A novel method for comparing radiation dose and image quality, between and within different x-ray units in a series of hospitals.

OBJECTIVES: To develop a novel method for comparing radiation dose and image quality (IQ) to evaluate adult chest x-ray (CXR) imaging among several hospitals. METHODS: CDRAD 2.0 phantom was used to acquire images in eight hospitals (17 digital x-ray units) using local adult CXR protocols. IQ was represented by image quality figure inverse (IQFinv), measured using CDRAD analyser software. Signal to noise ratio, contrast to noise ratio and conspicuity index were calculated as additional measures of IQ. Incident air kerma (IAK) was measured using a solid-state dosimeter for each acquisition. Figure of merit (FOM) was calculated to provide a single estimation of IQ and radiation dose. RESULTS: IQ, radiation dose and FOM varied considerably between hospitals and x-ray units. For IQFinv, the mean (range) between and within the hospitals were 1.42 (0.83-2.18) and 1.87 (1.52-2.18), respectively. For IAK, the mean (range) between and within the hospitals were 93.56 (17.26-239.15) µGy and 180.85 (122.58-239.15) µGy, respectively. For FOM, the mean (range) between and within hospitals were 0.05 (0.01-0.14) and 0.03 (0.02-0.05), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The suggested method for comparing IQ and dose using FOM concept along with the new proposed FOM, is a valid, reliable and effective approach for monitoring and comparing IQ and dose between and within hospitals. It is also can be beneficial for the optimisation of x-ray units in clinical practice. Further optimisation for the hospitals/x-ray units with low FOM are required to minimise radiation dose without degrading IQ.

Diagnostic Reference Levels of Radiographic and CT Examinations in Jordan: A Systematic Review.

ABSTRACT: A comprehensive search was performed to examine the literature on diagnostic reference levels (DRL) for computed tomography (CT) and radiography examinations that are performed routinely in Jordan. EBSCO, Scopus, and Web of Science were used for the search. The acronym "DRL" and the additional phrase "dose reference levels" were used to search for articles in literature. Seven papers that reported DRL values for radiography and CT scans in Jordan were identified. One study reported DRLs for conventional radiography, two studies reported CT DRLs in pediatrics, and the remaining four studies provided DRL values for adult CT scans. The most popular techniques for determining the DRLs were the entrance surface dose, volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), and dose-length product (DLP) values. Variations in Jordanian DRL values were noted across both modalities. Lower radiation doses and less variation in DRL values may be achieved by educating and training radiographers to better understand dose reduction strategies. To limit dose variance and enable dosage comparison, CT DRLs must be standardized in accordance with the guidelines of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP).

Effects of body part thickness on low-contrast detail detection and radiation dose during adult chest radiography.

INTRODUCTION: Differences in patient size often provide challenges for radiographers, particularly when choosing the optimum acquisition parameters to obtain radiographs with acceptable image quality (IQ) for diagnosis. This study aimed to assess the effect of body part thickness on IQ in terms of low-contrast detail (LCD) detection and radiation dose when undertaking adult chest radiography (CXR). METHODS: This investigation made use of a contrast detail (CD) phantom. Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) was utilised to approximate varied body part thicknesses (9, 11, 15 and 17 cm) simulating underweight, standard, overweight and obese patients, respectively. Different tube potentials were tested against a fixed 180 cm source to image distance (SID) and automatic exposure control (AEC). IQ was analysed using bespoke software thus providing an image quality figure inverse (IQFinv ) value which represents LCD detectability. Dose area product (DAP) was utilised to represent the radiation dose. RESULTS: IQFinv values decreased statistically (P = 0.0001) with increasing phantom size across all tube potentials studied. The highest IQFinv values were obtained at 80 kVp for all phantom thicknesses (2.29, 2.02, 1.8 and 1.65, respectively). Radiation dose increased statistically (P = 0.0001) again with increasing phantom thicknesses. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate that lower tube potentials provide the highest IQFinv scores for various body part thicknesses. This is not consistent with professional practice because radiographers frequently raise the tube potential with increased part thickness. Higher tube potentials did result in radiation dose reductions. Establishing a balance between dose and IQ, which must be acceptable for diagnosis, can prevent the patient from receiving unnecessary additional radiation dose.

Effective dose and image quality for different patient sizes during AP upper abdominal radiography: A phantom study.

