Vasomotor response to different endothelium-dependent vasodilators in an animal model.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Incomplete re-endothelialization of stents can be revealed as paradoxical vasoconstriction with endothelium-dependent vasodilators. As no consensus exists about the best method or agent, our objective is to analyze the response to different drugs in a coronary swine model. METHODS: Twenty-seven stents were implanted in 9 domestic swine. The vessel diameter of proximal and distal segments (≥5 mm) was assessed immediately post implantation. Different endothelium-dependent vasodilators were used: intracoronary (IC) acetylcholine, 20 µg (A2) and 40 µg (A4), IC serotonin (S), 100 µg, and isoproterenol (I), intravenous infusion. The results are presented as constriction (%) compared with maximal vasodilation with IC nitroglycerin (N, 200 µg). RESULTS: In 10 vessels (37%), A4 provoked an occlusive spasm. Acetylcholine induced a higher degree of vasoconstriction (A4, 42 ± 39%; A2, 16 ± 14%) than the rest of the agonists (S, 6 ± 12%; I, 6 ± 11%; P<.01). The constriction rate was not related to the induced hemodynamic changes. CONCLUSIONS: After focal endothelial denudation in a coronary swine model, the constriction rate induced by different endothelium-dependent vasodilators is highly variable. The highest value is observed after IC acetylcholine bolus. The constriction rate does not correlate with the observed hemodynamic changes.

[Instent restenosis related to vessel injury score degree. Are current experimental models valid for drug-eluting stents analysis?]. / La reestenosis en el stent depende del daño vascular inducido. ¿Son válidos los modelos experimentales actuales de análisis de los stents farmacoactivos?

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Drug-eluting stents are useful for preventing restenosis, but the patho-physiological processes involved in the proliferative response after implantation are still not known in detail. The aim of this study is to compare the coronary vascular histomorphometry after implanting drug-eluting stents and bare metal stents in a swine model. METHODS: Sixty stents were randomly implanted in 20 Large White female pigs with a ratio of baremetal/drug-eluting stents of 1:2. After 28 days, euthanasia and histomorphometry were performed. We defined the vessel injury score in accordance to whether the internal elastic lamina was intact or ruptured. RESULTS: There were no differences between drug-eluting stents and bare metal stents in the intact internal elastic lamina group regarding neointimal area or % restenosis (1.3 [1.1-2.2]) vs 2.0 [1.3-2.5] mm²; P=.6; and 14.0 [12.1-20.8] vs 22.2 [14.1-23.3] %; P=.5). We assessed statistically significant differences for the ruptured internal elastic lamina group, (neointimal area 1.2 [0.8-2.0] vs 2.9 [2.3-3.7] mm²; P=.001 and % restenosis 16.63 [11.2-23.5] vs 30.4 [26.4-45.7] %; P=.001). CONCLUSIONS: In our swine model, we did not find any differences between proliferative response of drug-eluting stents and bare metal stents when the internal elastic lamina is intact; differences are only found when vascular injury is deeper.