Making Choices: A Multi-institutional, Longitudinal Cohort Study Assessing Changes in Treatment Outcome Valuation for Low-Risk Thyroid Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relative importance of treatment outcomes to patients with low-risk thyroid cancer (TC). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Overuse of total thyroidectomy (TT) for low-risk TC is common. Emotions from a cancer diagnosis may lead patients to choose TT resulting in outcomes that do not align with their preferences. METHODS: Adults with clinically low-risk TC enrolled in a prospective, multi-institutional, longitudinal cohort study from 11/2019-6/2021. Participants rated treatment outcomes at the time of their surgical decision and again 9 months later by allocating 100 points amongst 10 outcomes. T-tests and Hotelling's T 2 statistic compared outcome valuation within and between subjects based on chosen extent of surgery (TT vs. lobectomy). RESULTS: Of 177 eligible patients, 125 participated (70.6% response) and 114 completed the 9-month follow-up (91.2% retention). At the time of the treatment decision, patients choosing TT valued the risk of recurrence more than those choosing lobectomy and the need to take thyroid hormone less ( P <0.05). At repeat valuation, all patients assigned fewer points to cancer being removed and the impact of treatment on their voice, and more points to energy levels ( P <0.05). The importance of the risk of recurrence increased for those who chose lobectomy and decreased for those choosing TT ( P <0.05). CONCLUSION: The relative importance of treatment outcomes changes for patients with low-risk TC once the outcome has been experienced to favor quality of life over emotion-related outcomes. Surgeons can use this information to discuss the potential for asthenia or changes in energy levels associated with total thyroidectomy.

Behavioral Interventions on Surgeons' Preoperative Decision-Making: A Scoping Review and Critical Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Consensus is lacking regarding the optimal strategy to influence surgeons' behaviors to reduce low-value surgical care. Comprehensively describing the existing body of literature that seeks to intervene on surgeons' preoperative decision-making may aid in structuring future behavior change strategies. METHODS: We performed a scoping review using four databases (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, Embase, Web of Science, and Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) for articles that tested the effect of behavioral-based interventions on any aspect of surgeons' decision-making in the preoperative setting. Abstracted data were characterized by summative descriptions and analyzed using the Tailored Implementation for Chronic Disease framework, mapping aspects of deimplementation strategies in the studies onto the determinant(s) that they altered. Data abstraction and mapping tools were piloted and iteratively revised before two researchers independently assessing studies and categorizing determinants, and then meeting to discuss their decisions. RESULTS: There were 1460 articles identified from the initial search, with 17 full text articles ultimately included in the scoping review. Eight studies relied on a multidisciplinary preoperative conference to accomplish their aims, while five were multifaceted in their approach to deimplementation, and four studies used only a clinical decision support tool to accomplish their aims. Mapping determinants addressed in these studies onto the Tailored Implementation for Chronic Disease framework demonstrated that most strategies attempted to close knowledge gaps, leverage communication between providers, and broadcast institutional prioritization of change. CONCLUSIONS: There is a small but growing field of implementation and deimplementation strategies in preoperative surgical decision-making, and different approaches may be equally effective in varied clinical contexts. Deliberate measurement and comparison of outcomes, as well as selection of control groups, are areas for improvement in future work.

Targets for De-implementation of Unnecessary Testing Before Low-Risk Surgery: A Qualitative Study.

