Dysplastic Hips Have Decreased Iliofemoral Ligament Thickness on Coronal Sequences in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Matched Cohort Analysis.

PURPOSE: To characterize hip capsule thickness on advanced imaging in patients with and without hip dysplasia and to also evaluate differences in capsular thickness between patients with borderline and patients with true dysplasia. METHODS: Patients evaluated by the senior author for concerns of hip pathology from June 2020 to June 2021 were queried and images reviewed to determine dysplasia status by lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) ≤25°. A group of patients without dysplasia was identified and matched for age, sex, and body mass index. Hip capsular thickness was quantified using magnetic resonance imaging. A subanalysis was conducted to compare patients with true dysplasia (LCEA < 20°) with patients with borderline dysplasia (LCEAs between 20° and 25°). The analysis included independent samples t tests, χ2 tests, and multivariable regression. RESULTS: A total of eighty patients were included, with a mean age of 31.8 ± 11.7 years, a mean body mass index of 26.6 ± 6.5 points, and 70% (56) female patients. Patients with dysplasia had a mean LCEA of 19.8 ± 4.3°. Patients with dysplasia had decreased capsular thickness compared with patients without dysplasia (2.75 ± 0.96 mm vs 3.52 ± 1.22 mm, P = .003). Multivariable regression showed decreased capsular thickness associated with decreased LCEAs (ß = 2.804, R = 0.432, P < .001) and dysplasia (ß = -0.709, R2 = 0.056, P = .004). Results of a subanalysis of the dysplastic group examining differences between accepted definitions of borderline dysplasia and true dysplasia showed no significant differences in capsular thickness between the 2 groups (P = .379). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with hip dysplasia were found to have thinner iliofemoral ligaments in the coronal plane on magnetic resonance imaging on magnetic resonance imaging. Further investigation is needed to evaluate any potential implications with hip instability, given the thinner hip capsule demonstrated in this study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative prognostic trial.

Common radiographic indices used to measure patellar height do not consistently identify patella alta and lack interchangeability between measurements.

PURPOSE: Abnormal patellar height has been identified as a source of aberrant mechanical functioning within the patellofemoral joint. The purpose of this study is to examine the statistical agreement among three commonly used classification methods: Blackburne-Peel (BPI), Caton-Deschamps (CDI) and Insall-Salvati (ISR), by evaluating (1) the rates of patella alta identification and (2) the ability for one index to predict another. METHODS: One hundred lateral knee radiographs were evaluated using BPI, CDI and ISR to classify each knee as patella normal, patella alta or patella baja. Linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between each index. Conversion equations were then derived using the reported linear regression best-fit line, comparing each pair of indices. RESULTS: Patella alta was identified in 15 knees using BPI, 15 using CDI and 25 using ISR. A total of seven knees were classified as patella alta by all BPI, CDI and ISR. Statistical analysis revealed significant correlation (p ≤ 0.001) among BPI and CDI (R2 = 0.706), BPI and ISR (R2 = 0.328) and CDI and ISR (R2 = 0.288). Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test between the three indices revealed no significant difference between the means of converted and original indices. CONCLUSION: Despite their significant correlations and adequate reproducibility, variability between common patellar height indices render predictions and conversions between BPI, CDI and ISR inequivalent. Users of these indices must be aware of their incongruent properties when considering application to patients in the clinical setting. Furthermore, it remains unclear which patellar height measurement technique is the correct index to use in a given knee. This study highlights the need for further investigation to create a reliable and standardised method for identifying patella height. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy With and Without Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction in Adolescent Patients Leads to Decrease in Patellar Height and Patella Tendon Length.

OBJECTIVE: Patellar height changes after tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) have not yet been described. We aimed to evaluate whether TTO ± medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFL-R) influences patellar height and tendon length, hypothesizing that TTO would decrease patellar height and tendon length. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of skeletally mature adolescents (<18 y) receiving primary anteromedialization or medialization TTO ± MPFL-R. Patients with at least 6 months of radiographic follow-up were included in the study. Pre and postoperative patellar heights were assessed on lateral, weight-bearing, and flexion (30 to 70 degrees) radiographs using the Blackburne-Peel Index (BPI), Caton-Deschamps Index (CDI), and Insall-Salvati Ratio (ISR). Subgroup analyses were performed to compare patellar height changes in patients with preoperative patella alta, norma, and baja, as well as between patients undergoing medialization and anteromedialization TTO. Data were analyzed for normality using a Shapiro-Wilk test, and paired-sample t tests were performed. RESULTS: Forty-nine knees were included (mean age: 15 y; range: 12 to 17). A significant decrease in mean patellar height after TTO ± MPFL-R was observed across all measures: BPI (0.12, P = 0.000783), CDI (0.08, P = 0.01062), and ISR (0.15, P = 0.00000075). Patellar tendon length decreased by 2.26 mm ( P = 0.001272). Subgroup analyses demonstrated a decrease in mean patellar height across all 3 measurements ( P < 0.001; BPI, CDI, and ISR) for patients with preoperative patella alta but not patella norma or baja. Additional subgroup analysis showed a patellar height decrease using BPI (0.15, P = 0.004583) and ISR (0.14, P = 0.0002806) for patients receiving medialization TTO but not anteromedialization. The anteromedialization cohort did not demonstrate patellar height change using BPI and CDI; ISR demonstrated a decrease (0.10, P = 0.00917). CONCLUSIONS: Mean patellar height and tendon length decreases after TTO ± MPFL-R in skeletally mature, adolescent patients. Subgroup analyses suggest these changes occur in patients with preoperative patella alta and/or patients who undergo medialization TTO. These data suggest that some distalization in patellar positioning may be achieved without formal distalization osteotomy.