INTRODUCTION: Undertaking medical imaging examinations on obese patients can present practical challenges. Choosing optimal imaging protocols can be difficult, especially when promoting the ALARA principle. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of increasing body part thickness on image quality (IQ) and effective dose (ED) during upper abdominal radiography. A secondary aim was to determine the optimum exposure settings for larger sized patients. METHODS: Underweight, standard, overweight and obese abdomen sizes were simulated using an anthropomorphic upper abdomen phantom, without and with additional fat layers (6, 10 and 16 cm). Phantoms were imaged using a variety of tube potentials (70-110 kVp), automatic exposure control (AEC) and a source-to-image distance of 120 cm. IQ was assessed visually using a relative visual grading analysis (VGA) method. Radiation dose was evaluated by calculating the ED using the Monte Carlo PCXMC 2.0 computer program. RESULTS: IQ values showed a statistical reduction (p = 0.006) with increasing phantom size across all examined tube potentials. The highest IQ scores (3.3, 2.8, 2.5 and 2.2, respectively) were obtained at 70/75 kVp for all phantom thicknesses. As tube potential increased the IQ was also shown to decrease. ED showed a statistically significant increase (p < 0.001) with increasing phantom thicknesses. CONCLUSION: Higher EDs were evident when applying lower tube potentials. Using an AEC with high tube potentials (105/110 kVp) can lead to a considerable decrease in ED with acceptable IQ when undertaking upper abdomen radiography on patients with large body part thicknesses. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE: Applying higher values of tube potentials for patients who have a thicker abdomen can lead to decreased ED.

The effect of erect abdomen radiography on absorbed doses to internal organs and tissues: A clinical study.

BACKGROUND: As low as reasonably achievable principles (ALARA) should be applied during all X-ray examinations. In some institutions, an acute abdomen series includes both erect and supine radiography. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of an erect position on absorbed dose to internal abdominal organs when compared with the supine position. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective study was undertaken where 81 patients were imaged in both supine and erect positions. The PCXMC Monte Carlo software was used to estimate individual organ doses using dose area product (DAP). Absorbed doses were calculated for the large intestines, active bone marrow, liver, lungs, small intestine, stomach, gallbladder, breasts, uterus, ovaries, urinary bladder, kidneys, testicles, and prostate. RESULTS: The results showed a significant increase of absorbed dose by 1.4% when moving from a supine to an erect position. The testes were found to be the organs most affected by the erect position and then the urinary bladder. CONCLUSIONS: According to the study's findings, using the erect position during abdominal radiography increases the radiation dose for all of the selected organs compared to using a supine position. Therefore, it is advised that the use of erect abdomen radiography be restricted to certain circumstances.

Establishing local diagnostic reference levels for computed tomography examinations using size-specific dose estimates.

OBJECTIVES: To establish local DRL (LDRL) for computed tomography (CT) examinations based on size-specific dose estimates (SSDEs), which consider patient size. The concept of diagnostic reference level (DRL) was introduced to limit patient exposure to unnecessary radiation. However, traditional DRL values do not consider patient size. METHODS: Following institutional committee approval, data were collected from CT examinations of adult patients at Madinah General Hospital, Al Madinah Al Munawwarah, Saudi Arabia from January to March 2023. The SSDE was calculated for each patient using the effective diameter (Deff). RESULTS: The LDRLs of the brain, cervical spine, chest, thoracic spine and kidneys, ureters, and bladder (KUB) examinations were 118 mGy, 12 mGy, 8 mGy, 17 mGy, and 7 mGy, respectively. A strong correlation was observed between SSDEs and the volume computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol) for all examinations except chest scans (p<0.05). Size-specific dose estimates were higher than the CTDIvol, with a greater difference for patients with smaller Deff (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The established LDRL was within the international DRL. The use of SSDE has the potential to provide more accurate and relevant data for radiation safety practices; however, widespread adoption of SSDE in new CT scanners is necessary for promoting consistency and standardization methodologies.

Supine and erect abdominal radiography: A comparison of radiation dose and image quality.

Abdominal radiographs are often the first diagnostic imaging tool for patients with acute abdominal pain. In most cases, a supine X-ray is sufficient, but in some cases, an erect abdominal radiograph may be warranted and can provide additional benefits. The aim of this study was to compare erect and supine projections in terms of radiation dose and image quality. Body mass index (BMI), sagittal body thickness, dose area product (DAP)and effective dose (ED) data were collected for 81 patients referred for digital abdominal radiography in both the supine and erect positions. The ED was estimated by inserting the dose area product (DAP) for each projection into the dose modelling computer software PCXMC 2.0. Image quality was assessed by both visual and quantitative methods. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) ED was 0.4 ± 0.3 and 0.2 ± 0.1 mSv for erect and supine projections, respectively (p < 0.001). The estimated ED in the erect position was 102% higher compared to the supine position. The mean ± SD visual image quality was reduced (27%) when using an erect position 1.9 ± 0.5 when compared with supine 2.6 ± 0.7. The calculated signal to noise ratio (SNR) was higher in erect position by 14%. Contrast to noise ratio (CNR) was reduced by 16% when using an erect position. Study findings support the continued use of the supine position as the preferred method due to significant reductions in radiation dose when compared to erect imaging. A single projection is likely to be sufficient but in certain situations, for example in case of absence of a computed tomography (CT) scanner or ultrasound, then an additional erect abdominal radiograph may be warranted. The erect abdomen radiograph increases the radiation dose and decreases the image quality. Further research is required to define more holistically evaluation optimisation strategies to reduce the patient dose, such as using an increase source-to-image distance or the development of patient-specific exposure parameters for evaluating different clinical indications and patient sizes.

