Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Infect Dis ; 99: 214-218, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32585284

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the therapeutic use of plasma exchange in COVID-19 patients compared to controls. METHODS: A case series of critically ill adult men and non-pregnant women, ≥18 years of age, with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19, was studied at the Royal Hospital, Oman, from April 17 to May 11, 2020. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) was performed on patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with confirmed or imminent acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or severe pneumonia. The analysis was performed using univariate statistics. RESULTS: A total of 31 COVID-19 patients were included with an overall mean age of 51±15 years (range: 27-76 years); 90% (n=28) were males, and 35% (n=11) of the patients had TPE as a mode of treatment. The TPE group was associated with higher extubation rates than the non-TPE cohort (73% versus 20%; p=0.018). Additionally, patients on TPE had a lower 14 days (0 versus 35%; p=0.033) and 28 days (0 versus 35%; p=0.033) post plasma exchange mortality compared to patients not on TPE. However, all-cause mortality was only marginally lower in the TPE group compared to the non-TPE group (9.1% versus 45%; p=0.055; power=66%). Laboratory and ventilatory parameters also improved post TPE (n = 11). CONCLUSIONS: The use of TPE in severe COVID-19 patients has been associated with improved outcomes, however, randomized controlled clinical trials are warranted to draw final, conclusive findings.


Assuntos
Betacoronavirus , Infecções por Coronavirus/terapia , Troca Plasmática , Pneumonia Viral/terapia , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/patologia , Estado Terminal/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/patologia , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/etiologia , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J ; 14(3): e306-18, 2014 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25097764

RESUMO

The recognition and management of transfusion reactions (TRs) are critical to ensure patient safety during and after a blood transfusion. Transfusion reactions are classified into acute transfusion reactions (ATRs) or delayed transfusion reactions, and each category includes different subtypes. Different ATRs share common signs and symptoms which can make categorisation difficult at the beginning of the reaction. Moreover, TRs are often under-recognised and under-reported. To ensure uniform practice and safety, it is necessary to implement a national haemovigilance system and a set of national guidelines establishing policies for blood transfusion and for the detection and management of TRs. In Oman, there are currently no local TR guidelines to guide physicians and hospital blood banks. This paper summarises the available literature and provides consensus guidelines to be used in the recognition, management and reporting of ATRs.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA