Association between Hypertension and Atrial Fibrillation in Patients on Hemodialysis.

This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and the association between hypertension (HTN) and atrial fibrillation (AF) in hemodialysis (HD) patients. A chart review-based, cross-sectional study was conducted on HD patients who had received HD for at least 6 months. Demographic, hemodynamic, and laboratory data were retrieved from the BestCare system, and the main outcomes were blood pressure before and after dialysis, and the presence of AF. Our sample consisted of 304 HD patients; 162 (53%) were male, and the mean age was 63 ± 18 years. Sixty-eight (20%) had AF, of whom 44 (64.7%) were male, with a mean age of 73 ± 12 years. The risk of AF increased by 0.4 [odds ratio: 1.04; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02-1.06; P <0.001] for every year of age. Almost the entire sample (66.45%, n = 202) was hypertensive, and those patients had a mean age of 64 ± 17 years, and nearly one-third had a body mass index in the obese category (28.7%, n = 58). In addition, with every increase in the Charlson comorbidity index score by two points, there was a 40% increased risk of developing HTN (OR: 2.47; 95% CI: 1.17-5.18; P = 0.017). The risk factors for the development of HTN and AF in HD patients were found to be increasing age for AF and female sex for HTN. The presence of HTN and diabetes increased the risk of developing AF seven-fold after HD.

The history of renal transplantation in the Arab world: a view from Saudi Arabia.

The first successful renal transplantation in the Arab world took place in Jordan in 1972. Surprisingly, the kidney transplanted was from a non-heart-beating deceased donor. Many Arab countries followed suit, starting their transplantation programs in the 1970s and 1980s, but all were from living related donors. Very few Arab countries managed to start deceased donor programs, notable among which is the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Religion has an important part in personal life and government legislation in the Arab world; thus, organ procurement and transplantation had to wait for religious edicts (fatwas) to be passed about the permissibility of organ donation and brain death diagnosis before starting transplantation activities. In Saudi Arabia, the renal transplantation service went through several developmental phases, culminating in the establishment of the Saudi Center for Organ Transplantation, which has become the prototype of a successful multiorgan procurement center to be emulated by Arab and Muslim countries. The story of transplantation in the Arab world is intertwined and shaped by the prevailing socioeconomic and health indicators in the different countries. It also is the story of hard-working pioneers and of human endeavor against adversity, exemplified by 2 of the pioneers having received organ transplants. Arab countries have had more than their fair share of strife and wars, and this has impacted on transplantation services and programs.

Effect of thyroid function status in hemodialysis patients on erythropoietin resistance and interdialytic weight gain.

Thyroid function abnormalities are common in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Here, we investigated their frequency and impact on intradialytic hemodynamics and erythropoietin resistance index (ERI). Demographic and laboratory data including thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), interdialytic weight gain, and intradialytic blood pressure (BP) changes were measured, and ERI was calculated. The prevalence and causes of abnormities in TSH and free thyroxine (FT4) and their effects on ERI and intradialytic hemodynamics were then assessed. One hundred and thirty patients (mean age, 57.1 ± 19.2 years; 66.4% diabetic, 86.7% hypertensive) were enrolled. Among them, 16.7% had hypothyroidism, 2.3% had hyperthyroidism, and 10.9% had subclinical hypothyroidism. TSH level was significantly associated with higher BP (P <0.05), lower albumin (3.6 ± 4.4 and 2.6 ± 1.8, respectively; P = 0.05), lower dialysis hours (3.9 ± 5.3 and 2.6 ± 1.8, respectively), and lower ERI (3.7 ± 4.4 and 2.4 ± 1.9, respectively; P = 0.05). FT4 was significantly associated with higher interdialytic weight gain (13.4 ± 4.3 and 11.8 ± 2.2 pmol/L, respectively; P = 0.009) and higher pre-HD diastolic BP (13.2 ± 4.0 and 12.0 ± 2.9 pmol/L, respectively; P = 0.05). A negative correlation was seen between TSH level and urea reduction ratio (r = 0.29, P = 0.002), serum albumin (r = 0.304, P = 0.001), hemoglobin level (r = 0.26, P = 0.005), and ERI (r = 0.2, P = 0.002). A higher TSH level was associated with hypertension, lower albumin level, fewer dialysis hours, and increased resistance to erythropoietin. TSH level was negatively correlated with dialytic adequacy, serum albumin level, hemoglobin level, and ERI.

Safety climate in dialysis centers in Saudi Arabia: a multicenter study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the safety climate as perceived by nurses and physicians in the dialysis units in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional survey-based multicenter study using the Safety Climate Scale, which assesses the perception by staff of the prevailing climate of safety. We used 17 items in this survey. These could be further divided into 3 summative categories: (a) handling of errors and safety concerns (9 items), (b) leadership emphasis of safety (7 items), and (c) overall safety recommendation (1 item). The survey uses 5 Likert scale options (1, disagree strongly; 2, disagree slightly; 3, neutral; 4, agree slightly; and 5, agree strongly). RESULTS: There were 509 respondents--a response rate of 76.6% and 53.3% among nurses and physicians, respectively. The internal consistency using Cronbach α was 0.899. The overall mean (SD) of satisfaction with safety climate was higher among the nurses than the physicians (4.13 [1.1] and 4.05 [1.7], respectively; P = 0.029). The overall agreement rate was 73.8%, with more nurses than physicians agreeing that safety climate prevails the dialysis center (75.4% versus 72.1%, respectively; P = 0.047).The respondents perceived a stronger commitment to safety from their clinical area leaders than from senior leaders in the organization (76.2% and 72.4%, respectively). In addition, the physicians gave lower scores to more questions than the nurses particularly in 3 areas, namely, "leadership is driving us to be a safety-centered institution" (71.5% versus 76.5%; P = 0.037), "I am encouraged by my colleagues to report any patient safety concerns I may have" (67.4% versus 84.7%; P = 0.03), and "I know proper channels to ask questions about safety" (69.6% versus 87.2%; P = 0.002).The scores by the physicians in all the 3 summative categories were again less than the scores by the nurses, but this did not reach a statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: The nurses had higher perceptions of a prevailing safety climate than the physicians. There was a perception of a stronger commitment to safety from their clinical area leaders than from senior leaders in the organization. Senior management needs to relay their commitments to safety more effectively especially to physicians and to open clear and easily accessible channels for communication for safety issues.