Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Abdom Radiol (NY) ; 42(5): 1556-1565, 2017 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28070656

RESUMO

Peri-procedural anticoagulant management hinges on the balance of hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications. The radiologist is tasked with accurately assessing the hemorrhagic risk for patients undergoing procedures, taking into account procedural bleeding rates, underlying coagulopathy based on lab tests, and use of anticoagulants. The purpose of this article is to provide a contemporary review of commonly used anticoagulants and, incorporating published evidence, review their management related to image-guided procedures.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Diagnóstico por Imagem , Hemorragia/prevenção & controle , Radiografia Intervencionista , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Humanos , Fatores de Risco
2.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 72(14): 1195-203, 2015 Jul 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26150569

RESUMO

PURPOSE: A failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) was conducted to analyze the clinical and operational processes leading to above-target International Normalized Ratios (INRs) in warfarin-treated patients receiving concurrent antimicrobial therapy. METHODS: The INRs of patients on long-term warfarin therapy who received a course of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, metronidazole, fluconazole, miconazole, or voriconazole (highly potentiating antimicrobials, or HPAs) between September 1 and December 31, 2011, were compared with patients on long-term warfarin therapy who did not receive any antimicrobial during the same period. A multidisciplinary team of physicians, pharmacists, and a systems analyst was then formed to complete a step-by-step outline of the processes involved in warfarin management and concomitant HPA therapy, followed by an FMEA. RESULTS: Patients taking trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, metronidazole, or fluconazole demonstrated a significantly increased risk of having an INR of >4.5. The FMEA identified 134 failure modes. The most common failure modes were as follows: (1) electronic medical records did not identify all patients receiving warfarin, (2) HPA prescribers were unaware of recommended warfarin therapy when HPAs were prescribed, (3) HPA prescribers were unaware that a patient was taking warfarin and that the drug interaction is significant, and (4) warfarin managers were unaware that an HPA had been prescribed for a patient. CONCLUSION: An FMEA determined that the risk of adverse events caused by concomitantly administering warfarin and HPAs can be decreased by preemptively identifying patients receiving warfarin, having a care process in place, alerting providers about the patient's risk status, and notifying providers at the anticoagulation clinic.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos/efeitos adversos , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Coagulação Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Análise do Modo e do Efeito de Falhas na Assistência à Saúde/métodos , Coeficiente Internacional Normatizado/métodos , Varfarina/efeitos adversos , Anti-Infecciosos/administração & dosagem , Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Coagulação Sanguínea/fisiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Interações Medicamentosas/fisiologia , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Varfarina/administração & dosagem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA