A Rare Case of Multiple Bone Infarctions and Abnormal Pulmonary Function Tests in a Patient With Compound Heterozygous Hemoglobin S and Type 2 Hereditary Persistence of Fetal Hemoglobin.

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a group of inherited blood disorders characterized by abnormal hemoglobin production, affecting individuals worldwide with varying prevalence across different populations. Manifestations vary, ranging from severe to mild. SCD is characterized by the presence of hemoglobin S (HbS), which distorts erythrocytes upon deoxygenation, leading to sickling. This results in hemolytic anemia, painful vaso-occlusive crises (VOC), and multiple organ damage, including bones, due to microinfarcts. Sickle cell trait (SCT), or carrier status, is not considered an SCD and often runs a benign course. We report a 44-year-old man of African descent presenting with a one-month history of pain in his ankles and feet. He had a prior diagnosis of sickle cell "trait" without previous VOC. Hematological indices were normal. Hemoglobin electrophoresis showed absent HbA, elevated HbS, elevated HbF, and normal HbA2. X-rays and MRI revealed bilateral bone infarction in diaphyses of right proximal and bilateral distal tibias. Molecular analysis of [Formula: see text]-globin revealed compound heterozygous hemoglobin S and type 2 deletion of persistence of fetal hemoglobin (HPFH). Pulmonary function tests revealed restrictive lung disease. A literature review from 1946 to May 2024 via PubMed, EMBASE, and Medline was performed, revealing two cases of HbS-HPFH with avascular necrosis affecting the femoral neck were briefly reported more than 60 years ago. Although pulmonary function tests in SCD typically show a mild restrictive pattern with decreased diffusion capacity and rarely an obstructive pattern, no cases of HbS-HPFH were identified. In conclusion, multiple bone infarctions are extremely rare in HbS-HPFH. Lung and bone diseases might be unrecognized in this unique disorder.

A rare twist: COVID-19 infection masquerading as IgA vasculitis in a hemophilia a patient.

Hemophilia A and B are one of the most common hereditary bleeding disorders. Patients are predisposed to bleeding spontaneously or after minor trauma in different areas such as the skin, gastrointestinal, or joints. COVID-19 infection has been associated with various clinical manifestations and complications including rarely triggering IgA vasculitis. We report a 23-year-old man who was previously diagnosed with severe hereditary hemophilia A. He presented to our hospital with classic symptoms of IgA vasculitis, complaining of petechiae and purpura in his limbs, fatigue, body aches, poor oral intake, abdominal pain, and watery non-bloody diarrhea. He did not present with respiratory symptoms or fever typical of COVID-19 infection. Abnormal blood tests were mildly elevated C-reactive protein, elevated d-dimers, and low Factor VIII activity. Extensive immunological tests were negative. CT abdomen with contrast was unremarkable. A skin biopsy strongly indicated IgA vasculitis. COVID-19 test came back positive. The patient was managed symptomatically and with glucocorticosteroids which significantly improved his symptoms. The available literature on clinical features, laboratory tests, and management of COVID-19-associated IgA vasculitis is discussed. However, there is no case reported on the associations between hemophilia, COVID-19 infection, and IgA vasculitis. This is the first case of atypical COVID-19 infection masquerading as de novo IgA vasculitis in an adult patient with underlying hemophilia. Our case contributes to the growing body of literature about hemophilia being a possible predisposing factor that a COVID-19 virus relies on to amplify immune dysregulation resulting in IgA vasculitis.

From Sand to Excellence: A Deep Dive into Abu Dhabi's Rheumatology Landscape.

The Emirate of Abu Dhabi (AD) is the capital and largest emirate of the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The emirate's economic significance stems from non-oil and oil contributions to GDP. The 2022 GDP of Abu Dhabi was USD 230 billion. The government provides services to its residents through digital platforms such as official websites. The Abu Dhabi Health Insurance Law No. 23 of 2005 mandates that residents have access to necessary medical care and services. There is a paucity in the literature on the available rheumatology services in the Arab region. This review article aims to explore the status of rheumatology services in AD for both residents and visitors. It will include an overview of paediatric and adult rheumatology care, accessibility of diagnostic procedures, the integration of electronic medical records, access to medications, the status of postgraduate education, research, and suggestions on how to enhance rheumatology services in AD as a destination for medical tourism.

Consensus-Based Recommendations for the Implementation of Health Technology Assessment in the United Arab Emirates.

OBJECTIVES: Healthcare research and development have accelerated at an unprecedented rate creating a challenge even for high-income countries to finance all new technologies. Health technology assessment (HTA) aims to maximize health gains out of available resources. Our study aimed to provide tailor-made recommendations for HTA implementation in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). METHODS: We conducted a policy survey to explore the gap between the current and preferred future environment of HTA implementation in the UAE. The survey was distributed in 2 workshops discussing the importance of HTA implementation, and results were further aggregated to yield a list of draft recommendations. Recommendations were then assessed for their feasibility in a round table discussion with experts in the field to generate actions for HTA implementation. RESULTS: Survey results and round table discussion indicated the need to leverage HTA for value-based decision making. Experts confirmed the unmet need for broader coverage of graduate and postgraduate HTA training with the aim of specific PhD programs in the UAE. Public funding for HTA appraisals and expanding the scope of HTA to nonpharmaceuticals was recommended. Furthermore, experts recommended that several HTA bodies should be coordinated centrally and highlighted the importance of having an explicit soft cost-effectiveness threshold for common technologies and a higher threshold for orphan drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Although HTA in the UAE is still in its early stages, strong initiatives are being taken for its implementation. Our survey results served as a step in developing a detailed action plan for HTA implementation that will enhance the sustainability of the healthcare system.

