Ustekinumab Drug Levels and Outcomes in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND: Data regarding the utility of therapeutic drug monitoring with ustekinumab (UST) are sparse. Our aim was to determine the correlation of UST levels with outcomes in a cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective study of all patients with IBD who received UST from January 1, 2014 to March 1, 2022. The primary outcomes were the correlation of UST level with clinical remission (per physician global assessment), endoscopic healing [the absence of ulcers/erosions in Crohn's disease (CD) and Mayo endoscopic score ≤1 for ulcerative colitis (UC)], and normal serum C-reactive protein (CRP) (≤5 mg/L). Secondary outcomes included defining optimal UST trough levels associated with favorable outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 71 patients (74.6% with CD; 57.7% female) were included. The median age was 39.5 years [interquartile range (IQR): 26 to 52] and 12.6% were on combination therapy with immunomodulators. Median UST trough levels were significantly higher in patients who achieved endoscopic healing at 5.4 µg/mL versus 3.5 µg/mL (P=0.035) and normal CRP at 5.5 µg/mL versus. 3.1 µg/mL (P=0.002). A cutoff UST level of 4.8 µg/mL yielded the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.73 (95% CI: 0.61-0.80) to predict a normal CRP followed by a cutoff of 3.5 µg/mL which yielded an AUC of 0.66 (95% CI: 0.52-0.81) to predict endoscopic healing. CONCLUSIONS: UST trough levels were significantly higher in patients who achieved a normal CRP and endoscopic healing. A cutoff UST level of 4.8 µg/mL reliably predicted CRP normalization.

Rates, Predictors, and Outcomes of Ustekinumab Dose Escalation in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

OBJECTIVE: Ustekinumab (UST) is effective for the induction and maintenance of remission in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, a significant proportion of patients will require UST dose escalation. We sought to determine the rates, predictors, and outcomes of UST dose escalation in patients with IBD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective study of all patients with IBD who received UST from January 1, 2014 to March 1, 2022. Primary outcomes were the rates and predictors of UST dose escalation. Secondary outcomes included steroid-free clinical remission, endoscopic healing, and normalization of serum c-reactive protein in patients who underwent UST dose escalation. RESULTS: A total of 198 patients were included (58% females and 76.7% with Crohn's disease). UST dose was escalated by 55.5% (n = 110). Mean baseline albumin was lower in the UST dose escalation group at 3.86 ± 0.47 versus 4.03 ± 0.45 g/dL (P = 0.044). The mean hemoglobin was lower in the UST dose escalation group at 12.1 ± 1.83 versus 12.7 ± 1.42 (P = 0.049). On multivariate analysis, male sex alone was associated with the need for dose escalation (odds ratio: 4.08, 95% CI: 1.20 - 13.90; P = 0.025). In the UST dose escalation group, 66.1% achieved steroid-free clinical remission, 55.8% had normalization of c-reactive protein, and 35.8% achieved endoscopic healing. CONCLUSIONS: UST dose escalation was needed in more than half of patients with IBD in this real-world cohort. UST dose escalation resulted in clinical remission in more than half of the cohort and endoscopic healing in one-third of patients.

Impact of COVID-19 Treatment on Real-World Outcomes in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND: While there are multiple safe and effective agents for COVID-19 treatment, their impact in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains uncertain. AIMS: Our objective was to assess the effects of these therapies on both IBD and COVID outcomes. METHODS: A single-center retrospective study of adult patients with IBD who contracted COVID-19 between 12/2020 and 11/2022 was performed. Patients were stratified by COVID-19 treatment (antivirals and/or intravenous antibodies) vs no therapy. The primary outcome was the development of severe COVID-19 infection, defined by need for supplemental oxygen, corticosteroids and/or antibiotics, or hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included rates of withholding advanced IBD therapy (defined as biologic agents or small molecules) and of post-COVID-19 IBD flare. RESULTS: Of 127 patients with COVID-19 infection, 70% were on advanced therapies, 35% received COVID-19 treatment, and 15% developed severe COVID-19. Those treated for COVID-19 were more likely to be on corticosteroids [odds ratio (OR) 4.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.72-12.39, p = 0.002] or advanced IBD therapies (OR 2.78, 95% CI 1.04-7.43, p = 0.041). After adjusting for age, race, sex, corticosteroid use, obesity, COVID-19 vaccination status, and severe COVID-19 infection, those treated for COVID-19 were more likely to have IBD therapy held (OR 6.95, 95% CI 1.72-28.15, p = 0.007). There was no significant difference in rates of post-COVID-19 IBD flares or severe COVID-19 infection. There were no COVID-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with IBD on advanced therapies were frequently treated for acute COVID-19. Although COVID-19 treatment was associated with temporary withholding of IBD therapy, it did not result in increased IBD flares.

