Use of Primary Care and Emergency Departments for Substance Use Treatment: The Rural and Urban Divide.

Background: Alcohol and illicit substance use remain significant public health issues in the United States. In this analysis, we assessed differences in the use of primary care and emergency departments (EDs) for treatment of substance use among rural and urban sexual minorities (SMs).Methods: Data come from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH, 2015-2019). Survey-weighted multivariable linear and logistic regression analyses were used to assess the relationship between sexual identity and the use of primary care settings or EDs for treatment of substance use, stratified by urbanicity of residence.Results: Among the entire sample, 7.9% reported residing in rural environments with slightly more SMs living in urban (7.3%) relative to rural (5.4%) locales. Both rural (ß=-0.20; 95% CI: -0.29, -0.10) and urban SMs (ß=-0.13; 95% CI: -0.16, -0.11) self-reported worse overall health. Urban SMs, but not rural SMs, had significantly higher odds of reporting use of primary care treatment for substance use (aOR 2.80; 95% CI: 2.13, 3.68). ED treatment for substance use was greater among both rural (aOR = 2.99; 95% CI: 1.01, 8.87) and urban SMs (aOR = 3.02; 95% CI: 2.12, 4.30) as was overall number of ED visits among both rural (ß = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.24, 0.72) and urban SMs (ß = 0.23; 95% CI: 0.19, 0.28) .Conclusion: These findings suggest increased reliance on EDs for treatment of alcohol or substance use among rural SMs. Future research should examine whether increasing culturally competent primary care services for SMs in rural areas may be a key intervention point for reducing health disparities.

Alcohol and inflammation: Examining differences at the intersection of sexual identity and race/ethnicity.

Sexual minorities (SMs; e.g., lesbian, gay, bisexual, and other non-heterosexual individuals) are more likely to be current alcohol drinkers than their heterosexual peers while separately experiencing elevated inflammation. Yet, little research has assessed the association between alcohol use and inflammation among subgroups of SMs, let alone potential differences among people with multiple marginal identities (e.g., race/ethnicity and sexual identity). Data came from the National Health and Nutrition Survey 2015-2016. Survey-weighted multivariable linear regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between alcohol use categories, heavy episodic drinking, and log-CRP (C-reactive protein). Models were stratified by sexual identity to determine whether associations between alcohol use and inflammation or between race/ethnicity and inflammation differed by sexual identity. Among 3220 participants, 1000 (36.8%) reported light alcohol use, 870 (32.0%) reported moderate use, and 483 (17.8%) reported heavy use. Mean raw CRP was 4.1 mg/L (SD = 8.1). The association between race/ethnicity and CRP differed in stratified relative to non-stratified models with key differences in CRP among individuals with multiple marginalized identities. We also observed that while the "classic" J-shaped relationship between alcohol use and systemic inflammation persists among heterosexuals in this sample, it does not hold among subgroups of sexual minorities. In particular, bisexuals who report heavy alcohol use, compared to non-users, experience significantly elevated CRP. Finally, we did not observe any association between heavy episodic drinking and CRP among subgroups of sexual minorities. Future studies assessing alcohol and biomarker data need to strive to include subgroups of sexual minorities and people with multiple marginal identities to better target behavioral and biomedical interventions aimed at reducing health disparities.