Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Radiol ; 88(12): 1873-80, 2007 Dec.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18235348

RESUMO

Systematic over-reading of screening mammograms increases the number of cancers detected. Published results will vary based on the particularities of different programs. A feature of the revised French program is that over-reading is limited to ACR BI-RADS 1 and 2 mammograms. In the Loire-Atlantic region, 8.7% of detected cancers between 2003-2005 were detected at over-reading. We have reviewed our database to analyze the features of these cancers detected only by the second reviewer during this period and search for causes of non-detection by the initial reviewer. Cancers detected only by the second reviewer were generally small. Breast parenchyma was mainly type 1 or 2 of the BI-RADS classification. In our study, 60% of these cancers initially missed were considered as "detection errors" because there were not detected by the initial reviewer whereas 40% were considered as "interpretation errors" because they were detected by the initial reviewer but interpreted as benign.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Mamografia/métodos , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/classificação , Calcinose/classificação , Calcinose/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma in Situ/classificação , Carcinoma in Situ/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/classificação , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma Lobular/classificação , Carcinoma Lobular/diagnóstico por imagem , Erros de Diagnóstico , Feminino , França , Humanos , Linfonodos/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ultrassonografia Mamária
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA