Stacked Lateral Thigh Perforator Flap as a Novel Option for Autologous Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Autologous breast reconstruction using perforator flaps offers excellent outcomes, minimizes donor-site morbidity, and allows for precise donor-site selection. The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator, profunda artery perforator, and gluteal artery perforator flaps along with the stacked flap technique are the most common options. This study reports the first series of the stacked lateral thigh perforator flap. METHODS: A retrospective review of all stacked lateral thigh perforator flaps done by a single group of surgeons was performed. Demographics, flap weights, complications, indications, and surgical technique were tabulated for each patient. RESULTS: Eight female patients with a history of breast cancer underwent delayed unilateral breast reconstruction with stacked lateral thigh perforator flaps for a total of 16 flaps. Mean patient age, body mass index, flap weight, and stacked flap weight were 47.3 years, 26.2 kg/m, 333.1 g, and 666.1 g, respectively. Microsurgical revascularization was completed in anterograde and retrograde fashion to the internal mammary vasculature. Flap survival was 100 percent and one subsequent flap revision was performed. Two patients developed a seroma at the donor site. Indications included insufficient abdominal tissue, prominent lateral thigh lipodystrophy, prior abdominal surgery, and failed prior abdominally based autologous reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: This series demonstrates that the lateral thigh perforator flap is a reliable and effective option for a stacked breast reconstruction. Its ease of harvest (stemming from reliable anatomy), straightforward dissection, and intraoperative positioning make it an appealing flap option. The stacked lateral thigh perforator flap allows the reconstructive surgeon to tailor breast reconstruction to the patient, focusing on body habitus and minimizing morbidity. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Outcomes Comparison for Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction in Specialty Surgery Hospitals Versus Tertiary Care Facilities.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative monitoring is crucial in the care of free flap breast reconstruction patients. Tertiary care facilities (TCFs) provide postoperative monitoring in an ICU after surgery. Specialty surgery hospitals (SSHs) do not have ICUs, but these facilities perform free flap breast reconstruction as well. Are outcomes comparable between the 2 facilities in terms of flap reexploration times and overall success? METHODS: Retrospective study including 163 SSH and 157 TCF patients. Primary predictor was facility in which the procedure was performed. Secondary predictors included operative, demographic, and comorbidity data. Primary outcomes were flap take back rate and flap failures. Secondary outcomes were total time from adverse event noticed in the flap to returning to the operating room (OR) and total time from decision made to return to the OR to returning to the OR (decision made). Tertiary outcomes were length of stay, operative times, and blood loss. RESULTS: Patients at the TCF were generally less healthy than SSH patients. Salvage rates and failure rates were similar between the 2 institutions. Adverse event noticed and decision made times did not differ between the 2 facilities. Overall flap success rate was 98.22% at SSH and 98.81% at TCF. No primary or secondary predictors had a significant correlation with increased odds for flap failure. CONCLUSION: SSHs can offer similar outcomes in free flap breast reconstruction with just as effective clinical response times to endangered flaps as found in a TCF. However, surgery at an SSH may best be reserved for healthier patients.