evaluated beyond 3 months. ICH occurred in 7.7% of the population, more frequently in the enoxaparin group (DOACs 4, 4% vs. enoxaparin 7, 16%, p = 0.037). Non-ICH bleeds were predominantly minor and more common in the DOAC group (DOACs 13, 13% vs. enoxaparin 1, 2%, p = 0.037). Thromboembolic events were not different between groups (DOACs 9. 9% vs, enoxaparin 2, 4%, p = 0.503). Anticoagulant switches occurred more in the enoxaparin group (DOACs 12, 12.4% vs. enoxaparin, 37.8%, p < 0.001), primarily due to patient or provider preference. Our data supports DOACs to be preferred over LMWH for the treatment of VTE or for stroke prevention with AF to prevent ICH in patients with brain tumors or metastases.

Antithrombotic and hemostatic stewardship: Evaluation of romiplostim for treatment of thrombocytopenia at a large academic medical center.

Romiplostim is indicated for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), though is often used off-label for other indications such as chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) and thrombocytopenia post hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Although romiplostim is FDA approved at a starting dose of 1 mcg/kg, it is often initiated at 2-4 mcg/kg depending on the severity of thrombocytopenia in clinical practice. Given the limited data, but interest in higher doses of romiplostim for indications other than ITP, we aimed to assess our inpatient romiplostim utilization at NYU Langone Health.This was a single-center, retrospective review of 84 adult patients from January 2019 to July 2021. The top three indications were ITP (51, 60.7%), CIT (13, 15.5%), and HSCT (10, 11.9%). The median initial romiplostim dose was 3.8 mcg/kg (range, 0.9-10.8). 51% of patients achieved a platelet count of ≥50 × 109/L by the end of week 1 of therapy. For patients achieving goal platelets by the end of week 1, the median dose of romiplostim was 2.4 mcg/kg (range, 0.9-10.8). There was 1 episode of thrombosis and 1 episode of stroke.We found that higher than FDA-recommended initial doses should be considered to achieve a platelet response. It appears to be safe to initiate romiplostim as higher doses, and to increase doses by greater increments than 1 mcg/kg in order to achieve a platelet response. Future prospective studies are needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of romiplostim in off-label indications and should evaluate clinical outcomes such as bleeding and need for transfusions.

Evaluating the Use of Unfractionated Heparin with Intra-Aortic Balloon Counterpulsation.

BACKGROUND: Evidence supporting anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin (UFH) in patients with an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) to prevent limb ischaemia remains limited, while bleeding risks remain high. Monitoring heparin in this setting with anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) is not previously described. OBJECTIVES: The study objective is to describe the incidence of thromboembolic and bleeding events with the use of UFH in patients with an IABP utilising monitoring with both anti-Xa and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). METHODS: This is a retrospective study of adults who received an IABP and UFH for ≥24 hours. Electronic medical records were reviewed for pertinent data. The primary outcome was the incidence of limb ischaemia during IABP. Secondary outcomes included myocardial infarction, thrombus on IABP, or stroke. Exploratory outcomes included any venous thromboembolism and bleeding events. RESULTS: Of 159 patients, 88% received an IABP for cardiogenic shock and median duration of IABP support was 118 hours (interquartile range, 67-196). Limb ischaemia occurred in four of 159 patients (2.5%). Strokes occurred in 3.8% of the cohort, and bleeding events occurred in 33%. Despite anticoagulation use in all patients, 11% experienced a venous thromboembolism, with most identified upon asymptomatic screening with concern for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. We found no differences in outcomes that occurred with a hybrid anti-Xa and aPTT versus aPTT monitoring alone. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a high rate of thrombotic and bleeding complications with the use of UFH in patients with an IABP. Use of anti-Xa versus aPTT for monitoring was not associated with complications. These data suggest safer anticoagulation strategies are needed in this setting.

Off-Target Effects of Cancer Therapy on Development of Therapy-Induced Arrhythmia: A Review.

