Bioequivalence of rimegepant, a small molecule CGRP receptor antagonist, administered as an oral tablet, a sublingual orally disintegrating tablet, and a supralingual orally disintegrating tablet: two phase 1 randomized studies in healthy adults.

BACKGROUND: Rimegepant is an orally administered small molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist indicated for the acute and preventive treatment of migraine. METHODS: Two single-center, phase 1, open-label, randomized bioequivalence studies were conducted in healthy adult non-smokers, aged 18-55 years. One study compared the rate and extent of absorption of the marketed formulation of rimegepant 75 mg orally disintegrating tablet (ODT) administered sublingually with rimegepant 75 mg oral tablet, an earlier development formulation; the second compared the rate and extent of absorption of 75 mg rimegepant ODT administered supralingually with rimegepant oral tablet. RESULTS: The ln-transformed geometric mean ratios for the area under the curve (AUC) from time 0 to the last available concentration time point (time t) (AUC0-t), AUC from time 0 to infinity (AUC0-inf), and maximum observed concentration (Cmax) of sublingual rimegepant ODT vs. rimegepant tablet were 97, 97, and 105%, respectively, and the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were all within the predefined range (80-125%) for bioequivalence. The ln-transformed geometric mean ratios for the AUC0-t and AUC0-inf of supralingual rimegepant ODT vs. rimegepant tablet were 98%, the 90% CIs were within the predefined range (80-125%), and the geometric mean ratio for Cmax was 103% with the 95% upper confidence bound for the scaled average bioequivalence criterion of -0.0575 (within-participant coefficient of variation for the reference for Cmax > 30%) for bioequivalence. CONCLUSIONS: Rimegepant 75 mg ODT, administered sublingually or supralingually, and rimegepant 75 mg oral tablet were bioequivalent.

Doravirine and the Potential for CYP3A-Mediated Drug-Drug Interactions.

Identifying and understanding potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are vital for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection. This article discusses DDIs between doravirine, a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), and cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) substrates and drugs that modulate CYP3A activity. Consistent with previously published in vitro data and DDI trials with the CYP3A substrates midazolam and atorvastatin, doravirine did not have any meaningful impact on the pharmacokinetics of the CYP3A substrates ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel. Coadministration of doravirine with CYP3A inhibitors (ritonavir or ketoconazole) increased doravirine exposure approximately 3-fold. However, these increases were not considered clinically meaningful. Conversely, previously published trials showed that coadministered CYP3A inducers (rifampin and rifabutin) decreased doravirine exposure by 88% and 50%, respectively (K. L. Yee, S. G. Khalilieh, R. I. Sanchez, R. Liu, et al., Clin Drug Investig 37:659-667, 2017 [https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-017-0513-4]; S. G. Khalilieh, K. L. Yee, R. I. Sanchez, R. Liu, et al., J Clin Pharmacol 58:1044-1052, 2018 [https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.1103]), while doravirine exposure following prior efavirenz administration led to an initial reduction in doravirine exposure of 62%, but the reduction became less pronounced with time (K. L. Yee, R. I. Sanchez, P. Auger, R. Liu, et al., Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e01757-16, 2017 [https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01757-16]). Overall, the coadministration of doravirine with CYP3A inhibitors and substrates is, therefore, supported by these data together with efficacy and safety data from clinical trials, while coadministration with strong CYP3A inducers, such as rifampin, cannot be recommended. Concomitant dosing with rifabutin (a CYP3A inducer less potent than rifampin) is acceptable if doravirine dosing is adjusted from once to twice daily; however, the effect of other moderate inducers on doravirine pharmacokinetics is unknown.

Characterisation of the absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and mass balance of doravirine, a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor in humans.

Absorption, distribution, metabolism and elimination of doravirine (MK-1439), a novel non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, were investigated. Two clinical trials were conducted in healthy subjects: an oral single dose [14 C]doravirine (350 mg, ∼200 µCi) trial (n = 6) and an intravenous (IV) single-dose doravirine (100 µg) trial (n = 12). In vitro metabolism, protein binding, apparent permeability and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) transport studies were conducted to complement the clinical trials. Following oral [14 C]doravirine administration, all of the administered dose was recovered. The absorbed dose was eliminated primarily via metabolism. An oxidative metabolite (M9) was the predominant metabolite in excreta and was the primary circulating metabolite (12.9% of circulating radioactivity). Following IV administration, doravirine clearance and volume of distribution were 3.73 L/h (95% confidence intervals (CI) 3.09, 4.49) and 60.5 L (95% CI 53.7, 68.4), respectively. In vitro, doravirine is not highly bound to plasma proteins (unbound fraction 0.24) and has good passive permeability. The metabolite M9 was generated by cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A)4/5-mediated oxidation. Doravirine was a P-gp substrate but P-gp efflux is not expected to play a significant role in limiting doravirine absorption or to be involved in the elimination of doravirine. In conclusion, doravirine is a low clearance drug, primarily eliminated by CYP3A-mediated metabolism.

