Clomiphene citrate versus high doses of gonadotropins for in vitro fertilisation in women with compromised ovarian reserve: a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present randomised controlled non-inferiority trial is to test whether in women with compromised ovarian reserve requiring in vitro fertilisation, a protocol of ovarian stimulation using exclusively clomiphene citrate performs similarly to a regimen with high doses of gonadotropins. METHODS: Women with day 3 serum FSH > 12 IU/ml on at least two occasions or previous poor response to hyper-stimulation were recruited at four Italian infertility units. Selected women were allocated to clomiphene citrate 150 mg/day from day 3 to day 7 of the cycle (n=145) or to a short protocol with GnRH agonist 0.1 mg and recombinant FSH 450 IU daily (n=146). They were randomised by means of a computer-generated list into two groups. The study was not blinded. The main outcome of the study was the delivery rate per started cycle. RESULTS: The study was interrupted after the scheduled two years of recruitment before reaching the sample size. 148 women were allocated to clomiphene citrate and 156 to the short protocol with high doses of gonadotropins; 124 and 125 participants were analysed in the groups, respectively. Women allocated to high doses of gonadotropins retrieved more oocytes and had a higher probability to perform embryo-transfer. However, the chances of success were similar. The delivery rate per started cycle in women receiving clomiphene citrate and high-dose gonadotropins was 3% (n=5) and 5% (n=7), respectively (p=0.77). The mean estimated cost per delivery in the two groups was 81,294 and 113,107 Euros, respectively. No side-effects or adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In women with compromised ovarian reserve selected for in vitro fertilisation, ovarian stimulation with clomiphene citrate or high-dose gonadotropins led to similar chances of pregnancy but the former is less expensive. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registered on http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01389713).

Low-molecular-weight heparin in women with repeated implantation failure.

UNLABELLED: Implantation failure is common in assisted reproduction techniques (ART). The role of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is a matter of debate as a potential factor to improve implantation. AIM: To evaluate the pregnancy rate in patients with or without heparin administration. MATERIALS & METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational analysis of patients with at least two IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles with implantation failure, screened for inherited thrombophilia and submitted to further ART cycles with or without administration of LMWH. A total of 265 patients fulfilled the enrollment criteria. Of these 149 (56%) were primary infertile and 116 (44%) were secondary infertile. Their mean age was 36.3 ± 3.6 years. We analyzed basal FSH, smoking habit, gene variants for inherited thrombophilia (i.e., MTHFR C677T, prothrombin G202A10G and Factor V Leiden). The patients underwent 569 new ART cycles: 512 (90%) without and 57 (10%) with LMWH. RESULTS: In total 105 clinical pregnancies were observed in 569 cycles (18.8%). The pregnancy rate was 17.19% (88/512) in patients not treated with LMWH and 29.52% (17/57) in the LMWH-treated group (p = 0.006). In women over 36 years of age the pregnancy rate was 15.53% (50/322) in nontreated versus 35.71% (10/28) in treated cycles (p = 0.007), while no difference was found in younger women. No statistical difference was found between the presence of inherited thrombophilia and pregnancy rate in treated and untreated cycles. DISCUSSION: significantly higher pregnancy rate in patients with previous ART implantation failures was observed with LMWH. Our results confirm no relation among inherited thrombophilia and pregnancy rate in patients with previous IVF implantation failures. These findings should be confirmed by randomized controlled trials before use of LMWH for ART cycles is recommended.