Female Patients and Decreased Hip Capsular Thickness on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Associated With Increased Axial Distraction Distance on Examination Under Anesthesia: An In Vivo Study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the relation of hip capsular thickness as measured on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and intraoperative hip joint axial distraction distance on an examination under anesthesia. METHODS: A retrospective review of primary arthroscopic hip procedures performed between November 2018 and June 2021 was conducted. The inclusion criteria included a diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and preoperative radiographic imaging and MRI. Fluoroscopic images were obtained at 0 lb and 100 lb of axial traction force. Total distraction distance was calculated by comparing the initial joint space with the total joint space at 100 lb. Hip capsular thickness was measured on MRI. Analysis was conducted using multiple linear regression, independent-samples t tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: Eighty patients were included. Bivariable regression showed an association between an increased distraction distance and female sex (ß = 4.303, R = 0.561, P < .001), as well as decreased anterior axial (ß = -1.291, R = 0.365, P < .001) and superior coronal (ß = -1.433, R = 0.501, P < .001) capsular thickness. Multivariable regression (R = 0.645) showed an association between an increased distraction distance and female sex (ß = 3.175, P < .001), as well as decreased superior coronal capsular thickness (ß = -0.764, P = .022). Independent-samples t tests showed that female patients had significantly decreased superior coronal capsular thickness (2.92 ± 1.14 mm vs 3.99 ± 1.15 mm, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Female sex and decreased hip capsular thickness in the superior aspect of the coronal plane on magnetic resonance scans were found to be predictors of increased hip joint axial distraction distance on examination under anesthesia prior to hip arthroscopy, with anterior axial capsular thickness being a moderate predictor. Poor predictors of distraction distance were posterior axial and inferior coronal capsular thickness, age, body mass index, and lateral center-edge angle. Female patients were also found to have thinner hip capsules in the superior region, which may explain the association between female patients and increased distraction. These findings further characterize the relation between capsular thickness and hip laxity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Previous Arthroscopic Hip Surgery Increases Axial Distractibility Compared to the Native Contralateral Hip and May Suggest Instability.

PURPOSE: To compare intraoperative hip joint distractibility between hips that previously underwent arthroscopic surgery and the contralateral hip with no history of surgical manipulation. METHODS: Patients undergoing revision hip arthroscopy between April 2019 and December 2020, who previously underwent arthroscopic hip surgery for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome, were prospectively enrolled. Exclusion criteria were any contralateral hip surgery. Before instrumentation, fluoroscopic images of both hips were obtained at 25 lbs traction intervals up to 100 lbs. Total joint space was measured at each traction interval. Distraction was calculated as the difference between the baseline joint space and the total joint space at each subsequent traction interval. Wilcoxon signed ranks tests and McNemar tests were used to compare distraction between revision and native contralateral hips. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients were included. Mean distraction of operative hips was significantly greater than mean distraction of nonoperative hips at traction intervals of 50 lbs (2.13 vs 1.04 mm, P = .002), 75 lbs (6.39 vs 3.70 mm, P < .001), and 100 lbs (8.24 vs 5.39, P < .001). Mean total joint space of operative hips was significantly greater than mean total joint space of nonoperative hips at traction intervals of 50 lbs (6.60 vs 5.39 mm, P < .001), 75 lbs (10.86 vs 8.05 mm, P < .001), and 100 lbs (12.73 vs 9.73, P < .001). A greater percentage of operative hips achieved all distraction thresholds, in 2-mm intervals up to 10-mm, at each traction interval. CONCLUSIONS: In the majority of patients undergoing revision hip arthroscopy, previous arthroscopic hip surgery increases axial distractibility of the hip joint compared with the native contralateral hip at axial traction forces of 50-100 lbs. Increased axial distractibility following hip arthroscopy may be suggestive of hip instability and can be assessed on a stress examination with the patient under anesthesia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, case-control study.