Relationship between body habitus and image quality and radiation dose in chest X-ray examinations: A phantom study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of being overweight on image quality (IQ), radiation dose and acquisition parameters when undertaking adult chest X-ray (CXR) examinations using routine acquisition protocols. METHODS: The Lungman chest phantom, with and without chest plates, was used to simulate the chest region for larger size and average adult patients, respectively. Radiographic acquisitions were conducted using 17 X-ray machines located in eight hospitals using their routine clinical protocols. IQ was assessed using relative visual grading analysis (VGA) and 2 alternative forced choice (2AFC) by six observers. Incident air kerma (IAK) was measured using a solid-state dosimeter. RESULTS: IQ mean (range) scores between the hospitals were 16.2 (12.0-21.3) with a 56.0% difference and 20.9 (14.1-23.6) with a 50.2% difference for the standard and larger size phantoms, respectively. IAK mean (range) scores 63 µGy (19-136 µGy) with a 150% difference and 159 µGy (27-384 µGy) with a 173% difference for the standard and larger size phantoms, respectively. The chest plates had a significant negative impact on IQ (P = 0.001) and lead to an increased in IAK by approximately 50%. CONCLUSION: Visual measures of IQ and IAK showed large differences between hospitals for standard and larger phantom sizes; differences within the hospitals was lower. Overall, Lungman with chest plates was found to degrade IQ and increase radiation dose by a factor of two. Further optimisation is required especially for the larger sized patient's imaging protocols for all eight hospitals.

Comparative analysis of radiation dose and low contrast detail detectability using routine paediatric chest radiography protocols.

OBJECTIVES: To compare low contrast detail (LCD) detectability and radiation dose for routine paediatric chest X-ray (CXR) imaging protocols among various hospitals. METHODS: CDRAD 2.0 phantom and medical grade polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) slabs were used to simulate the chest region of four different paediatric age groups. Radiographic acquisitions were undertaken on 17 X-ray machines located in eight hospitals using their existing CXR protocols. LCD detectability represented by image quality figure inverse (IQFinv) was measured physically using the CDRAD analyser software. Incident air kerma (IAK) measurements were obtained using a solid-state dosimeter. RESULTS: The range of IQFinv, between and within the hospitals, was 1.40-4.44 and 1.52-2.18, respectively for neonates; 0.96-4.73 and 2.33-4.73 for a 1-year old; 0.87-1.81 and 0.98-1.46 for a 5-year old and 0.90-2.39 and 1.27-2.39 for a 10-year old. The range of IAK, between and within the hospitals, was 8.56-52.62 µGy and 21.79-52.62 µGy, respectively for neonates; 5.44-82.82 µGy and 36.78-82.82 µGy for a 1-year old; 10.97-59.22 µGy and 11.75-52.94 µGy for a 5-year old and 13.97-100.77 µGy and 35.72-100.77 µGy for a 10-year old. CONCLUSIONS: Results show considerable variation, between and within hospitals, in the LCD detectability and IAK. Further radiation dose optimisation for the four paediatric age groups, especially in hospitals /X-ray rooms with low LCD detectability and high IAK, are required.

An investigation into the validity of utilising the CDRAD 2.0 phantom for optimisation studies in digital radiography.

OBJECTIVES: To determine if a relationship exists between low contrast detail (LCD) detectability using the CDRAD 2.0 phantom, visual measures of image quality (IQ) and simulated lesion visibility (LV) when performing digital chest radiography (CXR). METHODS: Using a range of acquisition parameters, a CDRAD 2.0 phantom was used to acquire a set of images with different levels of image quality. LCD detectability using the CDRAD 2.0 phantom, represented by an image quality figure inverse (IQFinv) metric, was determined using the phantom analyser software. A Lungman chest phantom was loaded with two simulated lesions, of different sizes/placed in different locations, and was imaged using the same acquisition factors as the CDRAD 2.0 phantom. A relative visual grading analysis (VGA) was used by seven observers for IQ and LV evaluation of the Lungman images. Correlations between IQFinv, IQ and LV were investigated. RESULTS: Pearson's correlation demonstrated a strong positive correlation (r = 0.91; p < 0.001) between the IQ and the IQFinv. Spearman's correlation showed a good positive correlation (r = 0.79; p < 0.001) and (r = 0.68; p < 0.001) between the IQFinv and the LV for the first lesion (left upper lobe) and the second lesion (right middle lobe), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: From results presented in this study, the automated evaluation of LCD detectability using CDRAD 2.0 phantom is likely to be a suitable option for IQ and LV evaluation in digital CXR optimisation studies. Advances in knowledge: This research establishes the potential of the CDRAD 2.0 phantom in digital CXR optimisation studies.