BACKGROUND: Advances in cancer therapeutics have improved overall survival and prognosis in this patient population; however, this has come at the expense of cardiotoxicity including arrhythmia. SUMMARY: Cancer and its therapies are associated with cardiotoxicity via several mechanisms including inflammation, cardiomyopathy, and off-target effects. Among cancer therapies, anthracyclines and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are particularly known for their pro-arrhythmia effects. In addition to cardiomyopathy, anthracyclines may be pro-arrhythmogenic via reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and altered calcium handling. TKIs may mediate their cardiotoxicity via inhibition of off-target tyrosine kinases. Ibrutinib-mediated inhibition of CSK may be responsible for the increased prevalence of atrial fibrillation. Further investigation is warranted to further elucidate the mechanisms behind arrhythmias in cancer therapies. KEY MESSAGES: Arrhythmias are a common cardiotoxicity of cancer therapies. Cancer therapies may induce arrhythmias via off-target effects. Understanding the mechanisms underlying arrhythmogenesis associated with cancer therapies may help design cancer therapies that can avoid these toxicities.

A Comparison of Prothrombin Complex Concentrate and Recombinant Activated Factor VII for the Management of Bleeding With Cardiac Surgery.

Bleeding following cardiac surgery that warrants transfusion of blood products is associated with significant complications, including increased mortality at 1 year following surgery. Factor concentrates, such as prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC), or recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) have been used off-label for bleeding in cardiac surgery that is refractory to conventional therapy. The objective of this retrospective study is to assess the hemostatic effectiveness of 4-factor PCC or rFVIIa for bleeding after a broad range of cardiac surgeries. Patients were included if they were at least 18 years of age and had undergone cardiac surgery with bleeding requiring intervention with 4-factor PCC or rFVIIa. There were no differences observed in the number of packed red blood cells (4-factor PCC: 2 units vs. rFVIIa: 2 units), fresh frozen plasma (0 units vs. 1 unit) or platelet (2 units vs. 2 units) transfusions following the administration of 4-factor PCC or rFVIIa. The patients in the rFVIIa group, required more cryoprecipitate than those in the 4-factor PCC group (4-factor PCC: 2 units (range 0-6) vs. rFVIIa: 2 units (range 0-8), p = 0.03). There were no differences in secondary outcomes of chest tube output at 2, 6, 12 and 24 hours, nor was there a difference in reexploration rates or the median length of stay in the intensive care unit. Thromboembolic complications at 30 days were similar between the two groups (4-factor PCC: 13% vs. rFVIIa 26%, p = 0.08). The total median dose requirement for 4-factor PCC was 1000 units (15 units/kg) and 2 mg (20 mcg/kg) for rFVIIa. The results demonstrate feasibility of utilizing the minimum amount of drug in order to achieve a desired effect. Both 4-factor PCC and rFVIIa appear to be safe and effective options for the management of bleeding associated with cardiac surgery.

Real world prescribing practices of apixaban or rivaroxaban lead-in doses for the treatment of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients.

The oral factor Xa inhibitors (OFXAi) apixaban and rivaroxaban are increasingly utilized for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) with recommended initial higher dose 7- and 21-day lead-in regimens, respectively. In patients receiving initial parenteral anticoagulation, it remains unknown if the full recommended higher dose OFXAi lead-in regimens are warranted, or if days can be subtracted. We aimed to describe when clinicians may deviate from recommended lead-in durations and evaluate clinical outcomes in these scenarios. This is a retrospective, observational study of patients 18 years or older who were treated with rivaroxaban or apixaban for acute pulmonary embolism (PE) or symptomatic proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) that received parenteral anticoagulation for at least 24 h before transitioning to the OFXAi. Among our cohort of 171 patients with acute VTE who received parenteral anticoagulation for a median of 48 h, 134 (78%) were prescribed a full OFXAi lead-in and 37 (22%) were prescribed a reduced lead-in. Patients in the reduced lead-in group were older with more cardiac comorbidities and antiplatelet use. There were four recurrent thromboembolic events within 3 months, two in the reduced lead-in group and two in the full lead-in group (5% vs. 2%, p = 0.206). Bleeding within 3 months occurred in 9 (5%) patients, with 6 events occurring in the reduced lead-in group and 3 events in the full lead-in group (16% vs. 2%, p = 0.004). Prescribing patterns of OFXAi lead-in therapy duration are variable in patients receiving initial parenteral anticoagulation. Larger cohorts are needed to better define the safety and efficacy of lead-in reduction.