Concentration-QTc and cardiac safety analysis of single and multiple zavegepant nasal spray doses in healthy participants to support approval.

Zavegepant is a novel gepant administered as a nasal spray approved in the United States at a 10 mg dose for the acute treatment of migraine with or without aura in adults. The cardiovascular safety of zavegepant nasal spray was assessed in both single-ascending dose (SAD) and multiple-ascending dose (MAD) studies in healthy participants. The SAD study included 72 participants (54 active/18 placebo) who received 0.1-40 mg zavegepant or placebo. The MAD study included 72 participants (56 active/16 placebo) who received 5-40 mg zavegepant or placebo for 1-14 days. Plasma zavegepant pharmacokinetics and electrocardiographic (ECG) parameters (Fridericia-corrected QT interval [QTcF], heart rate, PR interval, ventricular depolarization [QRS], T-wave morphology, and U-wave presence) were analyzed pre- and post-zavegepant administration. Using pooled data from the SAD and MAD studies, the relationship between time-matched plasma zavegepant concentrations and QTc interval was assessed using a linear mixed-effects model to evaluate the potential for QTc interval prolongation. Results showed that single and multiple doses of zavegepant had no significant impact on ECG parameters versus placebo, and there was no concentration-dependent effect on QTcF interval. The estimated slope of the plasma zavegepant concentration-QTcF model was -0.053 ms per ng/mL with a 90% confidence interval of -0.0955 to -0.0110 (p = 0.0415), which is not considered clinically meaningful. At doses up to four times the recommended daily dose, zavegepant does not prolong the QT interval to any clinically relevant extent.

Changes in lipoprotein subfraction concentration and composition in healthy individuals treated with the CETP inhibitor anacetrapib.

We investigated the effects of the cholesteryl ester (CE) transfer protein inhibitor anacetrapib (ANA) on plasma lipids, lipoprotein subfraction concentrations, and lipoprotein composition in 30 healthy individuals. Participants (n = 30) were randomized to ANA 20 mg/day, 150 mg/day, or placebo for 2 weeks. Changes in concentration of lipoprotein subfractions were assessed using ion mobility, and compositional analyses were performed on fractions separated by density gradient ultracentrifugation. ANA 150 mg/day versus placebo resulted in significant decreases in LDL-cholesterol (26%) and apo B (29%) and increases in HDL-cholesterol (82%). Concentrations of medium and small VLDL, large intermediate density lipoprotein (IDL), and medium and small LDL (LDL2a, 2b, and 3a) decreased whereas levels of very small and dense LDL4b were increased. There was enrichment of triglycerides and reduction of CE in VLDL, IDL, and the densest LDL fraction. Levels of large buoyant HDL particles were substantially increased, and there was enrichment of CE, apo AI, and apoCIII, but not apoAII or apoE, in the mid-HDL density range. Changes in lipoprotein subfraction concentrations and composition with ANA 20 mg/day were similar to those for ANA 150 mg/day but were generally smaller in magnitude. The impact of these changes on cardiovascular risk remains to be determined.

SAR studies on the central phenyl ring of substituted biphenyl oxazolidinone-potent CETP inhibitors.

SAR studies of the substitution effect on the central phenyl ring of the biphenyl scaffold were carried out using anacetrapib (9a) as the benchmark. The results revealed that the new analogs with substitutions to replace trifluoromethyl (9a) had a significant impact on CETP inhibition in vitro. In fact, analogs with some small groups were as potent or more potent than the CF(3) derivative for CETP inhibition. Five of these new analogs raised HDL-C significantly (>20mg/dL). None of them however was better than anacetrapib in vivo. The synthesis and biological evaluation of these CETP inhibitors are described.

Human Milk and Plasma Pharmacokinetics of Single-Dose Rimegepant 75 mg in Healthy Lactating Women.

