How does vertical laminar fracture impact the decision-making in thoracolumbar fractures? A systematic scoping review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Although vertical laminar fracture (VLF) is generally considered a severity marker for thoracolumbar fractures (TLFs), its exact role in decision-making has never been established. This scoping review aims to synthesize the research on VLF's role in the decision-making of TLFs. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception to  June 11, 2023, for studies examining the association of VLF in thoracolumbar fractures with dural lacerations, neurological deficits, radiographic parameters, or treatment outcomes. Additionally, experimental studies that analyze the biomechanics of burst fractures with VLF were included. The studies extracted key findings, objectives, and patient population. A meta-analysis was performed for the association of VLF with dural laceration and neurological deficit, and ORs were pooled with a 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies were included in this systematic review, encompassing 2021 patients, and twelve were included in the meta-analysis. According to the main subject of the study, the association of VLF with a dural laceration (n = 14), neurological deficit (n = 4), radiographic parameters (n = 3), thoracolumbar fracture classification (n = 2), and treatment outcome (n = 2). Seven studies with a total of 1010 patients reported a significant association between VLF and neurological deficit (OR = 7.35, 95% CI [3.97, 14.25]; P < 0.001). The pooled OR estimates for VLF predicting dural lacerations were 7.75, 95% CI [2.41, 24.87]; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: VLF may have several important diagnostic and therapeutic implications in managing TLFs. VLF may help to distinguish AO type A3 from A4 fractures. VLF may help to predict preoperatively the occurrence of dural laceration, thereby choosing the optimal surgical strategy. Clinical and biomechanical data suggest VLF may be a valuable modifier to guide the decision-making in burst fractures; however, more studies are needed to confirm its prognostic importance regarding treatment outcomes.

Traumatic thoracic spine fracture: can we predict when MRI would modify the fracture classification or decision-making compared to CT alone?

PURPOSE: To determine the impact of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on fracture classification for thoracic spine fractures (TSFs) compared to computed tomography (CT) alone. METHODS: This study was a retrospective review of 63 consecutive patients with TSFs who underwent CT and MRI within ten days of injury. Three reviewers classified all fractures according to the AOSpine Classification and the Thoracolumbar AOSpine Injury severity score (TLAOSIS). Posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) injury on MRI was defined by "black stripe discontinuity" and on CT by the presence of vertebral body translation, facet joint malalignment, horizontal laminar or spinous process fracture, and interspinous widening. The proportion of patients with AO type A/B/C and with TLAOSIS ≤ 5 and ≥ 6 was compared between CT and MRI. Classification and regression trees were used to create a series of predictive models for the probability of PLC injury in AO type A fractures. RESULTS: AO classification using CT was as follows: type A in 35 patients (55%), type B in 18 patients (29%), and type C in 10 patients (16%). Thirty-three patients (52%) had a TLAOSIS ≤5, while the remaining 30 (48%) had TLAOSI ≥6. The addition of MRI after CT upgraded type A to type B fractures in 10 patients (16%) and changed TL AOSIS from ≤5 to ≥6 in 8 cases (12.8%). Type A fractures with load sharing score (LSC) ≥6 had a 60% chance of upgrading to type B, while LSC <6 had a 12.5% chance of upgrading to type B. CONCLUSIONS: CT yielded (89%) accuracy in diagnosing PLC injury in TSFs. The addition of MRI after CT substantially changed the AO classification or TLAOISS, compared to CT alone, thus suggesting an added value of MRI for PLC assessment for TSFs classification.

Traumatic low lumbar fractures: How often MRI changes the fracture classification or clinical decision-making compared to CT alone?

