RESUMO
Surgical site infection (SSI) after pilonidal disease surgery can lead to serious complications. We systematically searched the PubMed, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases for studies evaluating the use of antimicrobials as an adjunct to pilonidal disease surgery. We identified 12 eligible studies [nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs), three retrospective cohort studies], enrolling a total of 1,172 patients. No difference was observed when single-dose prophylaxis was compared to no prophylaxis or to a long course of antibiotics (seven studies, 690 patients). Similarly, gentamicin collagen sponges (GCS) did not appear to be beneficial when compared with no GCS (with primary or secondary closure; four studies, 402 patients). One study (80 patients) reported faster healing and lower SSI and recurrence rates with GCS than a 7-day course of antibiotics. The clinical heterogeneity precluded a formal meta-analysis. Although the generalization of our findings may be limited by the relative paucity and clinical heterogeneity of the existing studies, prophylactic antibiotics or GCS did not appear to be beneficial in promoting healing or reducing SSI or recurrence rates. Large, double-blind, placebo-controlled RCTs are warranted in order to further elucidate this issue.
Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Antibioticoprofilaxia/métodos , Dermatopatias Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Dermatopatias Bacterianas/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/métodos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
We sought to identify risk factors for postoperative infections, caused by multi-drug-resistant gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) in surgical patients. This was a retrospective cohort study among patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU) for more than 5 days, following general surgical operations. Comparison of patients who developed infection caused by MDR-GNB with the remainder of the cohort showed that every minute of operative time, use of special treatments during hospitalization (antineoplastic, immunosuppressive or immunomodulating therapies), every day of metronidazole, and every day of carbapenems use, increased patients' odds to acquire an infection caused by MDR-GNB by 0.7%, 8.9 times, 9%, and 9%, respectively [OR (95% CI): 1.007 (1.003-1.011), p = 0.001; 8.9 (1.8-17.3), p = 0.004; 1.09 (1.04-1.18), p = 0.039; 1.09 (1.01-1.18), p = 0.023, respectively]. The above were adjusted in the multivariable analysis for the confounder of time distribution of infections caused by MDR-GNB. Finally, the secondary comparison, with patients that did not develop any infection, showed that patients who had received antibiotics, within 3 months prior to admission, had 3.8 times higher odds to acquire an infection caused by MDR-GNB [OR (95% CI): 3.8 (1.07-13.2), p = 0.002]. This study depicts certain, potentially modifiable, risk factors for postoperative infections in patients hospitalized in the ICU for more than 5 days.
Assuntos
Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/efeitos dos fármacos , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/epidemiologia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/microbiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/microbiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
The objective of this investigation was to document clinicians' awareness regarding the incidence and severity of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD). An international electronic survey was conducted among corresponding authors of articles indexed by PubMed and published during the last 10 years in 'Core Clinical Journals'. A total of 1,163 clinicians answered (response rate 59%); most of the responses were submitted from North America (54.6%), Europe (32.2%), and Asia/Pacific (11.6%). Only 2.2% of the participants answered correctly all four questions, while 14.1% answered all questions incorrectly. Regarding each question, 10.8% of the participants correctly estimated current CDAD treatment failure or recurrence rates to be around 40%, 33.4% correctly estimated the ratio of antibiotic-associated colitis attributed to C. difficile to be around 60%, 72.7% correctly responded that almost all antibiotics are associated with CDAD, and 41.7% correctly responded that any patient is at risk for CDAD. Almost half (44.4%) of the respondents considered CDAD to be underestimated. Participants from North America scored higher than those from Europe or Asia/Pacific (p < 0.001). Participants considering CDAD to be overestimated (3.4%) had the lowest mean score of correct answers. Among a clinically diverse international sample of physicians with academic expertise, there was an inadequate level of awareness of the magnitude and clinical importance of CDAD.