False-negative ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to clarify the clinicopathological features of patients with false-negative fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and to determine the factors associated with negative FNAC. METHODS: Patients with negative FNAC from January 2010 to December 2019 were included. The patients with positive sentinel nodes (SN) were divided into two groups: micrometastasis (≤2 mm) group and macrometastasis (>2 mm) group. The clinicopathological characteristics were compared between the two groups using the χ2 test. RESULTS: A total of 165 patients with negative FNAC were included; 52 (31.5%) had positive SNs. Of the 52 patients, 13 (25%) had micrometastasis and the remaining 39 (75%) had macrometastasis. Of the 113 patients with negative SNs, none had metastases found in non-SNs. No significant differences were observed in age, cT stage or subtype, and preoperative ultrasound findings between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The false-negative rate of FNAC was high (31.5%). Micrometastatic disease was seen in patients with negative FNAC, and this might be the cause of false-negative FNAC results.

Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer: Diagnostic accuracy and role in surgical management.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of axillary lymph nodes (LN) in breast cancer, to compare the results of FNAC and pathological examination, and to distinguish patients with 1 to 2 metastatic LNs from those with ≥3 metastatic LNs in patients with FNAC-positive patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 198 breasts of 196 patients with breast cancer who underwent FNAC and surgery for the primary and axilla without neoadjuvant chemotherapy from January 2010 to August 2016. Axillary nodal status was assessed by ultrasound (US), and whether FNAC-positive had three or more suspicious LNs on US imaging was examined. RESULTS: The results of FNAC were positive in 75 (38%), negative in 97 (49%), suspicious in 2 (1%), indeterminate in 5 (2.5%), and insufficient in 19 patients (9.5%). FNAC sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 62.6%, 100%, 100%, and 62.0%, respectively. Whereas 53% (18/34) of patients with false-negative FNAC had one metastatic LN on final pathology, 61% (47/77) patients who were FNAC-positive had three or more metastatic LNs. In the FNAC-positive patients, all patients had ≥3 metastatic LNs if they had ≥3 suspicious LNs on US imaging. CONCLUSION: Patients with positive cytology were more likely to have ≥3 positive LNs compared to false-negative cytology patients. Patients with ≥3 abnormal LNs on US and positive FNAC might require axillary dissection.

Overexpression of RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42 GTPases is associated with progression in testicular cancer.

The Rho family of GTPases are involved in actin cytoskeleton organization and associated with carcinogenesis and progression of human cancers. We investigated the roles of Rho family GTPases, prototypes RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42, and the major downstream targets of RhoA, ROCK-I, and ROCK-II in testicular cancer. We quantified protein expression in paired tumor and nontumor samples from surgical specimens from 57 consecutive patients with testicular germ cell tumors using Western blotting. Protein expression of RhoA, ROCK-I, ROCK-II, Rac1, and Cdc42 was significantly higher in tumor tissue than in nontumor tissue (P < 0.0001). Expression of protein for RhoA, ROCK-I, ROCK-II, Rac1, and Cdc42 was greater in tumors of higher stages than lower stages (P < 0.0001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001, respectively). Within stage II nonseminoma (31 patients), protein levels of RhoA, ROCK-I, ROCK-II, Rac1, and Cdc42 in the primary tumor were lower in the group of 24 patients with no evidence of disease after therapy compared with 7 patients with disease that was refractory/recurrent (P < 0.05). Rho family GTPases may be involved in the progression of testicular germ cell tumors.

Significant association of Rho/ROCK pathway with invasion and metastasis of bladder cancer.

PURPOSE: The small GTP-binding protein Rho and its best-characterized downstream effector Rho-associated serine-threonine protein kinase, ROCK, participate in actin cytoskeleton organization, and are linked to pathogenesis and progression of several human tumors. We investigated the roles of Rho and ROCK in bladder cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Using Western blotting, we quantitated Rho and ROCK protein expression in paired tumor and nontumor surgical samples from 107 consecutive Japanese patients with bladder cancer. RESULTS: RhoA, RhoC, and ROCK were more abundant in tumors and metastatic lymph nodes than in nontumor bladder and uninvolved lymph nodes (P < 0.0001). Amounts of RhoA and RhoC protein, and ROCK protein expression correlated positively with one another (P < 0.0001). High RhoA, RhoC, and ROCK expression were related to poor tumor differentiation (P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.01, respectively), muscle invasion (P < 0.001), and lymph node metastasis (P < 0.05). Kaplan-Meier plots linked high RhoA, RhoC, and ROCK protein expression to shortened disease-free and overall survival (P < 0.0001). By univariate analysis, high RhoA, RhoC, and ROCK protein expression predicted shortened disease-free and overall survival (P < 0.0001). By multivariate analysis, only RhoC was independently influenced in disease-free survival (P < 0.05), and RhoA and RhoC in overall survival (P < 0.001). In contrast, RhoB expression was inversely related to the grade and stage (P < 0.05), and its higher expression is associated with better overall survival (P < 0.05). In superficial tumors (Ta or T1; 63 patients), RhoA, RhoC, and ROCK were unrelated with recurrence-free survival. Overall survival in tumors invading muscle (T2 to T4; 44 patients) was significantly influenced by RhoA, RhoC, and ROCK in a Kaplan-Meier analysis (P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001, and P < 0.01, respectively). Whereas RhoA, RhoC, and ROCK independently predicted shortened overall survival in patients with invasive tumor by univariate analysis (P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001, and P < 0.01, respectively), only RhoC did so by multivariate analysis (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Rho/ROCK pathway apparently involved in occurrence and progression of bladder cancer may be valuable prognostic markers.