Prevalence and Outcomes of D-Dimer Elevation in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of D-dimer elevation in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) hospitalization, trajectory of D-dimer levels during hospitalization, and its association with clinical outcomes. Approach and Results: Consecutive adults admitted to a large New York City hospital system with a positive polymerase chain reaction test for SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) between March 1, 2020 and April 8, 2020 were identified. Elevated D-dimer was defined by the laboratory-specific upper limit of normal (>230 ng/mL). Outcomes included critical illness (intensive care, mechanical ventilation, discharge to hospice, or death), thrombotic events, acute kidney injury, and death during admission. Among 2377 adults hospitalized with COVID-19 and ≥1 D-dimer measurement, 1823 (76%) had elevated D-dimer at presentation. Patients with elevated presenting baseline D-dimer were more likely than those with normal D-dimer to have critical illness (43.9% versus 18.5%; adjusted odds ratio, 2.4 [95% CI, 1.9-3.1]; P<0.001), any thrombotic event (19.4% versus 10.2%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.9 [95% CI, 1.4-2.6]; P<0.001), acute kidney injury (42.4% versus 19.0%; adjusted odds ratio, 2.4 [95% CI, 1.9-3.1]; P<0.001), and death (29.9% versus 10.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 2.1 [95% CI, 1.6-2.9]; P<0.001). Rates of adverse events increased with the magnitude of D-dimer elevation; individuals with presenting D-dimer >2000 ng/mL had the highest risk of critical illness (66%), thrombotic event (37.8%), acute kidney injury (58.3%), and death (47%). CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal D-dimer was frequently observed at admission with COVID-19 and was associated with higher incidence of critical illness, thrombotic events, acute kidney injury, and death. The optimal management of patients with elevated D-dimer in COVID-19 requires further study.

Evaluation of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin for Intracardiac Thromboses.

ABSTRACT: Intracardiac thrombus (ICT) formation is a common complication of several cardiovascular diseases. Warfarin is recommended for treatment of ICT by guidelines based on observational studies occurring before the advent of nonvitamin K antagonist direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). We aim to evaluate the current prescribing patterns at our institution and to compare the efficacy and safety profiles of warfarin versus DOACs for ICT. This is a retrospective review of adult patients treated with oral anticoagulation for ICT between May 2013 and December 2019. Our primary end point was complete thrombus resolution. Secondary outcomes included time to resolution of thrombus, treatment failure, and duration of therapy. Safety end points included stroke and systemic embolization (SSE) and bleeding events. A total of 123 patients were included (DOAC n = 61; warfarin n = 62). At baseline, more patients in the DOAC group had anemia [6 (10%) vs. 0 (0%), P = 0.013] and alcohol use disorder [6 (10%) vs. 0 (0%), P = 0.013]. Complete thrombus resolution occurred in 50 (82%) and 46 (74%) patients in the DOAC and warfarin groups, respectively (P = 0.298). There was a shorter time to thrombus resolution in the DOAC group versus the warfarin group {63 days [interquartile range (IQR) 40-138] vs. 123 days [IQR 86-244], P = 0.003}. There were no differences found in SSE or bleeding between the groups [DOAC 11 (19%) vs. warfarin 17 (28%), P = 0.213]. For patients with an ICT, treatment with a DOAC for at least 3 months may be a comparable alternative to warfarin in safety and efficacy.

Catheter-directed Thrombolysis for Neonatal IVC and Bilateral Renal Vein Thrombosis: A Case Report.

Renal vein thrombosis is the most common non-catheter-associated venous thromboembolism event in neonates, accounting for up to 20% of cases. Although mortality rates are lower than a variety of other forms of pediatric thrombosis, renal vein thrombi are associated with significant short-term and long-term sequelae. This report presents the case of a full-term neonate presenting with bilateral renal vein thrombosis with inferior vena cava involvement treated with catheter-directed thrombolysis. This case report intends to highlight the value of a multidisciplinary approach to pediatric venous thromboembolism and to outline relevant procedural details and current laboratory and imaging monitoring of catheter-directed thrombolysis.

Thromboelastography Profiles of Critically Ill Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019.