Objective: Investigate whether rimegepant-an oral small molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist for the treatment of migraine-is excreted in human milk after a single 75 mg dose and characterize its concentration-time profile in the plasma and milk of healthy lactating women to determine the relative infant dose (RID). Methods: This open-label, single-center study enrolled healthy lactating women aged 18-40 years with a gestation of 37-42 weeks and uncomplicated delivery of a single healthy child ≥2 weeks (14 days) and ≤6 months before study drug administration. Plasma samples were collected 0, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours postdose; human milk samples were collected at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, and 36 hours. The milk:plasma drug concentration ratio was estimated as the ratio of the human milk:plasma areas under the curve. The RID (%) was calculated as 100 times the quotient of the body weight-normalized infant and maternal doses. Results: Subjects (N = 12) were enrolled between 25 January and 15 September 2020. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) age was 29.8 (3.6) years; mean (SD) body mass index was 26.8 (4.9) kg/m2. The mean (SD) RID of rimegepant was 0.51% (0.14). The mean (SD) body-weight normalized infant dose was 0.005 (0.001) mg/kg/day, the mean (SD) body-weight normalized maternal dose was 1.04 (0.18) mg/kg/day, and mean (SD) maternal body weight was 74.0 (13.3) kg. Conclusion: On a weight-adjusted basis, the mean RID of rimegepant was <1% of the maternal dose.

P-Glycoprotein and Breast Cancer Resistance Protein Transporter Inhibition by Cyclosporine and Quinidine on the Pharmacokinetics of Oral Rimegepant in Healthy Subjects.

Rimegepant (Nurtec ODT)-an orally administered, small-molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist indicated for the acute and preventive treatment of migraine-is a substrate for both the P-glycoprotein and breast cancer resistance protein transporters in vitro. We evaluated the effects of concomitant administration of strong inhibitors of these transporters on the pharmacokinetics of rimegepant in healthy subjects. This single-center, open-label, randomized study was conducted in 2 parts, both of which were 2-period, 2-sequence, crossover studies. Part 1 (n = 15) evaluated the effect of a single oral dose of 200-mg cyclosporine, a strong inhibitor of the P-glycoprotein and breast cancer resistance protein transporters, on the pharmacokinetics of rimegepant 75 mg. Part 2 (n = 12) evaluated the effect of a single oral dose of 600-mg quinidine, a strong selective P-glycoprotein transporter, on the pharmacokinetics of rimegepant 75 mg. Coadministration with cyclosporine showed an increase in rimegepant area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity and maximum observed concentration based on geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals [CIs]) of 1.6 (1.49-1.72) and 1.41 (1.27-1.57), respectively, versus rimegepant alone. Coadministration with quinidine showed an increase in rimegepant area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity and maximum observed concentration geometric mean ratios (90% CIs) of 1.55 (1.40-1.72) and 1.67 (1.46-1.91), respectively, versus rimegepant alone. Strong P-glycoprotein inhibitors (cyclosporine, quinidine) increased rimegepant exposures (>50%, <2-fold). In parts 1 and 2, rimegepant coadministration was well tolerated and safe. The similar effect of cyclosporine and quinidine coadministration on rimegepant exposure suggests that inhibition of breast cancer resistance protein inhibition may have less influence on rimegepant exposure.

The PET tracer [11C]MK-6884 quantifies M4 muscarinic receptor in rhesus monkeys and patients with Alzheimer's disease.

Positron emission tomography (PET) ligands play an important role in the development of therapeutics by serving as target engagement or pharmacodynamic biomarkers. Here, we describe the discovery and translation of the PET tracer [11C]MK-6884 from rhesus monkeys to patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). [3H]MK-6884/[11C]MK-6884 binds with high binding affinity and good selectivity to an allosteric site on M4 muscarinic cholinergic receptors (M4Rs) in vitro and shows a regional distribution in the brain consistent with M4R localization in vivo. The tracer demonstrates target engagement of positive allosteric modulators of the M4R (M4 PAMs) through competitive binding interactions. [11C]MK-6884 binding is enhanced in vitro by the orthosteric M4R agonist carbachol and indirectly in vivo by the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor donepezil in rhesus monkeys and healthy volunteers, consistent with its pharmacology as a highly cooperative M4 PAM. PET imaging of [11C]MK-6884 in patients with AD identified substantial regional differences quantified as nondisplaceable binding potential (BPND) of [11C]MK-6884. These results suggest that [11C]MK-6884 is a useful target engagement biomarker for M4 PAMs but may also act as a sensitive probe of neuropathological changes in the brains of patients with AD.

