[Clinical trials that have changed our practices 2010-2020]. / Les essais cliniques en radiothérapie qui ont changé les pratiques 2010­2020.

PURPOSE: This article aims to describe and list the clinical trials that have changed our practices in breast cancer, urological cancer, gynecological cancer, cancer of the upper aerodigestive tract and digestive cancer in the last ten years. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We listed and selected the studies published between 2010 and 2020. The articles were identified on the basis of a Medline search with PubMed and knowledge of the authors. RESULTS: Five to six trials were selected in breast cancer, urological cancers, gynecological cancers, cancers of the upper aerodigestive tract and digestive cancers asking the different fundamental questions in radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: Depending on the pathologies, the questions raised over the past 10 years remain fundamental questions such as the place of neoadjuvant treatment, the place of hypofractionation or the type of chemotherapy concomitant with radiotherapy.

Patterns of practice of androgen deprivation therapy combined to radiotherapy in favorable and unfavorable intermediate risk prostate cancer. Results of The PROACT Survey from the French GETUG Radiation Oncology group.

PURPOSE: The intermediate-risk (IR) prostate cancer (PCa) group is heterogeneous in terms of prognosis. For unfavorable or favorable IR PCa treated by radiotherapy, the optimal strategy remains to be defined. In routine practice, the physician's decision to propose hormonal therapy (HT) is controversial. The PROACT survey aimed to evaluate pattern and preferences of daily practice in France in this IR population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A web questionnaire was distributed to French radiotherapy members of 91 centers of the Groupe d'Etude des Tumeurs Uro-Genitales (GETUG). The questionnaire included four sections concerning: (i) the specialists who prescribe treatments and multidisciplinary decisions (MTD) validation; (ii) the definition of IR subsets of patients; (iii) radiotherapy parameters; (iv) the pattern of practice regarding cardiovascular (CV) and (iv) metabolic evaluation. A descriptive presentation of the results was used. RESULTS: Among the 82 responses (90% of the centers), HT schedules and irradiation techniques were validated by specific board meetings in 54% and 45% of the centers, respectively. Three-fourths (76%) of the centers identified a subset of IR patients for a dedicated strategy. The majority of centers consider PSA>15 (77%) and/or Gleason 7 (4+3) (87%) for an unfavorable IR definition. Overall, 41% of the centers performed systematically a CV evaluation before HT prescription while 61% consider only CV history/status in defining the type of HT. LHRH agonists are more frequently prescribed in both favorable (70%) and unfavorable (98%) IR patients. Finally, weight (80%), metabolic profile (70%) and CV status (77%) of patients are considered for follow-up under HT. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first survey on HT practice in IR PCa. The PROACT survey indicates that three-quarters of the respondents identify subsets of IR-patients in tailoring therapy. The CV status of the patient is considered in guiding the HT decision, its duration and type of drug.

Quality of life in long-term survivors of testicular cancer: a population-based case-control study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate quality of life and social problems in long-term survivors of testicular cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 1998, 71 testicular cancer survivors (cases) identified from the Calvados General Tumor Registry were enrolled onto a case-control study. One hundred nineteen healthy control subjects (controls), matched by age and location of residence, were selected at random from electoral rolls. Three self-administered questionnaires were used: two health-related quality-of-life questionnaires (Short Form-36 and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 core questionnaires) and one life situation questionnaire. Specific questions concerning sexuality were also added. RESULTS: With a mean follow-up of 11 years, health-related quality-of-life scores did not differ significantly between cases and controls, nor did general symptom scores. Psychosocial problems were reported equally by cases and controls. Cases reported more modification of sexual life (P =.04) with decreased sexual enjoyment (P <.01), decreased desire (P =.02), and infertility (P <.01). Cases did not report more divorce than controls; they reported fewer changes in relationships with friends (P =.03). Although a similar proportion of cases and controls were at work, cases expressed less ambitious professional plans (P =.002). Cases had greater difficulty in borrowing from banks (P <.001). CONCLUSION: French long-term survivors of testicular cancer do not express more impairment of health-related quality of life or familial or professional life in comparison with healthy men. They did have more sexual life problems and found difficulty in borrowing from banks. This information should be used by practitioners to help their patients cope with their disease and return to normal life.

Radiotherapy of stage I and II carcinomas of the mobile tongue and/or floor of the mouth.

From 1977 to 1990, 94 evaluable patients were treated with iridium-192 implantation in the Centre Claudius Regaud for a Stage I (52 patients) or a Stage II (42 patients) squamous cell carcinoma of the mobile tongue and/or the floor of the mouth. Interstitial brachytherapy was associated with external irradiation in 68 patients (group 1; mean dose, 48 Gy for external irradiation, 26 Gy for brachytherapy) or was exclusive in 26 patients (group 2; mean dose, 66 Gy). The mean follow-up was 44 months. Eleven acute complications were noted during or immediately after the implant (1 lethal myocardial infarction, 6 hematomas of the tongue which spontaneously resolved, 3 local sepsis). The mean duration of the mucositis was 9 weeks (from 4 to 20 weeks). Ten patients (17%) experienced a late complication (8 in group 1, 2 in group 2): 3 bone necroses requiring hemimandibulectomy (1 post-operative death), 1 tongue necrosis treated by a transoral mucosal excision, 6 bone expositions which recovered after medical treatment. Local control rates for T1 and T2 tumors were 75% (39/52) and 51% (21/41), respectively. Sixteen patients (17%) presented a nodal relapse which was associated in 6 cases with a concomitant local relapse. The local control rate of T1 tumors was 64% (23/36) in group 1 versus 100% (16/16) in group 2 (p < 0.01). For T2 tumors, these figures were 45% (14/31) and 70% (7/10), respectively (p > 0.3). The influence of 13 parameters on the local control was studied in analysis. In the one model analysis, a cox regression tumor size was significantly predictive of actuarial local recurrence (p < 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Clinical impact of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in cancer patients. A comparative study between dedicated camera and dual-head coincidence gamma camera.

AIM: Positron emission tomography (PET) using fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) can be performed using a dedicated PET scanner (PET-I) or a dual-head coincidence gamma camera (CGC-I). The aim of this study was to comparatively assess the impact of PET-I and CGC-I on clinical management in cancer patients. METHODS: From November 2000 to November 2002, PET-I and CGC-I were performed at an interval of 2 days in 151 patients with colorectal cancer (n=40), breast cancer (n=28), thyroid cancer (n=23), lung tumors (n=22), germ cell tumors (n=14), unknown primary cancer (n=7) and other cancers (n=17). PET-I and CGC-I were interpreted independently with knowledge of conventional imaging (CI). In June 2003, theoretical management, e.g. treatment modality/ies and treatment intent (curative or palliative), after CI, PET-I and CGC-I were stated during multidisciplinary sessions and were a posteriori considered as appropriate or inappropriate using pathological and follow-up data. RESULTS: The theoretical management proposed after PET-I and after CGC-I was similar in 112/151 (74%; 95% CI: 66-81%) patients. In 125 assessable patients, theoretical management after PET-I was appropriate in 86% (95% CI: 79-92%), significantly higher (P=0.0033) than after CGC-I (70%; 95% CI: 62-78%). Both proportions were also higher than after CI (46%; 95% CI: 37-56%), (P<0.0001). A similar trend for higher proportions of appropriate management after PET-I than after CGC-I was observed for each tumor localization. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical impact of PET-I is superior to that of CGC-I in a large series of cancer patients. Although CGC-I could be considered as an acceptable alternative, PET-I remains the standard and should preferably equip nuclear medicine departments.