The relationship between hepatic fibrosis and arterial stiffness in hemodialysis patients.

INTRODUCTION: The main cause of death in hemodialysis patients is cardiovascular diseases. Increased arterial stiffness is a predictor of cardiovascular events for hemodialysis patients. Among the nondialysis patient population, arterial stiffness increases in those with hepatic fibrosis and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. This study aims to examine the relationship between hepatic fibrosis and arterial stiffness in hemodialysis patients for the first time in the literature. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The study includes chronic hemodialysis patients over 18 years of age who had been treated for hemodialysis for at least 6 months. Patients with chronic liver disease, chronic viral hepatitis (HBV and HCV), alcohol use, or liver disease accompanied by polycystic kidney disease and active infection were excluded. Hepatic fibrosis scores were measured using the FibroScan device. Single-cuff Mobil-o-Graph was used for measurement of arterial stiffness. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were enrolled; 54.2% of the patients were male, and the mean age was 53.9 ± 12.9 years. Thirty-nine percent of the patients had diabetes. Average pulse wave velocity (PWV) value of the patients was 8.3 ± 1.6 m/s, and it had positive correlation with age, CAP score, fibrosis score, and body mass index and showed negative correlation to albumin. It was seen that the patients with a PWV value ≥ 10 m/s have significantly higher CAP score compared with the patients with a PWV < 10 m/s. When the factors predicting PWV were examined in the regression analysis, age and systolic blood pressure were found to be determinants. CONCLUSION: Increased hepatic fibrosis in hemodialysis patients is associated with increased arterial stiffness, but this relationship is not independent.

Serum NT-proBNP levels are associated with cognitive functions in hemodialysis patients.

It has been demonstrated that NT-proBNP and macrophage inhibitor cytokine-1 (MIC-1/GDF-15) are associated with cognitive functions in patients without renal disease. In the present study, we examined the association of these two molecules with cognitive functions in hemodialysis patients for the first time in the literature. A total of 94 patients were enrolled. The Mini-Mental Test and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test (MoCA) were applied for the purpose of measuring the cognitive functions. The NT-proBNP and MIC-1/GDF-15 levels were examined with the ELISA. The mean age of the patients was 48 ± 12; 58 (61.7%) of them were male and 21.3% were diabetic. We found that in 77% of patients have impaired cognitive functions (MoCA total score <24). The NT-proBNP level had a significant and negative correlation with the MoCA Test Delayed Recall and Total Score. When the patients were divided into two groups according to NT-proBNP levels (above 10.500 and below), it was observed that the Mini-Mental Test Record Memory, MoCA Test Delayed Recall, and MoCA test total scores were significantly different from each other. In the present study, we show, for the first time in the literature, that NT-proBNP levels are associated with cognitive functions in dialysis patients.

Can vasohibin-1, an endothelium-derived angiogenesis inhibitor, be a marker of endothelial dysfunction in hemodialysis patients?

BACKGROUND: Endothelial dysfunction (ED) is associated with high cardiovascular disease burden in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Vasohibin-1, an endothelium-derived angiogenesis inhibitor, is essential for endothelial cell survival, therefore it may be a promising marker of ED. We aimed to investigate whether vasohibin-1 levels are associated with ED markers in HD patients. METHODS: Fifty HD patients and 30 healthy controls were included in the study. As markers of ED, endothelium-dependent flow-mediated dilatation (FMD), carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT), and pulse wave velocity (PWV) were examined. Serum vasohibin-1 levels were measured with ELISA. RESULTS: Serum vasohibin-1 levels were low (387.7 ± 115.7 vs 450.1 ± 140.1 P = .02), FMDs' were impaired (6.65 ± 2.50 vs 10.95 ± 2.86 P < .001), PWV (7.92 ± 1.964 vs 6.79 ± 0.96 P = .01) and CIMT (0.95 ± 0.20 vs 0.60 ± 0.11 P < .001) were increased in HD patients compared to healthy controls. In regression analysis, vasohibin-1 levels were not related with FMD, PWV, or CIMT. CONCLUSIONS: Hemodialysis patients have low serum vasohibin-1 levels but serum levels of vasohibin-1 did not show any significant relationship with FMD, PWV, and CIMT in HD patients. Since vasohibin-1 acts via paracrine pathways, serum levels may be insufficient to explain the relationship between vasohibin and ED. Local vasohibin-1 activity on tissue level may be more important instead of circulating levels.

Asprosin and meteorin-like protein immunoreactivity in invasive ductal breast carcinoma stages.

AIM: The study aimed to investigate asprosin (ASP) and meteorin-like (METRNL) protein immunoreactivity in invasive ductal breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Overall, 60 cases of invasive ductal breast cancer (20 cases each of Grade 1, 2 and 3) were evaluated in addition to 20 normal breast tissues obtained from the Pathology Department Archive. ASP and METRNL expressions were assessed using immunohistochemical staining and visualised under a light microscope. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in ASP and METRNL immunoreactivity among all the groups included in the study (p < 0.001). Cancer tissues with Grade 1, 2 and 3 showed a significant increase in ASP and METRNL immunoreactivity compared with the control group; however, no significant difference was noted among the cancer tissues with Grade 1, 2 and 3. CONCLUSIONS: ASP and METRNL immunoreactivity increased at the cellular level in invasive ductal breast cancer, but there was no difference in immunoreactivity among the breast cancer grades.

Effectiveness of TI-RADS and ATA classifications for predicting malignancy of thyroid nodules.