Comparative Safety of Biologic Agents in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease With Active or Recent Malignancy: A Multi-Center Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Safety of biologic agents is a key consideration in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and active or recent cancer. We compared the safety of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α antagonists vs non-TNF biologics in patients with IBD with active or recent cancer. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients with IBD and either active cancer (cohort A) or recent prior cancer (within ≤5 years; cohort B) who were treated with TNFα antagonists or non-TNF biologics after their cancer diagnosis. Primary outcomes were progression-free survival (cohort A) or recurrence-free survival (cohort B). Safety was compared using inverse probability of treatment weighting with propensity scores. RESULTS: In cohort A, of 125 patients (483.8 person-years of follow-up evaluation) with active cancer (age, 54 ± 15 y, 75% solid-organ malignancy), 10 of 55 (incidence rate [IR] per 100 py, 4.4) and 9 of 40 (IR, 10.4) patients treated with TNFα antagonists and non-TNF biologics had cancer progression, respectively. There was no difference in the risk of progression-free survival between TNFα antagonists vs non-TNF biologics (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.25-2.30). In cohort B, of 170 patients (513 person-years of follow-up evaluation) with recent prior cancer (age, 53 ± 15 y, 84% solid-organ malignancy; duration of remission, 19 ± 19 mo), 8 of 78 (IR, 3.4) and 5 of 66 (IR 3.7) patients treated with TNFα antagonists and non-TNF biologics had cancer recurrence, respectively. The risk of recurrence-free survival was similar between both groups (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.24-3.77). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with IBD with active or recent cancer, TNFα antagonists and non-TNF biologics have comparable safety. The choice of biologic should be dictated by IBD disease severity in collaboration with an oncologist.

The emerging role of Janus kinase inhibitors in the treatment of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases.

Autoimmune and inflammatory diseases are common and diverse, and they can affect nearly any organ system. Much of the pathogenesis of these diseases is related to dysregulated cytokine activity. Historically, autoimmune and inflammatory diseases have been treated with medications that nonspecifically suppress the immune system. mAbs that block the action of pathogenic cytokines emerged 2 decades ago and have become widely useful. More recently, agents that simultaneously block multiple pathogenic cytokines via inhibition of the downstream Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator of transcription pathway have emerged and are becoming increasingly important. These small-molecule inhibitors, collectively termed JAK inhibitors, are US Food and Drug Administration-approved in a few autoimmune/inflammatory disorders and are being evaluated in many others. Here, we review the biology of the JAK-signal transducer and activator of transcription pathway and the use of JAK inhibitors to treat autoimmune and inflammatory diseases across medical subspecialties.