OBJECTIVES: The rate of thromboembolic events among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 is high; however, there is no robust method to identify those at greatest risk. We reviewed thromboelastography studies in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 to characterize their coagulation states. DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING: Tertiary ICU in New York City. PATIENTS: Sixty-four patients with coronavirus disease 2019 admitted to the ICU with thromboelastography performed. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Fifty percent of patients had a clotting index in the hypercoagulable range (clotting index > 3) (median 3.05). Reaction time and K values were below the lower limit of normal in 43.8% of the population consistent with a hypercoagulable profile. The median α angle and maximum amplitude (75.8° and 72.8 mm, respectively) were in the hypercoagulable range. The α angle was above reference range in 70.3% of patients indicative of rapid clot formation. Maximum amplitude, a factor of fibrinogen and platelet count and function, and a measure of clot strength was above reference range in 60.1% of patients. Thirty-one percent had thromboembolic events; thromboelastography parameters did not correlate with events in our cohort. Those with D-dimer values greater than 2,000 were more likely to have shorter reaction times compared with those with D-dimer levels less than or equal to 2,000 (4.8 vs 5.6 min; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion of critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 have hypercoagulable thromboelastography profiles with additional derangements related to fibrinogen and platelet function. As the majority of patients have an elevated thromboelastography maximum amplitude, a follow-up study evaluating platelet aggregation would be instructive.

Perils of Antithrombotic Transitions: Effect of Oral Factor Xa Inhibitors on the Heparin Antifactor Xa Assay.

BACKGROUND: Oral factor Xa inhibitors (OFXais) may interfere with the heparin antifactor Xa (antiXa) assay. The best method to measure heparin activity during the transition from an OFXai to intravenous (IV) unfractionated heparin (UFH) remains unknown. This study aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of transitioning from an OFXai to UFH. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients with supratherapeutic antiXa levels on UFH who received either apixaban or rivaroxaban within 72 hours before UFH initiation at NYU Langone Health. The primary objective was to identify the incidence of interference on the heparin antiXa assay due to OFXai exposure in the previous 72 hours. The secondary outcomes included the indication for transition to UFH and the rate of thromboembolic and bleeding events. RESULTS: A total of 93 patients with supratherapeutic antiXa activity levels with prior OFXai use were reviewed. Moderate renal impairment, defined as creatinine clearance less than 49 mL/min, was present in 67 (72%) patients. The primary indication for transition from OFXai to UFH was in anticipation for a procedure, and it occurred in 37 (40%) patients. There were 3 major bleeding events and 3 clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events. No thromboembolic events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: This study assessed the prevalence of supratherapeutic antiXa levels and clinical outcomes during the transition from OFXais to UFH. Health care systems should develop guidelines to assist clinicians in monitoring antiXa activity in patients undergoing a transition from an OFXai to UFH. It is also important to assess the patient's underlying thromboembolic and bleeding risks.

Cost comparison of andexanet versus prothrombin complex concentrates for direct factor Xa inhibitor reversal after hemorrhage.

Andexanet-alpha is a specific reversal agent for direct factor Xa inhibitors (dFXaI). We aimed to project utilization rates and cost of andexanet for reversal of dFXaI-related major hemorrhage compared to 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrates (4F-PCC). A retrospective, multicenter review was conducted between 1/1/2014 and 7/15/2018 of patients who received 4F-PCC for reversal of dFXaI-related life-threatening hemorrhages. Total hospital reimbursements/patient were calculated based on national average MS-DRG payments adjusting for Medicare discounts. The projected cost for andexanet (based on dose and insurance) and % reimbursement/patient was compared to the actual cost of 4F-PCC. Hemostasis at 24 h (excellent/good vs. poor) and 30-day thrombotic complications were assessed. Of 126 patients who received 4F-PCC to reverse dFXaI, 46 (~ 10 per-year) met inclusion criteria. The median projected cost of andexanet was $22,120/patient, compared to $5670/patient for 4F-PCC (P < 0.001). The median hospital reimbursement was $11,492/hospitalization. The projected cost of andexanet alone would exceed the entire hospital reimbursement in 74% of patients by a median of $7604, while 4F-PCC cost exceeded the total hospital payments in 7% of patients in the same cohort (P < 0.001). Hemostasis was excellent/good in 72% of patients post-4F-PCC, compared to 82% in andexanet trials. Thromboembolic events occurred in 4% of patients following 4F-PCC versus 10% in andexanet trials. The projected cost of andexanet would exceed the national average hospital reimbursement/patient in nearly 75% of patients by over $7500/hospitalization. 4F-PCC was significantly less expensive, had lower rates of thrombosis, but also lower rates of good/excellent hemostasis compared to published data for andexanet.

