RESUMO
Our study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of buprenorphine for the management of acute post-surgical pain reported in published studies in the years 2015-2022. Comprehensive research was performed by using online resources like PUBMED and the Wiley Library database to gather the relevant literature. Two authors were assigned to independently collect the information. Cochran's Q-test and I square statistic were used to determine the heterogeneity across the studies. Publication bias was estimated by using the Egger regression analysis and found to be significantly present once the P value <0.05. In this review, 15 studies were included. The pooled ratio of pain reduction after 12 hours of surgery was reported as 11.2% with 97% heterogeneity. Day one shows 5.9 reductions in pain with 98% heterogeneity. The 3% more pain was reduced on day 2. The day 3 pooled pain reduction score was observed as 1.9%. The overall pool prevalence of pain reduction was noted as 6.2% at different time duration with significant heterogeneity of 100%. Buprenorphine transdermal and sublingual both have significant pain relief scores. The analgesic drug consumption was reduced at the end of the follow-up duration.
RESUMO
Background: Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) is a common complication among parturients who had undergone obstetric neuraxial block. Epidural blood patch is the current gold standard treatment for PDPH, although it is an invasive procedure. We conducted this systematic review to assess the efficacy of sphenopalatine ganglion block (SPGB) as a noninvasive treatment of PDPH. Methods: Relevant reports were searched from Google Scholar, PubMed, Science Direct, and Scopus from the inception of the databases to November 30, 2020. A total of 10 reports found to be related to SPGB for the treatment of PDPH in the obstetric population were enrolled. Significant relief of headache with no further intervention and initial relief of headache that requires further interventions were considered as the primary outcomes. The secondary outcome was the complications after SPGB. Results: A total of 68 patients were identified. We found that 41 of 68 patients (60.3%) had effective management with significant relief of headache with no further interventions needed. Moreover, a total of 27 of 68 patients (39.7%) had initially effective management that needed further interventions. The use of 2% lidocaine was found to be the most effective among all used local anesthetics with 85.7% effective management. Furthermore, parturients who developed PDPH after spinal anesthesia responded to SPGB better than other obstetric neuraxial techniques. Conclusions: This systematic review showed that SPGB is a promising treatment modality for the management of PDPH with no reported complications. Before recommending this technique for treating PDPH, we are calling for randomized clinical trials to prove its efficacy.
RESUMO
Ankle blocks are commonly used as surgical anesthetics and for postoperative analgesia during foot surgeries. It is chiefly an infiltration block which utilizes a localized anesthetic approach for providing surgical anaesthesia for a variety of foot procedures. Thus, in this systematic review, we focus primarily on the use, effectiveness, success and failures of regional ankle blocks in outpatient surgeries and hereby compare them with other anesthetic techniques and agents commonly used. Literature search was carried out using PubMed, Medline, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane Library for the studies existing till April 2021. Search was conducted by two independent reviewers separately keeping in view the structured format of the review. Data were thoroughly read and were extracted manually into a structured data extraction form. After going through the databases, 252 relevant articles were identified as per the search strategy. Among those 99 duplicate records were taken away. Among the remaining one hundred fifty-three records, one hundred thirty-eight records were excluded majorly going through their titles and abstracts. Next matching our inclusion criteria and going through the full texts, fifteen studies were excluded. Lastly, after excluding the reviews and case studies we included relevant 11 studies that compared the efficacy of ankle block in outpatient foot and ankle surgery in the present analysis. Seven studies used anatomic landmark guided (ALG) approach, three studies used ultrasound guided (USG) approach, while one study included both approaches. The results showed a significantly lower VAS score postoperatively at 24 hrs. It was observed that in general, immediately after surgery the VAS pain scores are low due to the continued analgesic effect provided by the ankle block. 0.25%-0.5% bupivacaine was the most common single long-acting local anesthetics used. Patient satisfaction ranged from 66%-95.8%. Major complications included block failure and consequent requirement of general anesthesia and few cases of transient nerve injuries. Therefore, this systematic review supports the fact that ankle block has advantages like excellent success rates with minimal side effects, high levels of patient satisfaction and decreased hospital expenses. Thus, it proves to be a safe and highly effective means of regional anesthesia for the majority of foot and ankle surgeries in outpatient settings.