Effect of raltegravir on estradiol and norgestimate plasma pharmacokinetics following oral contraceptive administration in healthy women.

AIMS: Oral contraceptives such as norgestimate-ethinyl estradiol (Ortho Tri-Cyclen®) are commonly prescribed in the HIV-infected patient population. A placebo-controlled, randomized, two-period crossover study in healthy HIV-seronegative subjects was conducted to assess the effect of raltegravir on the pharmacokinetics of the estrogen and progestin components of norgestimate-ethinyl estradiol [ethinyl estradiol (EE) and norelgestromin (NGMN), an active metabolite of norgestimate (NGT)]. METHODS: In each of two periods, nineteen healthy women established on norgestimate-ethinyl estradiol contraception (21 days of active contraception; 7 days of placebo) received either 400 mg raltegravir or matching placebo twice daily on days 1-21. Pharmacokinetics were analysed on day 21 of each period. RESULTS: The geometric mean ratio (GMR) and 90% confidence interval (CI) for the EE component of norgestimate-ethinyl estradiol when co-administrated with raltegravir relative to EE alone was 0.98 (0.93-1.04) for the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC(0-24 h) ) and 1.06 (0.98-1.14) for the maximum concentration of drug in the plasma (C(max) ); the GMR (90% CI) for the NGMN component of norgestimate-ethinyl estradiol when co-administered with raltegravir relative to NGMN alone was 1.14 (1.08-1.21) for AUC(0-24 h) and 1.29 (1.23-1.37) for C(max) . There were no discontinuations due to a study drug-related adverse experience, nor any serious clinical or laboratory adverse experience. CONCLUSIONS: Raltegravir has no clinically important effect on EE or NGMN pharmacokinetics. Co-administration of raltegravir and an oral contraceptive containing EE and NGT was generally well tolerated; no dose adjustment is required for oral contraceptives containing EE and NGT when co-administered with raltegravir.

2-(4-Carbonylphenyl)benzoxazole inhibitors of CETP: attenuation of hERG binding and improved HDLc-raising efficacy.

The development of 2-phenylbenzoxazoles as inhibitors of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) is described. Efforts focused on finding suitable replacements for the central piperidine with the aim of reducing hERG binding: a main liability of our benchmark benzoxazole (1a). Replacement of the piperidine with a cyclohexyl group successfully attenuated hERG binding, but was accompanied by reduced in vivo efficacy. The approach of substituting a piperidine moiety with an oxazolidinone also attenuated hERG binding. Further refinement of this latter scaffold via SAR at the pyridine terminus and methyl branching on the oxazolidinone led to compounds 7e and 7f, which raised HDLc by 33 and 27mg/dl, respectively, in our transgenic mouse PD model and without the hERG liability of previous series.

2-(4-carbonylphenyl)benzoxazole inhibitors of CETP: scaffold design and advancement in HDLc-raising efficacy.

The development of 2-phenylbenzoxazoles as inhibitors of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) is described. Initial efforts aimed at engineering replacements for the aniline substructures in the benchmark molecule. Reversing the connectivity of the central aniline lead to a new class of 2-(4-carbonylphenyl)benzoxazoles. Structure-activity studies at the C-7 and terminal pyridine ring allowed for the optimization of potency and HDLc-raising efficacy in this new class of inhibitors. These efforts lead to the discovery of benzoxazole 11v, which raised HDLc by 24 mg/dl in our transgenic mouse PD model.

2-Arylbenzoxazoles as CETP inhibitors: raising HDL-C in cynoCETP transgenic mice.

We describe structure-activity studies leading to the discovery of 2-arylbenzoxazole 3, the first in a series to raise serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in transgenic mice. Replacement of the 4-piperidinyloxy moiety with piperazinyl provided a more synthetically tractable lead, which upon optimization resulted in compound 4, an excellent inhibitor of cholesteryl ester transfer protein function with good pharmacokinetic properties and in vivo efficacy.

2-Arylbenzoxazoles as CETP inhibitors: Substitution of the benzoxazole moiety.

A series of 2-arylbenzoxazole inhibitors of the cholesterol ester transfer protein (CETP) is described. Structure-activity studies focused on variation of the substitution of the benzoxazole moiety. Substitution at the 5- and 7-positions of the benzoxazole moiety was found to be beneficial for CETP inhibition. Compound 47 was found to be the most potent inhibitor in this series and inhibited CETP with an IC(50) of 28nM.