Prospective multicenter study to evaluate capsule endoscopy competency using a validated assessment tool.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Capsule endoscopy (CE) is an established, noninvasive modality for examining the small bowel. Minimum training requirements are based primarily on guidelines and expert opinion. A validated tool to assess the competence of CE is lacking. In this prospective, multicenter study, we determined the minimum number of CE procedures required to achieve competence during gastroenterology fellowship; validated a capsule competency test (CapCT); and evaluated any correlation between CE competence and endoscopy experience. METHODS: We included second- and third-year gastroenterology fellows from 3 institutions between 2013 and 2018 in a structured CE training program with supervised CE interpretation. Fellows completed the CapCT with a maximal score of 100. For comparison, expert faculty completed the same CapCT. Trainee competence was defined as a score ≥90% compared with the mean expert score. Fellows were tested after 15, 25, and 35 supervised CE interpretations. CapCT was validated using expert consensus and item analysis. Data were collected on the number of previous endoscopies. RESULTS: A total of 68 trainees completed 102 CapCTs. Fourteen CE experts completed the CapCT with a mean score of 94. Mean scores for fellows after 15, 25, and 35 cases were 83, 86, and 87, respectively. Fellows with at least 25 interpretations achieved a mean score ≥84 in all 3 institutions. CapCT item analysis showed high interobserver agreement among expert faculty (k = 0.85). There was no correlation between the scores and the number of endoscopies performed. CONCLUSION: After a structured CE training program, gastroenterology fellows should complete a minimum of 25 supervised CE interpretations before assessing competence using the validated CapCT, regardless of endoscopy experience.

Patient-oriented education and visual-aid intervention are inadequate to identify patients with potential capsule retention: a prospective randomized study.

Background/aims: The key procedure-related risk with video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is capsule retention, which should be suspected in patients who have not reported capsule passage. The study aims were to determine the frequency of capsule passage visualization and the difference in self-reporting of capsule passage between patients who receive patient-oriented education (POE) and patients who receive POE and a visual aid intervention in the form of a wrist band (WB). Methods: This was a prospective randomized study that enrolled patients undergoing VCE. Patients were randomly assigned to a POE group versus a POE and WB group. POE consisted of verbal education and an information booklet. Both groups received instructions to notify the study team regarding capsule passage. Results: Sixty patients (mean age 57 ± 18 years; 61% female) were included. A total of 57 patients were included in the analysis (3 lost to follow-up; 28 in POE group; 29 in WB group). Capsule passage status was reported by 68% without significant difference between POE and WB groups (72% vs. 64%; p = .51). Capsule passage status was obtained from all 57 patients with the addition of a proactive follow-up. Only 56% (n = 32) reported visualizing capsule passage. Of the remaining patients who did not visualize capsule passage, 60% (n = 15) reported on this without significant difference between the POE and WB groups (p = .23). Conclusions: Lack of visualization of capsule passage is a poor indicator of retention. Self-reporting of VCE passage status is suboptimal and the addition of a visual aid did not improve this parameter.

Endoscopic muscle biopsy sampling of the duodenum and rectum: a pilot survival study in a porcine model to detect myenteric neurons.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Small bowel and colorectal muscle biopsy sampling requires a surgical approach. Advancing our understanding of the pathophysiology of motility disorders, such as functional bowel disorders, intestinal pseudo-obstruction, and slow-transit constipation, is hindered by our inability to noninvasively obtain muscularis propria (MP) for evaluation of multiple cell types, including myenteric neurons. The aims of this study were to determine (1) technical feasibility, reproducibility, and safety of performing duodenal endoscopic muscle biopsy sampling (dEMB) and rectal endoscopic muscle biopsy sampling (rEMB) using a clip-assist technique and (2) the presence of myenteric neurons in tissue samples. METHODS: Five 40-kg pigs were studied. Each animal underwent a dEMB and rEMB procedure. dEMB was performed using a single resection clip-assist technique. An over-the-scope clip was advanced to the duodenum. Tissue was suctioned into the cap and the clip deployed. The pseudopolyp of the duodenal wall created was then resected using snare electrocautery. rEMB was performed using a double resection clip-assist technique. EMR was initially performed to uncover the underlying MP using a band ligation technique. An over-the-scope clip was then advanced to the exposed MP. The MP was retracted and suctioned into the cap and the clip deployed. The pseudopolyp of the MP was resected using snare electrocautery. An antibody to protein gene product 9.5 was used to determine the presence of myenteric neurons in the samples. Animals were kept alive for 2 weeks, at which time an upper endoscopy and necropsy were performed. RESULTS: dEMB and rEMB were successfully performed in all animals with no procedural adverse events using this "no hole" (close then cut) approach. Mean procedure times for dEMB and rEMB were 23.7 ± 2.5 minutes and 13.25 ± 2.8 minutes, respectively. Mean length of resected full-thickness duodenal wall was 13.25 ± 4.3 mm and rectal MP was 12.5 ± 1.7 mm. Hematoxylin and eosin stain and antibody to protein gene product 9.5 confirmed the presence of MP with inner circular, outer longitudinal, and intermuscular layers, including myenteric neurons, in all samples. Clinical course was uneventful in all animals. Repeat upper endoscopy at 2 weeks showed well-healed dEMB sites. Necropsy in all animals showed no perforation, fluid collection, or abscess at the dEMB and rEMB sites. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this preclinical study, dEMB and rEMB appear to be technically feasible, reproducible, and safe. Sufficient MP tissue was obtained to identify myenteric neurons. These promising results are a step toward successful and safe implementation of these techniques into clinical practice for tissue diagnosis of muscle-based pathologies.

