RESUMO
There are remarks on diverse types of timber structures in the tropics. This paper examines several case histories in Sri Lanka, focusing on the culturally varied and ecologically diverse traditional buildings with wood used for construction. The main objective was to gather data and document the knowledge on wood preservation. Information was gathered through face-to-face interviews with 270 individuals' reference to 138 structures. A holistic analysis was performed to understand the techniques used to overcome the degradation mechanisms and state of conservation. The demographic profile of the informants was evaluated and cross-relationships on the tabulated data were analyzed by SPSS statistical software following the snow-balling sampling technique. There were three main preservation techniques identified from the open-ended questions namely, wood kept under smoke pits, wood kept under paddy field mud, and wood kept under the river banks. Preserving wood by keeping it under paddy field mud (49.62 %) was the highest recorded answer. The most obtained material matrix of preservation was plant origins (48.88 %). For generations, people have transmitted traditional and cultural practices through oral knowledge. The results conclude this knowledge places a high value on protecting construction technologies and applications while preserving biodiversity. Unfortunately, by today this technology has started extinct. The results revealed the importance of social norms and cultural perceptions as a set of valuable information that was practiced with a great history in a tropical country.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: To evaluate PSA levels and kinetic cutoffs to predict positive bone scans for men with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) cohort. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 531 bone scans of 312 clinically CRPC patients with no known metastases at baseline treated with a variety of primary treatment types in the SEARCH database. The association of patients' demographics, pathological features, PSA levels and kinetics with risk of a positive scan was tested using generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: A total of 149 (28%) scans were positive. Positive scans were associated with younger age (odds ratio (OR)=0.98; P=0.014), higher Gleason scores (relative to Gleason 2-6, Gleason 3+4: OR=2.03, P=0.035; Gleason 4+3 and 8-10: OR=1.76, P=0.059), higher prescan PSA (OR=2.11; P<0.001), shorter prescan PSA doubling time (PSADT; OR=0.53; P<0.001), higher PSA velocity (OR=1.74; P<0.001) and more remote scan year (OR=0.92; P=0.004). Scan positivity was 6, 14, 29 and 57% for men with PSA<5, 5-14.9, 15-49.9 and ⩾ 50 ng ml(-1), respectively (P-trend <0.001). Men with PSADT ⩾ 15, 9-14.9, 3-8.9 and <3 months had a scan positivity of 11, 22, 34 and 47%, correspondingly (P-trend <0.001). Tables were constructed using PSA and PSADT to predict the likelihood of a positive bone scan. CONCLUSIONS: PSA levels and kinetics were associated with positive bone scans. We developed tables to predict the risk of positive bone scans by PSA and PSADT. Combining PSA levels and kinetics may help select patients with CRPC for bone scans.