RESUMO
An 86-year-old female with history of surgical aortic valve replacement presented with clinical signs of heart failure. Echocardiography revealed a reduction in left ventricular systolic function and severe bioprosthetic aortic valve dysfunction. This is the first reported case of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement with concomitant undermining iatrogenic coronary obstruction with radiofrequency needle procedure in a surgical bioprosthetic valve.
Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica , Valva Aórtica , Bioprótese , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas , Doença Iatrogênica , Desenho de Prótese , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter , Humanos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/efeitos adversos , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/instrumentação , Resultado do Tratamento , Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Valva Aórtica/fisiopatologia , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/fisiopatologia , Ablação por Cateter/efeitos adversos , Falha de Prótese , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/instrumentação , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/efeitos adversos , Traumatismos Cardíacos/etiologia , Traumatismos Cardíacos/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismos Cardíacos/terapia , Agulhas , Função Ventricular Esquerda , Oclusão Coronária/diagnóstico por imagem , Oclusão Coronária/etiologia , Oclusão Coronária/terapia , Oclusão Coronária/fisiopatologia , Angiografia CoronáriaRESUMO
INTRODUCTIONS & AIMS: Heart failure (HF) is a common comorbidity in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We sought to access the temporal trends and outcomes of TAVR or SAVR in HF patients. METHOD: The NIS database from 2011-2014 was queried for patients that underwent TAVR or SAVR and were subsequently diagnosed with HF. Temporal trends in the utilisation of TAVR or SAVR in HF patients were analysed. RESULTS: Among 27 982 patients who were diagnosed with HF of whom 17 681 (63.2%) had heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) while 10 301 (36.8%) had heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), 9049 (32.3%) underwent TAVR and 16 933 (76.7%) underwent SAVR. Patients with HFrEF and HFpEF had higher utilisation of TAVR compared with SAVR over the course of the study period (P trend < .001). TAVR was associated with lower mortality [2.8% in 2012 and 1.8% in 2014 (P .013)] compared with SAVR. Similarly, multiple logistic regression showed a statistically significant lower in-hospital mortality in the TAVR group compared with SAVR (aOR 0.634; CI 0.504, 0.798, P < .001). CONCLUSION: For patients with severe aortic valve stenosis and heart failure who undergo aortic valve intervention, TAVR is associated with less odds of in-hospital mortality compared with SAVR.
Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca , Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Humanos , Fatores de Risco , Volume Sistólico , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Aortic insufficiency (AI) is a frequent problem after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation and results in increased morbidity and mortality. Advances in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) technology have resulted in this being discussed as a potential option for LVAD patients with AI. While small case series have been published, we report the first case of TAVR thrombosis in an LVAD patient. This case highlights a major diagnostic and management dilemma that should become more present if this strategy becomes more widespread.
Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Insuficiência da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Coração Auxiliar , Choque Cardiogênico/terapia , Trombose/etiologia , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/efeitos adversos , Função Ventricular Esquerda , Insuficiência da Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Insuficiência da Valva Aórtica/etiologia , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Assistência Perioperatória , Fatores de Risco , Choque Cardiogênico/diagnóstico , Choque Cardiogênico/fisiopatologia , Trombose/diagnóstico por imagem , Trombose/tratamento farmacológico , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/instrumentação , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has strained health care resources around the world, causing many institutions to curtail or stop elective procedures. This has resulted in an inability to care for patients with valvular and structural heart disease in a timely fashion, potentially placing these patients at increased risk for adverse cardiovascular complications, including CHF and death. The effective triage of these patients has become challenging in the current environment, as clinicians have had to weigh the risk of bringing susceptible patients into the hospital environment during the COVID-19 pandemic against the risk of delaying a needed procedure. In this document, the authors suggest guidelines for how to triage patients in need of structural heart disease interventions and provide a framework for how to decide when it may be appropriate to proceed with intervention despite the ongoing pandemic. In particular, the authors address the triage of patients in need of transcatheter aortic valve replacement and percutaneous mitral valve repair. The authors also address procedural issues and considerations for the function of structural heart disease teams during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Cardiopatias/cirurgia , Pandemias/estatística & dados numéricos , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Triagem/normas , COVID-19 , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Cardiologia/métodos , Cardiologia/normas , Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Cardiopatias/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Masculino , Saúde Ocupacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Segurança do Paciente , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , Sociedades Médicas , Triagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
The novel coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), is highly infectious, carries significant morbidity and mortality, and has rapidly resulted in strained health care system and hospital resources. In addition to patient-related care concerns in infected individuals, focus must also relate to diminishing community spread, protection of staff, case selection, and concentration of resources. The current document based on available data and consensus opinion addresses appropriate catheterization laboratory preparedness for treating these patients, including procedure-room readiness to minimize external contamination, safe donning and doffing of personal protective equipment (PPE) to eliminate risk to staff, and staffing algorithms to minimize exposure and maximize team availability. Case selection and management of both emergent and urgent procedures are discussed in detail, including procedures that may be safely deferred or performed bedside.
