RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Although forearm arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are the preferred initial vascular access for hemodialysis based on national guidelines, there are no population-level studies evaluating trends in creation of forearm vs upper arm AVFs and arteriovenous grafts (AVGs). The purpose of this study was to report temporal trends in first-time permanent hemodialysis access type, and to assess the effect of national initiatives on rates of AVF placement. METHODS: Retrospective cross-sectional study (2012-2022) utilizing the Vascular Quality Initiative database. All patients older than 18 years with creation of first-time upper extremity surgical hemodialysis access were included. Anatomic location of the AVF or AVG (forearm vs upper arm) was defined based on inflow artery, outflow vein, and presumed cannulation zone. Primary analysis examined temporal trends in rates of forearm vs upper arm AVFs and AVGs using time series analyses (modified Mann-Kendall test). Subgroup analyses examined rates of access configuration stratified by age, sex, race, dialysis, and socioeconomic status. Interrupted time series analysis was performed to assess the effect of the 2015 Fistula First Catheter Last initiative on rates of AVFs. RESULTS: Of the 52,170 accesses, 57.9% were upper arm AVFs, 25.2% were forearm AVFs, 15.4% were upper arm AVGs, and 1.5% were forearm AVGs. From 2012 to 2022, there was no significant change in overall rates of forearm or upper arm AVFs. There was a numerical increase in upper arm AVGs (13.9 to 18.2 per 100; P = .09), whereas forearm AVGs significantly declined (1.8 to 0.7 per 100; P = .02). In subgroup analyses, we observed a decrease in forearm AVFs among men (33.1 to 28.7 per 100; P = .04) and disadvantaged (Area Deprivation Index percentile ≥50) patients (29.0 to 20.7 per 100; P = .04), whereas female (17.2 to 23.1 per 100; P = .03), Black (15.6 to 24.5 per 100; P < .01), elderly (age ≥80 years) (18.7 to 32.5 per 100; P < .01), and disadvantaged (13.6 to 20.5 per 100; P < .01) patients had a significant increase in upper arm AVGs. The Fistula First Catheter Last initiative had no effect on the rate of AVF placement (83.2 to 83.7 per 100; P=.37). CONCLUSIONS: Despite national initiatives to promote autogenous vascular access, the rates of first-time AVFs have remained relatively constant, with forearm AVFs only representing one-quarter of all permanent surgical accesses. Furthermore, elderly, Black, female, and disadvantaged patients saw an increase in upper arm AVGs. Further efforts to elucidate factors associated with forearm AVF placement, as well as potential physician, center, and regional variation is warranted.
Assuntos
Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica , Bases de Dados Factuais , Antebraço , Diálise Renal , Humanos , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/tendências , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/estatística & dados numéricos , Diálise Renal/tendências , Feminino , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos Transversais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Fatores de Tempo , Antebraço/irrigação sanguínea , Estados Unidos , Resultado do Tratamento , Implante de Prótese Vascular/tendências , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Adulto , Extremidade Superior/irrigação sanguínea , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Análise de Séries Temporais InterrompidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: A difficult challenge in health equity training is conducting honest and safe discussions about differences in lived experience based on social identity, and how racism and other systems of oppression impact health care. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a Theatre of the Oppressed workshop for medical students that examines systems of oppression as related to lived health care experiences. DESIGN: Mixed-methods cross-sectional survey and interviews. PARTICIPANTS: Forty randomly assigned early first-year medical students. INTERVENTIONS: A 90-min virtual workshop with three clinical scenes created by students where a character is being discriminated against or oppressed. During performance, students can stop scene, replace oppressed character, and role play how they would address harm, marginalization, and power imbalance. Participants discuss what they have witnessed and experienced. MAIN MEASURES/APPROACH: Likert-scale questions assessing workshop's impact. Open-ended survey questions and interviews about workshop. KEY RESULTS: Thirty-one (78%) of 40 participants completed the survey. Fifty-three percent were female. Thirty-seven percent were White, 33% Asian American, 15% Black, 11% Latinx, and 4% multiracial. Ninety percent thought this training could help them take better care of patients with lived experiences different from their own. Most agreed or strongly agreed the workshop helped them develop listening (23, 77%) and observation (26, 84%) skills. Twelve (39%) students felt stressed, while 29 (94%) felt safe. Twenty-five (81%) students agreed or strongly agreed there were meaningful discussions about systemic inequities. Students reported the workshop helped them step into others' shoes, understand intersectional experiences of multiple identities, and discuss navigating and addressing bias, discrimination, social drivers of health, hierarchy, power structures, and systems of oppression. Some thought it was difficult to have open discussions because of fear of being poorly perceived by peers. CONCLUSIONS: Theatre of the Oppressed enabled medical students to engage in meaningful discussions about racism and other systems of oppression.