Criteria for the Operating Room Confirmation of the Diagnosis of Hip Instability: The Results of an International Expert Consensus Conference.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to establish an international expert consensus on operating room findings that aid in the diagnosis of hip instability. METHODS: An expert panel was convened to build an international consensus on the operating room diagnosis/confirmation of hip instability. Seventeen surgeons who have published or lectured nationally or internationally on the topic of hip instability were invited to participate. Fifteen panel members completed a pre-meeting questionnaire and agreed to participate in a 1-day consensus meeting on May 15, 2021. A review of the literature was performed to identify published intraoperative reference criteria used in the diagnosis of hip instability. Studies were included for discussion if they reported and intraoperative findings associated with hip instability. The evidence for and against each criteria was discussed, followed by an anonymous voting process. For consensus, defined a priori, items were included in the final criteria set if at least 80% of experts agreed. RESULTS: A review of the published literature identified 11 operating room criteria that have been used to facilitate the diagnosis of hip instability. Six additional criteria were proposed by panel members as part of the pre-meeting questionnaire. Consensus agreement was achieved for 8 criteria, namely ease of hip distraction under anesthesia (100.0% agreement), inside-out pattern of chondral damage (100.0% agreement), location of chondral damage on the acetabulum (93.3% agreement), pattern of labral damage (93.3% agreement), anteroinferior labrum chondral damage (86.7% agreement), perifoveal cartilage damage (97.6% agreement), a capsular defect (86.7% agreement), and capsular status (80.0% agreement). Consensus was not achieved for 9 items, namely ligamentum teres tear (66.7% agreement), arthroscopic stability tests (46.7% agreement), persistent distraction after removal of traction (46.7% agreement), findings of examination under anesthesia (46.7% agreement), the femoral head divot sign (40.0% agreement), inferomedial synovitis (26.7% agreement), drive-through sign (26.7% agreement), iliopsoas irritation (26.7% agreement) and ligamentum teres-labral kissing lesion (13.3% agreement). All experts agreed on the final list of 8 criteria items reaching consensus. CONCLUSION: This expert panel identified 8 criteria that can be used in the operating room to help confirm the diagnosis of hip instability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V expert opinion.

Editorial Commentary: Not Yet Convinced That the Femoroacetabular Impingement Resection (Fair) Arc Measurement Provides a "Fair" Assessment of Cam Resection Principles.

Hip arthroscopy has proven to be an effective surgical approach for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome. Studies have shown that patients typically have improved functional outcomes and high rates of return to activity following cam lesion resection and reshaping of the femoral head-neck junction. However, despite these favorable outcomes, there is still a steep and well-recognized learning curve in FAI hip arthroscopy. Although it is common dogma to consider an ideal reshaping of the femoral head-neck junction as being perfectly spherical, the ability to achieve this intraoperatively can be quite challenging. A new tool is the "femoroacetabular impingement resection (FAIR) arc," measured on a 45° Dunn lateral radiograph where a best-fit circle incorporates the region immediately inferior to the anteroinferior iliac spine, the subspine region, and lateral femoral neck base. The maximal radial distance height is then measured from the circumference of this circle to the apex of the cam lesion. This radiographic aid may assist with intraoperative estimate of appropriate cam lesion resection depth. While I tend to utilize preoperative radiographs and intra-operative neck sclerosis to determine cam resection depth, I continue to seek out other ways to effectively perform a femoral osteoplasty. While my initial attempt to utilize the FAIR index in my practice did not seem effective, I will continue to test this measurement in my patients.

Joint Venting Prior to Hip Distraction Minimizes Traction Forces During Hip Arthroscopy.

PURPOSE: This study evaluates the effect of venting on distraction of the hip during arthroscopy on a post-free traction table for fixed traction forces ranging from 0 to 100 pounds (lbs). METHODS: Patients underwent surgery by the senior author (S.K.A.) between November 2018 and July 2019. Inclusion criteria were primary hip arthroscopy requiring central compartment access. Patients were positioned in 10-15° Trendelenburg on a post-free traction table. Prior to instrumentation, fluoroscopic images of the operated hip joint were taken at 25-lb intervals from 0 to 100 lbs of axial traction. Traction was released for 15 minutes. Venting with 20 mL of air was performed and fluoroscopic images were repeated at all traction intervals. Joint displacement was measured at all intervals. An unvented control group underwent the same axial traction protocol for comparison. RESULTS: Sixty-one consecutive patients underwent study protocol. Fifty-eight hips in 57 patients were included. Thirty-two (55.2%) were female; mean age was 31 ± 13 years and mean body mass index was 25.7 ± 6.2. Paired samples analysis demonstrated mean differences in distraction distance prior to and after venting of 0.27, 2.60, 4.09, 4.54, and 2.31 mm at 0, 25, 50, 75, and 100 lbs of traction, which were significant (P < .001) at all traction intervals. Significantly more vented hips distracted at least 10 mm at 25-100 lbs traction (P ≤ .001). An unvented control group showed no significant differences between the first and second traction application. CONCLUSIONS: Venting prior to applying traction on a post-free traction table increases the distraction distance achieved for a given traction force at multiple levels of traction in comparison to the pre-vented state. Our results suggest venting the hip joint prior to the application of traction may serve to reduce the maximal amount of traction required to safely instrument the hip arthroscopically. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, case series.