PURPOSE: To determine the impact of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on fracture classification for low lumbar fractures (LLFs) compared to CT alone. METHODS: This study was a retrospective review of 41 consecutive patients with LLFs who underwent CT and MRI within 10 days of injury. Three reviewers classified all fractures according to AOSpine Classification and the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification (TLISS). Posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) injury in MRI was defined by black stripe discontinuity and in CT by the presence of: vertebral body translation, facet joint malalignment, horizontal laminar or spinous process fracture, and interspinous widening. The proportion of patients with AO type A/B/C and with TLISS < 5 and ≥ 5 was compared between CT and MRI. We examined the overall accuracy and individual CT findings for PLC injury. RESULTS: AO classification using CT was: AO type A in 26 patients (61%), type B in 7 patients (17%), and type C in 8 patients (22%). Seventeen patients (41%) had a TLISS ≥ 5 while 24 (59%) had TLISS < 5. The addition of MRI after CT changed the AO classification in only 2 patients (4.9%, 95% CI (0.6-16.5%) due to upgrade of type A to type B or vice versa, but did not change TLISS from < 5 to ≥ 5 [p< 0.0001; 95% CI (0.59, 0.77)]. CONCLUSIONS: CT was highly accurate (95%) for diagnosis of PLC injury in LLFs. Addition of MRI after CT did not change the AO classification or TLISS, compared to CT alone, thus suggesting limited additional value of MRI for PLC assessment or fracture classification.

A Proposal for a Standardized Imaging Algorithm to Improve the Accuracy and Reliability for the Diagnosis of Thoracolumbar Posterior Ligamentous Complex Injury in Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic Literature Review. OBJECTIVE: To propose a systematic imaging algorithm for diagnosing posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) injury in computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to improve the reliability of PLC assessment. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. The Scopus database was searched from its inception until July 21, 2022, for studies evaluating CT or MRI assessment of the PLC injury following thoracolumbar trauma. The studies extracted key findings, objectives, injury definitions, and radiographic modalities. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies were included in this systematic review, encompassing 2021 patients. Five studies evaluated the accuracy of MRI in detecting thoracolumbar PLC injury using intraoperative findings as a reference. These studies indicate that black stripe discontinuity due to supraspinous or ligamentum flavum rupture is a more specific criterion of PLC injury than high-signal intensity. Thirteen papers evaluated the accuracy or reliability of CT in detecting thoracolumbar PLC injury using MRI or intraoperative findings as a reference. The overall accuracy rate of CT in detecting PLC injury was 68-90%. Two studies evaluate the accuracy of combined CT findings, showing that ≥2 CT findings are associated with a positive predictive value of 88-91 %. Vertebral translation, facet joint malalignment, spinous process fracture, horizontal laminar fracture, and interspinous widening were independent predictors of PLC injury. CONCLUSION: We provided a comprehensive imaging algorithm for diagnosing PLC in CT and MRI based on available literature and our experience. The algorithm will potentially improve the accuracy and reliability of PLC assessment, however it needs multicentre prospective validation.

Which Morphological Features of Facet Diastasis Predict Thoracolumbar Posterior Ligamentous Complex Injury as Defined by Magnetic Resonance Imaging?

BACKGROUND: The association of various morphological features of facet diastasis with posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) injury has not been previously described. This study aims to determine the diagnostic value of facet diastasis subtypes for diagnosing thoracolumbar PLC injury. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 337 consecutive patients with acute thoracolumbar fractures who had computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within 10 days of injury. Three and 5 reviewers evaluated MRI and CT images, respectively. Facet diastasis was subclassified as follows: Dislocated, no articular surface apposition; subluxed, incomplete articular surface apposition; and facet fracture articular process fractures which may be displaced ≥2 mm or otherwise undisplaced, facet joint widening (FJW) ≥ 3 mm. We examined the diagnostic accuracy and the multivariate associations of facet diastasis subtypes with PLC injury in MRI. RESULTS: Facet dislocation, subluxation, and displaced facet fracture yielded a high positive predictive value (PPV) for PLC injury (96%, 88%, and 94%, respectively). In contrast, undisplaced facet fracture and FJW yielded a moderate PPV for PLC injury (78%, and 45%, respectively). Facet dislocation, subluxation, and displaced facet fracture showed independent associations with PLC injury (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 38.4, 17.1, 13.4, respectively; P < 0.05). Undisplaced facet fracture and FJW were not associated with PLC injury (AOR = 3.9 [95% confidence interval, 0.49-38.4], P = 0.20) and (AOR = 1.94 [95% confidence interval, 0.48-7.13]; P = 0.20; P = 0.33), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Facet dislocation, subluxation, and displaced facet fracture, but not undisplaced facet fracture or FJW, were independently associated with PLC injury. Therefore, we propose to define facet diastasis as a surrogate marker of PLC injury in MRI based on these morphologies.