Assessment of dextrose 50 bolus versus dextrose 10 infusion in the management of hyperkalemia in the ED.

INTRODUCTION: Hypoglycemia is a common adverse effect when intravenous (IV) insulin is administered for hyperkalemia. A prolonged infusion of dextrose 10% (D10) may mitigate hypoglycemia compared to dextrose 50% (D50) bolus. Our objective was to evaluate whether D10 infusion is a safe and effective alternative to D50 bolus for hypoglycemia prevention in hyperkalemic patients receiving IV insulin. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients ≥ 18 years who presented to the emergency department (ED) with hyperkalemia (K+ > 5.5) and received IV insulin and D10 infusion or D50 bolus within 3 h. The primary endpoint was incidence of hypoglycemia, defined as blood glucose (BG) ≤ 70 mg/dL, in the 24 h following IV insulin administration for hyperkalemia. RESULTS: A total of 134 patients were included; 72 in the D50 group and 62 in the D10 group. There was no difference in incidence of hypoglycemia between the D50 and D10 groups (16 [22%] vs. 16 [26%], p = 0.77). Symptomatic hypoglycemia, severe hypoglycemia, and hyperglycemia rates in the D50 and D10 groups were [5 (7%) vs. 2 (3%), p = 0.45], [5 (7%) vs. 1 (2%), p = 0.22], and [34 (47%) vs. 23 (37%), p = 0.31] respectively. Low initial BG was a predictor for developing hypoglycemia. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, D10 infusions appeared to be at least as effective as D50 bolus in preventing hypoglycemia in hyperkalemic patients receiving IV insulin. In context of ongoing D50 injection shortages, D10 infusions should be a therapeutic strategy in this patient population.

Cardiotoxicity with carfilzomib at doses greater than 27 mg/m2: A case series.

Carfilzomib is a second-generation proteasome inhibitor that irreversibly inhibits chymotrypsin-like (CT-L) activities of the proteasome, and is indicated for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Cardiotoxicity is a well-established adverse effect of carfilzomib. The extent of cardiac toxicity in the literature spans anywhere from palpitations to cardiac arrest, with the most commonly reported manifestation being new-onset or worsening heart failure. A pre-clinical study of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of carfilzomib given via intravenous bolus or 30-minute infusion in rats showed that carfilzomib can strongly induce apoptosis and potently damage cardiac myocytes at clinically relevant concentrations. Moreover, the mortality rate with the bolus administration was 44% whereas the same dose administered as a 30-minute infusion did not result in mortality. There remains limited clinical data regarding the safety of carfilzomib at doses of 27-56 mg/m2 based on infusion times as these doses have not been well studied. This retrospective review was conducted to evaluate the safety of carfilzomib at doses >27 mg/m2 at all infusion times.