A Narrow Posterior Joint Space on a False Profile Radiograph Does Not Correlate With Posterior Joint Cartilage Degeneration in Hip Preservation Patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether a narrow posterior joint space (<2 mm) correlated with posterior joint cartilage degeneration in the hip preservation patient population. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 155 consecutive hip arthroscopy cases by a single surgeon (SKA) from March 2012 to February 2013 was performed. Patients were included in the study if they had an adequate perioperative false profile radiograph and clear intraoperative arthroscopic images of the posterior hip joint. The narrowest posterior joint space (NPJS) width and the directly posterior, posterosuperior, superior, and anterosuperior joint space widths were measured on the false profile radiograph. Femoral and acetabular cartilage of the posterior hip joint were graded according to the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) classification system using arthroscopic images obtained at the time of surgery. The cartilage grades of patients with <2 mm NPJS were compared with cartilage grades of patients with ≥2 mm NPJS. RESULTS: There was no difference in cartilage grading between patients with <2 mm NPJS (19 patients) and those with ≥2 mm NPJS (81 patients) (P = .905). The mean age of patients with NPJS ≥2 mm and <2 mm was 34.0 (median 31.2; interquartile range [IQR] 23.7, 42.9) and 38.7 (median 43.0; IQR 26.1, 50.9) respectively, and was not statistically different (P = .183). No correlation between cartilage grade and NPJS measurement was found (P = .374). CONCLUSION: In this predominantly cam-type femoroacetabular impingement patient cohort, our findings indicate there is no correlation between a <2 mm posterior hip joint narrowing seen on false profile radiographs and posterior hip cartilage degeneration confirmed with arthroscopy. Although posterior arthritis can be visualized on a false profile radiograph, a posterior joint space measurement <2 mm should not be interpreted as isolated posterior joint wear and should not be considered a hip arthroscopy contraindication. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Which Two-dimensional Radiographic Measurements of Cam Femoroacetabular Impingement Best Describe the Three-dimensional Shape of the Proximal Femur?

BACKGROUND: Many two-dimensional (2-D) radiographic views are used to help diagnose cam femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), but there is little consensus as to which view or combination of views is most effective at visualizing the magnitude and extent of the cam lesion (ie, severity). Previous studies have used a single image from a sequence of CT or MR images to serve as a reference standard with which to evaluate the ability of 2-D radiographic views and associated measurements to describe the severity of the cam lesion. However, single images from CT or MRI data may fail to capture the apex of the cam lesion. Thus, it may be more appropriate to use measurements of three-dimensional (3-D) surface reconstructions from CT or MRI data to serve as an anatomic reference standard when evaluating radiographic views and associated measurements used in the diagnosis of cam FAI. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to use digitally reconstructed radiographs and 3-D statistical shape modeling to (1) determine the correlation between 2-D radiographic measurements of cam FAI and 3-D metrics of proximal femoral shape; and 2) identify the combination of radiographic measurements from plain film projections that were most effective at predicting the 3-D shape of the proximal femur. METHODS: This study leveraged previously acquired CT images of the femur from a convenience sample of 37 patients (34 males; mean age, 27 years, range, 16-47 years; mean body mass index [BMI], 24.6 kg/m, range, 19.0-30.2 kg/m) diagnosed with cam FAI imaged between February 2005 and January 2016. Patients were diagnosed with cam FAI based on a culmination of clinical examinations, history of hip pain, and imaging findings. The control group consisted of 59 morphologically normal control participants (36 males; mean age, 29 years, range, 15-55 years; mean BMI, 24.4 kg/m, range, 16.3-38.6 kg/m) imaged between April 2008 and September 2014. Of these controls, 30 were cadaveric femurs and 29 were living participants. All controls were screened for evidence of femoral deformities using radiographs. In addition, living control participants had no history of hip pain or previous surgery to the hip or lower limbs. CT images were acquired for each participant and the surface of the proximal femur was segmented and reconstructed. Surfaces were input to our statistical shape modeling pipeline, which objectively calculated 3-D shape scores that described the overall shape of the entire proximal femur and of the region of the femur where the cam lesion is typically located. Digital reconstructions for eight plain film views (AP, Meyer lateral, 45° Dunn, modified 45° Dunn, frog-leg lateral, Espié frog-leg, 90° Dunn, and cross-table lateral) were generated from CT data. For each view, measurements of the α angle and head-neck offset were obtained by two researchers (intraobserver correlation coefficients of 0.80-0.94 for the α angle and 0.42-0.80 for the head-neck offset measurements). The relationships between radiographic measurements from each view and the 3-D shape scores (for the entire proximal femur and for the region specific to the cam lesion) were assessed with linear correlation. Additionally, partial least squares regression was used to determine which combination of views and measurements was the most effective at predicting 3-D shape scores. RESULTS: Three-dimensional shape scores were most strongly correlated with α angle on the cross-table view when considering the entire proximal femur (r = -0.568; p < 0.001) and on the Meyer lateral view when considering the region of the cam lesion (r = -0.669; p < 0.001). Partial least squares regression demonstrated that measurements from the Meyer lateral and 90° Dunn radiographs produced the optimized regression model for predicting shape scores for the proximal femur (R = 0.405, root mean squared error of prediction [RMSEP] = 1.549) and the region of the cam lesion (R = 0.525, RMSEP = 1.150). Interestingly, views with larger differences in the α angle and head-neck offset between control and cam FAI groups did not have the strongest correlations with 3-D shape. CONCLUSIONS: Considered together, radiographic measurements from the Meyer lateral and 90° Dunn views provided the most effective predictions of 3-D shape of the proximal femur and the region of the cam lesion as determined using shape modeling metrics. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our results suggest that clinicians should consider using the Meyer lateral and 90° Dunn views to evaluate patients in whom cam FAI is suspected. However, the α angle and head-neck offset measurements from these and other plain film views could describe no more than half of the overall variation in the shape of the proximal femur and cam lesion. Thus, caution should be exercised when evaluating femoral head anatomy using the α angle and head-neck offset measurements from plain film radiographs. Given these findings, we believe there is merit in pursuing research that aims to develop the framework necessary to integrate statistical shape modeling into clinical evaluation, because this could aid in the diagnosis of cam FAI.