INTRODUCTION: Despite multispecialty recommendations to avoid routine preoperative testing before low-risk surgery, the practice remains common and de-implementation has proven difficult. The goal of this study as to elicit determinants of unnecessary testing before low-risk surgery to inform de-implementation efforts. METHODS: We conducted focused ethnography at a large academic institution, including semi-structured interviews and direct observations at two preoperative evaluation clinics and one outpatient surgery center. Themes were identified through narrative thematic analysis and mapped to a comprehensive and integrated checklist of determinants of practice, the Tailored Implementation for Chronic Diseases framework (TICD). RESULTS: Thirty individuals participated (surgeons, anesthesiologists, primary care physicians, physician assistants, nurses, and medical assistants). Three themes were identified: (1) Shared Values (TICD Social, Political, and Legal Factors), (2) Gaps in Knowledge (TICD Individual Health Professional Factors, Guideline Factors), and (3) Communication Breakdown (TICD Professional Interactions, Incentives and Resources, Capacity for Organizational Change). Shared Values describe core tenets expressed by all groups of clinicians, namely prioritizing patient safety and utilizing evidence-based medicine. Clinicians had Gaps in Knowledge related to existing data and preoperative testing recommendations. Communication Breakdowns within interdisciplinary teams resulted in unnecessary testing ordered to meet perceived expectations of other providers. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians have knowledge gaps related to preoperative testing recommendations and may be amenable to de-implementation efforts and educational interventions. Consensus guidelines may streamline interdisciplinary communication by clarifying interdisciplinary needs and reducing testing ordered to meet perceived expectations of other clinicians.

Predictors and Outcomes of Upstaging in Rectal Cancer Patients Who Did Not Receive Preoperative Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative chemoradiation is indicated for clinical stage II and III rectal cancers; however, the accuracy of clinical staging with preoperative imaging is imperfect. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to better characterize the incidence and management of clinical and pathologic stage discordances in patients who did not receive preoperative chemoradiation. DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort analysis. SETTINGS: The source of data was the National Cancer Database from 2006 to 2015. PATIENTS: We identified patients who underwent resection with curative intent for clinical stage I rectal adenocarcinoma without preoperative chemotherapy or radiation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We evaluated the characteristics of "upstaged" patients-those with T3/T4 tumors found on pathology (pathologic stage II) and/or with positive regional nodes in the resection specimen (pathologic stage III) compared with those patients who were not upstaged (pathologic stage I). We then used a mixed-effects multivariable survival model to compare overall survival between these groups. RESULTS: Among 7818 clinical stage I rectal cancer patients who did not receive preoperative therapy, tumor upstaging occurred in 819 (10.6%) and nodal upstaging occurred in 1612 (20.8%). Upstaged patients were more likely than those not upstaged to have higher grade tumors and positive margins. Survival was worse in upstaged patients (hazard ratio [HR], 1.64; 95% CI, 1.4-1.9) but improved among those upstaged patients who received either chemotherapy (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.6-0.9) or chemoradiation (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.5-0.7). LIMITATIONS: In addition to the inherent limitations of a retrospective cohort study, the National Cancer Database does not record functional outcomes, local recurrence, or disease-specific survival, so we are restricted to the evaluation of overall survival as an oncologic outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Inaccurate preoperative staging remains a common clinical challenge in the management of rectal cancer. Survival among upstaged patients is improved among those who receive recommended postoperative chemotherapy and/or chemoradiation, yet many patients do not receive guideline-concordant care. See Video Abstract at https://links.lww.com/DCR/B999 . PREDICTORES Y RESULTADOS DE SOBRE ESTADIFICACIN EN PACIENTES CON CNCER DE RECTO QUE NO RECIBIERON TERAPIA PREOPERATORIA: ANTECEDENTES:La quimio radiación preoperatoria está indicada para los estadios clínicos II y III del cáncer rectal; sin embargo, la precisión de la estadificación clínica con imágenes preoperatorias es imperfecta.OBJETIVO:El objetivo fue mejorar la caracterización de la incidencia y el manejo de la discordancia del estadio clínico y patológico en pacientes que no recibieron quimio radiación preoperatoria.DISEÑO:Este fue un análisis de cohorte retrospectivo.CONFIGURACIÓN:La fuente de datos fue de la Base de datos Nacional del Cáncer entre los años 2006-2015.PACIENTES:Identificamos pacientes que fueron sometidos a resección con intención curativa por adenocarcinoma rectal en estadio clínico I, sin quimioterapia o radiación preoperatoria.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Evaluamos las características de los pacientes "sobre estadificados": aquellos con tumores T3/T4 encontrados en patología (estadio patológico II) y/o con ganglios regionales positivos en la muestra de resección (estadio patológico III), en comparación con aquellos pacientes que no fueron sobre estadificados (estadio patológico I). Luego usamos un modelo de supervivencia multivariable de efectos mixtos para comparar la supervivencia general entre estos grupos.RESULTADOS:De entre 7818 pacientes con cáncer de recto, en estadio clínico I, y que no recibieron tratamiento preoperatorio, se produjo una sobre estadificación tumoral en 819 (10,6%) y una sobre estadificación ganglionar en 1612 (20,8%). Los pacientes sobre estadificados tenían más probabilidades que los no sobre estadificados de tener tumores de mayor grado y márgenes positivos. La supervivencia fue peor en los pacientes sobre estadificados (HR 1,64, IC del 95% [1,4, 1,9]), pero mejoró entre los pacientes sobre estadificados que recibieron quimioterapia (HR 0,71, IC del 95% [0,6, 0,9]) o quimio radiación (HR 0,62, 95% IC [0,5, 0,7]).LIMITACIONES:Además de las limitaciones inherente a un estudio de cohorte de tipo retrospectivo, la Base de datos Nacional del Cáncer no registra resultados funcionales, la recurrencia local o la supervivencia específica de la enfermedad, por lo que estamos restringidos a la evaluación de la supervivencia general como un resultado oncológico.CONCLUSIONES:La estadificación preoperatoria inexacta sigue siendo un desafío clínico común en el tratamiento del cáncer de recto. La supervivencia entre los pacientes con sobre estadificación mejora en aquellos que reciben la quimioterapia y/o quimio radioterapia postoperatoria recomendada, aunque muchos pacientes no reciben atención acorde con las guías. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B999 . (Traducción-Dr. Osvaldo Gauto ).

