RESUMO
The recent advances in next-generation sequencing technologies provide a new and effective way of tracking malaria drug-resistant parasites. To take advantage of this technology, an end-to-end Illumina targeted amplicon deep sequencing (TADS) and bioinformatics pipeline for molecular surveillance of drug resistance in P. falciparum, called malaria resistance surveillance (MaRS), was developed. TADS relies on PCR enriching genomic regions, specifically target genes of interest, prior to deep sequencing. MaRS enables researchers to simultaneously collect data on allele frequencies of multiple full-length P. falciparum drug resistance genes (crt, mdr1, k13, dhfr, dhps, and the cytochrome b gene), as well as the mitochondrial genome. Information is captured at the individual patient level for both known and potential new single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with drug resistance. The MaRS pipeline was validated using 245 imported malaria cases that were reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The chloroquine resistance crt CVIET genotype (mutations underlined) was observed in 42% of samples, the highly pyrimethamine-resistant dhpsIRN triple mutant in 92% of samples, and the sulfadoxine resistance dhps mutation SGEAA in 26% of samples. The mdr1 NFSND genotype was found in 40% of samples. With the exception of two cases imported from Cambodia, no artemisinin resistance k13 alleles were identified, and 99% of patients carried parasites susceptible to atovaquone-proguanil. Our goal is to implement MaRS at the CDC for routine surveillance of imported malaria cases in the United States and to aid in the adoption of this system at participating state public health laboratories, as well as by global partners.
Assuntos
Antimaláricos/farmacologia , Biologia Computacional/métodos , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala/métodos , Resistência a Medicamentos , Genótipo , Malária/parasitologia , Malária/prevenção & controle , Plasmodium falciparum/efeitos dos fármacos , Plasmodium falciparum/genética , Plasmodium falciparum/patogenicidade , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único/genética , Pirimetamina/farmacologia , Sulfadoxina/farmacologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Transfusion-transmitted malaria (TTM) is a rare occurrence with serious consequences for the recipient. A case study is presented as an example of best practices for conducting a TTM investigation. CASE REPORT: A 15-year-old male with a history of sickle cell disease developed fever after a blood transfusion. He was diagnosed with Plasmodium falciparum malaria and was successfully treated. The American Red Cross, New York State Department of Health, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention investigated the eight donors who provided components to the transfusion. The investigation to identify a malaria-positive donor included trace back of donors, serologic methods to identify donor(s) with a history of malaria exposure, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing, microsatellite analysis to identify the parasite in a donor and match its genotype to the parasite in the recipient, and reinterview of all donors to clarify malaria risk factors. RESULTS: One donor had evidence of infection with P. falciparum by PCR, elevated antibody titers, and previously undisclosed malaria risk factors. Reinterview revealed that the donor immigrated to the United States from Togo just short of 3 years before the blood donation. The donor was treated for asymptomatic low parasitemia infection. CONCLUSION: This investigation used standard procedures for investigating TTM but also demonstrated the importance of applying sensitive laboratory techniques to identify the infected donor, especially a donor with asymptomatic infection with low parasitemia. Repeat interview of all donors identified as having contributed to the transfused component provides complementary epidemiologic information to confirm the infected donor.
Assuntos
Doadores de Sangue , Segurança do Sangue/normas , Transfusão de Sangue , Seleção do Doador/normas , Malária Falciparum/transmissão , Reação Transfusional/parasitologia , Adolescente , Anemia Falciforme/complicações , Anemia Falciforme/terapia , Infecções Assintomáticas , Emigrantes e Imigrantes , Humanos , Malária Falciparum/diagnóstico , Malária Falciparum/parasitologia , Masculino , Parasitemia/parasitologia , Plasmodium falciparum/isolamento & purificação , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Togo/etnologiaRESUMO
Malaria infection during pregnancy is associated with an increased risk for maternal and fetal complications. In the United States, treatment options for uncomplicated, chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax malaria in pregnant women are limited to mefloquine or quinine plus clindamycin (1). However, limited availability of quinine and increasing resistance to mefloquine restrict these options. Strong evidence now demonstrates that artemether-lumefantrine (AL) (Coartem) is effective and safe in the treatment of malaria in pregnancy. The World Health Organization (WHO) has endorsed artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs), such as AL, for treatment of uncomplicated malaria during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy and is currently considering whether to add ACTs, including AL, as an option for malaria treatment during the first trimester (2,3). This policy note reviews the evidence and updates CDC recommendations to include AL as a treatment option for uncomplicated malaria during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy and during the first trimester of pregnancy when other treatment options are unavailable. These updated recommendations reflect current evidence and are consistent with WHO treatment guidelines.