Editorial Commentary: Hip Arthroscopy Capsular Approaches: Periportal, Puncture, Interportal, T-Cut Does It Really Matter?

When treating femoroacetabular impingement, appropriate visualization is needed to technically perform a complete osteoplasty. Adequate visualization typically requires some level of disruption of the hip capsule during the surgical approach. As a result, complications including microinstability or frank dislocation may result from any violation of the hip capsule. There is a trade-off involved in the various capsular approaches: the balance between appropriate visualization in order to adequately perform a complete femoral osteoplasty versus disruption of the capsule, potentially causing iatrogenic hip instability. If visualization is compromised, it is better to extend a capsulotomy than to have a burr, shaver, or electrocautery remove part of the capsular envelope. In the end, the solution is to use an approach that allows you to visualize and treat the femoroacetabular impingement pathology, yet maintain the integrity of the capsular envelope.

Editorial Commentary: Patient Profiling: Identifying Risk Factors That Help Predict Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopy Candidates.

Hip pain in the young athletic population is often caused by femoroacetabular impingement morphology. If a patient fails conservative management, hip arthroscopy becomes a potential treatment option. Our ability to maximize patient outcomes after hip arthroscopy is directly related to preoperative patient selection, intraoperative technical ability, and attention to detail in the postoperative period. When considering surgery as a therapeutic option, we want to first identify that the pain is truly stemming from the hip. Once the hip is identified as the culprit, then we proceed with the responsibility of discussing pros and cons and risks and benefits to each patient to critically evaluate whether surgical treatment is a viable option. With the explosion of literature in the field of hip preservation, we have recognized certain modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors that aid us in identifying patients who may have difficulty in achieving their functional athletic expectations after surgery.

Do Your Routine Radiographs to Diagnose Cam Femoroacetabular Impingement Visualize the Region of the Femoral Head-Neck Junction You Intended?

PURPOSE: To use computer models and image analysis to identify the position on the head-neck junction visualized in 10 radiographic views used to quantify cam morphology. METHODS: We generated 97 surface models of the proximal femur from computed tomography scans of 59 control femurs and 38 femurs with cam morphology-a flattening or convexity at the femoral head-neck junction. Each model was transformed to a position that represents the anteroposterior, Meyer lateral, 45° Dunn, modified false-profile, Espié frog-leg, modified 45° Dunn, frog-leg lateral, cross-table, 90° Dunn, and false-profile views. The position on the head-neck junction visualized from each view was identified on the surfaces. This position was then quantified by a clock face generated on the plane of the head-neck junction, in which the 12-o'clock position indicated the superior head-neck junction and the 3-o'clock position indicated the anterior head-neck junction. The mean visualized clock-face position was calculated for all subjects. Analysis was repeated to account for variability in femoral version. A general linear model with repeated measures was used to compare each radiographic view and anteversion angle. RESULTS: Each radiographic view provided visualization of the mean clock-face position as follows: anteroposterior view, 12:01; Meyer lateral view, 1:08; 45° Dunn view, 1:40; modified false-profile view, 2:01; Espié frog-leg view, 2:14; modified 45° Dunn view, 2:35; frog-leg lateral view, 2:45; cross-table view, 3:00; 90° Dunn view, 3:13; and false-profile view, 3:44. Each view visualized a different position on the clock face (all P < .001). Increasing simulated femoral anteversion by 10° changed the visualized position of the head-neck junction to a more clockwise position (range, 0:07 to 0:29; all P < .001), whereas decreasing anteversion by 10° visualized a more counterclockwise position (range, -0:23 to -0:08; all P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Ten common radiographic views used to identify cam morphology visualized different clock-face positions of the head-neck junction. Our data will help clinicians to understand the position of the head-neck junction visualized for each radiographic view and make educated decisions in the selection of radiographs acquired in the clinic. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our findings will aid clinicians in choosing a set of radiographs to capture cam morphology in the assessment of patients with hip pain.

