An Update on Noninfectious Retinal Vasculitis.

BACKGROUND: Retinal vasculitis (RV) signifies the inflammation of various retinal vessels. Noninfectious RV differs from infectious RV with regard to its pathogenesis and treatment. It can have varied clinical presentations and may be associated with systemic vasculitic diseases. SUMMARY: Noninfectious RV can be caused due to type-III hypersensitivity reactions, increased expression of intracellular adhesion molecules, and genetic susceptibility. Noninfectious RV is primarily classified on the basis of the type of retinal vessels involved. It can be further classified as an occlusive or nonocclusive. RV can be a major association of systemic diseases like Behcet's disease, sarcoidosis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Newer modalities, like ultra-widefield fundus fluorescein angiography, can help in the management of RV. Effective treatment of noninfectious RV requires anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive therapy. The patients may require treatment with high-dose corticosteroids and biological agents. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections and laser photocoagulation may be indicated to treat the occlusive disease. Prompt treatment may prevent complications like vitreous hemorrhage, neovascular glaucoma, and tractional retinal detachment. The treatment more often requires a multidisciplinary approach. KEY MESSAGES: This review provides a comprehensive update on the various causes of noninfectious RV, including both systemic and isolated ocular conditions. It also details various complications and management strategies for this condition.

Cytomegalovirus-Associated Non-Necrotizing Retinopathy, Occlusive Retinal Vasculitis, and Neovascularization.

PURPOSE: To report a rare case of cytomegalovirus (CMV)-associated non-necrotizing viral retinopathy, occlusive retinal vasculitis, papillitis, and retinal neovascularization in a young 41-year-old woman. METHODS: Case report. RESULTS: The patient presented with features of papillitis, peripapillary cotton-wool spots, pre-retinal hemorrhages, and occlusive vasculitis. Her visual acuity was 20/100 in the left eye. She developed a worsening of the disease upon initiation of systemic corticosteroids. Her serum immunoglobulins (Ig) (both IgG and IgM) were highly positive for CMV. Anterior chamber paracentesis was positive for CMV DNA using real-time polymerase chain reaction. After stopping systemic corticosteroids, she was initiated on oral valganciclovir, with rapid resolution of the vasculitis and cotton-wool spots. After three months, the patient developed retinal neovascularization and underwent pan-retinal photocoagulation. However, her uveitis was inactive, and her visual acuity improved to 20/25. CONCLUSIONS: Non-necrotizing viral retinopathy has been associated with either varicella zoster virus (VZV) or herpes simplex virus (HSV). Our case highlights that CMV can also lead to non-necrotizing retinopathy and must be suspected in patients who may be negative for VZV and HSV. Appropriate anti-viral treatment can prevent severe vision loss in these patients.

Intravitreal faricimab as an adjuvant in the management of tubercular uveitis.

PURPOSE: To report the use of intravitreal faricimab used as an adjunct in the management of intraocular tuberculosis (IOTB) in a patient with occlusive retinal vasculitis (ORV) and choroiditis. METHODS: A case report. RESULTS: A 27-year-old Asian male presented with bilateral choroiditis and ORV complicated by retinal neovascularization and vitreous hemorrhage in one eye. The patient had a positive tuberculin skin test, indeterminate interferon-gamma release assay, and Ghon's focus on chest radiography. With a diagnosis of IOTB, the patient was treated with anti-tubercular therapy. Due to the significant vitreous hemorrhage, he underwent pars plana vitrectomy in one eye. The patient received bilateral faricimab. Within a week of the injection, he had a near-complete resolution of the extensive choroidal and retinal vascular inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal faricimab, given its angiopoietin-2 (ang2) inhibition and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor action, maybe a helpful adjunct in IOTB. Whether ang2 inhibition provides any additional benefit needs further evaluation in extensive studies.