Assuntos
Antimaláricos/uso terapêutico , Artemisininas/uso terapêutico , Etanolaminas/uso terapêutico , Fluorenos/uso terapêutico , Malária/tratamento farmacológico , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/tratamento farmacológico , Combinação Arteméter e Lumefantrina , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Combinação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Estados UnidosRESUMO
The rapid emergence of drug-resistant malaria parasites during the course of an infection remains a major challenge for providing accurate treatment guidelines. This is particularly important in cases of malaria treatment failure. Using a previously well-characterized case of malaria treatment failure, we show the utility of using next-generation sequencing for early detection of the rise and selection of a previously reported atovaquone-proguanil (malarone) drug resistance-associated mutation.
Assuntos
Citocromos b/genética , Resistência a Medicamentos/genética , Mutação , Plasmodium falciparum/genética , Proteínas de Protozoários/genética , Adulto , Antimaláricos/uso terapêutico , Atovaquona/uso terapêutico , Combinação de Medicamentos , Expressão Gênica , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala , Humanos , Malária Falciparum/tratamento farmacológico , Malária Falciparum/parasitologia , Masculino , Nigéria , Plasmodium falciparum/efeitos dos fármacos , Plasmodium falciparum/isolamento & purificação , Proguanil/uso terapêutico , Viagem , Falha de Tratamento , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Among 1,683 persons in the United States who developed malaria following international travel during 2012, more than half acquired disease in one of 16 countries in West Africa. Since March 2014, West Africa has experienced the world's largest epidemic of Ebola virus disease (Ebola), primarily affecting Guinea, Sierra Leone, and Liberia; in 2014, approximately 20,000 Ebola cases were reported. Both Ebola and malaria are often characterized by fever and malaise and can be clinically indistinguishable, especially early in the course of disease. Immediate laboratory testing is critical for diagnosis of both Ebola and malaria, so that appropriate lifesaving treatment can be initiated. CDC recommends prompt malaria testing of patients with fever and history of travel to an area that is endemic for malaria, using blood smear microscopy, with results available within a few hours. Empiric treatment of malaria is not recommended by CDC. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing is recommended to diagnose Ebola. During the Ebola outbreak in West Africa, CDC received reports of delayed laboratory testing for malaria in travelers returning to the United States because of infection control concerns related to Ebola. CDC reviewed documented calls to its malaria consultation service and selected three patient cases to present as examples of deficiencies in the evaluation and treatment of malaria among travelers returning from Africa during the Ebola epidemic.