Assuntos
Cateterismo Cardíaco/estatística & dados numéricos , Angiografia Coronária/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , COVID-19 , Cateterismo Cardíaco/normas , Cardiologia , Angiografia Coronária/métodos , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Laboratórios Hospitalares , Liderança , Masculino , Mentores , Pandemias/estatística & dados numéricos , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/estatística & dados numéricos , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Sociedades Médicas , Análise de Sobrevida , Estados UnidosRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Innovation for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has transformed a medically complex treatment into a standardized procedure. While Edwards SAPIEN and Medtronic CoreValve occupy the market for TAVR in the United States (US), additional valve systems are being developed. The Boston Scientific Lotus Valve system was recently FDA-approved and will represent the third valve in the US market. This evidence-based review will summarize advantages, disadvantages, and projected impact of this new TAVR system. RECENT FINDINGS: The Lotus Valve system demonstrates superiority in terms of rates of paravalvular leak, with similar rates of mortality and disabling stroke. This benefit is at the expense of increased pacemaker implantation rates, though preliminary data from subsequent iterations of the Lotus Valve suggest decreasing rates over time. There is much anticipation from ongoing trials utilizing the Lotus Edge system, which may perform best for those with pre-existing pacemakers or anatomy that increases likelihood of paravalvular leak.
Assuntos
Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter , Previsões , Humanos , Desenho de Prótese/tendências , Fatores de Risco , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Conscious sedation is used during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with limited evidence as to the safety and efficacy of this practice. METHODS: The National Cardiovascular Data Registry Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry was used to characterize the anesthesia choice and clinical outcomes of all US patients undergoing elective percutaneous transfemoral TAVR between April 1, 2014, and June 30, 2015. Raw and inverse probability of treatment-weighted analyses were performed to compare patients undergoing TAVR with general anesthesia with patients undergoing TAVR with conscious sedation on an intention-to-treat basis for the primary outcome of in-hospital mortality, and secondary outcomes including 30-day mortality, in-hospital and 30-day death/stroke, procedural success, intensive care unit and hospital length-of-stay, and rates of discharge to home. Post hoc falsification end point analyses were performed to evaluate for residual confounding. RESULTS: Conscious sedation was used in 1737/10 997 (15.8%) cases with a significant trend of increasing usage over the time period studied (P for trend<0.001). In raw analyses, intraprocedural success with conscious sedation and general anesthesia was similar (98.2% versus 98.5%, P=0.31). The conscious sedation group was less likely to experience in-hospital (1.6% versus 2.5%, P=0.03) and 30-day death (2.9% versus 4.1%, P=0.03). Conversion from conscious sedation to general anesthesia was noted in 102 of 1737 (5.9%) of conscious sedation cases. After inverse probability of treatment-weighted adjustment for 51 covariates, conscious sedation was associated with lower procedural success (97.9% versus 98.6%, P<0.001) and a reduced rate of mortality at the in-hospital (1.5% versus 2.4%, P<0.001) and 30-day (2.3% versus 4.0%, P<0.001) time points. Conscious sedation was associated with reductions in procedural inotrope requirement, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay (6.0 versus 6.5 days, P<0.001), and combined 30-day death/stroke rates (4.8% versus 6.4%, P<0.001). Falsification end point analyses of vascular complications, bleeding, and new pacemaker/defibrillator implantation demonstrated no significant differences between groups after adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: In US practice, conscious sedation is associated with briefer length of stay and lower in-hospital and 30-day mortality in comparison with TAVR with general anesthesia in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses. These results suggest the safety of conscious sedation in this population, although comparative effectiveness analyses using observational data cannot definitively establish the superiority of one technique over another.