Patient Preferences in Cases of Inter-system Medical Error Discovery (IMED).

OBJECTIVE: This study analyzes patients' preferences around disclosure in cases of IMED. BACKGROUND: Patients prefer that physicians disclose their self-discovered medical errors, and disclosure expectations and practices have changed accordingly. Patient preferences about disclosure when physicians discover another provider's error are unknown. METHODS: We conducted telephone interviews beyond thematic saturation (N = 30) from January to March 2018 with patient volunteers in Michigan. Participants responded to 2 medical error vignettes, the first involving a single physician discovering their own error, and the second involving an IMED scenario. Interviews were conducted concurrently with thematic coding, coded independently by 2 investigators, and discussed until consensus was reached. Analysis proceeded after the inductive and comparative approach of interpretive description. RESULTS: Patients considered IMED essentially equivalent to self-discovered errors, and strongly preferred disclosure in both scenarios. Patients preferred disclosure for a variety of reasons, most commonly describing an inherent value in knowing about their own health, a belief that physicians should practice honesty and transparency, and a desire to participate in future care in an informed manner. Patients said they would likely take certain actions after disclosure of another physician's error, ranging from confronting the responsible physician to changing providers to pursuing legal action, with the latter being only in cases of irreversible and debilitating errors. CONCLUSIONS: This study explores a new domain within the field of error disclosure, concluding that patients preferred disclosure of errors in cases of IMED. Overall, these findings provide motivation to devise systems-level solutions to enable and facilitate IMED disclosure.

Hiring Practices of US Academic Surgery Departments-Challenges and Opportunities for More Inclusive Hiring.

