Complications of Medical Tourism in Aesthetic Surgery: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: As medical cost continues to rise, so has the use of medical tourism by patients as a more cost-effective alternative. While the upfront cost savings attract many unsuspecting patients from their country of origin, there are significant patient safety issues surrounding short- and long-term follow-up, as well as the management and cost of complications. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses on complications that presented after cosmetic surgeries performed abroad. The literature search was performed on October 18, 2022, using the databases of PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase. RESULTS: From the 44 studies that were included, 589 patients were identified who presented with complications after having a cosmetic procedure abroad. Infection was the most prevalent complication in this study followed by wound dehiscence, seroma/hematoma, and tissue necrosis. Ninety-eight percent of the infectious organisms were bacterial, and 81% of them were from the Mycobacterium genus. CONCLUSIONS: Cosmetic tourism is a global phenomenon. This systematic review highlights the nature of complications following cosmetic tourism, the surgeries that resulted in complications, the countries that the primary procedures took place in, and the countries of origin of the patients. To aid in reducing morbidity and mortality from cosmetic tourism, regulatory bodies should educate and empower the public to aid them in making educated medical conditions when seeking care.

Acantholytic Dyskeratosis Consistent With Grover's Disease After Letrozole Therapy.

We present a rare case of Grover's disease (GD) associated with letrozole therapy in a 66-year-old female with stage IV breast cancer. GD is a dermatological condition characterized by papulovesicular lesions typically found on the chest and trunk. While GD is linked to chemotherapeutic agents, its association with letrozole is not well documented. The patient presented with a pruritic rash on her neck, right arm, and trunk, initially misdiagnosed as contact dermatitis. Despite treatment with triamcinolone acetonide, the rash persisted. A subsequent punch biopsy confirmed acantholytic dyskeratosis consistent with GD. Discontinuation of letrozole and treatment with augmented betamethasone dipropionate resulted in significant improvement within four weeks. This case underscores the importance of considering drug-induced dermatological conditions in patients undergoing chemotherapy. While hypersensitivity drug eruptions typically present as morbilliform-patterned cutaneous eruptions, GD should be considered, especially in older patients with multiple medications. The incidence of GD following letrozole therapy is not well studied, making this case a valuable addition to the limited literature. In summary, recognizing and managing drug-induced skin conditions in cancer patients are crucial. This report contributes to our understanding of the potential association between letrozole and GD, emphasizing the need for further research in this area.