Assuntos
Anestesia Geral , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/terapia , Sedação Consciente , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anestesia Geral/efeitos adversos , Anestesia Geral/mortalidade , Anestesia Geral/tendências , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/mortalidade , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/fisiopatologia , Pesquisa Comparativa da Efetividade , Sedação Consciente/efeitos adversos , Sedação Consciente/mortalidade , Sedação Consciente/tendências , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Análise de Intenção de Tratamento , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Alta do Paciente , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Sistema de Registros , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/efeitos adversos , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/mortalidade , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/tendências , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) is a highly prevalent cardiovascular disorder accounting for a rising economic and social burden on aging populations. In spite of continuing study on the pathophysiology of disease, there remain no medical therapies to prevent the progression of CAVD. The discovery of biomarkers represents a potentially complementary approach in stratifying risk and timing of intervention in CAVD and has the advantage of providing insight into causal factors for the disease. Biomarkers have been studied extensively in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, with success as additive for clinical and scientific purposes. Similar research in CAVD is less robust; however, the available studies of biomarkers in CAVD show promise for enhanced clinical decision making and identification of causal factors for the disease. This comprehensive review summarizes available established and novel biomarkers in CAVD, their contributions toward an understanding of pathophysiology, their potential clinical utility, and provides an outline to direct future research in the field.
Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica/sangue , Valva Aórtica/metabolismo , Valva Aórtica/patologia , Remodelação Óssea , Calcinose/sangue , Mediadores da Inflamação/sangue , Metabolismo dos Lipídeos , Remodelação Ventricular , Animais , Valva Aórtica/fisiopatologia , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/epidemiologia , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/terapia , Biomarcadores/sangue , Calcinose/epidemiologia , Calcinose/terapia , Humanos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In the initial PARTNER trial (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves) of transcatheter aortic valve replacement for high-risk (HR) and inoperable patients, mortality at 1 year was 24% in HR and 31% in inoperable patients. A recent report of the 30-day outcomes with the low-profile SAPIEN 3 transcatheter aortic valve replacement system demonstrated very low rates of adverse events, but little is known about the longer-term outcomes with this device. METHODS: Between October 2013 and September 2014, 583 HR (65%) or inoperable (35%) patients were treated via the transfemoral (84%) or transapical/transaortic (16%) access route at 29 US sites. Major clinical events at 1 year were adjudicated by an independent clinical events committee, and echocardiographic results were analyzed by a core laboratory. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics included age of 83 years, 42% female, and median Society of Thoracic Surgeons score of 8.4%. At the 1-year follow-up, survival (all-cause) was 85.6% for all patients, 87.3% in the HR subgroup, and 82.3% in the inoperable subgroup. Survival free of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in the transfemoral patients from the HR cohort was 87.7% and 93.3%, respectively. There was no severe paravalvular leak. Moderate paravalvular leak (2.7%) was associated with an increase in mortality at 1 year, whereas mild paravalvular leak had no significant association with mortality. Symptomatic improvement as assessed by the percentage of patients in New York Heart Association class III and IV (90.1% to 7.7% at 1 year; P<0.0001) and by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire overall summary score (improved from 46.9 to 72.4; P<0.0001) was marked. Multivariable predictors of 1-year mortality included alternative access, Society of Thoracic Surgeons score, and disabling stroke. CONCLUSIONS: In this large, adjudicated registry of SAPIEN 3 HR and inoperable patients, the very low rates of important complications resulted in a strikingly low mortality rate at 1 year. Between 30 and 365 days, the incidence of moderate paravalvular aortic regurgitation did not increase, and no association between mild paravalvular leak and 1-year mortality was observed, although a small increase in disabling stroke occurred. These results, which likely reflect device iteration and procedural evolution, support the use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement as the preferred therapy in HR and inoperable patients with aortic stenosis. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01314313.
Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter , Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , Artéria Femoral , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Sistema de Registros , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/instrumentação , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/mortalidade , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: With widespread adoption of transcatheter aortic valve replacement, there has been a change in the approach to management of valvular heart disease. New interest has taken hold in transcatheter therapies for valvular heart disease, as well as research into pathophysiology and progression of disease. Additionally, several key trials have further refined our understanding of surgical management of valvular heart disease. This review will elucidate recent clinical trial data leading to changes in practice. RECENT FINDINGS: There have been several landmark trials expanding the indications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Additionally, although still early, trials are beginning to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of transcatheter mitral valves. Options for transcatheter management of right-sided valvular disease continue to evolve, and these are areas of active investigation. SUMMARY: The emergence of novel therapies for valvular heart disease has expanded the management options available, allowing physicians to better individualize treatment of patients with valvular heart disease. This review will focus on the recent (within 2 years) trials in this field of interest.