Outcomes of endoscopic intervention for overt GI bleeding in severe thrombocytopenia.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) in the setting of thrombocytopenia raises concerns about endoscopic procedure risk. We aimed to assess the safety and outcomes of endoscopy for overt GIB in the setting of severe thrombocytopenia in liver cirrhosis (LC) and non-liver cirrhosis (NLC). METHODS: This is a retrospective study on inpatients who underwent endoscopy within 24 hours of presentation for overt GIB with a platelet count (PC) of 20 to <50 × 103/mL. Outcomes included diagnostic and therapeutic yields, procedural adverse events, packed red blood cell (pRBC) and platelet transfusions, recurrent bleeding rate, and all-cause and GIB-related mortality. RESULTS: One hundred forty-four patients were identified. The median PC was 41 × 103/mL and 61% had LC. The diagnostic yield was 68% (LC = 61%, NLC = 79%, P = .04). Therapeutic yield was 60% (59% vs 60%, P = 1.00). The initial hemostasis rate was 94% with one adverse event. The median number of pRBC and platelet transfusions decreased after intervention in the entire cohort. Recurrent bleeding rates were 22% at 1 month and 30% at 1 year, with no differences between groups. An increased international normalized ratio (INR) >2 was a predictor of recurrent bleeding. All-cause mortality was 19% at 1 month and 37% at 1 year, whereas GIB-associated mortality in our cohort was only 3% at 1 month and 4% at 1 year, with no significant difference between LC and NLC. Predictors of mortality were INR >2, activated partial thromboplastin time >38 seconds, hypotension, intensive care unit admission, and pulmonary comorbidities. CONCLUSION: In this study cohort, we observed that endoscopy for overt GIB in the setting of severe thrombocytopenia in patients with LC and NLC appears safe, has moderate diagnostic and therapeutic yields with high initial hemostasis rate, and is associated with a significant decrease in pRBC and platelet transfusions. Recurrent bleeding and all-cause mortality rates remain high.

Over-the-scope clip-assisted endoscopic full-thickness resection of epithelial and subepithelial GI lesions.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) allows for definitive diagnosis and treatment of select subepithelial and epithelial lesions unsuitable to conventional resection techniques. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of over-the-scope (OTS) clip-assisted EFTR for these lesions. METHODS: Patients who underwent OTS clip-assisted EFTR between June 2014 and October 2015 were analyzed. The procedure involved (1) thermal marking of the periphery of the lesion; (2) lesion suction into the cap of either an OTSC (Ovesco Endoscopy AG, Tübingen, Germany) or Padlock clip (Aponos Medical Corp, Kingston, NH, USA) with or without triprong anchor retraction of the lesion; (3) clip deployment; and (4) en bloc resection of the lesion above the clip using an electrosurgical snare and/or knife. Data were abstracted for demographics, lesion features, histopathologic diagnoses, R0 resection (negative margins) status, and adverse events. RESULTS: Nine patients (7 men) with a mean age of 63 ± 9.6 years were identified. The endoscopic findings included subepithelial lesions in the duodenum (n = 4), rectosigmoid colon (n = 2), stomach (n = 1), and postappendectomy appendiceal orifice polyps (n = 2). The mean lesion size was 8 ± 3 mm and the mean procedure time 53 ± 21 minutes. R0 resection was confirmed in all cases. The histopathologic diagnoses included neuroendocrine tumors (n = 6), sessile serrated adenomas (n = 2), and pancreatic heterotopia (n = 1). No adverse events were noted. CONCLUSIONS: OTS clip-assisted EFTR is an effective and safe technique for the removal of select subepithelial and epithelial lesions that are not amenable to conventional resection techniques.