Development of the Emirates Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Tool for Orphan Drugs.

Background The number of orphan drug approvals is currently increasing globally. This creates a significant burden on payers and healthcare systems. This study aimed to create a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) tool for evaluating orphan drugs within the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The intended result of the tool is to provide evidence-based guidance to decision-makers in reimbursement and procurement decisions. Methods We conducted a literature search and local expert interviews to identify relevant preliminary criteria for the MCDA tool. Then we conducted a structured consensus-building session for healthcare experts and decision-makers in the UAE to develop the Emirati MCDA tool for orphan drugs. The experts voted for the criteria to be included in the tool and their ranking according to importance, as well as the weight of each criterion and its scoring function. To improve understanding and facilitate the voting process, experts were provided with a brief illustration of similar tools conducted in other countries before the voting sessions. Finally, the tool was developed in a Microsoft Excel sheet (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington, United States), and it was validated and tested based on real case studies, then it was fine-tuned accordingly based on the experts' discussions. The final tool was provided to the attendees to guide their decisions in the reimbursement and procurement of orphan drugs. Results The created tool provides a score for each analyzed orphan drug based on its value. Ten criteria were included in the final MCDA tool. These were cost-effectiveness (25.1% of the weight), magnitude of health gain (20.1%), availability of therapeutic alternative (14.3%), disease severity (11%), budget impact (7.9%), disease rarity (5.6%), strength of clinical evidence (5.6%), burden on households (4.5%), indication uniqueness (3.2%), and patients' age (2.6%). Conclusions Implementation of evidence-based healthcare necessitates assessing the fair value of each health technology. Addressing the high unmet medical needs and improving healthcare for patients with rare diseases are priorities within the UAE. The created Emirates MCDA tool for orphan drugs has the potential to help decision-makers implement value-based and evidence-based reimbursement decisions for orphan drugs.

Consensus-Based Overarching Principles and Recommendations on the Use of Biosimilars in the Treatment of Inflammatory Arthritis in the Gulf Region.

BACKGROUND: Though biologic agents have significantly improved the treatment of inflammatory arthritis (rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and axial spondyloarthritis), high costs, stringent regulations, strict reimbursement criteria, and existing patents have limited patient access to treatments. While being highly similar in quality, safety, and efficacy to biologic reference products, biosimilars can reduce the financial burden and prevent underutilization of medication. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this initiative was to develop an evidence-based consensus of overarching principles and recommendations aimed at standardizing the use of biosimilars in treating inflammatory arthritis in the Gulf region. METHODS: A task force of practicing rheumatologists, a clinical pharmacist, a health economist, patients, regulators, and payors from across the Gulf region developed recommendations and overarching principles based on the outputs of a systematic literature review conducted to address Patient-Intervention-Comparison-Outcome (PICO) questions specific to key challenges regarding the use of biosimilars for the treatment of inflammatory arthritis in the region. As the data before 2017 have been previously reviewed in another publication, the current review focused on data published between January 2017 and August 2022 (PROSPERO ID CRD42022364002). Consensus on each statement required a level of agreement of 70% or greater. RESULTS: Consensus was reached for five overarching principles and nine recommendations by the task force. The principles emphasize the importance of improving the awareness, understanding, and perception of biosimilars, as well as the need for regulated regional real-world data generation and protocols to make biosimilars a viable and affordable treatment option for all patients. The consensus recommendations advocate the need for shared treatment decisions between rheumatologists and patients when considering biosimilars. They further recommend that confirmation of a biosimilar's efficacy and safety in a single indication is sufficient for extrapolation to other diseases for which the reference product has been approved. Finally, there is a need for pharmacovigilance and national health policies governing the adoption and prescription of biosimilars in clinical practice across the region. CONCLUSIONS: These are the first consensus recommendations for the Gulf region based on a systematic literature review and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, integrating clinical evidence with clinical expertise to optimize decision making for the use of biosimilars in patients with inflammatory arthritis. They were formulated based on predominantly international data because of the limited regional data and therefore can be generalized to serve as recommendations for healthcare professionals in other parts of the world.

Correction: Cardiac Arrhythmia and Heart Failure Shortly After Starting Romosozumab for Osteoporosis: A Case-Based Review.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.7759/cureus.50303.].

Paradoxical Psoriasis and Worsening Spondylitis Due to Secukinumab in a Patient With Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is an autoimmune disease primarily affecting the axial skeleton, with associated extra-musculoskeletal manifestations. Treatment strategies targeting cytokines tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin 17 (IL-17) have proven effective. However, paradoxical reactions, including paradoxical psoriasis and arthritis, have been reported in axSpA patients receiving TNF-α inhibitors. IL-17 inhibitors have been used as an alternative treatment option, but paradoxical reactions have also been rarely observed. This case report presents a 45-year-old man with axSpA who responded to infliximab for six years before discontinuing it due to secondary failure. After the washout period of infliximab, he was started on secukinumab but developed paradoxical psoriasis and worsening of inflammatory back pain after receiving the second loading dose which necessitated replacing it with upadacitinib. Complete resolution of paradoxical psoriasis and significant improvement in his back pain after three months ensued. This case contributes to understanding the complex dynamics in treating axSpA and managing paradoxical reactions.