Assuntos
Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Humanos , Valva MitralRESUMO
The SCAI Publications Committee and Emerging Leadership Mentorship (ELM) Fellows concisely summarize and provide context on the most important coronary trials presented at large international meetings in 2016, including SCAI, ACC, TCT, EuroPCR, ESC, and AHA. The intent is to allow quick assimilation of trial results into interventional practice, and enable busy interventional cardiologists to stay up to date. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Assuntos
Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/mortalidade , Difusão de Inovações , Humanos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Interrogation of the electronic health record (EHR) using billing codes as a surrogate for diagnoses of interest has been widely used for clinical research. However, the accuracy of this methodology is variable, as it reflects billing codes rather than severity of disease, and depends on the disease and the accuracy of the coding practitioner. Systematic application of text mining to the EHR has had variable success for the detection of cardiovascular phenotypes. We hypothesize that the application of text mining algorithms to cardiovascular procedure reports may be a superior method to identify patients with cardiovascular conditions of interest. METHODS: We adapted the Oracle product Endeca, which utilizes text mining to identify terms of interest from a NoSQL-like database, for purposes of searching cardiovascular procedure reports and termed the tool "PennSeek". We imported 282,569 echocardiography reports representing 81,164 individuals and 27,205 cardiac catheterization reports representing 14,567 individuals from non-searchable databases into PennSeek. We then applied clinical criteria to these reports in PennSeek to identify patients with trileaflet aortic stenosis (TAS) and coronary artery disease (CAD). Accuracy of patient identification by text mining through PennSeek was compared with ICD-9 billing codes. RESULTS: Text mining identified 7115 patients with TAS and 9247 patients with CAD. ICD-9 codes identified 8272 patients with TAS and 6913 patients with CAD. 4346 patients with AS and 6024 patients with CAD were identified by both approaches. A randomly selected sample of 200-250 patients uniquely identified by text mining was compared with 200-250 patients uniquely identified by billing codes for both diseases. We demonstrate that text mining was superior, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.95 compared to 0.53 by ICD-9 for TAS, and a PPV of 0.97 compared to 0.86 for CAD. CONCLUSION: These results highlight the superiority of text mining algorithms applied to electronic cardiovascular procedure reports in the identification of phenotypes of interest for cardiovascular research.
Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica , Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Mineração de Dados , Fenótipo , Algoritmos , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Humanos , Classificação Internacional de DoençasRESUMO
The valve-in-valve (viv) procedure has been shown to be effective in treating patients with a degenerated bioprosthesis who are also considered high risk or inoperable for a reoperation. We describe a case of concomitant transfemoral transcatheter viv aortic and mitral valve replacements.
Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Artéria Femoral , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/métodos , Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/métodos , Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Bioprótese/efeitos adversos , Ecocardiografia Transesofagiana , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valva Mitral/diagnóstico por imagem , Falha de Prótese , Reoperação/efeitos adversos , Risco , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Aortic insufficiency following left ventricular assist device implantation (LVAD) has been reported in up to 40% of patients and is associated with a worse prognosis. We describe the case of a successful transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement with a self-expanding bioprosthesis for aortic insufficiency following destination LVAD implantation.
