Esophagectomy versus observation following endoscopic submucosal dissection of pT1b esophageal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Management following endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of pT1b esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) remains controversial. This study compared pathological and survival outcomes of patients after endoscopic resection (ER) of pT1b EAC followed by either en bloc esophagectomy or observation. METHODS: From 1/12 to 12/22, all patients with pT1b EAC treated with ER were identified from a prospectively maintained departmental database. ESD was curative (all of: Submucosal invasion < 500 µm; G1/2, LVI/PNI-; deep margin-) or non-curative (one or more of Submucosal invasion ≥ 500 µm; G3; LVI/PNI+; deep margin+). Patients were allocated to observation (OBS) or esophagectomy (SURG) based on patient factors/preference and pathological variables. RESULTS: 56/171 ERs met the inclusion criteria. ER was curative in 8/56 (14%) and non-curative in 48/56 (86%). OBS was undertaken after 8/27 (30%) curative and 19/27 (70%) non-curative resections. All 29 SURG patients had non-curative ERs and were younger, had lower Charlson comorbidity scores and had more deep margin + lesions than OBS patients. Post-esophagectomy, 15/29 (52%) had no residual disease within the surgical specimen while pT+N-/pT-N+/pT+N+ occurred in 5/3/6 (17%/10%/21%) patients. Of those with residual disease in the surgical specimen, 12/14 (86%) had deep margin + ERs; however, only ESD instead of EMR was independently associated with a lower risk of residual disease (OR 0.431, 95% CI - 0.016 to 1.234, p = 0.045). OBS and SURG patients had equivalent overall survival outcomes and recurrence was low in both groups even following non-curative ER. Follow-up was 28 months (0-102) and 30 months (0-97), respectively. CONCLUSION: In select patients, including some of those with a non-curative ESD resection of pT1B EAC, surveillance alone may be appropriate. Alternatives beyond traditional pathological features is needed to direct patient care more accurately.

Germline EGFR c.2527G > A (p.V843I) variant and familial lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Somatic epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathogenic variants have been identified and are routinely tested in the molecular diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as they represent a target for EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. However, germline variants in EGFR are much less frequently reported. CASE PRESENTATION: Herein, we report the case of a 46-year-old woman diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma who was found to harbor a rare germline missense variant in exon 21 of EGFR: NM_005228.5(EGFR):c.2527G>A (p.V843I). In the tumor, this variant (Cosmic ID COSV51767379) was accompanied by a secondary, known pathogenic EGFR variant in cis, also occurring in exon 21, c.2573T>G (p.L858R) (Cosmic ID 6224). Her mother was previously diagnosed with poorly differentiated lung carcinoma and her tumor was also found to harbour the p.V843I variant but no other pathogenic variants. Notably, the proband's sister, diagnosed with a lung carcinoma with sarcomatous features at age 44, did not carry this variant or any other somatic or germline EGFR variants. CONCLUSION: This is the second report of familial lung adenocarcinoma associated with the germline p.V843I variant, which remains classified as a variant of uncertain significance. The lack of segregation of this variant in the proband's affected sister illustrates the complexity with evaluating lung cancer predisposition factors. Currently, there is a paucity of data regarding the therapeutic outcomes of patients with tumors expressing this rare germline variant, therefore we propose an algorithm for the identification of at-risk individuals and families as the first step for their personalized management.

Medical students' logbook case loads do not predict final exam scores in surgery clerkship.

Purpose: To investigate the reliability of medical student logbook data in assessing student performance and predicting outcomes in an objective standardized clinical exam and a multiplechoice exam during surgery rotation. In addition, we examined the relationship between exam performance and the number of clinical tutors per student. Materials and methods: A retrospective review of the logbooks of first and third clinical year medical students at the Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, was undertaken during their surgery rotation during the academic year 2012-2013. Results: Logbooks of 184 students were reviewed and analyzed. There were 92 and 93 students in the first and third clinical years, respectively. We did not identify any correlation between the number of clinical encounters and clinical exam or multiple-choice exam scores; however, there was an inverse relationship between the number of clinical tutors encountered during a rotation and clinical exam scores. Conclusion: Overall, there was no correlation between the volume of self-reported clinical encounters and exam scores. Furthermore, an inverse correlation between the number of clinical tutors encountered and clinical exam scores was detected. These findings indicate a need for reevaluation of the way logbook data are entered and used as an assessment tool.