BACKGROUND: Thyroid cancer is one of the most common cancers and is especially common in young patients. Therefore, effective recognition and treatment of thyroid cancer are essential for patient survival. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of standard guidelines for predicting thyroid malignancy. To do so, thyroid nodules were classified according to the categories of the American Thyroid Association (ATA) and Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) guidelines, and compared with fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) results. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 1741 thyroid nodules with a final diagnosis in 1121 consecutive patients. The FNAB was recommended for all patients according to ATA guidelines and subsequently performed. The nodules were reclassified according to TI-RADS guidelines. RESULTS: Comparing nodules classified according to ATA and TI-RADS in terms of ultrasonography (US) features with the Bethesda cytological diagnosis classification System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology, 37.6% of the nodules classified in the high-risk category according to the ATA classification were found to be malignant cytology, 10.4% suspicious for malignancy, 4% non-diagnostic, 9.6% indeterminant cytology, and 38.4% benign. According to the TI-RADS risk category, 50% of those with high suspicion were malignant, 13.3% suspicious for malignancy cytology and 36.7% were benign. For the TI-RADS guidelines, the best cutoff value for differentiating benign and malignant nodules was found to be 4.5 (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.962, 95% CI = 0.943-0.981, p < 0.001). For the ATA guidelines, the best cutoff value for separating benign and malignant nodules was 4.5 (AUC = 0.917, 95% CI = 0.875-0.959, p < 0.001). The diagnostic performances of the TI-RADS and ATA score systems were evaluated using highly suspicious nodules. The sensitivity and specificity of highly suspicious nodules, according to both TI-RADS and ATA guidelines, were both high. Sensitivity and specificity of ATA classification were 80% and 96.3%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of TI-RADS classification were 76% and 97.5%, respectively, but positive predictive value was low (63.3% compared to 55.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Both, the ATA and TI-RADS classifications can effectively predict malignancy risk of thyroid nodules and may thus decrease unnecessary FNAB.

Prediction of Peritoneal Recurrence in Patients with Gastric Cancer: a Multicenter Study.

PURPOSE: The peritoneum is the common recurrence site of gastric cancer (GC) presenting with worse survival. Although some predictive clinicopathological factors have been identified, there is no comprehensive assessment of peritoneal recurrence risk prediction for patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (CR) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) after surgery. We aimed to predict peritoneal recurrence and develop a new scoring model in GC. METHODS: This retrospective study included 274 GC patients who presented with recurrence after curative gastrectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Risk factors for peritoneal recurrence were analyzed using the following parameters: age, gender, tumor location and characteristics, and differences between treatment modalities. All parameters were assessed by binary logistic regression analysis to compare the patients with and without peritoneal recurrence. Then, a new risk scoring model was developed. RESULTS: Peritoneal recurrence was observed in 115 (44.1%) patients. Peritoneal recurrence was higher in female gender (odds ratio (OR), 1.93; 1.07-3.49, P = 0.030, 1 point), T4a-b stage (OR, 2.47; 1.14-5.36, P = 0.022, 1 point), poor/undifferentiated (OR, 2.04; 1.31-4.06, P = 0.004, 1 point), and signet cell carcinoma (OR, 2.04; 1.04-4.02, P = 0.038, 1 point) after adjusted for resection and dissection types. The risk scoring model was developed using the related parameters: Peritoneal recurrence rates were 24.6%, 42.6%, and 71.4% for group 1 (0 point), group 2 (1-2 points), and group 3 (3-4 points), respectively. CONCLUSION: Female gender, T4 tumor stage, undifferentiated histopathology, and signet cell type had a tendency to peritoneal recurrence after adjusted for treatment modalities. Patients with 3 or 4 risk factors had an 8.8-fold increased risk for the development of peritoneal recurrence.

Does neutrophyl to lymphocyte ratio really predict chronic kidney disease progression?

PURPOSE: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an inflammatory process. In addition to increased morbidity and mortality, inflammation also contributes to the progression of CKD. Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a marker of inflammation. Some recent data suggest that NLR may predict the progression of CKD. METHODS: In this study, 5-year data of 740 patients with stage 2-4 CKD were reviewed retrospectively. Demographic data, NLR, CRP, albumin, the amount of proteinuria were recorded. At the beginning and the end of follow-up the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and the annual GFR decline rate were calculated. Patients were divided to high and low NLR group according to median value of their baseline NLR. Reaching stage 5 CKD or initiation of renal replacement therapy was determined as end-point for follow-up. RESULTS: The mean age was 62.8 ± 0.57 years, eGFR 40 ml/min/1.73 m2, median NLR was 2.76. NLR increased as the CKD-stage increased. Mean follow-up time was 51.2 ± 30 months and 21.4% of patients reached the end-point. NLR was significantly increased at follow-up (from 3.22 to 5.68, p < 0.001). Annual GFR loss and baseline CRP were higher but baseline albumin and GFR were lower of patients with high NLR. The percent of patients reaching the end-point was not different between the groups with high and low baseline NLR. Kaplan Meier analysis showed that patients with high NLR had significantly lower mean renal survival (86.5 months) than patients with low NLR (105 months) (p < 0.001). In the Cox-regression analysis NLR was not an independent predictor in reaching the end-point but presence of diabetes mellitus, younger age and low baseline eGFR were found effective. CONCLUSIONS: NLR is an indicator of inflammation in chronic kidney disease. It may not be an independent predictor of CKD progression except that the CKD is in a more advanced stage and reflects the associated inflammation. Classical risk factors such as DM and lower GFR are more powerful predictors of progression.