Moving towards universal health coverage: lessons from 11 country studies.

In recent years, many countries have adopted universal health coverage (UHC) as a national aspiration. In response to increasing demand for a systematic assessment of global experiences with UHC, the Government of Japan and the World Bank collaborated on a 2-year multicountry research programme to analyse the processes of moving towards UHC. The programme included 11 countries (Bangladesh, Brazil, Ethiopia, France, Ghana, Indonesia, Japan, Peru, Thailand, Turkey, and Vietnam), representing diverse geographical, economic, and historical contexts. The study identified common challenges and opportunities and useful insights for how to move towards UHC. The study showed that UHC is a complex process, fraught with challenges, many possible pathways, and various pitfalls--but is also feasible and achievable. Movement towards UHC is a long-term policy engagement that needs both technical knowledge and political know-how. Technical solutions need to be accompanied by pragmatic and innovative strategies that address the national political economy context.

Expanding the primary health care workforce through contracting with nongovernmental entities: the cases of Bahia and Rio de Janeiro.

BACKGROUND: Brazil has experienced difficulties in attracting health professionals (especially doctors and nurses) to practice at the primary health care (PHC) level and in rural and remote areas. This study presents two case studies, each a current initiative in contracting for primary health services in Brazil: one for the state of Bahia and the other for the city of Rio de Janeiro. The two models differ considerably in context, needs, modalities, and outcomes. This article does not attempt to evaluate the initiatives but to identify their strengths and weaknesses. METHODS: Analysis was based on indicators produced by the Brazilian health care information systems, a review of literature and other documentation, and key informant interviews. RESULTS: In the case of Bahia, the state and municipalities decided to create a State Foundation, a new institutional public entity acting under private law that centralizes the hiring of health professionals in order to offer stable positions with career plans and mobility within the state. Results have been mixed as a lower than expected municipal involvement resulted in relatively high administrative costs and consequent default on municipal financial contributions. In the case of Rio de Janeiro, the municipality opted to contract not-for-profit Social Organizations as it made a push to expand access to primary health care in the city. The approach has been successful in expanding coverage, but evidence on cost and performance is weak. CONCLUSIONS: Both cases highlight that improvements in cost and performance data will be critical for meaningful comparative evaluation of delivery arrangements in primary care. Despite the different institutional and implementation arrangements of each model, which make comparison difficult, the analysis provides important lessons for contracting out health professionals for PHC within Brazil and elsewhere.

Eficiência e sustentabilidade do gasto público em saúde no Brasil / Efficiency and sustainability of public health spending in Brazil

Objetivo: Este artigo discute questões relativas à eficiência e à sustentabilidade do gasto público com saúde no Brasil. A despeito das conquistas das últimas décadas, o Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) enfrenta desafios estruturais com consequências no acesso aos serviços públicos de saúde e na proteção financeira da população. Métodos: O artigo traça um breve panorama do financiamento da saúde no Brasil nos últimos 10 anos e apresenta análise da eficiência do gasto público em saúde utilizando modelos de análise envoltória de dados (data envelopment analysis ­ DEA) para os gastos com o SUS nos de 2013 e 2017. Resultados: Do ponto de vista do financiamento do sistema público de saúde, persiste o paradoxo de que o Brasil gasta pouco, mas gasta mal. Os gastos públicos com saúde são relativamente menores que os observados em países com sistemas de saúde com caraterísticas semelhantes, porém os gastos públicos per ca pita crescem a taxas maiores do que o crescimento do Produto Interno Bruto (PIB) per capita. Do ponto de vista da eficiência, a análise demonstra que há potencial de aumentar a eficiência do SUS. Apenas em 2017 essas ineficiências somavam R$ 35,8 bilhões. De forma geral, a atenção primária à saúde (APS) do SUS tem eficiência maior (63% e 68% em 2013 e 2017) do que a atenção de alta e média complexidade (MAC) (29% e 34% nos mesmos anos, respectivamente). Conclusão: Melhorar a eficiência do gasto público com saúde é particularmente importante no contexto atual de baixo crescimento econômico e fortes restrições fiscais no ambiente pós-pandemia. Ganhos de eficiência podem ser alcançados com: (i) ganhos de escala na estrutura e operação dos hospitais, (ii) integração do cuidado em redes de atenção à saúde, (iii) aumento da densidade e melhor distribuição da força de trabalho em saúde, (iv) mudança nos mecanismos e incentivos para vincular os pagamentos aos provedores e profissionais aos resultados de saúde, tendo a APS como organizadora do sistema, (v) inovações na gestão dos provedores de serviços de saúde, com ênfase em modelos de parcerias público-privadas (PPPs). A consolidação do SUS depende de políticas públicas que melhorem a eficiência e a qualidade dos serviços prestados à população.

Objective: This paper discusses issues related to the efficiency and sustainability of public spending on health in Brazil. Despite the achievements of recent decades, the Unified Health System (SUS) faces structural challenges with consequences on the access to public health services and on the financial protection of the population. Methods: The paper provides a brief overview of the public healthcare financing in Brazil over the last ten years and presents an efficiency analysis of the SUS public health spending, using data envelopment analysis (DEA) models for the years of 2013 and 2017. Results: In terms of public spending, the paradox that Brazil spends little but poorly on health still persists. Public expenditures on health are relatively lower than those observed in countries with health systems with similar characteristics, but public expenditures per capita grow at rates higher than the growth of gross domestic product (GDP) per capita. In terms of efficiency of public health spending, the analysis shows that there is potential to increase the efficiency of the SUS. In 2017, these inefficiencies amounted R$ 35.8 billion. In general, SUS primary healthcare (APS) is more efficient (63% and 68% in 2013 and 2017) than high and medium complexity care (MAC) (29% and 34% in the same years, respectively). Conclusion: Improving the efficiency of public spending on health is particularly important in the current context of low economic growth and strong fiscal constraints in the post-pandemic environment. Efficiency gains can be achieved with: (i) scale gains in the structure and operation of hospitals, (ii) integration of care in health care networks, (iii) increased density and better distribution of the health workforce, (iv) change in mechanisms and incentives to link payments to providers and professionals to health outcomes, with the PHC as the organizer of the system, (v) innovations in the management of health service providers, with an emphasis on public partnership models and private companies (PPPs) . The consolidation of the SUS depends on public policies to improve the efficiency and quality of services provided to the population.