Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy in Persons With Human Immunodeficiency Virus-HCV Genotype 1 Coinfection Resulting in High Rate of Sustained Virologic Response and Variable in Normalization of Soluble Markers of Immune Activation.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) direct-acting antivirals are highly effective. Less is known about changes in markers of immune activation in persons with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in whom a sustained virologic response (SVR) is achieved. METHODS: We conducted a nonrandomized clinical trial of 12 or 24 weeks of paritaprevir-ritonavir-ombitasvir plus dasabuvir (PrOD) with or without ribavirin in persons with HCV-1/HIV coinfection suppressed with antiretroviral therapy. Plasma HCV, soluble CD14 (sCD14), interferon-inducible protein 10, soluble CD163 (sCD163), interleukin 6 (IL-6), interleukin 18, monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP-1), autotaxin (ATX), and Mac2-binding protein (Mac2BP) were measured over 48 weeks. RESULTS: Participants were treated with PrOD for 12 (n = 9) or 24 (n = 36) weeks; the SVR rate at 12 weeks was 93%. At baseline, cirrhosis was associated with higher ATX and MCP-1, female sex with higher ATX and IL-6, older age with higher Mac2BP, higher body mass index with higher ATX, and HIV-1 protease inhibitor use with higher sCD14 levels. In those with SVR, interferon-inducible protein 10, ATX, and Mac2BP levels declined by week 2, interleukin 18 levels declined by the end of treatment, sCD14 levels did not change, and sCD163, MCP-1, and IL-6 levels changed at a single time point. CONCLUSIONS: During HIV/HCV coinfection, plasma immune activation marker heterogeneity is in part attributable to age, sex, cirrhosis, body mass index, and/or type of antiretroviral therapy. HCV treatment with paritaprevir-ritonavir-ombitasvir plus dasabuvir is highly effective and is associated with variable rate and magnitude of decline in markers of immune activation. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02194998.

Raltegravir pharmacokinetics before and during treatment with ombitasvir, paritaprevir/ritonavir plus dasabuvir in adults with human immunodeficiency virus-1 and hepatitis C virus coinfection: AIDS Clinical Trials Group sub-study A5334s.

AIMS: AIDS Clinical Trials Group study A5334s evaluated the pharmacokinetics of raltegravir before and during combined administration of ombitasvir, paritaprevir/ritonavir, plus dasabuvir (OBV/PTV/r + DSV) and weight-based ribavirin in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfected adults. The pharmacokinetics of OBV/PTV/r + DSV during raltegravir coadministration were also characterized. METHODS: Adults living with HIV/HCV coinfection receiving steady-state raltegravir (400 mg twice daily) with 2 nucleos(t)ide analogues were enrolled. Pharmacokinetics of raltegravir were assessed prior to HCV therapy, and 4 weeks later following initiation of OBV/PTV/r (25/150/100 mg) once daily + DSV (250 mg) twice daily. Geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to compare the following: raltegravir pharmacokinetics with HCV therapy (week 4) vs before HCV therapy (week 0); OBV/PTV/r and DSV pharmacokinetics vs historical healthy controls; raltegravir pharmacokinetics at week 0 vs historical control adults living with HIV. RESULTS: Eight of 11 participants had decreased raltegravir exposures after initiation of HCV therapy. The GMRs (90% CI) for maximum concentration and area under the concentration-time curve of raltegravir with vs without HCV therapy were 0.68 (0.38-1.19) and 0.82 (0.58-1.17), respectively. Comparing OBV/PTV/r pharmacokinetics in healthy controls, A5334s study participants demonstrated generally lower maximum concentration and area under the concentration-time curve values by 41-82% and 4-73%, respectively. Raltegravir exposures tended to be higher in A5334s study participants compared to adults living with HIV. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of participants' plasma raltegravir exposures were lower after initiation of HCV therapy in coinfected adults; however, confidence intervals were wide.