Outcomes of double-balloon enteroscopy-assisted direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy tube placement.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: In a large series, conventional direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (DPEJ) tube placement with push endoscopes failed in approximately one-third of patients. In a pilot study, double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE)-assisted DPEJ tube placement was successful in all patients in whom attempted conventional DPEJ had failed. The study aim was to assess the technical success of and adverse events related to DBE-DPEJ tube placement in a large cohort of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The medical records of all patients who underwent DBE-DPEJ tube placement between July 2010 and November 2013 were reviewed using a prospectively maintained electronic database. Data were abstracted for patient demographics, indications for DPEJ, gut anatomy, technical success rate, causes of failure, and adverse events. RESULTS: The study comprised a total of 94 patients (39 men; mean age 56 years; body mass index [BMI] 23 ±â€Š6.4 kg/m(2)). The most common indication for DPEJ was gastroparesis (n = 29). Altered gut anatomy was present in 36 patients (38 %). DBE-DPEJ tube placement was technically successful in 87 patients (93 %). The mean procedure duration was 33 minutes (range 15 - 88). DBE-DPEJ tube placement failed in seven patients (7 %), primarily because of limited instrument advancement in the setting of presumed surgical adhesions. Post-procedural adverse events occurred in eight patients (9 %), with one serious adverse event, which was a gastric interposition requiring surgical repair. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the published outcomes of DPEJ by conventional endoscopy, DBE-DPEJ tube placement was technically successful in a high proportion of patients (93 %) and with a relatively low rate of significant adverse events.

Outcomes and Predictors of Rebleeding After 2-Octyl Cyanoacrylate Injection in Acute Gastric Variceal Hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endoscopic injection of 2-octyl cyanoacrylate (2-OCA) is used on an off-label basis for gastric variceal hemorrhage (GVH) in the United States. We assessed the efficacy, safety, and predictors of rebleeding after gastric variceal obturation (GVO) with 2-OCA in patients with acute GVH. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of patients with GVH who underwent 2-OCA injection for GVO over a 15-year period. Rates of acute hemostasis, predictors of rebleeding, and cyanoacrylate-related adverse events were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 95 patients (63 males, median age 59±14 y) were analyzed. Gastric varices were categorized as GOV-1 (3%), GOV-2 (61%), and isolated gastric varices type 1 (36%) per Sarin classification. Initial hemostasis was achieved in all patients. Successful GVO, defined as sustained hemostasis within a month after injection, was achieved in 87 (92%) patients. Failed GVO with in-hospital rebleeding was observed in 8 (8%) patients. On univariate analysis, only the model for end-stage liver disease score was associated with an increased risk of rebleeding (odds ratio 1.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-1.4; P<0.01). Glue-related adverse events consisted of pulmonary emboli in 2 patients (2.1%), resulting in death in 1 patient. All cause in-hospital mortality was 13% due to uncontrolled gastric variceal rebleeding (n=3), renal failure (n=6), metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (n=1), hemorrhagic stroke (n=1), and pulmonary embolism (n=1). CONCLUSIONS: Injection of 2-OCA was effective at achieving hemostasis in a high proportion of patients (92%) admitted for acute GVH. The risk of glue-related pulmonary embolism approximated 2% in our patient cohort, including 1 fatality.