Assuntos
Diagnóstico Tardio , Malária/diagnóstico , Malária/terapia , Tempo para o Tratamento , Adulto , África/epidemiologia , Idoso , Epidemias , Feminino , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Viagem , Estados UnidosRESUMO
On July 16 2015, the Puerto Rico Department of Health (PRDH) was notified of a case of malaria, diagnosed by a hospital parasitology laboratory in a student who had traveled to Punta Cana, Dominican Republic, during late June for a school-organized graduation trip. Malaria is a mosquito-borne parasitic infection, characterized by fever, shaking chills, headaches, muscle pains, nausea, general malaise, and vomiting (1). Malaria can be clinically difficult to distinguish from other acute febrile illnesses, and a definitive diagnosis requires demonstration of malaria parasites using microscopy or molecular diagnostic tests. The student's initial diagnosis on July 10 was suspected dengue virus infection. Puerto Rico eliminated local malaria transmission during the mid-1950s (2); however, reintroduction remains a risk because of the presence of a competent vector (Anopheles albimanus) and ease of travel to areas where the disease is endemic, including Hispaniola, the island shared by the Dominican Republic and Haiti, and the only island in the Caribbean with endemic malaria (3). During 2014, the Dominican Republic reported 496 confirmed malaria cases and four associated deaths; Haiti reported 17,662 confirmed cases and nine deaths (4). During 2000-2014, Puerto Rico reported a total of 35 imported malaria cases (range = 0-7 per year); three cases were imported from Hispaniola. During June-August 2015, eight confirmed malaria cases among travelers to the Dominican Republic were reported to CDC's National Malaria Surveillance System (CDC, unpublished data, 2015).
Assuntos
Malária/diagnóstico , Plasmodium falciparum/isolamento & purificação , Viagem , Adolescente , República Dominicana/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Malária/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Porto Rico/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Quinidine gluconate, the only U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved treatment for life-threatening malaria in the United States, has a problematic safety profile and is often unavailable in hospitals. OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and clinical benefit of intravenous artesunate as an alternative to quinidine. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: U.S. hospitals. PATIENTS: 102 patients aged 1 to 72 years (90% adults; 61% men) with severe and complicated malaria. Patients received 4 weight-based doses of intravenous artesunate (2.4 mg/kg) under a treatment protocol implemented by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention between January 2007 and December 2010. At baseline, 35% had evidence of cerebral malaria, and 17% had severe hepatic impairment. Eligibility required the presence of microscopically confirmed malaria, need for intravenous treatment, and an impediment to quinidine. MEASUREMENTS: Clinical and laboratory data from each patient's hospital records were abstracted retrospectively, including information from baseline through a maximum 7-day follow-up, and presented before a physician committee to evaluate safety and clinical benefit outcomes. RESULTS: 7 patients died (mortality rate, 6.9%). The most frequent adverse events were anemia (65%) and elevated hepatic enzyme levels (49%). All deaths and most adverse events were attributed to the severity of malaria. Patients' symptoms generally improved or resolved within 3 days, and the median time to discharge from the intensive care unit was 4 days, even for patients with severe liver disease or cerebral malaria. More than 100 concomitant medications were used, with no documented drug-drug interactions. LIMITATION: Potential late-presenting safety issues might occur outside the 7-day follow-up. CONCLUSION: Artesunate was a safe and clinically beneficial alternative to quinidine.
Assuntos
Antimaláricos/uso terapêutico , Artemisininas/uso terapêutico , Drogas em Investigação/uso terapêutico , Malária/tratamento farmacológico , Parasitemia/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Antimaláricos/efeitos adversos , Artemisininas/efeitos adversos , Artesunato , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Quimioterapia Combinada , Drogas em Investigação/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Injeções Intravenosas , Malária/complicações , Masculino , Adesão à Medicação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Parasitemia/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Despite the availability of effective antimalarial prophylaxis, imported adult and pediatric malaria occurs in the United States, and this can pose diagnostic issues. We examined the clinical characteristics and diagnostic challenges of imported malaria requiring adult or pediatric inpatient admission at Montefiore Medical Center in the Bronx which provides care for a large population of immigrants from malaria endemic areas. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective single center review of patients admitted with a diagnosis of malaria at Montefiore Medical Center from 2005 through 2012. We extracted historical, clinical, and laboratory values from the electronic medical record and patient charts. RESULTS: We identified 95 patients who were diagnosed and hospitalized with malaria from 2005 to 2012, 33 (35%) of them were children and 17 (18%) were with severe malaria. Most patients contracted malaria while visiting friends and relatives in West Africa. Only 38% of travelers took prophylaxis, and fewer than half reported taking it as prescribed. Misdiagnosis by emergency room or primary care doctors was observed in almost one quarter of all of the patients. Misdiagnosis occurred significantly more frequently in children (43%) compared to adults (13%) (P = 0.002). Pediatric patients were more likely to present with abdominal pain (42% vs. 15%; P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric patients admitted for imported malaria at Montefiore Medical Center had a higher rate of misdiagnosis and presented with more gastrointestinal symptoms than hospitalized adults. By describing the clinical characteristics of patients with imported malaria, we hope to improve diagnostic accuracy by health care workers and raise awareness that friends and relatives may require more intensive pretravel counseling.