Is Appendiceal Diverticulitis Mimicking Acute Appendicitis?

Appendicular diverticulitis (AD) is a rare entity characterized by the inflammation of the arising diverticulum of the appendix. It has been reported to carry a high risk of perioperative complications, such as bleeding and perforation. Furthermore, multiple articles have highlighted the importance of diagnosing AD early due to its strong association with malignancies. Limited published cases concerning AD in our country and globally are available in the literature. Hence, we present in this article a case series of five exciting cases of incidental findings of AD that were initially diagnosed as acute appendicitis based on clinical evaluation and imaging findings. In our series, we performed a retrograde evaluation of the computed tomography scans of all five cases that showed diverticula. In conclusion, histopathological evaluation remains the method of choice to reach the definitive diagnosis; however, it is essential to highlight the relevance of imaging in diagnosing AD preoperatively in the early stages to reduce morbidity and mortality.

Analysis of the Combined Computed Tomography Findings Improves the Accuracy of Computed Tomography for Detecting Posterior Ligamentous Complex Injury of the Thoracolumbar Spine as Defined by Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of combined computed tomography (CT) findings for detecting posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) injury in thoracolumbar fractures using magnetic resonance imaging as a reference. METHODS: A retrospective review of 263 consecutive patients with thoracolumbar fractures who underwent CT and magnetic resonance imaging within 10 days of injury. Two reviewers evaluated CT for the following findings: facet joint malalignment, facet joint widening, horizontal laminar fracture, spinous process fracture, and interspinous widening. We examined the independent association of CT findings with PLC injury before combining the CT findings to calculate the diagnostic accuracy: sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV), and positive and negative likelihood ratios. PLC injury was defined by black stripe discontinuity caused by supraspinous or ligamentum flavum rupture. RESULTS: Facet joint malalignment, spinous process fracture, horizontal laminar fracture, and interspinous widening were independently associated with PLC injury (adjusted odds ratio range, 4.4e17.4). A single positive CT finding yielded a PPV of 31% and NPV of 66% for PLC injury. Two or more CT findings yielded a PPV of 91% for PLC injury. A negative CT for all the 4 CT sings had a 94% NPV for PLC injury. CONCLUSIONS: Two or more CT findings provided the best combination to confirm PLC injury; thus, this combination could be used as a criterion for injured PLC. A single CT finding lacks sufficient predictive value to confirm or rule out PLC injury. A negative CT for the 4 CT findings provided the highest sensitivity for PLC injuries.

Diagnostic Value of Various Morphological Features of Horizontal and Vertical Laminar Fractures for Posterior Ligamentous Complex Injury of the Thoracolumbar Spine as Defined by Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

