Understanding domains of health-related quality of life concerns of Singapore Chinese patients with advanced cancer: a qualitative analysis.

PURPOSE: Quality of life concerns in patients with advanced diseases might be different from other patients and are shaped by sociocultural context. The objective of this qualitative study was to identify domains and themes of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) that Chinese patients with advanced cancer in Singapore considered relevant and important. METHODS: English- and Chinese-speaking patients with advanced solid cancer were recruited from a tertiary cancer center and a community-based hospice for in-depth interview or focused group discussion. Thematic analysis was used to identify subthemes, themes, and domains from the transcripts. RESULTS: Forty-six ethnic Chinese (aged 26-86, 48% male) participated in the study. Six domains of HRQoL concerns were identified: pain and suffering, physical health, social health, mental health, financial well-being, and spiritual health. Pain and suffering are not limited to the physical domain, reflecting the multidimensional nature of this concept. Pain and suffering must also be understood within the cultural context. Healthcare relations (i.e., social health), existential well-being and religious well-being (i.e., spiritual health), and suffering (i.e., pain and suffering) are not fully captured in the existing HRQoL instruments. In addition, financial issues and the practice of secrecy in interpersonal relationships emerged as unique features possibly arising from our sociocultural context and healthcare financing landscape. CONCLUSION: Socioculturally specific issues not measured by the existing HRQoL instruments for use in patients with advanced cancers or terminal diseases were found in our study. These are non-physical pain and suffering, meaning of illness, meaning of death, financial issues, and practice of secrecy in interpersonal relationships.

The impact of surgical margin status and use of an interstitial implant on T1, T2 oral tongue cancers after surgery.

PURPOSE: In patients with T1,T2 oral tongue carcinoma treated with surgical resection, postoperative radiation therapy (RT) is required especially when surgical margins contain tumors. Irradiation techniques include external beam, interstitial implants, or a combination of the two modalities. We investigated whether positive surgical margin remains a poor prognostic factor after radiation therapy, and the contribution of interstitial implants to disease control. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1972 and 1989, 55 patients were treated postoperatively at the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology for T1,T2 squamous cell carcinomas of the oral tongue. Surgeries included 26 wide excisions or excisional biopsies and 29 composite resections or hemiglossectomies. Thirty-nine patients received external radiation therapy alone and 16 patients had an interstitial implant (ISI) as part of the treatment. The minimum follow-up is 4 years. RESULTS: At 2 and 5 years, the overall survivals for all patients were 82 and 68%. The disease-free survivals (DFS) were 82 and 70%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the pattern of failure and DFS when stratified by the status of surgical margins and the type of the surgical procedure. Local control was achieved in 15 of 18 patients when surgical margins were involved by tumor and in 29 of 37 patients without tumor involving margins (p > 0.05). Ten of 18 (56%) patients with tumor involving resection margins were treated with ISI, whereas only 3 of 33 (9%) of those with negative margins received ISI. Local control was achieved in 32 of 39 patients treated with external beam RT alone, and 13 of 16 patients who received interstitial implant (p > 0.05). Four patients treated with ISI developed persistent soft tissue ulceration and mandibular bone exposures. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative radiation therapy converted the ominous outcome of patients with tumor involving surgical margins. Patients with positive surgical margins were often selected to be treated with interstitial implants. We found that the local control was as good as in those with a more favorable pathology (negative margins) and treated with external RT alone. Further investigation is needed to optimize the implant treatment to minimize the complications.

Comfort care kit: use of nonoral and nonparenteral rescue medications at home for terminally ill patients with swallowing difficulty.

INTRODUCTION: We devised a comfort care kit (CCK) consisting of nonoral and nonparenteral rescue medications for caregivers to use at home for symptom control in imminently dying patients who have lost their ability to swallow. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of the CCK from the perspective of bereaved caregivers. METHODS: CCKs were handed out to caregivers for patients who were entered into the care for the dying pathway (CDP). Each CCK includes morphine and haloperidol ampoules, lorazepam tablets, atropine drops, and paracetamol suppositories given either through sublingual or rectal route. We conducted a telephone survey of bereaved caregivers to assess CCK's feasibility (proportion of use), pattern of use, perceived benefits and challenges, and need to transfer to emergency department at the end of life. RESULTS: Forty-nine caregivers completed the survey. Thirty-three (67%) reported that they used the CCK. A majority (76%) only used one medication from the kit. Atropine drops were the most commonly used, followed by morphine and paracetamol. All family members reported that the CCK was easy to use and 98% found it to be effective for symptom management. All except one patient died at home. CONCLUSION: The CCK was feasible and perceived to be effective for symptom control and easy to use. Further research is necessary to optimize the use of this kit and to document related outcomes.