Assuntos
Erros de Diagnóstico/estatística & dados numéricos , Emigrantes e Imigrantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Malária/diagnóstico , Pediatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Plasmodium/isolamento & purificação , Viagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Antimaláricos/uso terapêutico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Malária/epidemiologia , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Data from clinical studies show that artemether-lumefantrine (AL) is effective and well tolerated in adults and children with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. However, data on effectiveness and safety of AL in patients in non-endemic settings are limited. METHODS: A 5-year surveillance plan included all AL-treated adult and paediatric patients with confirmed or suspected P. falciparum malaria in the USA, as reported to the National Malaria Surveillance System at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Descriptive analyses included demographics, baseline characteristics, clinical effectiveness, and safety. From May 2010 to April 2015, demographics and baseline characteristics were collected for 203 patients and safety data for 108 patients. Treatment effectiveness data at day 7 were collected for 117 patients and at day 28 for 98 patients. RESULTS: The majority of patients were male (58.6 %), Black (62.6 %), non-Hispanic (92.6 %), and likely malaria non-immune (80.8 %). The median age was 32 (range 1-88) years and the median body mass index was 25.5 (range 13.8-42.4) kg/m(2). All patients with effectiveness data had confirmed (n = 116) or suspected (n = 1) malaria. The overall cure rate for patients treated with AL was 91.5 % (95 % CI 84.8-95.8 %) at day 7 and 96.9 % (95 % CI 91.3-99.4 %) at day 28. Adverse events were reported in four (3.7 %) patients, and there were no new or unexpected safety signals. CONCLUSION: AL was effective and well tolerated in the treatment of likely non-immune patients with P. falciparum malaria.
Assuntos
Antimaláricos/efeitos adversos , Antimaláricos/uso terapêutico , Artemisininas/efeitos adversos , Artemisininas/uso terapêutico , Etanolaminas/efeitos adversos , Etanolaminas/uso terapêutico , Fluorenos/efeitos adversos , Fluorenos/uso terapêutico , Malária Falciparum/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Combinação Arteméter e Lumefantrina , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Combinação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Malária Falciparum/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Plasmodium falciparum , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pretravel health consultations help international travelers manage travel-related illness risks through education, vaccination, and medication. This study evaluated costs and benefits of that portion of the health consultation associated with malaria prevention provided to US travelers bound for West Africa. METHODS: The estimated change in disease risk and associated costs and benefits resulting from traveler adherence to malaria chemoprophylaxis were calculated from 2 perspectives: the healthcare payer's and the traveler's. We used data from the Global TravEpiNet network of US travel clinics that collect de-identified pretravel data for international travelers. Disease risk and chemoprophylaxis effectiveness were estimated from published medical reports. Direct medical costs were obtained from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample and published literature. RESULTS: We analyzed 1029 records from January 2009 to January 2011. Assuming full adherence to chemoprophylaxis regimens, consultations saved healthcare payers a per-traveler average of $14 (9-day trip) to $372 (30-day trip). For travelers, consultations resulted in a range of net cost of $20 (9-day trip) to a net savings of $32 (30-day trip). Differences were mostly driven by risk of malaria in the destination country. CONCLUSIONS: Our model suggests that healthcare payers save money for short- and longer-term trips, and that travelers save money for longer trips when travelers adhere to malaria recommendations and prophylactic regimens in West Africa. This is a potential incentive to healthcare payers to offer consistent pretravel preventive care to travelers. This financial benefit complements the medical benefit of reducing the risk of malaria.
Assuntos
Antimaláricos/economia , Antimaláricos/uso terapêutico , Quimioprevenção/economia , Quimioprevenção/métodos , Malária/economia , Malária/prevenção & controle , Viagem , África Ocidental , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Modelos Estatísticos , Fatores de Tempo , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Long-term travelers to areas where malaria is endemic are at risk for this potentially fatal disease; however, malaria can be prevented through the use of insecticide-treated bednets, mosquito repellents, and chemoprophylaxis. Three options for chemoprophylaxis are available in the Africa region: mefloquine, doxycycline, and atovaquone-proguanil. These options differ by dosing regimen, cost, and side effect profile. Long-term adverse effects of these drugs have been reported rarely.
Assuntos
Antimaláricos/uso terapêutico , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Malária/prevenção & controle , Peace Corps , Voluntários/psicologia , África , Antimaláricos/economia , Atovaquona/economia , Atovaquona/uso terapêutico , Quimioprevenção , Doxiciclina/economia , Doxiciclina/uso terapêutico , Combinação de Medicamentos , Humanos , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Mefloquina/economia , Mefloquina/uso terapêutico , Proguanil/economia , Proguanil/uso terapêutico , Viagem , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Parenteral artesunate, a first-line treatment for severe malaria in several countries, is associated with increased survival and has a better safety profile compared with parenteral quinine or quinidine. However, parenteral artesunate has been associated with delayed hemolysis, leading to concerns about drug toxicity. Postartemisinin delayed hemolysis (PADH) can occur 1-3 weeks after initiation of treatment with artemisinin-based antimalarials such as artesunate and is characterized by a decline in hemoglobin levels amid hemolysis. CDC conducted a literature review and identified 18 cases of PADH since 2012, mostly in European travelers. In addition, malaria case reports were reviewed retrospectively, and active surveillance was implemented in the United States, identifying two additional PADH cases, for a total of 20. A few patients with PADH required blood transfusions, but among patients where complete follow-up information was available, all made a full recovery. Results from this review suggest that PADH occurs because of delayed clearance of once-infected erythrocytes, probably as a result of a pharmacologic effect of parenteral artesunate and not drug-related toxicity. Therefore, parenteral artesunate can still be considered a safe treatment for severe malaria and should remain an option for its treatment.
Assuntos
Anemia Hemolítica/induzido quimicamente , Antimaláricos/efeitos adversos , Artemisininas/efeitos adversos , Malária Falciparum/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Anemia Hemolítica/terapia , Antimaláricos/administração & dosagem , Artemisininas/administração & dosagem , Artesunato , Transfusão de Eritrócitos , Feminino , Hemólise , Humanos , Infusões Parenterais , Malária Falciparum/complicações , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Exchange transfusion (ET) has biologic plausibility as an adjunct to antimalarial drugs in treating severe malaria and has been used for decades despite limited evidence of its efficacy in improving survival. We examined the efficacy of ET as an adjunct treatment for severe malaria using US surveillance data and reviewed the literature to update recommendations. METHODS: Patients with severe malaria reported to the US national malaria surveillance system during 1985-2010 were matched, and survival outcomes were compared between patients receiving and not receiving ET. The literature review used search terms "severe malaria" and "exchange transfusion." Case reports and series, observational and case-control studies, and meta-analysis were included. RESULTS: One hundred one patients receiving ET were matched to 314 patients not receiving ET. There was no statistically significant association between ET and survival outcome (odds ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval, .44-1.60). We found 87 articles, mostly case reports or series, showing successful use of ET, likely reporting bias. There were 12 comparative studies, most of which were retrospective cohort studies, underpowered with no significant differences in survival. A previously published meta-analysis of 8 comparative studies found no significant survival differences. Adverse events were rarely reported but included acute respiratory distress syndrome, ventricular fibrillation, and hypotension. CONCLUSIONS: Despite rapid parasite clearance times resulting from ET, there is no evidence for efficacy of ET as adjunctive therapy in severe malaria. Adjunct ET cannot be recommended. When rapidly acting antimalarials, specifically artemisinins, become more widely available, the biologic plausibility argument for ET will become less relevant.