Lack of health insurance limits the benefits of hepatitis C virus screening: insights from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Hepatitis C follow-up study.

OBJECTIVES: Identifying barriers to access to hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment among screen detected subjects is critical for any public health strategy aimed at controlling HCV infection in the general population. METHODS: Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey HCV Follow-up study from 2001 to 2010 were used. Participants who tested positive for HCV were sent a letter informing them of their test results and advised to pursue further evaluation. Information on HCV transmission and its potential complications was also provided to all positive participants. These subjects were recontacted 6 months after notification to determine what action they had taken regarding the positive result. RESULTS: Of 38,025 participants, 502 tested positive for HCV infection, giving a prevalence of 1.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.8%, 1.8%). A total of 205 subjects participated in the 6-month follow-up interview. Those who could not be reached were more likely to be less educated, injecting drugs, and not to have health insurance. Half (50.2%) of the positive individuals were not aware of their status before notification. A total of 166 (81%) had pursued further evaluation. Only 18 (26.9%) received therapy. The main reason for not receiving treatment was high cost (19.4%). In adjusted analysis, the only barrier to pursuing downstream HCV care was the lack of health insurance (2.76, 95% CI 1.54, 7.69; P=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the lack of health insurance may attenuate the theoretical benefits of a screening program that identifies asymptomatic HCV-infected individuals who are less likely to pursue downstream care.

Inflammatory bowel disease training assessment of gastroenterology fellows in Saudi Arabia.

BACKGROUND: Recent advancement and complexity in the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has made it challenging for gastroenterology (GI) fellows to obtain competency and confidence in managing the complex IBD patient. We aimed to evaluate the confidence and training in IBD among GI fellows in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: We conducted an electronic, voluntary, and anonymous multicenter survey study of GI fellows in Saudi Arabia, from 1/5/2023 to 1/9/2023. The survey evaluated the fellows' confidence level in IBD management, methods of training received, and the amount of additional training desired in 20 core IBD domains. GI fellows' preferred learning method was also evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 65 GI fellows responded to the survey. In the entire cohort, >50% of fellows reported low confidence in 7 out of 20 IBD management domains, which included 71% in managing j-pouch disorders, 67% in managing the elderly/frail patient with IBD, 60% in managing extraintestinal manifestations, 57% in recommending preventative health services, and 54% in counseling patients on small molecules. Receiving >4 IBD didactic sessions per year was significantly associated with high confidence in managing j-pouch disorders (44.4% vs 13.3%, P = 0.05) and managing the elderly/frail patient with IBD (86.7% vs 50.0%, P = 0.03). Doing an external rotation to expand IBD knowledge was associated with high confidence in managing the elderly/frail patient with IBD (100% vs 26.7%, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Many GI fellows lacked confidence and training in key domains of IBD management. Enhancing IBD exposure with didactics and external rotations improved fellows' confidence in specific domains.

Epstein-Barr virus seroprevalence among inflammatory bowel disease patients in Saudi Arabia.

BACKGROUND: Seroprevalence of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is variable based on geographic distribution. There are no published data on the seroprevalence of EBV in patients with IBD in Saudi Arabia. This study aims to assess the seroprevalence of EBV in patients with IBD in a tertiary center in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review of patients ≥14 years of age with a confirmed diagnosis of IBD and known EBV status at our institution from January 1, 2018, to January 1, 2023. The primary outcome was the seroprevalence of EBV in IBD. Secondary outcomes included factors associated with EBV seropositivity and rates of EBV seroconversion in originally negative patients. RESULTS: A total of 150 patients were included (74.7% with Crohn's disease, median age 28 years [interquartile range 21-36.3]). EBV non-exposure was noted in 16.8% ( n = 25). The mean age was significantly lower in the EBV-naïve group at 26 ± 8.5 years compared to the EBV-exposed group at 31.2 ± 12.9 years ( P = 0.02). Seroprevalence of EBV was highest in patients >40 years of age (92.9%) and lowest in patients 14-25 years of age (78.2%). The rate of seroconversion in EBV-naïve patients was 16.7% after a mean follow-up time of 47.9 ± 46.3 months. CONCLUSION: In our cohort of IBD patients, 16.8% were naïve to EBV, and young age was a significant predictor of EBV non-exposure. Our data supports the practice of assessing EBV before initiating thiopurine therapy since EBV seroprevalence is not universal in our population.