Traction Time, Force and Postoperative Nerve Block Significantly Influence the Development and Duration of Neuropathy Following Hip Arthroscopy.

PURPOSE: To (1) evaluate the individual and combined effects of traction time and traction force on postoperative neuropathy following hip arthroscopy, (2) determine if perioperative fascia iliaca block has an effect on the risk of this neuropathy, and (3) identify if the these items had a significant association with the presence, location, and/or duration of postoperative numbness. METHODS: Between February 2015 and December 2016, a consecutive cohort of hip arthroscopy patients was prospectively enrolled. Traction time, force, and postoperative nerve block administration were recorded. The location and duration of numbness were assessed at postoperative clinic visits. Numbness location was classified into regions: 1, groin; 2, lateral thigh; 3, medial thigh; 4, dorsal foot; and 5,preoperative thigh or radiculopathic numbness. RESULTS: A total of 156 primary hip arthroscopy patients were analyzed, 99 (63%) women and 57 (37%) men. Mean traction time was 46.5 ± 20.3 minutes. Seventy-four patients (47%) reported numbness with an average duration of 157.5 ± 116.2 days. Postoperative fascia iliaca nerve block was a significant predictor of medial thigh numbness (odds ratio, 3.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.46-7.76; P = .04). Neither traction time nor force were associated with generalized numbness (P = .85 and P = .40, respectively). However, among those who experienced numbness, traction time and force were greater in patients with combined groin and lateral thigh numbness compared with those with isolated lateral thigh or medial thigh numbness (P = .001 and P = .005, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative neuropathy is a well-documented complication following hip arthroscopy. Concomitant pudendal and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve palsy may be related to increased traction force and time, even in the setting of low intraoperative traction time (<1 hour). Isolated medial thigh numbness is significantly associated with postoperative fascia iliaca blockade. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, case series.

Assessment of Acetabular Morphology Using the Acetabular Anterior Center-Edge Angle on Modified False-Profile Radiographs.

PURPOSE: To compare radiographic parameters of acetabular morphology between standard and modified false-profile (FP) radiographs. METHODS: Standard and modified FP radiographs were obtained in 225 hips in 200 consecutive patients evaluated for hip pain and suspected femoroacetabular impingement. Radiographs were retrospectively reviewed by 2 readers to determine the anterior center-edge angle (ACEA), as assessed to the sourcil and to the bone edge. Inter-rater reliability of radiographic measurements was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Measurements were evaluated for normality with the Shapiro-Wilk test, averaged between the 2 readers, and compared between views using the paired Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficient values for standard and modified FP views were 0.923 and 0.932, respectively, measuring to the sourcil and 0.867 and 0.896, respectively, measuring to the lateral bone edge. The median difference in ACEA measurements to the sourcil was 1° between the standard and modified FP view (45° vs 44°, P < .001). The median difference in ACEA measurements to the bone edge was 2° (34° vs 32°, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Thirty-five degrees of femoral internal rotation for a modified FP hip radiographic view provides similar clinical information regarding acetabular morphology to that of the standard FP view. Given that the modified FP view also provides better visualization of the anterosuperior head-neck junction cam lesion, the modified FP view may be preferred over the standard FP view in evaluation of hip pain in the young patient. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Isolated focal cartilage and labral defects in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome may represent new, unique injury patterns.

