Evaluation of handling, storage, and disposal practices of oral anticancer medications among cancer patients and their caregivers at home setting in the Princess Noorah Oncology Center.

BACKGROUD: Oral medications are commonly prescribed for many cancer patients. Unfortunately, most of them are dispensed without proper counseling about handling practices. We aimed to evaluate the handling, storage, and disposal practices of oral anticancer medications among cancer patients and their caregivers at home. METHODS: A cross-sectional questionnaire was filled in by adult cancer patients or caregivers who received oral anticancers and/or visited an outpatient pharmacy over two months. RESULTS: A total of 201 participants were interviewed, 67% were female, and nearly 44% were between 40 and 60 years of age. The majority of participants were educated (78%). The top five medications involved were: tamoxifen, capecitabine, letrozole, dasatinib, and imatinib. More than 95% of participants reported that medications were kept away from children and pets in the original container and stored away from extreme heat, cold, and humidity. Hand washing and wearing gloves were not consistently practiced. Only 5% reported "Always" wearing gloves, while 24% reported "Always" washing hands after handling anticancer medications. The participants reported that they had been informed about safe handling and storage by their physician (39%) and pharmacist (25%), while 34% had not been informed. In terms of disposal practices, 66% of patients have not had any unused or expired medications, 29% disposed them in the trash, and 27% returned them. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that patients and caregivers' handling practices of oral anticancer medications are inconsistent with the published recommendations. Hence, appropriate and comprehensive education is needed to mitigate the risk of exposure to these agents in the home setting.

The Overriding of Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE) Drug Safety Alerts Fired by the Clinical Decision Support (CDS) Tool: Evaluation of Appropriate Responses and Alert Fatigue Solutions.

Introduction Most computerized physician order entry (CPOE) software come with clinical decision-support components (CDS) that provide prescribers assistance and notify them about adverse drug reactions. An excessive number of alerts in a repeated and non-relevant manner leads to alert fatigue and enforces physicians and pharmacists to alert overrides. King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC) in Jeddah still reports a higher percentage of drug alerts overridden by clinicians and pharmacists. Thus, this study was conducted to evaluate CDS alerts overriding and to determine which alerts are clinically irrelevant and need modifications. Methods The study was carried out in the inpatient setting at KAMC in Jeddah, from September 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020. It was designed as a retrospective chart review study that included all red alerts that required comments and were overridden by a physician and pharmacist. Results Among 11350 red alerts, potential drug-drug interaction (pDDI), dose, and allergy alerts represent 57%, 41%, and 2%, respectively, of the total alerts. The most common drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in category X were proton pump inhibitors and clopidogrel (9.9%). The appropriate response by prescribers and pharmacists toward allergy alerts was associated with the highest odds compared with the other alerts (p < 0.05) while there is a significant decrease in the odds of appropriate action being taken by both prescribers and pharmacists in the dose screen alerts (p < 0.05). Among all clinical specialties, there is an increased odds of appropriate action being taken by residents and fellows for allergy and dose alerts, respectively, compared to other groups (p < 0.05). For diminishing the unnecessary alerts, we provided 14 alert refinements strategies and advised turning off four alerts. Applying this will terminate 32% of irrelevant alerts. Conclusion Our study's findings indicated that a substantial number of alerts are ignored, and the rate of appropriateness varies significantly by alert type and prescriber level.