RESUMO
This case study aims to elucidate the rare occurrence of bilateral internal carotid artery agenesis combined with a bovine aortic arch. The main objectives are to explore the incidence, embryological origins, clinical manifestations, and associated anomalies of this unique vascular condition. The study involves a detailed investigation of a 55-year-old male with a history of recurrent transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) using MRI and CT scan. The patient's medical history, clinical examination, and imaging results were systematically analyzed to provide a thorough understanding of the anatomical variations. The main findings include the rare coexistence of bilateral ICA agenesis and a bovine aortic arch, making this the 39th documented occurrence of bilateral ICA agenesis and the first recorded instance of its association with a bovine aortic arch. Also, the study highlighted the demographic characteristics, clinical presentations, and associated anomalies observed in the 38 documented cases of bilateral internal carotid artery agenesis. This case report contributes valuable insights into the rarity of bilateral internal carotid artery agenesis and its unprecedented association with a bovine aortic arch. The findings emphasize the importance of heightened anatomical awareness in clinical practice, particularly. Recognizing and understanding such variations is crucial for accurate diagnosis, appropriate management, and improved patient outcomes. Further research in this area is warranted to deepen our understanding of these complex vascular anomalies.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Vitiligo is an autoimmune disease affecting approximately 2% of the world's population. Besides vitiligo cosmetic issues, patients suffer from psychological comorbidities. This results from the stigmatization they encounter from surrounding individuals. Accordingly, the current study was the first to assess Jordanians' knowledge and attitude toward vitiligo. METHODS: Data collection was completed by an online questionnaire consisting of four sections to capture participants' sociodemographic characteristics, previous exposure, and knowledge and attitude toward vitiligo. The analysis took place through R and RStudio. RESULTS: Of our 994 surveyed participants, only 8.45% and 12.47% had a low level of vitiligo knowledge and negative total attitude score, respectively. Moreover, independent predictors of positive attitudes included younger age (18-30), high school education or lower, hearing about or living with a vitiligo patient, and higher knowledge scores. The highest prevalence of positive attitudes was observed when physicians were the source of knowledge. CONCLUSION: Some critical misconceptions were identified despite the Jordanian public having sufficient overall knowledge. Furthermore, higher knowledge reflected a higher prevalence of positive attitudes toward the patients. We recommend that future efforts target the public understanding of the nature of the disease and its being non-communicable. Moreover, we emphasize that medical knowledge should be communicated through qualified healthcare providers.