Longer Colonoscopy Withdrawal Time Is Associated With the Detection of Visible Dysplasia in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Background: Colonoscopy withdrawal time (CWT) of at least 6-9 minutes is the minimum time needed for adequate adenoma detection in the general population. The ideal CWT in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has not been determined. We aimed to identify the optimal CWT associated with the detection of visible dysplasia in patients with IBD. Methods: This is a retrospective study from 1/1/2017 to 9/1/2022 of adult patients with IBD in endoscopic healing undergoing surveillance via high-definition white light colonoscopy. The primary outcome was the association of CWT with visible dysplasia detection. Results: A total of 259 patients (mean age 56 ±â€…14.8 years; 51.3% female, 68% with ulcerative colitis; 8.9% with primary sclerosing cholangitis) underwent 330 colonoscopies. Patients with visible dysplasia were more likely to be older (P < .001) and have a personal history of visible dysplasia (P < .001) and invisible dysplasia (P = .023). The mean CWT was significantly longer in the visible dysplasia group at 26 minutes (interquartile range [IQR] 20-38.5) vs. 21 minutes (IQR 15-28) in procedures without visible dysplasia (P < .001). On multivariable analysis, increased age (P < .001), increased CWT (P = .001), and personal history of visible dysplasia (P = .013) were independently associated with the detection of visible dysplasia. A CWT of ≥15 minutes (odds ratio [OR] 2.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-6.6; P = .02] and not ≥9 minutes (OR 2.57; 95% CI, 0.33-20.2; P = .35) is significantly associated with detection of visible dysplasia. Conclusions: For patients with IBD undergoing surveillance via high-definition white light colonoscopy, the mean CWT was independently associated with the detection of visible dysplasia.

Clinical Decision Making in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Mimics: Practice Management from Inflammatory Bowel Disease LIVE.

Background: Since 2009, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) specialists have utilized "IBD LIVE," a weekly live video conference with a global audience, to discuss the multidisciplinary management of their most challenging cases. While most cases presented were confirmed IBD, a substantial number were diseases that mimic IBD. We have categorized all IBD LIVE cases and identified "IBD-mimics" with consequent clinical management implications. Methods: Cases have been recorded/archived since May 2018; we reviewed all 371 cases from May 2018-February 2023. IBD-mimics were analyzed/categorized according to their diagnostic and therapeutic workup. Results: Confirmed IBD cases made up 82.5% (306/371; 193 Crohn's disease, 107 ulcerative colitis, and 6 IBD-unclassified). Sixty-five (17.5%) cases were found to be mimics, most commonly medication-induced (n = 8) or vasculitis (n = 7). The evaluations that ultimately resulted in correct diagnosis included additional endoscopic biopsies (n = 13, 21%), surgical exploration/pathology (n = 10, 16.5%), biopsies from outside the GI tract (n = 10, 16.5%), genetic/laboratory testing (n = 8, 13%), extensive review of patient history (n = 8, 13%), imaging (n = 5, 8%), balloon enteroscopy (n = 5, 8%), and capsule endoscopy (n = 2, 3%). Twenty-five patients (25/65, 38%) were treated with biologics for presumed IBD, 5 of whom subsequently experienced adverse events requiring discontinuation of the biologic. Many patients were prescribed steroids, azathioprine, mercaptopurine, or methotrexate, and 3 were trialed on tofacitinib. Conclusions: The diverse presentation of IBD and IBD-mimics necessitates periodic consideration of the differential diagnosis, and reassessment of treatment in presumed IBD patients without appropriate clinical response. The substantial differences and often conflicting treatment approaches to IBD versus IBD-mimics directly impact the quality and cost of patient care.