[Reconstruction of Portal Vein and Superior Mesenteric Vein Using Superficial Femoral Vein Graft in Surgical Resection of Pancreatic Head Cancer-A Case Report].

We report a case of reconstruction of the portal vein(PV)and superior mesenteric vein(SMV)using a superficial femoral vein graft in total pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer. A 62-year-old man visited a previous hospital due to epigastric pain and bilirubinuria and was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. The patient was referred to our hospital for further examination and treatment. Abdominal CT scan revealed a 30 mm pancreatic head tumor with an abutment of almost 360 degrees around the superior mesenteric artery(SMA)and extensive involvement from the PV to branches of the SMV, radiologically classified as locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer. Although gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel combination therapy(GnP)was performed, the patient developed drug-induced lung injury after 3 courses. GnP was stopped, and chemoradiation therapy with S-1 was performed. After chemoradiation therapy, the tumor shrank to 14 mm, while no change of the abutment around SMA was observed. After 8 months from the initial diagnosis, total pancreatectomy and resection of the PV/SMV were performed. Approximately 70 mm of the PV/SMV was surgically removed and was reconstructed using a graft from the left superficial femoral vein in consideration of the length and diameter. Although delayed gastric emptying was postoperatively observed, the patient was discharged 39 days after operation, then received adjuvant therapy with S-1. The patient is alive without recurrence and the patency of PV/SMV was well maintained.

Oral Steroid Use and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Expansion　- Positive Association.

BACKGROUND: The maximum axial diameter (MAD) of a fusiform abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is an indicator of the risk of expansion or rupture. Apart from smoking and MAD itself, few expansion risk factors have been reported. In this study, we investigated expansion risk factors for AAA.Methods and Results:This retrospective cohort study included 176 patients who attended Tohoku University Hospital with infrarenal fusiform AAA. AAA expansion rate was determined on multidetector computed tomography, and the correlations between expansion rate and the clinical data were analyzed. The median expansion rate was 2.405 mm/year. On univariate analysis, a significant positive correlation with expansion rate was observed for the initial MAD (P<0.001) and significant negative correlations for oral angiotensin receptor blocker usage (P=0.025), height (P=0.005), body weight (P=0.017), total cholesterol (P=0.007), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P=0.004), and HbA1c (P=0.037). On logistic regression analysis, significant positive associations with expansion rate were observed for initial MAD (P<0.001) and oral steroid usage (P=0.029) and a negative association for height (P=0.041). CONCLUSIONS: Oral steroid usage is an important risk factor for AAA expansion, independent of other risk factors of atherosclerosis and MAD.

Distal Bypass Improves Skin Perfusion Pressure at the Whole Foot Regardless of Angiosomes in Patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.

Objectives: Distal bypass surgery's effect on tissue blood pressure beyond a focal angiosome remains debated. This study assessed tissue blood pressure in both direct revascularized angiosome (DRA) and indirect revascularized angiosome (IRA) after bypass surgery, utilizing repeated skin perfusion pressure (SPP) measurements. Methods: Twenty-nine limbs in 27 chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) patients (22 males and five females, age: 70.2 ± 9.3 years) who received distal bypass surgery were enrolled. SPP measurements were conducted for the DRA and IRA at 10 time intervals, encompassing both preoperative and postoperative periods of every 3-5 days until 30 days. Results: In total, 486 SPP measurements were collected from 58 measurement sites, and the transition of the SPP at the DRA was 35.4-62.5-59.5-70.2-58.2-62.2-63.1-63.6-63.8-73.4 mmHg and IRA was 29.4-53.4-53.7-58.8-51.3-63.1-47.9-62.1-57.6-61.0 mmHg. No significant differences were observed between SPP at the DRA and IRA. Fifteen wounds on the DRA (63%) and five on the IRA (100%) healed. Conclusion: Distal bypass improves SPP in both direct and IRAs of CLTI patients. These data indicated distal bypass improves tissue blood flow at entire foot regardless of angiosomes.

Extracorporeal shock wave therapy improves the walking ability of patients with peripheral artery disease and intermittent claudication.

BACKGROUND: Despite the recent advances in bypass surgery and catheter interventional therapy for peripheral artery disease (PAD), the long-term outcome of revascularization therapy for infrapopliteal lesions remains unsatisfactory. We have previously demonstrated that low-energy extracorporeal shock wave (SW) therapy effectively induces neovascularization through upregulation of angiogenic factors and improves myocardial ischemia in pigs and humans and in hindlimb ischemia in rabbits. In this study, we thus examined whether our SW therapy also improves the walking ability of patients with PAD and intermittent claudication. METHODS AND RESULTS: We treated 12 patients (19 limbs) in Fontaine II stage (males/females, 10/2; 60-86 years old) with low-energy SW therapy to their ischemic calf muscle 3 times/week for 3 consecutive weeks. After 24 weeks, the pain and distance subscale scores of the walking impairment questionnaire were significantly improved (33±25 vs. 64±26, 27±16 vs. 64±23, respectively, both P<0.01). Maximum walking distance was also significantly improved at 4 weeks (151±37% from baseline, P<0.01) and was maintained at 24 weeks (180±74% from baseline, P<0.01). Moreover, the recovery time of the tissue oxygenation index in the calf muscle during a treadmill test, which reflects local O2 supply, was significantly shortened (295±222s vs. 146±137s, P<0.01). Importantly, no adverse effects were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Non-invasive SW therapy improves the walking ability of PAD patients.

Prevention of Buttock Claudication by Preserving Antegrade Bilateral Superior Gluteal Arterial Blood Flow in EVAR for Aorto-Iliac Aneurysm Accompanied by Bilateral Internal Iliac Artery Aneurysms.

Buttock claudication (BC) is a complication of surgery for aorto-iliac aneurysms (AIAs) caused by sacrificing blood flow in the internal iliac artery (IIA). However, the preservation of antegrade blood flow of IIAs is often challenging when performing both open surgery and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for AIAs accompanied by IIA aneurysms. We performed EVAR and successfully preserved the antegrade blood flow of bilateral superior gluteal arteries using the GORE EXCLUDER iliac branch endoprosthesis with the VIABAHN endograft. BC did not occur, both subjectively and objectively, after surgery. This approach can be minimally invasive yet an effective procedure to prevent BC.

Surgical resection and inferior vena cava reconstruction for treatment of the malignant tumor: technical success and outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to review patients who underwent inferior vena cava (IVC) resection with concomitant malignant tumor resection and to consider the operative procedures and the outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2000 and 2012, 41 patients underwent resection of malignant tumors concomitant with surgical resection of the IVC at our institute. The records of these patients were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Primary tumor resections included nephrectomy, hepatectomy, retroperitoneal tumor extirpation, lymph node dissection, and pancreaticoduodenectomy. The IVC interventions were partial resection in 23 patients and total resection in 18 patients. Four patients underwent IVC replacement. Operation-related complications included pulmonary embolism, acute myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis, leg edema and temporary hemodialysis. There were no operative deaths. The mean follow-up period was 24.9 months (range: 2-98 months). The prognosis depended on the type and stage of the tumor. CONCLUSION: Resection and reconstruction of the IVC can be performed safely if the preoperative evaluations and surgical procedures are performed properly. The IVC resection without reconstruction was permissive if the IVC was completely obstructed preoperatively, but it may also be considered in cases where the IVC is not completely obstructed.