Healthcare providers' perceived barriers and facilitators to screening for intimate partner violence in pregnant women attending prenatal clinics.

AIM: To examine healthcare providers' extent of and perceived barriers and facilitators to screening for intimate partner violence in pregnant women attending prenatal clinics. DESIGN: Cross-sectional descriptive design was used to collect data from 130 healthcare providers. METHODS: Seventeen healthcare providers from 17 prenatal clinics in Kanungu district, Uganda, were recruited via convenience sampling to participate in an online survey implementing a modified Normalization Measure Development instrument. Data were collected between February 2023 and March 2023 (02/8/2023 to 03/12/2023) and analysed using descriptive and Mann-Whitney U test and chi-square tests. RESULTS: Slightly more than half (56%) of healthcare providers report screening pregnant women for intimate partner violence. There was a statistically significant relationship between healthcare providers screening for intimate partner violence and having previous training on intimate partner violence screening. The only barrier to screening identified was a lack of understanding of how intimate partner violence screening affects the nature of participant's own work. There were numerous potential facilitators identified for healthcare providers' intimate partner violence screening. CONCLUSION: Although higher-than-expected number of healthcare providers reported screening of pregnant women for intimate partner violence, the extent of screening is still suboptimal. The barrier to screening identified needs to be addressed and facilitators promoted. Receiving training among healthcare providers on intimate partner violence screening was associated with higher levels of screening; thus, this needs to be enhanced to optimize screening rates. Future studies should assess screening practices objectively and implement interventions to improve healthcare providers' intimate partner violence screening rates. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: Screening for intimate partner violence should be part of standard care provided by healthcare providers to all pregnant women during prenatal clinic visits. The study supports the need for more training for healthcare providers in aspects related to intimate partner violence screening in order to ensure prompt diagnosis and treatment of those affected, identify those at risk and increase awareness. There is a need to enhance healthcare providers' capacity for intimate partner violence screening through education by integrating intimate partner violence screening pre- and post-registration courses and preparation programs or curriculum. IMPACT: Intimate partner violence (IPV) in pregnancy is a global health problem. Screening for IPV by healthcare providers is suboptimal. This study found that only 56% of healthcare providers were routinely screening for IPV in Ugandan prenatal clinics. This study identified the main facilitators and one barrier to IPV screening. REPORTING METHOD: This study has adhered to the relevant EQUATOR guidelines for quantitative studies. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient was involved in this study.

Thematic Synthesis of the Experiences of Intimate Partner Violence Among Mothers Who Use Substances.

OBJECTIVE: To integrate the findings of qualitative research to describe the experiences of intimate partner violence (IPV) among mothers who use substances. DATA SOURCES: A systematic search of the literature was conducted using the databases of the American Psychological Association PsycINFO, CINAHL, and PubMed along with a manual search of Google Scholar. STUDY SELECTION: The Joanne Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research criteria was used to assess the studies for selection. Inclusion criteria comprised (a) qualitative research, (b) available in English, (c) published in peer-reviewed journals, (d) inclusive of descriptions of IPV experienced by mothers who use substances, (e) conducted in the United States, and (f) published between January 2013 and October 2023. DATA EXTRACTION: The researchers highlighted and extracted data from studies that met the inclusion criteria. Data describing IPV among mothers who use substances were extracted. DATA SYNTHESIS: A thematic synthesis was used to integrate the findings using three stages and included (a) free line-by-line coding of the findings of the primary studies, (b) the development of the free codes into associated areas to construct descriptive subthemes, and (c) the development of overarching analytic themes. CONCLUSION: Findings from 11 qualitative studies were synthesized. Four descriptive subthemes emerged to delineate the experiences of IPV in mothers who use substances: Experience of Various Types of IPV, Lack of Structures to Identify and Address IPV, Coping With Violence by Taking Substances, and Substance Use Influences Behaviors of IPV. Nurses who work with mothers who use substances should be knowledgeable about local resources for IPV, complete ongoing educational training for IPV screening, and be familiar with recommended guidelines for the routine assessment of IPV.

Assessing the determinants of antenatal care adherence for Indigenous and non-Indigenous women in southwestern Uganda.

BACKGROUND: With an increasing number of women attending antenatal care for the recommended number of contacts, focus now must be placed on the quality and utility of care; without understanding adherence, the true contribution of antenatal care to improved maternal health outcomes is difficult to determine. OBJECTIVE: This research explored the practicality of antenatal care recommendations for women and the factors which facilitate or hinder adherence and shape the overall utility of care. DESIGN: Qualitative data were collected using a community-centred approach by means of focus group discussions with women and key informant interviews with healthcare providers throughout May and June of 2017. Data were analysed via thematic analysis guided by an essentialist/realist paradigm. SETTING: Kanungu District, Uganda; a district in southwestern Uganda. PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of 38 Indigenous Batwa and non-Indigenous Bakiga women from four matched communities and three healthcare providers. FINDINGS: A number of barriers to antenatal care adherence were identified which included a lack of monetary and material resources, a lack of a shared understanding and perceived value of care, and gender and position-based power dynamics, all of which were compounded by previous experiences with antenatal care. The factors identified which influenced adherence were highly complex and non-linear, affected by individual, community, health centre, and health system-level factors. Promotion of spousal involvement in antenatal care had different effects based on pre-existing individual levels of spousal support, either improving or hindering adherence. A lack of resources created a double burden for women through which maternal health was jeopardized by the inability to adhere to antenatal care recommendations and the poor quality patient-provider relationships which resulted and deterred future antenatal care attendance. KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The capacity to avail oneself of antenatal care varied significantly for women based on their socio-economic status, levels of autonomy, and spousal support. Strategies to improve antenatal care need to focus on health equity to ensure care has a high degree of utility for all women. The interconnectedness of care and those who deliver care necessitates healthcare providers to develop strong patient-provider relationships through their attitudes, behaviours, and the delivery of equitable care. In light of a historical emphasis on attendance, this research highlights the significance of improving the quality and utility of antenatal care, inclusive of Indigenous perspectives, to deliver high-value care.