RESUMO
We examined longitudinal changes in BMD among women in the mid-life starting metformin. Study subjects were 57 years old (mean), and 36% were White. Women initiating metformin were similar to noninitiators. During the 3-year follow-up, BMD loss at all anatomic areas was similar between groups and in subgroups including baseline fasting blood glucose. PURPOSE/INTRODUCTION: Women with type 2 diabetes have higher bone mineral density (BMD), experience slower BMD loss, but have increased fracture risk. Data regarding the effect of metformin on BMD remain discordant. We examined longitudinal changes in BMD among women in the mid-life starting metformin. METHODS: Participants in the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN), a diverse community-based US cohort, with BMD measurements were evaluated. Propensity score matching helped balance baseline characteristics of metformin initiators versus noninitiators. Mixed model regression tested the change in BMD between groups. RESULTS: Subjects (n = 248) were 57.4 years old (mean), and 35.9% were White. Women initiating metformin (n = 124) were similar to noninitiators (n = 124) in age and race/ethnicity. During the median 3-year follow-up, BMD loss at all anatomic areas was similar between the metformin initiators and nonusers (all p > 0.3). Subgroup analyses including baseline fasting blood glucose showed no between-group differences. Initiation of metformin (vs. not) in peri-menopausal women was not associated with BMD changes. CONCLUSIONS: Women in the mid-life starting metformin had longitudinal changes in BMD very similar to other women not starting metformin.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Metformina , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Densidade Óssea , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Metformina/efeitos adversos , Glicemia , Saúde da MulherRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Calcium pyrophosphate deposition (CPPD) disease prevalence is similar to that of gout and osteoarthritis (OA), yet CPPD outcomes research greatly lags behind research in these other forms of arthritis. We compared validated patient-reported outcome measures in patients with CPPD vs gout and OA. METHODS: Patients with CPPD were recruited from Brigham and Women's Hospital from 2018 to 2022. Presence of CPPD manifestations (acute calcium pyrophosphate [CPP] crystal arthritis, chronic CPP inflammatory arthritis, and/or OA with CPPD) was confirmed by medical record review. Baseline surveys included the Gout Assessment Questionnaire version 2.0, modified to ask about "pseudogout" rather than "gout"; Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID-3); and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). We compared responses in patients with CPPD against published gout and OA cohort studies. RESULTS: Among 47 patients with CPPD, the mean age was 71.9 years and 51% were female. Sixty-eight percent had at least 1 episode of acute CPP crystal arthritis, 40% had chronic CPP inflammatory arthritis, and 62% had OA with CPPD. Pain visual analog scale scores during a flare were similar in CPPD (mean 6.8 [SD 1.9]) and gout (mean 6.7 [SD 2.6]; P = 0.78). Patients with CPPD reported significantly greater unmet treatment need than patients with gout (P = 0.04). RAPID-3 scores in CPPD (mean 8.1 [SD 5.6]) were lower than in gout (mean 12.1 [SD 6.2]; P < 0.01) and similar in OA (mean 6.8 [SD 6.1]; P = 0.30). Patients with CPPD had significantly worse WOMAC stiffness scores than patients with mild OA, and significantly better WOMAC function scores than patients with severe OA. CONCLUSION: Patients with CPPD may experience pain comparable to that in gout and OA and reported substantial unmet treatment needs.
Assuntos
Calcinose , Condrocalcinose , Gota , Osteoartrite , Humanos , Feminino , Idoso , Masculino , Pirofosfato de Cálcio , Gota/complicações , Gota/tratamento farmacológico , Osteoartrite/complicações , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo PacienteRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) collection between visits for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) could improve visit efficiency, reducing in-person visits for patients with stable symptoms while facilitating access for those with symptoms. We examined whether a mobile health PRO application integrated in the electronic health record (EHR) could reduce visit volume for those with RA. METHODS: We developed an application for RA that prompted patients every other day to complete brief PRO questionnaires. Results of the application were integrated into the EHR. We tested the application in a controlled interrupted time-series analysis between 2020 and 2023. Rheumatologists received EHR-based messages based on PRO results recommending the patient receive a visit earlier or later than scheduled. The primary outcome was monthly visit volume during the year before versus the year after initiation. RESULTS: A total of 150 patients with RA consented and used the application. The median age was 62 years, 83% were female, 7% had fewer than 2 years of disease, and 50% were seropositive; 150 controls were well matched. Among those in the application cohort, the estimated monthly median visit volume in the year before use of the application was 31.2 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 28.0-34.3); in controls, this was 30.4 (95% CI 27.3-33.6). In the year using the application, the estimated monthly visit volume was 36.8 (95% CI 33.4-40.3) compared to 38.7 (95% CI 35.2-42.3) in controls. The difference in the differences between the cohorts was not statistically significant (-2.7 visits, 95% CI -9.3 to 4.0). No differences were noted in flare rates or visit delays. CONCLUSION: In this initial trial of a PRO application intervention to improve visit efficiency, we found no association with reduced visit volume.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Many patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have difficulty finding clinicians to treat them because of workforce shortages. We developed an app to address this problem by improving care efficiency. The app collects patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and can be used to inform visit timing, potentially reducing the volume of low-value visits. We describe the development process, intervention design, and planned study for testing the app. METHODS: We employed user-centered design, interviewing patients and clinicians, to develop the app. To improve visit efficiency, symptom tracking logic alerts clinicians to PRO trends: worsening PROs generate alerts suggesting an earlier visit, and stable or improving PROs generate notifications that scheduled visits could be delayed. An interrupted time-series analysis with a nonrandomized control population will allow assessment of the impact of the app on visit frequency. RESULTS: Patient interviews identified several of the following needs for effective app and intervention design: the importance of a simple user interface facilitating rapid answering of PROs, the availability of condensed summary information with links to more in-depth answers to common questions regarding RA, and the need for clinicians to discuss the PRO data during visits with patients. Clinician interviews identified the following user needs: PRO data must be easy to view and use during the clinical workflow, and there should be reduced interval visits when PROs are trending worse. Some clinicians believed visits could be delayed for patients with stable PROs, whereas others raised concerns. CONCLUSION: PRO apps may improve care efficiency in rheumatology. Formal evaluation of an integrated PRO RA app is forthcoming.