Assuntos
Insuficiência da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Bioprótese , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas , Ventrículos do Coração , Coração Auxiliar , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/métodos , Adulto , Insuficiência da Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Insuficiência da Valva Aórtica/terapia , Ecocardiografia Transesofagiana , Artéria Femoral , Humanos , Masculino , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemAssuntos
Insuficiência da Valva Aórtica , Coração Auxiliar , Trombose , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter , Insuficiência da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Coração Auxiliar/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Trombose/etiologia , Trombose/prevenção & controle , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/efeitos adversos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
The SCAI Publications Committee and Emerging Leadership Mentorship (ELM) Fellows concisely summarize and provide context on the most important coronary trials presented at large international meetings in 2015, including the MATRIX, ABSORB, and TOTAL trials. The intent is to allow quick assimilation of trial results into interventional practice, and enable busy interventional cardiologists to stay up to date. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Assuntos
Cardiologia , Ponte de Artéria Coronária , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapêutico , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Sociedades Médicas , Congressos como Assunto , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an established therapy in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. Among patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), it is unclear which patients will derive maximal benefit from TAVR. METHODS: Clinical and echocardiographic data of patients with severe aortic stenosis and low LVEF (≤50%) who underwent TAVR at a single institution during 2009-2013 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into 2 groups post-TAVR based on improved LV function (Group A = ΔLVEF ≥ 10%) versus persistent LV dysfunction (Group B = ΔLVEF<10%). Echocardiographic parameters were assessed for their association with LVEF change post-TAVR. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to generate survival estimates. RESULTS: Of 382 patients who underwent TAVR, 60 patients had low LVEF, LV function failed to improve ≥10% in 50% of patients following the procedure (Group B). At baseline echocardiograms, Group B had higher LVEF, stroke volume (SV), SV index; and lower E, E/E', and estimated pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (PASP) compared to Group A. Higher mortality was found in Group B compared to the Group A (p = 0.003) with a significantly shorter survival (Group A = 3.3 ± 0.1 years vs Group B = 2.7 ± 0.2 years, p = 0.003). One-year event free survival was 53.3% in Group B compared to 93.3% in Group A, with a stable trend over ensuing years (5-year survival; 53.3% versus 90.0%, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing TAVR with depressed LV function, those who failed to improve were more likely to have relatively higher LVEF, SV, and SVI; and lower E, E/E', and PASP at baseline. Mortality rates were found to be higher in persistent LV dysfunction group. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico , Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Ecocardiografia/métodos , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/métodos , Função Ventricular Esquerda/fisiologia , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Valva Aórtica/fisiopatologia , Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/fisiopatologia , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , SístoleRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To examine whether transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a safe and effective treatment option for aortic stenosis in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). BACKGROUND: Patients with ESRD undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement have an operative mortality approaching 20% and a 10-year survival of approximately 12%. We investigated whether TAVR is a more reasonable option. METHODS: This is a multicenter, retrospective study of all patients with ESRD who underwent TAVR in 8 institutions between 12/2011 and 02/2013. Demographic characteristics, mortality, major, and minor complications were evaluated. Outcomes were stratified by operative approach. RESULTS: Forty-three patients with a mean age 76.2 ± 11.0 years and a mean STS predicted risk of mortality of 15.53 ± 8.70% underwent TAVR. Mean duration of dialysis was 45.2 ± 52.3 months (median 29.5 months). Transfemoral (TF) TAVR was performed in 31/43 (72.1%), transapical in 11/43 (25.6%), and transaortic in 1/43 (2.3%). Operative mortality was 14.0% (6/43) with TF mortality 6.5% (2/31) and 33.3% (4/12) in non-TF patients. Six-month mortality was 11/43 (25.6%: 16.1% TF, 50.0% non-TF). Complications included stroke in 2.3% (1/43) and life-threatening or major bleeding in 14.0% (6/43). Discharge to another healthcare facility was 27.0% (10/37). Readmission within 30 days of procedure for any cause was 18.9% (7/37). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ESRD who undergo TAVR are at high risk for mortality and complications. TAVR outcomes are comparable to but not substantially better than those with SAVR. Transfemoral TAVR seems to be at least as safe and effective as the current standard SAVR in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica/terapia , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca , Falência Renal Crônica/complicações , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/complicações , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/mortalidade , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/instrumentação , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/mortalidade , Feminino , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/instrumentação , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/métodos , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/mortalidade , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Falência Renal Crônica/diagnóstico , Falência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados UnidosRESUMO
RATIONALE: Bone marrow (BM) cell therapy for ischemic heart disease (IHD) has shown mixed results. Before the full potency of BM cell therapy can be realized, it is essential to understand the BM niche after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). OBJECTIVE: To study the BM composition in patients with IHD and severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. METHODS AND RESULTS: BM from 280 patients with IHD and LV dysfunction were analyzed for cell subsets by flow cytometry and colony assays. BM CD34(+) cell percentage was decreased 7 days after AMI (mean of 1.9% versus 2.3%-2.7% in other cohorts; P<0.05). BM-derived endothelial colonies were significantly decreased (P<0.05). Increased BM CD11b(+) cells associated with worse LV ejection fraction (LVEF) after AMI (P<0.05). Increased BM CD34(+) percentage associated with greater improvement in LVEF (+9.9% versus +2.3%; P=0.03, for patients with AMI and +6.6% versus -0.02%; P=0.021 for patients with chronic IHD). In addition, decreased BM CD34(+) percentage in patients with chronic IHD correlated with decrement in LVEF (-2.9% versus +0.7%; P=0.0355). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we show a heterogeneous mixture of BM cell subsets, decreased endothelial colony capacity, a CD34+ cell nadir 7 days after AMI, a negative correlation between CD11b percentage and postinfarct LVEF, and positive correlation of CD34 percentage with change in LVEF after cell therapy. These results serve as a possible basis for the small clinical improvement seen in autologous BM cell therapy trials and support selection of potent cell subsets and reversal of comorbid BM impairment. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATIONS URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT00684021, NCT00684060, and NCT00824005.