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Clostridioides difficile/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Clostridium/induzido quimicamente , Infecções por Clostridium/epidemiologia , Colite/induzido quimicamente , Colite/epidemiologia , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Ásia , Infecções por Clostridium/microbiologia , Infecções por Clostridium/patologia , Colite/microbiologia , Colite/patologia , Europa (Continente) , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , América do Norte , Médicos , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The Spartathlon ultra distance running race (246 kilometres) is an exhausting physical exercise leading to a state of systemic inflammation associated with dramatic elevation of interleukin-6 and acute-phase reactants to levels seen only in critically ill or patients near death. We sought to study the effect of this severe inflammatory response on the levels of serum procalcitonin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen healthy endurance-trained runners who participated in the 2006 Spartathlon were studied. Blood samples were taken the day before the race, within 15 min after the end of the race and 48 h after the end of the race. Serum interleukin-6, serum amyloid A protein, C-reactive protein, tumour necrosis factor-alpha and procalcitonin concentrations were determined. RESULTS: Serum interleukin-6, serum amyloid A protein and C-reactive protein were dramatically increased after the end of the race (150-, 116- and 10,470- fold increase of the mean values, respectively). Procalcitonin levels remained within normal range (mean +/- standard error of mean, 0.27 +/- 0.02 microg L(-1), 0.26 +/- 0.02 microg L(-1) and 0.27 +/- 0.02 microg L(-1) before, at the end, and 48 h after the race, respectively). Tumour necrosis factor-alpha measurements revealed no significant changes. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides strong evidence that Spartathlon, a prolonged endurance exercise resulting in severe stimulation of inflammatory mediators followed by muscle and liver damage, does not induce procalcitonin secretion. The findings cannot directly be applied to other causes of aseptic inflammation.
Assuntos
Proteína C-Reativa/metabolismo , Calcitonina/metabolismo , Inflamação/metabolismo , Precursores de Proteínas/metabolismo , Corrida/fisiologia , Adulto , Peptídeo Relacionado com Gene de Calcitonina , Humanos , Interleucina-6/metabolismo , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Proteína Amiloide A Sérica/metabolismo , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/metabolismoRESUMO
Several aspects of the procedure for obtaining blood cultures are rather controversial. An international survey among 386 experts was performed to investigate the clinical practice of obtaining blood cultures from patients with a central venous catheter (CVC). Among respondents, 64.5% obtain one set of blood cultures from the CVC and one set from the peripheral vein (PV). Other participants answered 'two sets from PV', 'two sets from CVC', 'one from PV', 'one from CVC' and 'other' (9.1%, 4.1%, 8.3%, 7%, and 7%, respectively). Clinicians who, according to the survey, demonstrated that they know the diagnostic performance characteristics of cultures more often obtain one culture from the CVC and one from the PV (73.9% vs. 61.7%, p 0.037).
Assuntos
Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Coleta de Amostras Sanguíneas/métodos , Sangue/microbiologia , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentação , Meios de Cultura , Fungemia/diagnóstico , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Internacionalidade , Padrões de Prática Médica , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: There is an ongoing discussion in the scientific community that even the leading scientific journals publish mainly research that is produced in the countries where these journals are based. METHODS: We analysed data regarding the origin of publications in 11 leading general medical journals during the last 35 years: The Lancet, British Medical Journal, Journal of the American Medical Association, New England Journal of Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, Archives of Internal Medicine, American Journal of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Proceedings, Canadian Medical Association Journal, Medical Journal of Australia and Journal of Internal Medicine (previously called Acta Medica Scandinavica). RESULTS: Among the examined journals, The Lancet has been the most diverse regarding the origin of publications; in the period 1971-1975, 62.6% of its publications originated from the UK while the relevant figure dropped to 43.2% in the period 2001-2005 (19.4% decrease). During the period 2000-2005, the proportion of publications that originated from the country in which each one of the rest of the examined journals has been based ranged from 71.7% to 95.1%. This figure decreased by a proportion ranging from 10.9% to 19.4% for some major US- and UK-based medical journals during the 35-year study period. DISCUSSION: Our own interpretation of the findings of this study is that scientific journals will better serve the global scientific community as well as the public by adopting policies that increase the mixture of the origin of research that they publish, including work from scientists in developing countries, especially during the era we live.