BACKGROUND: To increase workforce diversity among academic medical centers, the Association of American Medical Colleges recommends multiple inclusive strategies for evaluating and hiring candidates. Our objective was to determine (1) usual and inclusive hiring practices used among academic surgery departments and (2) the barriers to utilization of inclusive hiring practices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used a qualitative design and conducted semistructured interviews with academic surgery department chairs (n = 19). Participants were interviewed by phone between March 2018 and June 2018 until thematic saturation was reached. Interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Coding for major themes was conducted independently by two investigators and discussed to consensus iteratively using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Rather than broad and publicly available postings, many chairs reported soliciting a small number of applications from trusted networks. Although chairs report making efforts to include women or underrepresented minority candidates in interview pools, these efforts are not typically formalized. Chairs often reported an inability to secure diverse applicant pools, given the narrow specialty or clinical niche for which applications were being solicited. A major emergent theme was an assessment of a "candidate's fit" for the department. For this reason, recruiting current or former trainees was considered a safe opportunity for the department, given a perception of loyalty and trust in the internal training program for surgical preparation. CONCLUSIONS: Many chairs rely heavily on internal hires or trusted networks, which may limit both demographic and cognitive diversity. These findings highlight gaps between best inclusive hiring practices described in other industries and usual strategies for recruitment in US academic surgery.

Clinical and pathological outcomes of induction chemotherapy before neoadjuvant radiotherapy in locally-advanced rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In North America, preoperative combination chemoradiation is the most commonly recommended and utilized approach to locally advanced rectal cancer. There is increasing interest in the use of induction chemotherapy (IC) before radiation and surgery in locally advanced rectal cancer. How widely IC is being used and whether it improves pathologic and oncologic outcomes is unknown. METHODS: We evaluated clinical stage 2 or 3 rectal cancer patients in the National Cancer Database between 2006 and 2015. We identified predictors of use of IC with multivariable logistic regression and compared survival between groups using Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: Among 36 268 patients, IC use increased significantly over time from 5.5% in 2006 to 15.9% in 2015 (P < 0.001). Treatment at a hospital with a high IC rate was an independent predictor of receipt of IC. IC and traditional therapy yielded similar pathologic complete response rates (32.2% vs 30.5%, P = 0.2) and similar 5-year survival (82.4% vs 81.4%, 0.71). CONCLUSIONS: Use of IC for locally advanced rectal cancer has increased significantly. The choice of IC seems to be driven more by institutional and regional practice patterns than clinical characteristics and is not associated with improved pathologic or oncologic outcomes.

Creating diagnostic criteria for perforated appendicitis using cross-sectional imaging.

INTRODUCTION: Preoperative determination of perforated versus acute appendicitis can be difficult. We compared CT and MRI performance in diagnosing perforated appendicitis, and created diagnostic criteria. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all pediatric patients who underwent appendectomy within one day of CT or MRI between 1/1/2013 and 1/16/2016. True diagnosis was determined by pathology report. Findings on CT/MRI were grouped into "hard" findings (abscess, pneumoperitoneum, extruded fecalith, appendiceal wall with visible hole) and "soft" findings (extensive/diffuse inflammation/free fluid, phlegmon). Correlation of white blood cell count (WBC), temperature, peritoneal signs, and symptom duration >72 h with perforation was assessed using logistic regression. Significant correlates were incorporated in clinical criteria. RESULTS: 135 patients underwent appendectomy after CT/MRI. Fifty patients underwent MRI and 85 CT. Using hard and/or soft findings, MRI was 86.7% sensitive and 74.3% specific, compared to 68.4% (p = 0.19) and 92.4% (p = 0.025) for CT. WBC > 15, temperature >38.0 °C, and peritoneal signs predicted perforation. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI was highest using imaging findings alone. Accuracy of CT was improved by mandating at least one of the previous three clinical correlates, resulting in 68.4% sensitivity and 93.9% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: MRI trended toward more sensitive and CT was more specific for complicated appendicitis. CT specificity is improved by our algorithm.

Understanding and Assisting the Recovery of Non-English-Speaking Trauma Survivors: Assessment of the NESTS Pathway.