2-Arylbenzoxazoles as CETP inhibitors: substitution and modification of the alpha-alkoxyamide moiety.

The development of a series of 2-arylbenzoxazole alpha-alkoxyamide and beta-alkoxyamine inhibitors of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) is described. Highly fluorinated alpha-alkoxyamides proved to be potent inhibitors of CETP in vitro, and the highly fluorinated 2-arylbenzoxazole beta-alkoxyamine 4 showed a desirable combination of in vitro potency (IC(50)=151 nM) and oral bioavailability in the mouse.

Design of a novel class of biphenyl CETP inhibitors.

A new class of CETP inhibitors was designed and prepared. These compounds are potent both in vitro and in vivo. The most active compound (12d) has shown an ability to raise HDL significantly in transgenic mouse PD model.

A Pharmacokinetic Bioequivalence Study Comparing Sublingual Riluzole (BHV-0223) and Oral Tablet Formulation of Riluzole in Healthy Volunteers.

Orally administered riluzole extends survival in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, although it has significant shortcomings (eg, adverse events, dysphagic patients) that limit its utility. BHV-0223 is a Zydis-based orally disintegrating formulation of riluzole designed for sublingual administration that addresses the limitations of conventional tablets. This study assessed the bioequivalence between 40-mg BHV-0223 and standard 50-mg oral riluzole tablets, and the food effect on BHV-0223 pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers. Overall, 133 healthy subjects received BHV-0223 and riluzole tablets under fasted conditions. Geometric mean ratios for the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to time of last nonzero concentration (AUC0-t ) (89.9%; confidence interval [CI], 87.3%-92.5%), AUC from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞ ) (89.8%; CI, 87.3%-92.4%), and maximum observed concentration (112.7%; CI, 105.5%-120.4%) all met bioequivalence criteria (80%-125%). Subsequently, 67 subjects received BHV-0223 under fed conditions. The geometric mean ratios of AUC0-t (91.2%; CI, 88.1-94.3%), and AUC0-∞ (92.0%; CI, 89.0-95.1%) were similar, but maximum observed concentration ratios were not within bioequivalence criteria. BHV-0223 was well tolerated. This study demonstrated that 40-mg sublingual BHV-0223 is bioequivalent to 50-mg oral riluzole tablets.

No meaningful drug interactions with doravirine, lamivudine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate coadministration.

BACKGROUND: Doravirine (DOR) is a novel non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor available as a single tablet and a three-drug combination with lamivudine (3TC) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) to treat HIV-1 infection. These analyses assessed pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions with coadministration. METHODS: Two trials were conducted. Study 1: two-period, fixed-sequence; eight healthy participants; Period 1, DOR 100 mg followed by ≥7-day washout; Period 2, TDF 300 mg once daily for 18 days, coadministration of DOR 100 mg on day 14. Study 2: three-period, crossover, 15 healthy participants; Treatment A, DOR 100 mg; Treatment B, 3TC 300 mg + TDF 300 mg; Treatment C, DOR 100 mg + 3TC 300 mg + TDF 300 mg; ≥7-day washout between periods. RESULTS: Study 1: geometric mean ratios (GMRs; 90% confidence interval [CI]) of DOR area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞) and observed plasma concentrations at 24 h post-dose (C24 h; DOR+TDF/DOR) were 0.95 (0.80, 1.12) and 0.94 (0.78, 1.12), respectively. Study 2: GMRs (90% CI) of DOR AUC0-∞ and C24 h (DOR+3TC+TDF/DOR) were 0.96 (0.87, 1.06) and 0.94 (0.83, 1.06), respectively. GMRs (90% CI) of 3TC and tenofovir AUC0-∞ (DOR+3TC+TDF/3TC+TDF) were 0.94 (0.88, 1.00) and 1.11 (0.97, 1.28), respectively. Study drugs were generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple doses of TDF did not have a clinically meaningful effect on DOR PK. The PK of DOR were similar when administered alone or in combination with 3TC and TDF. DOR had no meaningful effect on the PK of 3TC and tenofovir.

Minimal pharmacokinetic interaction between the human immunodeficiency virus nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor etravirine and the integrase inhibitor raltegravir in healthy subjects.

