RESUMO
This manuscript provides an overview of the principles and requirements for implementing the ERAS program in thoracic surgery.The ERAS program optimises perioperative management of elective lung resection procedures and is based on the ERAS Guidelines for Thoracic Surgery of the ERAS Society. The clinical measures are described as in the current literature, with a focus on postoperative outcome. There are currently 45 enhanced recovery items covering four perioperative phases: from the prehospital admission phase (patient education, screening and treatment of potential risk factors such as anaemia, malnutrition, cessation of nicotine or alcohol abuse, prehabilitation, carbohydrate loading) to the immediate preoperative phase (shortened fasting period, non-sedating premedication, prophylaxis of PONV and thromboembolic complications), the intraoperative measures (antibiotic prophylaxis, standardised anaesthesia, normothermia, targeted fluid therapy, minimally invasive surgery, avoidance of catheters and probes) through to the postoperative measures (early mobilisation, early nutrition, removal of a urinary catheter, hyperglycaemia control). Most of these measures are based on scientific studies, with a high level of evidence and aim to reduce general postoperative complications.The ERAS program is an optimised perioperative treatment approach aiming to improve the postoperative recovery in patients after elective lung resection by reducing the overall complication rates and overall morbidity.
RESUMO
If mediastinal tumours cause symptoms these are related to their anatomical localization or a paraneoplastic syndrome. The differential diagnosis is based on the clinical situation with finding the lesion, and, furthermore, taking into account the age and sex of the patient, and the mediastinal compartment where the lesion is located. Cross-sectional radiographic diagnostic is essential for defining the therapeutic strategy. The anterior mediastinum is dominated by thymic tumours, mediastinal lymphomas, germ cell tumours and ectopic mediastinal poiters. The middle mediastinal compartment is the most frequent place of mediastinal cystic tumours, whereas the posterior mediastinum is the domain of neurogenic tumours. For selected cases a tissue biopsy is required. Surgery is the mainstay for most mediastinal tumours. Median sternotomy is the most frequent conventional surgical technique while minimally invasive surgery with thoracoscopic and above all robot assisted operation techniques are increasingly frequent. Combined chemotherapy and modern radiotherapy are essential components of the comprehensive treatment for mediastinal tumours.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Mediastino , Timoma , Neoplasias do Timo , Estudos Transversais , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Neoplasias do Mediastino/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Mediastino/patologia , Neoplasias do Mediastino/cirurgia , Timoma/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Timo/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Timo/cirurgiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND, OBJECTIVES: In recent years, ERAS treatment pathways have found their way into many surgical fields, as they reduce complications and accelerate postoperative recovery. For thoracic surgery, the first ERAS guidelines were published by the ERAS Society and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) in 2019. We have now evaluated how ERAS-items are implemented in clinical practice by using an online survey. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An online survey was conducted from 12/5/2021 until 1/6/2021. The survey consisted of 22 questions focusing on the key elements of an ERAS program according to the published ERAS guidelines. Results were summarised, descriptively analysed and put into context with the current literature. RESULTS: Of 155 thoracic surgeons, 32 responded to the survey. In 28.1% (n = 9) of the hospitals, an ERAS core unit was established, and a database to record the ERAS items existed in 15.6% (n = 5). Only 3.1% (n = 1) kept an ERAS-diary preoperatively. A so-called Carboloading was conducted at 15.6% (n = 5) of surgeons. Standard PONV prophylaxis was administered to 59.4% (n = 19) of the patients. In most cases (84.4%, n = 29), a single drain was inserted into the pleural cavity during anatomic resections. In 3% (n = 1) of the centres two drains, in 12.5% (n = 4) no drainage was placed. The most commonly applied initial suction was -10 cmH2O (75%, n = 24). Suction ≤ 2 cmH2O was used by only two of those interviewed. Drainage removal took place in 50% (n = 16) of cases between the 1st or 2nd POD, in 34.4% of cases (n = 11) between the 3rd and 4th POD and in 9.4% (n = 3) the drain remained longer than the 4th POD. The first postoperative mobilisation took place in 71.9% (n = 23) of the centres on the day of the operation. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of ERAS guidelines varies in Germany between centres. Certain perioperative processes are covered sufficiently, but the implementation of key features of ERAS is yet to be fully established in clinical practice. The first steps in this direction have already been taken and lay the foundation for cooperation across centres.
Assuntos
Cirurgiões , Cirurgia Torácica , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Torácicos , Alemanha , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Inquéritos e Questionários , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Torácicos/efeitos adversosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the perioperative and midterm oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) extended thymectomy for patients with large resectable thymomas compared to small thymomas. METHODS: This retrospective single-center study included 204 thymoma patients who underwent RATS extended thymectomy between January 2003 and February 2024. Patients were divided into two groups based on the thymoma size (5cm threshold). RESULTS: The study comprised 114 patients (55.9%) in the small thymoma (ST) group and 90 patients (44.1%) in the large thymoma (LT) group. No significant differences were found between the groups regarding gender, age, proportion of elderly patients, or pathologic high-risk classifications. Apart from a longer operative time (p=0.009) in the LT group, no differences were observed between the two groups regarding surgical parameters and postoperative outcomes. No deaths occurred within 30 days in either group. During a median follow-up of 61.0 months (95% CI: 48.96-73.04), four patients experienced recurrence (1.96%). No significant differences in the five-year overall survival (OS) rate (p=0.25) or recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate (p=0.43) were observed between groups. CONCLUSIONS: RATS extended thymectomy is technically feasible, safe, and effective for treating large resectable thymomas. Moreover, midterm outcomes for patients with completely resected large thymomas were comparable to those with small thymomas during a median follow-up period of up to five years.