Single-lateral cervical radiograph in pediatric trauma is equivalent to multiple views.

BACKGROUND: Cervical spine injuries (CSI) are rare within the pediatric population. Due to the significant consequences of missed CSI, children are often imaged excessively. In an attempt to decrease imaging of the cervical spine in children, we reviewed abnormal cervical radiographs (XR) to determine if the diagnosis of CSI could be made using a single-lateral cervical radiograph (LAT). Furthermore, we reviewed cervical computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to ensure there were no missed CSI. METHODS: Electronic medical records of trauma patients treated at a Level I Pediatric Trauma Center with abnormal XR findings followed by confirmatory CT or MRI between 2012 and 2017 were reviewed. All abnormal imaging on XR was compared with the LAT. In addition, all abnormal CTs and MRIs were reviewed to ensure there were no false negative XR. RESULTS: A total of 3,735 XR were performed with 26 abnormal interpretations. All bony CSI were visualized on LAT. Confirmatory imaging found 13 (50%) were false positive and 13 (50%) were true positive. Secondary analysis of CT identified 12 injuries with prior XR; 8 of 12 LAT identifying the injury and 4 of 12 false positive on CT. Secondary analysis of MRI identified nine injuries with prior XR; 5 of 9 LAT identifying the injury. The four false-negative reads on MRI were ligamentous injuries. CONCLUSION: Radiographs are commonly performed when evaluating CSI. In our population, initial assessment with a single LAT was equivalent to a multiple view XR. On secondary review, the only false-negative LAT reports were due to ligamentous injuries. This data suggests limiting exposure to LAT would accomplish the goal of reducing imaging without missing bony CSI and when ligamentous injury is suspected MRI should be the confirmatory study rather than CT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Test, level III.

Sequence of Pelvic Examination Affects Patient-Reported Pain.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this trial is to compare patient-reported pain based on the sequence of the pelvic examination and to assess the relationship between pain during the examination and quality of life, self-esteem, and sexual function. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial of women presenting for annual gynecologic examinations. Women were assigned to either group A: a Q-tip touch test, speculum examination, then bimanual examination or group B: Q-tip touch test, bimanual examination, then speculum examination. The primary outcome was visual analog scales to assess pain at baseline and after each portion of the examination. Secondary outcomes were responses to questionnaires for self-esteem, quality of life, and sexual function. RESULTS: Of 200 women who enrolled, 192 (96%) completed all visual analog scale data points. Each portion of the examination caused minimal pain over baseline in each group. Pain during the speculum examination was higher than pain during the bimanual examination in both groups (P = 0.007 and P < 0.001). Group B, however, had significantly higher pain scores after the speculum examination than group A (P = 0.044). The groups did not differ on bimanual pain scores (P = 0.76). Pain scores were not statistically different when analyzed by age, parity, sexual activity, sexual orientation, education, or previous hysterectomy. Within both groups, patients who documented having any pain after the speculum examination or the bimanual examination were also more likely to have lower quality of life scores (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Pain associated with the speculum examination was lower in those undergoing speculum before bimanual examination. Speculum pain was greater than bimanual pain in both groups. Most patients reported minimal or no pain during the different portions of the examination.