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Creating a diverse workforce is paramount to the success of the surgical field. A diverse workforce allows us to meet the health needs of an increasingly diverse population and to bring new ideas to spur technical innovation. The purpose of this study was to assess trends in workforce diversity within vascular surgery (VS) and general surgery (GS) as compared with orthopedic surgery (OS)-a specialty that instituted a formal diversity initiative over a decade ago. METHODS: Data on the trainee pool for VS (fellowships and integrated residencies), GS, and OS were obtained from the U.S. Graduate Medical Education reports for 1999 through 2017. Medical student demographic data were obtained from the Association of American Medical Colleges U.S. medical school enrollment reports. The representation of surgical trainee populations (female, Hispanic, and black) was normalized by their representation in medical school. We also performed the χ2 test to compare proportions of residents over dichotomized time periods (1999-2005 and 2013-2017) as well as a more sensitive trend of proportions test. RESULTS: The proportion of female trainees increased significantly between the time periods for the three surgical disciplines examined (P < .001). Hispanic trainees also represented an increasing proportion of all three disciplines (P ≤ .001). The proportion of black trainees did not significantly change in any discipline between the two periods. Relative to their proportion in medical school, Hispanic trainees were well represented in all surgical specialties studied (normalized ratio [NR], 0.95-1.52: 0.95 OS, 1.00 GS, 1.53 VS fellowship, and 1.23 VS residency). Compared with their representation in medical school, women were under-represented as surgical trainees (NR: 0.32 OS, 0.82 GS, 0.56 VS fellowship, and 0.78 VS residency) as were black trainees (NR: 0.63 OS, 0.90 GS, 0.99 VS fellowship, and 0.81 VS residency). CONCLUSIONS: Although there were significant increases in the number of women and Hispanic trainees in these three surgical disciplines, only Hispanic trainees enter the surgical field at a rate higher than their proportion in medical school. The lack of an increase in black trainees across all specialties was particularly discouraging. Women and black trainees were under-represented in all specialties as compared with their representation in medical school. The data presented suggest potential problems with recruitment at multiple levels of the pipeline. Particular attention should be paid to increasing the pool of minority medical school graduates who are both interested in and competitive for surgical specialties.
Assuntos
Competência Cultural , Diversidade Cultural , Equidade de Gênero , Cirurgia Geral/tendências , Médicas/tendências , Racismo/prevenção & controle , Sexismo/prevenção & controle , Cirurgiões/tendências , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/tendências , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Competência Cultural/organização & administração , Feminino , Cirurgia Geral/educação , Cirurgia Geral/organização & administração , Hispânico ou Latino , Humanos , Internato e Residência/tendências , Masculino , Cirurgiões Ortopédicos/tendências , Seleção de Pessoal/tendências , Médicas/organização & administração , Estudantes de Medicina , Cirurgiões/educação , Cirurgiões/organização & administração , Fatores de Tempo , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/educação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/organização & administraçãoRESUMO
Annual changes in day length enhance or suppress diverse aspects of immune function, giving rise to seasonal cycles of illness and mortality. The daily light-dark cycle also entrains circadian rhythms in immunity. Most published reports on immunological seasonality rely on measurements or interventions performed only at one point in the day. Because there can be no perfect matching of circadian phase across photoperiods of different duration, the manner in which these timescales interact to affect immunity is not understood. We examined whether photoperiodic changes in immune function reflect phenotypic changes that persist throughout the daily cycle, or merely reflect photoperiodic shifts in the circadian phase alignment of immunological rhythms. Diurnal rhythms in blood leukocyte trafficking, infection induced sickness responses, and delayed-type hypersensitivity skin inflammatory responses were examined at high-frequency sampling intervals (every 3â¯h) in Siberian hamsters (Phodopus sungorus) following immunological adaptation to summer or winter photoperiods. Photoperiod profoundly enhanced or suppressed immune function, in a trait-specific manner, and we were unable to identify a phase alignment of diurnal waveforms which eliminated these enhancing and suppressing effects of photoperiod. These results support the hypothesis that seasonal timescales affect immunity via mechanisms independent of circadian entrainment of the immunological circadian waveform.