INTRODUCTION: Spanish-speaking trauma and burn patients have unique needs in their post-discharge care navigation. The confluence of limited English proficiency, injury recovery, mental health, socioeconomic disadvantages, and acute stressors following hospital admission converge to enhance patients' vulnerability, but their specific needs and means of meeting these needs have not been well described. METHODS: This prospective, cross-sectional survey study describes the results of a multi-institutional initiative devised to help Spanish-speaking trauma and burn patients in their care navigation after hospitalization. The pathway consisted of informational resources, intake and follow up surveys, and multiple points of contact with a community health worker who aids in accessing community resources and navigating the healthcare system. RESULTS: From January 2022-November 2023, there were 114 patients identified as eligible for the NESTS pathway. Of these, 80 (70.2%) were reachable and consented to participate, and 68 of these patients were approached in person during their initial hospitalization. After initial screening, 60 (75.0%) of the eligible patients had a mental health, social services, or other need identified via our survey instrument. During the initial consultation with the CHW, 48 of the 60 patients with any identified need were connected to a resource (80%). Food support was the most prevalent need (N=46, 57.5%). More patients were connected to mental health resources (N=16) than reported need in this domain (N=7). CONCLUSIONS: The NESTS pathway identified the specific needs of Spanish-speaking trauma and burn patients in their recovery, notably food, transportation, and utilities. The pathway also addressed disparities in post-discharge care by connecting patients with community resources, with particular improvement in access to mental healthcare.

Evaluation of Access to Hospitals Most Ready to Achieve National Accreditation for Rectal Cancer Treatment.

Importance: The American College of Surgeons National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer (NAPRC) promotes multidisciplinary care to improve oncologic outcomes in rectal cancer. However, accreditation requirements may be difficult to achieve for the lowest-performing institutions. Thus, it is unknown whether the NAPRC will motivate care improvement in these settings or widen disparities. Objectives: To characterize hospitals' readiness for accreditation and identify differences in the patients cared for in hospitals most and least prepared for accreditation. Design, Setting, and Participants: A total of 1315 American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer-accredited hospitals in the National Cancer Database from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2015, were sorted into 4 cohorts, organized by high vs low volume and adherence to process standards, and patient and hospital characteristics and oncologic outcomes were compared. The patients included those who underwent surgical resection with curative intent for rectal adenocarcinoma, mucinous adenocarcinoma, or signet ring cell carcinoma. Data analysis was performed from November 2017 to January 2018. Exposures: Hospitals' readiness for accreditation, as determined by their annual resection volume and adherence to 5 available NAPRC process standards. Main Outcomes and Measures: Hospital characteristics, patient sociodemographic characteristics, and 5-year survival by hospital. Results: Among the 1315 included hospitals, 38 (2.9%) met proposed thresholds for all 5 NAPRC process standards and 220 (16.7%) met the threshold on 4 standards. High-volume hospitals (≥20 resections per year) tended to be academic institutions (67 of 104 [64.4%] vs 159 of 1211 [13.1%]; P = .001), whereas low-volume hospitals (<20 resections per year) tended to be comprehensive community cancer programs (530 of 1211 [43.8%] vs 28 of 104 [26.9%]; P = .001). Patients in low-volume hospitals were more likely to be older (11 429 of 28 076 [40.7%] vs 4339 of 12 148 [35.7%]; P < .001) and have public insurance (13 054 of 28 076 [46.5%] vs 4905 of 12 148 [40.4%]; P < .001). Low-adherence hospitals were more likely to care for black and Hispanic patients (1980 of 19 577 [17.2%] vs 3554 of 20 647 [10.1%]; P < .001). On multivariable Cox proportional hazards model regression, high-volume hospitals had better 5-year survival outcomes than low-volume hospitals (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.99-1.00; P < .001), but there was no significant survival difference by hospital process standard adherence. Conclusions and Relevance: Hospitals least likely to receive NAPRC accreditation tended to be community institutions with worse survival outcomes, serving patients at a lower socioeconomic position. To possibly avoid exacerbating disparities in access to high-quality rectal cancer care, the NAPRC study findings suggest enabling access for patients with socioeconomic disadvantage or engaging in quality improvement for hospitals not yet achieving accreditation benchmarks.

