Differences in oral food challenge reaction severity based on increasing age in a pediatric population.

BACKGROUND: Food allergy reactions range from mild to severe with differences in age appearing to be an important factor associated with reaction severity. OBJECTIVE: To define differences in oral food challenge (OFC) reaction severity in pediatric patients from infancy to adolescence using objective clinical outcomes and standardized reaction grading tools. METHODS: Retrospective review of all positive OFC results at 2 large institutions between September 2016 and February 2019. Reaction severity was defined by presence of cardiovascular, neurologic, lower respiratory, or laryngeal symptoms, epinephrine requirement, and grading using 2 established food allergy reaction scales. RESULTS: Infants and toddlers had fewer reactions involving cardiovascular, neurologic, lower respiratory, or laryngeal symptoms compared with older age groups. Epinephrine was also required less frequently during reactions in infants and toddlers, compared with older age groups. There was no difference in reaction severity in infants and toddlers based on clinical history of eczema. Increasing age was significantly correlated with increased epinephrine requirement (R2 = 0.12, P = .002), elevated Consortium of Food Allergy Research score (R2 = .012, P = .003), and approached significance for increased Practical Allergy score (R2 = .005, P = .05). History of asthma and sesame allergy were identified to be positively correlated with more severe reactions. CONCLUSION: Infants and young toddlers have less severe reactions during OFCs compared with older age groups supporting early food introduction practices. In children under 12 months of age, severe reactions are most rare calling into question screening practices using specific allergy testing before food introduction. Standardized reaction grading tools may be valuable instruments to categorize reaction severity during OFCs.

Safety of Multifood Oral Immunotherapy in Children Aged 1 to 18 Years at an Academic Pediatric Clinic.

BACKGROUND: Oral immunotherapy (OIT) aims to increase the reaction threshold to a food allergen and decrease the risk of a potentially life-threatening allergic reaction in the event of an accidental ingestion. Whereas single-food OIT is the most extensively studied, data on multifood OIT are limited. OBJECTIVE: Our study aimed to examine the safety and feasibility of single-food and multifood immunotherapy in a large cohort in an outpatient pediatric allergy clinic setting. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients enrolled in single-food and multifood OIT between September 1, 2019, and September 30, 2020, and data collection of those patients until November 19, 2021, were performed. RESULTS: There were 151 patients who underwent either an initial dose escalation (IDE) or a standard oral food challenge. Seventy-eight patients were receiving single-food OIT with 67.9% reaching maintenance. Fifty patients were undergoing multifood OIT with 86% reaching maintenance to at least 1 OIT food and 68% reaching maintenance for all their foods. Of the 229 IDEs, there were low frequencies of failed IDEs (10.9%), epinephrine administration (8.7%), emergency department referrals (0.4%), and hospital admission (0.4%). Cashew accounted for one-third of failed IDEs. Epinephrine administration during home dosing occurred in 8.6% of patients. Eleven patients discontinued OIT owing to symptoms during up-dosing. No patients discontinued once reaching maintenance. CONCLUSIONS: Desensitization to 1 food or multiple foods simultaneously through OIT appears to be safe and feasible using the OIT protocol that has been established. The most common adverse reaction causing discontinuation of OIT was gastrointestinal symptoms.