PURPOSE: Develop a framework to quantify the size, location and severity of femoral and acetabular-sided cartilage and labral damage observed in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy, and generate a database of individual defect parameters to facilitate future research and treatment efforts. METHODS: The size, location, and severity of cartilage and labral damage were prospectively collected using a custom, standardized post-operative template for 100 consecutive patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. Chondrolabral junction damage, isolated intrasubstance labral damage, isolated acetabular cartilage damage and femoral cartilage damage were quantified and recorded using a combination of Beck and ICRS criteria. Radiographic measurements including alpha angle, head-neck offset, lateral centre edge angle and acetabular index were calculated and compared to the aforementioned chondral data using a multivariable logistic regression model and adjusted odd's ratio. Reliability among measurements were assessed using the kappa statistic and intraclass coefficients were used to evaluate continuous variables. RESULTS: Damage to the acetabular cartilage originating at the chondrolabral junction was the most common finding in 97 hips (97%) and was usually accompanied by labral damage in 65 hips (65%). The width (p = 0.003) and clock-face length (p = 0.016) of the damaged region both increased alpha angle on anteroposterior films. 10% of hips had femoral cartilage damage while only 2 (2%) of hips had isolated defects to either the acetabular cartilage or labrum. The adjusted odds of severe cartilage (p = 0.022) and labral damage (p = 0.046) increased with radiographic cam deformity but was not related to radiographic measures of acetabular coverage. CONCLUSIONS: Damage at the chondrolabral junction was very common in this hip arthroscopy cohort, while isolated defects to the acetabular cartilage or labrum were rare. These data demonstrate that the severity of cam morphology, quantified through radiographic measurements, is a primary predictor of location and severity of chondral and labral damage and focal chondral defects may represent a unique subset of patients that deserve further study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Revisiting the Anteroinferior Iliac Spine: Is the Subspine Pathologic? A Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Subspine impingement is a recognized source of extraarticular hip impingement. Although CT-based classification systems have been described, to our knowledge, no study has evaluated the morphology of the anteroinferior iliac spine (AIIS) with plain radiographs nor to our knowledge has any study compared its appearance between plain radiographs and CT scan and correlated AIIS morphology with physical findings. Previous work has suggested a correlation of AIIS morphology and hip ROM but this has not been clinically validated. Furthermore, if plain radiographs can be found to adequately screen for AIIS morphology, CT could be selectively used, limiting radiation exposure. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purposes of this study were (1) to determine the prevalence of AIIS subtypes in a cohort of patients with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement; (2) to compare AP pelvis and false profile radiographs with three-dimensional (3-D) CT classification; and (3) to correlate the preoperative hip physical examination with AIIS subtypes. METHODS: A retrospective study of patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome was performed. Between February 2013 and November 2016, 601 patients underwent hip arthroscopy. To be included here, each patient had to have undergone a primary hip arthroscopy for the diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. Each patient needed to have an interpretable set of plain radiographs consisting of weightbearing AP pelvis and false profile radiographs as well as full documentation of physical findings in the medical record. Patients who additionally had a CT scan with 3-D reconstructions were included as well. During the period in question, it was the preference of the treating surgeon whether a preoperative CT scan was obtained. A total of 145 of 601 (24%) patients were included in the analysis; of this cohort, 54% (78 of 145) had a CT scan and 63% (92 of 145) were women with a mean age of 31 ± 10 years. The AIIS was classified first on patients in whom the 3-D CT scan was available based on a previously published 3-D CT classification. The AIIS was then classified by two orthopaedic surgeons (TGM, MRK) on AP and false profile radiographs based on the position of its inferior margin to a line at the lateral aspect of the acetabular sourcil normal to vertical. Type I was above, Type II at the level, and Type III below this line. There was fair interrater agreement for AP pelvis (κ = 0.382; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.239-0.525), false profile (κ = 0.372; 95% CI, 0.229-0.515), and 3-D CT (κ = 0.325; 95% CI, 0.156-0.494). There was moderate to almost perfect intraobserver repeatability for AP pelvis (κ = 0.516; 95% CI, 0.284-0.748), false profile (κ = 0.915; 95% CI, 0.766-1.000), and 3-D CT (κ = 0.915; 95% CI, 0.766-1.000). The plane radiographs were then compared with the 3-D CT scan classification and accuracy, defined as the proportion of correct classification out of total classifications. Preoperative hip flexion, internal rotation, external rotation, flexion adduction, internal rotation, subspine, and Stinchfield physical examination tests were compared with classification of the AIIS on 3-D CT. Finally, preoperative hip flexion, internal rotation, and external rotation were compared with preoperative lateral center-edge angle and alpha angle. RESULTS: The prevalence of AIIS was 56% (44 of 78) Type I, 39% (30 of 78) Type II, and 5% (four of 78) Type III determined from the 3-D CT classification. For the plain radiographic classification, the distribution of AIIS morphology was 64% (93 of 145) Type I, 32% (46 of 145) Type II, and 4% (six of 145) Type III on AP pelvis and 49% (71 of 145) Type I, 48% (70 of 145) Type II, and 3% (four of 145) Type III on false profile radiographs. False profile radiographs were more accurate than AP pelvis radiographs for classification when compared against the gold standard of 3-D CT at 98% (95% CI, 96-100) versus 80% (95% CI, 75-85). The false profile radiograph had better sensitivity for Type II (97% versus 47%, p < 0.001) and specificity for Types I and II AIIS (97% versus 53%, p < 0.001; 98% versus 90%, p = 0.046) morphology compared with AP pelvis radiographs. There was no correlation between AIIS type as determined by 3-D CT scan and hip flexion (rs = -0.115, p = 0.377), internal rotation (rs = 0.070, p = 0.548), flexion adduction internal rotation (U = 72.00, p = 0.270), Stinchfield (U = 290.50, p = 0.755), or subspine tests (U = 319.00, p = 0.519). External rotation was weakly correlated (rs = 0.253, p = 0.028) with AIIS subtype. Alpha angle was negatively correlated with hip flexion (r = -0.387, p = 0.002) and external rotation (r = -0.238, p = 0.043) and not correlated with internal rotation (r = -0.068, p = 0.568). CONCLUSIONS: The findings in this study suggest the false profile radiograph is superior to an AP radiograph of the pelvis in evaluating AIIS morphology. Neither preoperative hip internal rotation nor impingement tests correlate with AIIS type as previously suggested questioning the utility of the AIIS classification system in identifying pathologic AIIS anatomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study.