OBJECTIVE: To determine diagnostic value of morphological features of horizontal laminar fracture (HLF) and vertical laminar fracture (VLF) for diagnosis of posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) injury. METHODS: This retrospective review comprised 271 consecutive patients with acute thoracolumbar fractures presenting to a Level 1 trauma center between January 2014 and January 2021. Two reviewers evaluated computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. VLFs were subclassified based on length and depth of lamina involved, as follows: type 1, full-length complete; type 2, full-length incomplete; type 3, partial-length complete or incomplete. HLFs were subclassified as follows: bilateral versus unilateral, displaced >2 mm versus nondisplaced, and lamina-only versus laminar and pedicle. We examined the diagnostic accuracy and the univariate and multivariate associations of laminar fracture subtypes with PLC injury as defined by black stripe discontinuity. RESULTS: Bilateral HLFs, laminar and pedicle fractures, displaced HLFs, and type 1 VLFs yielded a high positive predictive value for PLC injury (95%, 91%, 100%, and 86%, respectively). Type 2 and 3 VLFs did not show significant univariate associations with PLC injury. Bilateral HLFs, laminar and pedicle fractures, and displaced HLFs showed independent associations with PLC injury (adjusted odds ratio = 13.6, 8.4, 6, and 10.3, respectively; P < 0.002). Type 1 VLFs did not show a significant association with PLC (adjusted odds ratio = 10.3; P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral HLFs, laminar and pedicle fractures, and displaced HLFs, but not any VLF subtypes, were independently associated with PLC injury. These findings may improve the reliability of PLC assessment by computed tomography.

Can Vertical Laminar Fracture Further Discriminate Fracture Severity Between Thoracolumbar AO Type A3 and A4 Fractures?

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether vertical laminar fracture (VLF) can distinguish between AO type A3 and A4 fractures. METHODS: In a retrospective review of 111 consecutive acute thoracolumbar burst fractures, 5 reviewers independently analyzed computed tomography scans to classify fractures into A3 or A4 and to identify VLF. The following computed tomography parameters were measured: spinal canal stenosis >50%, anterior vertebral height ratio <50%, load sharing score >6, and local kyphosis >20°. We calculated the diagnostic performance of VLF in detecting A4 fracture. We compared the proportion of fractures with positive bony parameters, neurological deficit, dural tears, and surgical treatment between A3, A4 with VLF, and A4 without VLF. RESULTS: VLF was present in 62/75 (83%) A4 fractures and 2/36 (5.5%) A3 fractures (P < 0.0001). VLF yielded a high specificity of 94% (95% confidence interval 81%-99%) and moderately high sensitivity of 83% (95% CI 72%-91%) in detecting A4 fractures. A significantly higher proportion of A4 fractures with VLF had neurological deficit (24% vs. 0, P = 0.05), spinal canal stenosis >50% (25% vs. 0, P = 0.04), and anterior vertebral height ratio <50% (24% vs. 0, P = 0.05) than A4 fractures with no VLF. Interrater and intrarater κ values for VLF and AO standard criterion were excellent (>0.85). CONCLUSIONS: We found VLF to be highly specific, sensitive, and reliable in detecting A4 fractures. A higher proportion of A4 fractures with VLF had radiographic parameters and neurological deficit than A4 fractures with no VLF. VLF could be used as a severity modifier to further discriminate A3 and A4 fractures regarding severity and potentially guide treatment decision making.

Porto-mesenteric vein thrombosis following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity: Case series and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Portal vein thrombosis is a rare and a potentially lethal complication of Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. In this series, we describe the presentation, treatment, and outcome of 5 cases of PMVT post-laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) treated successfully at our hospital. CASE REPORT: Five patients presented to our emergency department with diffuse abdominal pain associated with anorexia, nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Computed tomography (CT) scan showed evidence of portal, mesenteric and splenic vein thrombosis and small bowel ischemia in three patients. Two patients were treated only with anticoagulant and the other three patients were treated with surgery in the form of diagnostic laparoscopy converted to laparotomy with Small bowel resection. CONCLUSION: Portal and mesenteric venous thrombosis after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is an unusual complication but it has life threatening consequences if it is not diagnosed early and treated adequately. The patients with porto-mesenteric venous thrombosis (PMVT) usually present themselves with vague abdominal symptoms. As so, the physicians should have high index of suspicion to recommend computed tomography (CT) abdomen to confirm diagnosis and start adequate treatment.