Assuntos
Ritmo Circadiano/imunologia , Imunidade , Fotoperíodo , Estações do Ano , Adaptação Fisiológica/imunologia , Animais , Cricetinae , Masculino , Phodopus/imunologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Contemporary pulmonary embolism (PE) research, in many cases, relies on data from electronic health records (EHRs) and administrative databases that use International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes. Natural language processing (NLP) tools can be used for automated chart review and patient identification. However, there remains uncertainty with the validity of ICD-10 codes or NLP algorithms for patient identification. METHODS: The PE-EHR+ study has been designed to validate ICD-10 codes as Principal Discharge Diagnosis, or Secondary Discharge Diagnoses, as well as NLP tools set out in prior studies to identify patients with PE within EHRs. Manual chart review by two independent abstractors by predefined criteria will be the reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values will be determined. We will assess the discriminatory function of code subgroups for intermediate- and high-risk PE. In addition, accuracy of NLP algorithms to identify PE from radiology reports will be assessed. RESULTS: A total of 1,734 patients from the Mass General Brigham health system have been identified. These include 578 with ICD-10 Principal Discharge Diagnosis codes for PE, 578 with codes in the secondary position, and 578 without PE codes during the index hospitalization. Patients within each group were selected randomly from the entire pool of patients at the Mass General Brigham health system. A smaller subset of patients will also be identified from the Yale-New Haven Health System. Data validation and analyses will be forthcoming. CONCLUSIONS: The PE-EHR+ study will help validate efficient tools for identification of patients with PE in EHRs, improving the reliability of efficient observational studies or randomized trials of patients with PE using electronic databases.
Assuntos
Embolia Pulmonar , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Classificação Internacional de Doenças , AlgoritmosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: It is well documented that surgeons who identify as racial and ethnic minorities experience discrimination while navigating the surgical environment. There is evidence to suggest that the most prevalent form of discrimination experienced is microaggressions. This study sought to identify common microaggressions experienced in the surgical workplace by racial and ethnic minority surgeons with the use of a validated scale. METHODS: A one-time, deidentified survey was administered to surgeons who identified as a racial and ethnic minority via email. The survey included demographic questions and a shortened version of the Racial Microaggressions Scale, a validated 32-item scale developed to measure microaggressions in everyday life. Subscale means were calculated and compared using sample t-tests along with an analysis of variance. RESULTS: A total of 185 surgeons completed the survey with 166 included in the final analysis (97 male-identifying, 67 female-identifying). Significantly different microaggression experiences between race and ethnicity were found on the environmental (p < 0.001), foreigner/not belonging (p ≤ 0.001), low achieving/undesirable (p < 0.001), criminality (p < 0.001), and invisibility (p < 0.001) subscales with higher scores denoting more frequent experiences. Black and African American surgeons scored higher than Asian and Asian American and Hispanic and Latino surgeons on the low achieving/undesirable subscale (1.7 vs 0.9 and 1.2, respectively) and the invisibility subscale (1.5 vs 0.8 and 0.8, respectively). In addition, Asian and Asian American and Hispanic and Latino surgeons scored significantly higher on the foreigner/not belonging subscale compared with Black and African American surgeons (1.6 and 1.6 vs 0.9, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The current study suggests that surgeons who identified as a racial and ethnic minority experience microaggressions in various ways. Understanding the specific experience of racial and ethnic minority surgeons is important as the surgical workplace strives to create more inclusive environments by acknowledging the lived experience of its diverse workforce.