Modified False-Profile Radiograph of the Hip Provides Better Visualization of the Anterosuperior Femoral Head-Neck Junction.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to quantify the amount of internal femur rotation required to visualize the 12 to 3 o'clock positions of the femoral head-neck junction as seen on the false-profile radiograph. METHODS: Computed tomography (CT) images of the femur were retrospectively reviewed from control subjects and cam femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) patients. Using an automatically determined clockface, the positions between 12 and 3 o'clock were determined. The optimal femoral rotation angle to visualize each clockface position on the femoral head-neck junction was calculated based on the CT surface data. RESULTS: Fifty-nine control subjects and 38 cam FAI patients were evaluated for this study. The mean (95% confidence interval) internal femur rotation needed to optimally visualize the clockface positions of the femoral head-neck junction on the modified false-profile radiograph were 0.9° (0.8°-1.0°) for 3:00, 10.3° (10.0°-10.6°) for 2:30, 21.6° (21.0°-22.1°) for 2:00, 34.3° (33.6°-35.1°) for 1:30, 49.6° (48.6°-50.4°) for 1:00, 68.4° (67.7°-69.0°) for 12:30, and 90.1° (89.9°-90.4°) for 12:00. CONCLUSIONS: Internal femur rotation of 35° during the false-profile radiograph may better visualize the femoral head-neck junction in the anterosuperior (1 to 2 o'clock) region commonly associated with the cam lesion. From this view, rotation angles between 0° and 90° can be used to visualize other regions of the anterosuperior femoral head-neck junction. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The internal rotation of the affected femur for a modified false-profile radiograph may provide a new radiographic view that can be used to quantify anterosuperior femoral head-neck morphology.

Computed Tomography Scans in Patients With Young Adult Hip Pain Carry a Lifetime Risk of Malignancy.

PURPOSE: To calculate the lifetime risk of malignancy in young adult patients with hip pain using 5 different imaging and radiation dose protocols with or without pre- and postoperative computed tomography (CT). METHODS: Radiographic and CT patient radiation doses were retrospectively reviewed. Imaging protocols for hip pain composed of radiographs with or without pre- and postoperative CT scans were modeled and radiation doses were estimated using the PCXMC computer code. Based on these radiation doses, lifetime attributable risks of cancer and mortality for a 10- through 60-year-old male and female were calculated as published by the committee on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation (BEIR) in the BEIR VII report. Relative risks and number needed to harm (NNH) were calculated for each protocol. RESULTS: Based on a review of our institutional database, 2 CT scan doses were used for this study: a high 5.06 mSv and a low 2.86 mSv. Effective doses of radiation ranged from 0.59 to 0.66 mSv for radiographs alone to 10.71 to 10.78 mSv for radiographs and CT both pre- and postoperatively at the higher dose. Lifetime attributable risk of cancer for radiographs alone was 0.006% and 0.011% for a 20-year-old male and female, respectively. Lifetime attributable risk of cancer for radiographs along with pre- and postoperative CT scans at higher dose was 0.105% and 0.177% for a 20-year-old male and female, respectively. Radiographs alone lead to an NNH of 16,667 for males and 9,090 for females, whereas the protocol with pre- and postoperative CT scans at the higher dose led to an NNH of 952 for males and 564 for females. The relative risk of this protocol compared to radiographs alone was 17.5 for males and 16.1 for females. CONCLUSION: Protocols with CT scans of the hip/pelvis pose a small lifetime attributable risk (0.034%-0.177% for a 20-year-old) but a large relative risk (5-17 times) of cancer compared with radiographs alone in the imaging evaluation for hip pain that decreases with increasing age. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study illustrates the need for clinicians to understand the imaging protocols used at their institution to understand the risks and benefits of using those protocols in their practice.