Intraoperative parathyroid hormone levels ≤40 pg/mL are associated with the lowest persistence rates after parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative parathyroid hormone (IOPTH) monitoring is used to predict biochemical cure during parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism; however, there is variability in the intraoperative parathyroid hormone criteria used by surgeons to predict normocalcemia after parathyroidectomy. This study sought to determine the intraoperative parathyroid hormone criteria correlated with the lowest rates of persistent hyperparathyroidism after parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 2,654 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism who underwent parathyroidectomy with intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring at a single institution from 1999 to 2014. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to measure the association between the lowest intraoperative parathyroid hormone level and the persistence of primary hyperparathyroidism after parathyroidectomy. RESULTS: A total of 66 patients (2.5%) had persistent hyperparathyroidism after parathyroidectomy. Using the traditional intraoperative parathyroid hormone criteria of a ≥50% decrease from the baseline level, the rate of persistent primary hyperparathyroidism was greater when intraoperative parathyroid hormone did not decrease to ≥50% from the baseline level (17 of 180 patients [9.4%] vs 49 of 2,474 [2.0%], [OR 5.9, 95% CI 3.2-10.5, P < .001]). Regardless of whether intraoperative parathyroid hormone decreased ≥50%, patients with a lowest intraoperative parathyroid hormone above the normal range (10-65 pg/mL) had greater persistence rates compared with patients with an intraoperative parathyroid hormone <65 pg/mL (30 of 350 [8.6%] vs 36 of 2,304 [1.6%], [OR 6.6, 95% CI 3.4-12.7, P < .001]). Furthermore, patients with a lowest intraoperative parathyroid hormone 40 to 65 pg/mL had increased rates of adjusted persistence compared with patients with lowest intraoperative parathyroid hormone ≤40 pg/mL (13 of 385 [3.4%] vs 23 of 1,919 [1.2%], [OR 4.2, 95% CI 2.0-8.7, P < .001]). Patients with lowest intraoperative parathyroid hormone <5 to 20 pg/mL did not have decreased rates of persistence compared with patients with lowest intraoperative parathyroid hormone 20 to 40 pg/mL (9 of 996 [0.9%] vs 14 of 923 [1.5%], [OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.2-1.2, P = .14]). CONCLUSION: Patients with a lowest intraoperative parathyroid hormone ≤40 pg/mL compared with the traditional criteria of a ≥50% decrease from baseline and a final parathyroid hormone in the normal range (<65 pg/mL) had the lowest rates of persistent primary hyperparathyroidism after parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism. The single criteria of a lowest intraoperative parathyroid hormone level ≤40 pg/mL may best predict the lowest persistent disease rates after parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism.

Evidence-based management of chylothorax in infants.

PURPOSE: Management guidelines for infants with chylothorax lack substantial evidence. We sought to identify variables that impact outcomes in these patients in order to develop an evidence-based management algorithm. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all infants diagnosed with chylothorax from June 2005 to December 2014 at our institution. Data collected included demographics, chest tube output (CTO), medical and dietary interventions, surgical procedures, and absolute lymphocyte count (ALC). Outcomes analyzed included death, sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), requiring surgery, and success of therapy, defined as CTO decrease by >50% within 7days. RESULTS: Of 178 neonates with chylothorax, initial therapy was high medium chain triglyceride (MCT) feedings in 106 patients, nothing by mouth (NPO), total parenteral nutrition (TPN) in 21, and NPO/TPN plus octreotide in 45. Octreotide use in addition to NPO/TPN revealed no significant differences in any outcome including success (47% vs. 43%, p=0.77). Initial CTO and ALC correlated with needing surgery (p=0.002 and p=0.006, respectively), and with death (p=0.028 and p=0.043, respectively). ALC also correlated with sepsis (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Octreotide has no advantage over NPO/TPN alone in infants with chylothorax. CTO and ALC predict requiring surgery. We propose a management guideline based on CTO and ALC without a role for octreotide. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective case-control study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.