Posaconazole versus voriconazole as antifungal prophylaxis during induction therapy for acute myelogenous leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with acute myelogenous leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome undergoing induction chemotherapy are at increased risk of invasive fungal infection due to prolonged, severe neutropenia. Due to this risk, national guidelines recommend invasive fungal infection prophylaxis in this population until the resolution of neutropenia. Although posaconazole has demonstrated superiority over fluconazole and itraconazole, there is limited evidence for voriconazole for invasive fungal infection prophylaxis in this population. Even less data are available comparing posaconazole and voriconazole directly. The study objective was to investigate the efficacy and safety of delayed-release posaconazole tablets versus voriconazole for primary invasive fungal infection prophylaxis. The primary outcome was rate of discontinuation of either agent. Secondary outcomes included specific rates of discontinuation due to adverse events and drug-drug interactions, rates of breakthrough invasive fungal infection, and 30-day and 100-day mortality rates. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of adult patients admitted to NYU Langone Health between 1 January 2014 and 31 August 2017 and initiated on invasive fungal infection prophylaxis during induction or reinduction chemotherapy for acute myelogenous leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome. RESULTS: In total, 77 patients were included in the study: 43 using posaconazole delayed-release tablets and 34 using oral voriconazole. In the posaconazole group, 30% of patients (n = 13) discontinued therapy for any reason compared with 35% (n = 12) of patients in the voriconazole group (p = 0.64). A higher percentage of patients in the voriconazole group discontinued due to adverse events (6 patients, 18% vs. 1 patient, 2%, p = 0.04). Mortality rates at 30 and 100 days were similar between both groups. No breakthrough invasive fungal infections was noted in either group. CONCLUSION: Overall, discontinuations for any reason were similar in patients taking both posaconazole delayed-release and oral voriconazole. Both posaconazole delayed-release tablets and oral voriconazole appear to be effective at preventing invasive fungal infection in acute myelogenous leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome patients undergoing induction chemotherapy, although posaconazole may be more tolerable.

Renal and Cardiac Implications of Sodium Glucose Cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) Inhibitors: The State of the Science.

OBJECTIVE: To review the role of the sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in the management of type 2 diabetes (T2DM), including the effects on renal and cardiovascular (CV) outcomes. DATA SOURCES: A literature search of MEDLINE databases (1964 through May 2018) was conducted utilizing key words sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors, SGLT2 inhibitors, and diabetes; additional limits for drug names were added. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Available English-language data from reviews, abstracts, presentations, and clinical trials of use of SGLT2 therapy specifically detailing outcomes on CV and renal disease in humans were reviewed. DATA SYNTHESIS: This review will explore the role of the SGLT2 inhibitors on CV and renal outcomes in patients with T2DM. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: A paradigm shift regarding the regulation of medications for the treatment of T2DM has resulted in the need for CV outcomes data as part of the drug approval process. Reduction of major CV events and progression of nephropathy in patients with T2DM represent major outcomes of clinical significance. Few medications have been able to establish a reduction in these end points; data for the use of SGLT2 inhibitors are favorable in this regard. CONCLUSION: The SGLT2 inhibitors represents a class of medications that reduce glucose levels via a novel and complementary mechanism. Emerging evidence suggests a plausible explanation for the observed reduction in adverse renal and CV outcomes in recent clinical trials. Questions remain whether these agents reduce renal disease risk greater than achievement of the same glycemic goals as other antidiabetics and whether CV and renal benefits are reproducible in high-risk patients with chronic kidney disease.

Assessment of patients post reversal with idarucizumab.

Idarucizumab, a fully humanized Fab antibody fragment, is indicated for reversal of dabigatran's anticoagulant activity. Idarucizumab neutralizes the anticoagulant effects of dabigatran by binding to dabigatran and its metabolite. In the full analysis of 503 patients, idarucizumab fully reversed the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran in more than 98% of patients. Real-world clinical experience with idarucizumab for dabigatran reversal remains limited. We report 11 real-world clinical cases in which idarucizumab was administered for dabigatran reversal in the setting of bleed (bleeding cohort n = 5) or emergent procedure (emergent procedure cohort, n = 6). Coagulation tests and clinical outcomes were assessed before and after idarucizumab administration. Clinical outcomes included thromboembolic events and hemostasis. The median (IQR) aPTT (seconds) before versus after idarucizumab was 40.4 (36.1) versus 27.3 (6.2) (bleeding cohort) and 50.1 (13.4) versus 26.5 (8.1) (emergent procedure cohort). The median (IQR) INR before and after idarucizumab was 2.0 (1.1) versus 1.2 (0.1) (bleeding cohort) and 1.1 (0.5) versus 1.1 (0.3) (emergent procedure cohort). Hemostasis was achieved in 4/5 patients in the bleeding cohort and 5/6 patients in the emergent procedure cohort. Thrombotic events occurred in four patients with a median time (IQR) from idarucizumab administration of 7.4 (4.3-14.7) days. Idarucizumab achieved adequate dabigatran reversal as evident by normalization of aPTT, INR, and achieving hemostasis. However, our data demonstrates a high thrombotic risk associated with dabigatran reversal with idarucizumab than previously reported.