Etravirine, a next-generation nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, and raltegravir, an integrase strand transfer inhibitor, have separately demonstrated potent activity in treatment-experienced, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients. An open-label, sequential, three-period study with healthy, HIV-seronegative subjects was conducted to assess the two-way interaction between etravirine and raltegravir for potential coadministration to HIV-infected patients. In period 1, 19 subjects were administered 400 mg raltegravir every 12 h (q12 h) for 4 days, followed by a 4-day washout; in period 2, subjects were administered 200 mg etravirine q12 h for 8 days; and in period 3, subjects were coadministered 400 mg raltegravir and 200 mg etravirine q12 h for 4 days. There was no washout between periods 2 and 3. Doses were administered with a moderate-fat meal. Etravirine had only modest effects on the pharmacokinetics of raltegravir, while raltegravir had no clinically meaningful effect on the pharmacokinetics of etravirine. For raltegravir coadministered with etravirine relative to raltegravir alone, the geometric mean ratio (GMR) and 90% confidence interval (CI) were 0.90 and 0.68 to 1.18, respectively, for the area under the concentration curve from 0 to 12 h (AUC(0-12)), 0.89 and 0.68 to 1.15, respectively, for the maximum concentration of drug in serum (C(max)), and 0.66 and 0.34 to 1.26, respectively, for the trough drug concentration (C(12)); the GMR (90% CI) for etravirine coadministered with raltegravir relative to etravirine alone was 1.10 (1.03, 1.16) for AUC(0-12), 1.04 (0.97, 1.12) for C(max), and 1.17 (1.10, 1.26) for C(12). All drug-related adverse clinical experiences were mild and generally transient in nature. No grade 3 or 4 adverse experiences or discontinuations due to adverse experiences occurred. Coadministration of etravirine and raltegravir was generally well tolerated; the data suggest that no dose adjustment for either drug is necessary.

Effect of the cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor, anacetrapib, on lipoproteins in patients with dyslipidaemia and on 24-h ambulatory blood pressure in healthy individuals: two double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled phase I studies.

BACKGROUND: The inhibition of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) is considered a potential new mechanism for treatment of dyslipidaemia. Anacetrapib (MK-0859) is a CETP inhibitor currently under development. We aimed to assess anacetrapib's effects as monotherapy on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and on 24-h ambulatory blood pressure. METHODS: We did two double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase I studies. In the first study, 50 patients with dyslipidaemia (LDL-C 100-190 mg/dL; 40 active, 10 placebo) aged 18-75 years received anacetrapib doses of 0, 10, 40, 150, or 300 mg orally once a day with a meal for 28 days. Standard lipid and lipoprotein monitoring, safety monitoring, and anacetrapib concentrations for pharmacokinetics were done. In the second study, 22 healthy participants aged 45-75 years received either 150 mg of anacetrapib once a day or matching placebo with a meal for 10 days in each crossover period, in a randomised sequence, with at least a 14-day washout between the treatment periods. Continuous 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was done on day -1 and day 10 of each treatment period in this study. The primary or secondary endpoints of safety and tolerability were assessed in both studies by monitoring clinical adverse experiences, physical examinations, vital signs, 12-lead electrocardiogram, and laboratory safety. Analysis was per protocol. These trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00565292 and NCT00565006. FINDINGS: In the dyslipidaemia study, one patient withdrew consent and one was excluded from the data analysis for HDL-C and LDL-C because complete pre-dose measurements were not available. Anacetrapib produced dose-dependent lipid-altering effects with peak lipid-altering effects of 129% (mean 51.1 [SD 3.8]-114.9 [7.9] mg/dL) increase in HDL-C and a 38% (138.2 [11.4]-77.6 [7.9] mg/dL) decrease in LDL-C in patients with dyslipidaemia. In the 24-h ambulatory blood pressure study in healthy individuals, least squares difference between anacetrapib and placebo groups on day 10 were 0.60 (90% CI -1.54 to 2.74; p=0.634) mm Hg for systolic blood pressure and 0.47 (90% CI -0.90 to 1.84; p=0.561) mm Hg for diastolic blood pressure. INTERPRETATION: Anacetrapib seems to exhibit HDL-C increases greater than those seen with other investigational drugs in this class and LDL-C lowering effects similar to statins. Despite greater lipid-altering effects relative to other members of this class, anacetrapib seems not to increase blood pressure, suggesting that potent CETP inhibition by itself might not lead to increased blood pressure.