A survey of the use of tourniquet among orthopaedic surgeons in Nigeria.

BACKGROUND: The modern arterial tourniquet is an automatic tourniquet system which contains many features that help to minimise complications and improve safety. However, the non-pneumatic tourniquet is still in use, a practice that may be commoner in resource-constrained settings. This study was conducted to investigate the types of tourniquet available and used by orthopaedic surgeons in Nigeria as well as the practical aspects and complications of their use of the tourniquet. MATERIALS AND METHODS: At an Annual General Meeting/Scientific Conference of Nigerian Orthopaedic Association, a survey was conducted among orthopaedic surgeons using a pre-tested self-administered questionnaire which contained questions on types of tourniquet, practical aspects of the use of tourniquet and complications. RESULTS: The non-pneumatic tourniquet was usually used by 60.2% of the respondents and 58.1% of those who had both pneumatic and non-pneumatic tourniquets used the latter more commonly. In most cases, the tourniquet was applied by surgeons or surgical residents on the arm or thigh. Surgeons who had ever used the tourniquet in diabetic patients were 71.6% while 29.5% had used it in patients with sickle cell disease. Tourniquet duration was usually 1½ h and 2 h in the upper and lower limbs, respectively. The two most common complications were tourniquet palsy and tourniquet pain. CONCLUSIONS: The non-pneumatic tourniquet was more commonly used than the pneumatic tourniquet. Application of the tourniquet on sites other than the thigh and the upper arm were uncommon. The most common complication was neurologic injury.

Physiological parameters for Prognosis in Abdominal Sepsis (PIPAS) Study: a WSES observational study.

Background: Timing and adequacy of peritoneal source control are the most important pillars in the management of patients with acute peritonitis. Therefore, early prognostic evaluation of acute peritonitis is paramount to assess the severity and establish a prompt and appropriate treatment. The objectives of this study were to identify clinical and laboratory predictors for in-hospital mortality in patients with acute peritonitis and to develop a warning score system, based on easily recognizable and assessable variables, globally accepted. Methods: This worldwide multicentre observational study included 153 surgical departments across 56 countries over a 4-month study period between February 1, 2018, and May 31, 2018. Results: A total of 3137 patients were included, with 1815 (57.9%) men and 1322 (42.1%) women, with a median age of 47 years (interquartile range [IQR] 28-66). The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 8.9%, with a median length of stay of 6 days (IQR 4-10). Using multivariable logistic regression, independent variables associated with in-hospital mortality were identified: age > 80 years, malignancy, severe cardiovascular disease, severe chronic kidney disease, respiratory rate ≥ 22 breaths/min, systolic blood pressure < 100 mmHg, AVPU responsiveness scale (voice and unresponsive), blood oxygen saturation level (SpO2) < 90% in air, platelet count < 50,000 cells/mm3, and lactate > 4 mmol/l. These variables were used to create the PIPAS Severity Score, a bedside early warning score for patients with acute peritonitis. The overall mortality was 2.9% for patients who had scores of 0-1, 22.7% for those who had scores of 2-3, 46.8% for those who had scores of 4-5, and 86.7% for those who have scores of 7-8. Conclusions: The simple PIPAS Severity Score can be used on a global level and can help clinicians to identify patients at high risk for treatment failure and mortality.

Global validation of the WSES Sepsis Severity Score for patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections: a prospective multicentre study (WISS Study).

BACKGROUND: To validate a new practical Sepsis Severity Score for patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) including the clinical conditions at the admission (severe sepsis/septic shock), the origin of the cIAIs, the delay in source control, the setting of acquisition and any risk factors such as age and immunosuppression. METHODS: The WISS study (WSES cIAIs Score Study) is a multicenter observational study underwent in 132 medical institutions worldwide during a four-month study period (October 2014-February 2015). Four thousand five hundred thirty-three patients with a mean age of 51.2 years (range 18-99) were enrolled in the WISS study. RESULTS: Univariate analysis has shown that all factors that were previously included in the WSES Sepsis Severity Score were highly statistically significant between those who died and those who survived (p < 0.0001). The multivariate logistic regression model was highly significant (p < 0.0001, R2 = 0.54) and showed that all these factors were independent in predicting mortality of sepsis. Receiver Operator Curve has shown that the WSES Severity Sepsis Score had an excellent prediction for mortality. A score above 5.5 was the best predictor of mortality having a sensitivity of 89.2 %, a specificity of 83.5 % and a positive likelihood ratio of 5.4. CONCLUSIONS: WSES Sepsis Severity Score for patients with complicated Intra-abdominal infections can be used on global level. It has shown high sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratio that may help us in making clinical decisions.