Effects of metformin and rosiglitazone in HIV-infected patients with hyperinsulinemia and elevated waist/hip ratio.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of metformin and rosiglitazone, alone or in combination, on fat distribution, insulin sensitivity, and lipids in HIV-infected patients with insulin resistance and changes in fat distribution. METHODS: A total of 105 subjects were randomly assigned to receive metformin (500 mg twice a day increasing to 1000 mg twice a day after 2 weeks) with rosiglitazone placebo (Met/P, N = 26); rosiglitazone (4 mg/day) with metformin placebo (Rosi/P, N = 27); rosiglitazone (4 mg/day) plus metformin (500 mg twice a day increasing to 1000 mg twice a day after 2 weeks; Met/Rosi, N = 25); or dual placebo (P/P, N = 27) for 16 weeks. Efficacy assessments included oral glucose tolerance testing, abdominal computed tomography, whole-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and the measurement of fasting lipids and other biochemical indices. Safety was monitored throughout. Intent-to-treat analyses were performed using non-parametric methods. RESULTS: The median insulin area under the curve (AUC) decreased significantly compared with baseline in both groups randomly assigned to rosiglitazone (Rosi/P -25.7 microIU/ml, P = 0.012; Met/Rosi -17.7 microIU/ml, P = 0.002); and tended to decrease in the Met/P group (-11.1 microIU/ml, P = 0.058). The change in AUC with combination therapy was significant compared with placebo (P = 0.032). No treatment was associated with significant changes in visceral or subcutaneous abdominal fat. Leg fat increased in subjects on Rosi/P compared with placebo (+4.8 versus -8.3%, P = 0.034). Rosiglitazone, but not metformin, increased adiponectin but also increased LDL-cholesterol and decreased HDL-cholesterol. Gastrointestinal effects occurred frequently in subjects on metformin. CONCLUSION: Both treatments improved insulin sensitivity, but neither reduced visceral fat. Rosiglitazone may increase subcutaneous fat in some individuals.

Safety and efficacy of extended-release niacin for the treatment of dyslipidaemia in patients with HIV infection: AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study A5148.

BACKGROUND: Dyslipidaemia is very common in patients with HIV infection, but current therapies are often suboptimal. Since niacin may cause insulin resistance and hepatotoxicity, it has generally been avoided in this setting. METHODS: Non-diabetic male subjects (n=33) who had well-controlled HIV infection on antiretroviral therapy, fasting triglycerides > or =2.26 mmol/l and non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) > or =4.66 mmol/l received escalating doses of extended-release niacin (ERN) up to 2,000 mg nightly for up to 44 weeks. RESULTS: Fourteen subjects (42%) had pre-diabetes at entry. Twenty-three subjects (70%) received the maximum dose, eight (24%) received 1,500 mg. Niacin was well-tolerated. Only four subjects (12%) discontinued study treatment. There were small increases in fasting glycaemia and insulin resistance estimated by the homeostasis model assessment, but insulin resistance measures from the 2-h oral glucose tolerance test only transiently worsened. No subject developed persistent fasting hyperglycaemia; one had persistently elevated 2-h glucose >11.1 mmol/l. There were no significant changes in serum transaminases or uric acid. At week 48, the median change in fasting lipid levels in mmol/l (interquartile range) were: total cholesterol -0.21 (-1.35, -0.05), HDL-C +0.013 (-0.03,+0.28), non-HDL-C -0.49 (-1.37,+0.08) and triglycerides -1.73 (-3.68, -0.72). Favourable changes in large HDL and large very low density lipoprotein particle concentration were observed by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. CONCLUSIONS: ERN in doses up to 2,000 mg daily was safe, well-tolerated and efficacious in HIV-infected subjects with atherogenic dyslipidaemia. Increases in glycaemia and insulin resistance tended to be transient.

The effect of long-term storage on measured plasma lactate concentrations and prospective lactate results from a multicenter trial of antiretroviral therapy.

Plasma lactate measurements are typically performed in real time, limiting their usefulness in multicenter or longitudinal studies. To determine the stability of lactate specimens, blood was drawn in sodium fluoride/potassium oxalate tubes from 13 volunteers before and after 5 min of handgrip exercise to intentionally increase lactate concentrations. Plasma was stored at -70 degrees C. Aliquots were assayed in real time and after 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months. Real-time lactate concentrations measured at baseline ranged from 0.52 to 2.23 mmol/L before and from 2.91 to 11.04 mmol/L after handgrip exercise. Using a linear mixed model, the estimated change from baseline at month 24 was 1.67% (95% confidence interval, -0.70% to 4.03%) for pre-exercise samples and 0.39% (95% CI, -1.13% to 1.91%) for post-exercise samples. Stored serial specimens from 232 HIV-infected subjects in a multicenter trial of antiretroviral therapy were also assayed centrally. Among those, median plasma lactate increased from baseline to 64 weeks by 0.4 mmol/L with zidovudine+lamivudine treatment and by 0.6 mmol/L with didanosine+stavudine (each p<0.001 from baseline; p=0.04 for difference between groups over time). When performed as in this study, frozen storage with central batch lactate analysis is appropriate for prospectively collected samples in multicenter trials.