Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 207(1): 119-127, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38722442

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To report the prospective long-term outcome data of patients whose chemotherapy decision was guided by the EndoPredict test. METHODS: Patients with hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative early breast cancer with 0-3 positive lymph nodes were enrolled. The EndoPredict test was carried out on all tumor samples. Treatment compliance, local recurrence, distant metastases, and survival were evaluated. Associations of EPclin risk stratification with 5-year disease-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival were evaluated by time-to-event analysis. RESULTS: 368 consecutive patients were included in the analysis. Median follow-up was 8.2 years. EndoPredict allocated 238 (65%) in the low-risk and 130 (35%) patients in the high-risk group. Risk for disease recurrence or death in EPclin high-risk patients was twofold higher than in EPclin low-risk patients (hazard ratio [HR] 2.08; 95% CI 1.26-3.44; p = 0.004). EPclin low-risk patients had a 5-year disease-free survival of 95.3% (95% CI 92.6-98.0%). EPclin high-risk patients were at higher risk of developing distant metastases or death (HR 2.21; 95% CI 1.27-3.88; p = 0.005). EPclin high-risk patients who underwent chemotherapy had a 5-year DFS of 89.1% (95% CI 82.7-96.1%) in contrast to high-risk patients without chemotherapy (68.9%; 95% CI 56.2-84.5%; HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.23-0.95; p = 0.036). EPclin high-risk patients were at higher risk of experiencing distant metastases or death than EPclin low-risk patients regardless of menopausal status (premenopausal: HR 3.55; 95% CI 1.17-12.32; p = 0.025; postmenopausal: HR 1.92; 95% CI 0.99-3.7; p = 0.054). CONCLUSION: EndoPredict can guide decisions on adjuvant chemotherapy in early luminal breast cancer. EndoPredict risk stratification is also applicable in premenopausal women.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais , Neoplasias da Mama , Receptor ErbB-2 , Receptores de Estrogênio , Receptores de Progesterona , Humanos , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Mama/metabolismo , Feminino , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Idoso , Receptores de Estrogênio/metabolismo , Receptores de Progesterona/metabolismo , Biomarcadores Tumorais/metabolismo , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco/métodos , Prognóstico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Intervalo Livre de Doença
2.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 302(6): 1461-1467, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32902674

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Prospectively collected outcome data of patients (pts) whose adjuvant systemic therapy recommendation was based on the clinico-molecular test EndoPredict® (EP) are presented. METHODS: Pts with ER-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer with 0-3 positive lymph nodes were enrolled. The EP was carried out on all tumor samples. Pts were evaluated for treatment compliance, local recurrence, distant metastases and overall survival. Censored time-to-event outcomes were analysed by Cox proportional hazards models. Additional estimates of the event-free-survival were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Hypothesis testing was conducted on two-sided exploratory 5% significance levels. RESULTS: 373 consecutive pts were enrolled. EP classified 238 pts (63.8%) as low risk and 135 pts (36.2%) as high risk. Median follow-up was 41.6 months. Risk for disease recurrence or death in EPclin high-risk patients was twofold higher in comparison with EPclin low-risk patients (hazard ratio (HR) 2.05 (95% CI 0.85-4.96; p = 0.110). Patients with EPclin high risk were at significant higher risk of distant metastases than patients with EPclin low risk (HR 5.18; 95% CI 1.04-25.74; p = 0.0443). EPclin high-risk patients who actually underwent adjuvant CTX had a 3-year-DFS of 96.3% (95% CI 92.2-100) in contrast to EPclin high-risk patients without CTX (3-year-DFS: 91.5% (95% CI 82.7-100%); HR 0.32; 95% CI 0.10-1.05; p = 0.061). CONCLUSION: These first prospective outcome results show that EP, in clinical routine, is a valid clinico-molecular test, to predict DFS and to guide decision of adjuvant CTX use in ER-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer pts with 0-3 positive lymph nodes. Adjuvant CTX seems to be beneficial for EPclin high-risk patients.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Hormonais/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Receptores de Estrogênio/metabolismo , Adulto , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/metabolismo , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Características da Família , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Prospectivos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Breast ; 49: 101-107, 2020 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31786414

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Adjuvant chemotherapy decision in patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative breast cancer (BC) is challenging. Ki-67 is widely used for adjuvant therapy decision in BC. The multigene assay EndoPredict (EP) has shown to provide valid and additional information about the risk of recurrence compared to traditional pathological factors. In this study, we compared Ki-67 with EP assay generated risk groups. METHODS: We analyzed the results from prospective EP testing (n = 373) and tumor proliferation assessed by Ki-67 staining in luminal breast cancer. We statistically investigated the association of both parameters and probed for equivalence in risk stratification. RESULTS: Evaluation of Ki-67 was feasible in 307 (82%) BC specimens with known EP test results. The EPscore (now called 12-gene molecular score) delineated 140 low and 167 high scores. After combining the EPscore with pathological tumor stage and nodal status, we received 203 EPclin low-risk and 104 EPclin high-risk classifications. EPscore and EPclin were significantly associated with Ki-67 indices and tumor grade (p < 0.001). Overall, we observed a moderate correlation between Ki-67 and the EPscore (r = 0.63) as well as the EPclin score (r = 0.59). CONCLUSION: Ki-67 values above 25% partly overlap with EP test results and therefore indicate a high-risk profile. In these cases, the additional prognostic information from EP testing might be rather low. However, low and intermediate Ki-67 values (less than 25%) alone were not reliable in predicting a low risk EP profile, indicating that EP testing is useful in this subgroup.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/análise , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Tomada de Decisão Clínica/métodos , Testes Genéticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Antígeno Ki-67/análise , Adulto , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Feminino , Testes Genéticos/métodos , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Patologia Molecular/métodos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Receptores de Estrogênio , Medição de Risco/métodos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA