Evaluation of constipation.

The evaluation of the chronically constipated patient is multifaceted and challenging. Many clinicians define constipation according to the latest Rome III diagnostic criteria for functional gastrointestinal disorders. Female sex, older age, low fiber diet, a sedentary life style, malnutrition, polypharmacy, and a lower socioeconomic status have all been identified as risk factors for functional constipation. In elderly patients, it is important to rule out a colonic malignancy as the cause of constipation. The initial evaluation of the constipated patient includes a detailed history to elicit symptoms distinguishing slow transit constipation from obstructive defecation. Slow transit and obstructive defecation are the two major subtypes of functional constipation. In addition, the clinician should identify any secondary causes of constipation. The office examination of the constipated patient includes an abdominal, perineal, and a rectal exam. Many patients improve with lifestyle modification. When dietary interventions and lifestyle modifications fail, many diagnostic studies are available to further evaluate the constipated patient. Sitzmark transit study, nuclear scintigraphic defecography, electromyography, anorectal manometry, balloon expulsion test, paradoxical puborectalis contraction, cinedefecography, and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging defecography have all been used to diagnose the underlying causes of functional constipation.

The diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer: A comparison of endoscopic ultrasound and computed tomography with pancreas protocol.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in United States. We compared Computed Tomography (CT) with pancreas protocol and Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) in terms of mass detection, mass size, vascular involvement and lymph node involvement. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 93 patients. Concordance between CT and EUS, and accuracy of CT and EUS were assessed using a retrospective chart review and statistical analysis. RESULTS: CT and EUS agreed on mass detection in 88% of the cases and mass size in 67% of the cases. They agreed in 74% of cases about the presence or absence of vascular involvement and 82% in lymph node involvement. Cohen's kappa indicated that the concordance between two tests was moderately reliable. CONCLUSION: CT and EUS agree moderately well in identifying characteristics of pancreatic masses, but discrepancies between the two modalities are common, particularly with respect to involvement of specific blood vessels and lymph nodes. Clinicians should use caution in relying on a single modality to make decisions.

Perianal Crohn's disease: a review.

Perianal involvement in Crohn's disease (CD), which encompasses fistulas, ulcers, abscesses, strictures and cancer, can lead to significant impairment in quality of life. The objective of this article is to review the major perianal complications of CD and the current medical and surgical modalities used to treat them. Antibiotics are commonly used despite a lack of controlled trials to validate their use and should be used as a bridge to maintenance therapy. The anti-metabolites azathioprine and 6-MP have shown a positive response in terms of fistula closure, although these data are mostly from trials looking at this as a secondary endpoint. Infliximab is an effective agent for induction and maintenance of treatment of fistulizing CD. Further studies to evaluate the use of subcutaneous anti-tumor necrosis factors are needed to convincingly prove their efficacy for perianal fistulizing disease. In CD, clinicians should avoid surgery as a first-line approach for skin tags, hemorrhoids or fissures in the setting of proctitis. Surgery, particularly lateral internal sphincterotomy, in combination with medical therapy is associated with higher fissure healing rates in the absence of proctitis. Fistulotomy is curative for most simple low perianal fistulae, but complex fistulas often require sphincter-sparing surgical procedures. Less invasive approaches such as a chemical sphincterotomy should be used first, with therapy escalated only if this fails.

Peritoneal Surface Disease Severity Score as a predictor of resectability in the treatment of peritoneal surface malignancies.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the clinical utility of the Peritoneal Surface Disease Severity Score (PSDSS) as a preoperative predictor of resectability in the treatment of peritoneal surface malignancies. METHODS: Forty-nine patients were selected for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and were stratified according to the PSDSS retrospectively. RESULTS: Of 52 cytoreductive surgeries performed in 49 patients, HIPEC was performed in 33 cases (63%). We analyzed 31 cases of appendiceal and colorectal cancer patients who underwent CRS and HIPEC and 12 who underwent CRS only. 68% of the patients in whom CRS and HIPEC was performed were classified as PSDSS stage I or II. Contrastingly, all patients in whom CRS and HIPEC was unachievable were scored as PSDSS stage III or IV. CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes of this study suggest that the PSDSS can be used as a preoperative assessment tool to predict disease resectability in the treatment of peritoneal surface malignancies.