Assuntos
Antígenos CD34/sangue , Células da Medula Óssea/metabolismo , Antígeno CD11b/sangue , Ensaio de Unidades Formadoras de Colônias/métodos , Isquemia Miocárdica/sangue , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/sangue , Idoso , Biomarcadores/sangue , Medula Óssea/fisiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Isquemia Miocárdica/diagnóstico , Volume Sistólico/fisiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/diagnósticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1) promotes tissue repair through mechanisms of cell survival, endogenous stem cell recruitment, and vasculogenesis. Stromal Cell-Derived Factor-1 Plasmid Treatment for Patients with Heart Failure (STOP-HF) is a Phase II, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate safety and efficacy of a single treatment of plasmid stromal cell-derived factor-1 (pSDF-1) delivered via endomyocardial injection to patients with ischaemic heart failure (IHF). METHODS: Ninety-three subjects with IHF on stable guideline-based medical therapy and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40%, completed Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLWHFQ) and 6-min walk distance (6 MWD), were randomized 1 : 1 : 1 to receive a single treatment of either a 15 or 30 mg dose of pSDF-1 or placebo via endomyocardial injections. Safety and efficacy parameters were assessed at 4 and 12 months after injection. Left ventricular functional and structural measures were assessed by contrast echocardiography and quantified by a blinded independent core laboratory. Stromal Cell-Derived Factor-1 Plasmid Treatment for Patients with Heart Failure was powered based on change in 6 MWD and MLWHFQ at 4 months. RESULTS: Subject profiles at baseline were (mean ± SD): age 65 ± 9 years, LVEF 28 ± 7%, left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) 167 ± 66 mL, N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) (NTproBNP) 1120 ± 1084 pg/mL, MLWHFQ 50 ± 20 points, and 6 MWD 289 ± 99 m. Patients were 11 ± 9 years post most recent myocardial infarction. Study injections were delivered without serious adverse events in all subjects. Sixty-two patients received drug with no unanticipated serious product-related adverse events. The primary endpoint was a composite of change in 6 MWD and MLWHFQ from baseline to 4 months follow-up. The primary endpoint was not met (P = 0.89). For the patients treated with pSDF-1, there was a trend toward an improvement in LVEF at 12 months (placebo vs. 15 mg vs. 30 mg ΔLVEF: -2 vs. -0.5 vs. 1.5%, P = 0.20). A pre-specified analysis of the effects of pSDF-1 based on tertiles of LVEF at entry revealed improvements in EF and LVESV from lowest-to-highest LVEF. Patients in the first tertile of EF (<26%) that received 30 mg of pSDF-1 demonstrated a 7% increase in EF compared with a 4% decrease in placebo (ΔLVEF = 11%, P = 0.01) at 12 months. There was also a trend towards improvement in LVESV, with treated patients demonstrating an 18.5 mL decrease compared with a 15 mL increase for placebo at 12 months (ΔLVESV = 33.5 mL, P = 0.12). The change in end-diastolic and end-systolic volume equated to a 14 mL increase in stroke volume in the patients treated with 30 mg of pSDF-1 compared with a decrease of -11 mL in the placebo group (ΔSV = 25 mL, P = 0.09). In addition, the 30 mg-treated cohort exhibited a trend towards improvement in NTproBNP compared with placebo at 12 months (-784 pg/mL, P = 0.23). CONCLUSIONS: The blinded placebo-controlled STOP-HF trial demonstrated the safety of a single endocardial administration of pSDF-1 but failed to demonstrate its primary endpoint of improved composite score at 4 months after treatment. Through a pre-specified analysis the STOP-HF trial demonstrates the potential for attenuating LV remodelling and improving EF in high-risk ischaemic cardiomyopathy. The safety profile supports repeat dosing with pSDF-1 and the degree of left ventricular remodelling suggests the potential for improved outcomes in larger future trials.