Assuntos
Transfusão Total/métodos , Malária Falciparum/terapia , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Transfusão Total/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Recent identification of local mosquito-borne transmission of malaria in Florida, Texas, and Maryland and increasing travel to malaria-endemic countries raise the likelihood that U.S. obstetricians might encounter a pregnant patient with malaria. Pregnancy increases the risk of becoming infected with malaria and of developing severe disease. Malaria during pregnancy also increases the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, including low birth weight, pregnancy loss, and preterm birth; thus, prevention and prompt diagnosis and treatment are essential. Diagnosis can be challenging during pregnancy among persons with partial immunity because placental sequestration of parasite-infected red blood cells can result in lower parasite levels in peripheral blood. Treatment for uncomplicated malaria depends on the expected resistance pattern, which is determined by the specific Plasmodium species identified and where infection was acquired. For severe disease, parenteral artesunate treatment needs to be initiated immediately. Given the dire consequences of malaria in pregnancy, prevention is crucial. For persons born and raised in endemic areas, interventions include use of insecticide-treated bed nets, intermittent preventive treatment, and prompt diagnosis and treatment of illness. U.S. pregnant persons should avoid travel to endemic countries; for unavoidable travel, pregnant travelers should receive chemoprophylaxis and avoid mosquito bites. Although the risk is low to U.S. pregnant persons who are not traveling internationally, avoiding mosquito bites is important, especially for pregnant persons residing in or visiting areas with recent local mosquito-borne transmission.
Assuntos
Antimaláricos , Malária , Nascimento Prematuro , Animais , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Gravidez , Antimaláricos/uso terapêutico , Mordeduras e Picadas de Insetos , Malária/diagnóstico , Malária/tratamento farmacológico , Malária/prevenção & controle , Militares , Parto , Placenta , Vigilância da População , Nascimento Prematuro/parasitologia , Viagem , Complicações Parasitárias na Gravidez/tratamento farmacológico , Complicações Parasitárias na Gravidez/prevenção & controleRESUMO
Evidence suggests that imported malaria is a diagnostic challenge with initial misdiagnosis rates of 40% or greater. Given that prompt diagnosis and appropriate treatment are the only intervention proven to prevent progression to severe malaria and death, these figures are concerning. The purpose of this clinical review is to provide the most up-to-date and practical information on the diagnosis and treatment of imported malaria for the emergency health care provider. We highlight common pitfalls, errors, and mistakes in arriving at the correct diagnosis. We also emphasize the 3 key aspects to avoid progression to severe disease: rapid diagnosis, prompt initiation of treatment, and appropriate choice of antimalarial treatment.
Assuntos
Malária/diagnóstico , Doença Aguda , Antimaláricos/uso terapêutico , Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Malária/tratamento farmacológico , Malária/etiologia , Gravidez , ViagemRESUMO
During the spring of 2009, pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus (pH1N1) was recognized and rapidly spread worldwide. To describe the geographic distribution and patient characteristics of pH1N1-associated deaths in the United States, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention requested information from health departments on all laboratory-confirmed pH1N1 deaths reported from 17 April through 23 July 2009. Data were collected using medical charts, medical examiner reports, and death certificates. A total of 377 pH1N1-associated deaths were identified, for a mortality rate of .12 deaths per 100,000 population. Activity was geographically localized, with the highest mortality rates in Hawaii, New York, and Utah. Seventy-six percent of deaths occurred in persons aged 18-65 years, and 9% occurred in persons aged ≥ 65 years. Underlying medical conditions were reported for 78% of deaths: chronic lung disease among adults (39%) and neurologic disease among children (54%). Overall mortality associated with pH1N1 was low; however, the majority of deaths occurred in persons aged <65 years with underlying medical conditions.