Endoscopic full-thickness plication versus laparoscopic fundoplication: a prospective study on quality of life and symptom control.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic antireflux techniques have emerged as alternative therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Endoscopic plication receives continuing interest as an effective and safe procedure. This treatment option has not been the subject of comparison with well-established operative therapies to date. The present study aimed at comparatively evaluating the effectiveness of endoscopic plication and laparoscopic fundoplication in terms of quality of life and symptom control. METHODS: Between October 2006 and April 2010, 60 patients with documented GERD were randomly assigned to undergo either endoscopic plication or laparoscopic fundoplication. Quality-of-life scores and symptom grading were recorded before treatment and at 3- and 12-month follow-up. Outcomes were compared with the statistical significance set at a p value of 0.05. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients from the endoscopic group and 27 patients from the operative group were available at follow-up. Quality-of-life scores showed a substantial and similar increase for both groups after treatment. Symptoms of heartburn (p < 0.02), regurgitation (p < 0.004), and asthma (p = 0.03) were significantly improved in the endoscopic group, whereas laparoscopic fundoplication was more effective in controlling symptoms of heartburn (p < 0.01) and regurgitation (p < 0.05) compared to the endoscopic procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic plication and laparoscopic fundoplication resulted in significant symptom improvement with similar quality-of-life scores in a selected patient population with GERD, whereas operative treatment was more effective in the relief of heartburn and regurgitation at the expense of higher short-term dysphagia rates.

Influence of the size of the hiatus on the rate of reherniation after laparoscopic fundoplication and refundopilication with mesh hiatoplasty.

BACKGROUND: Intrathoracic wrap migration is the most frequent morphological anatomic reason for failure of laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS). This study investigates whether the size of the esophageal hiatus is a factor in reherniation after LARS with mesh hiatoplasty and after primary failed hiatal closure. METHODS: Fifty-four patients who underwent a laparoscopic 270° Toupet fundoplication with simple sutured crura and posterior onlay of Parietex mesh prosthesis between October 2003 and June 2008 were evaluated with respect to the occurrence of postoperative intrathoracic wrap migration/reherniation. Indication for mesh hiatoplasty was a hiatus with a hiatal surface area (HSA) of at least 5.60 cm(2) or slippage after the first LARS. The integrity of repair was assessed using a barium swallow test. Cinematography was performed at a median of 25.6 months (3-63 months after operation) and was completed in 49 of 54 patients (90%). Follow-up was completed in 24 patients who underwent primary LARS (group A) and 25 patients who underwent a laparoscopic refundoplication (group B). RESULTS: In group A, the occurrence of postoperative wrap reherniation was diagnosed in 20.8% of the patients, compared to 40% in group B. In both groups only one patient with recurrent hiatal hernia was symptomatic. In group A, patients who developed a recurrent hernia had a larger HSA than patients without postoperative reherniation. There was a huge difference in the size of the HSA between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with reherniation. In comparison, group B patients had HSA of similar size in all described cases. CONCLUSION: In primary intervention, recurrence of hiatal hernia is more likely the larger the HSA is. The size of the hiatus is a major contributing factor to the possibility of reherniation. After failed primary hiatal closure, the size of the hiatal defect is no marker for the possibility of reherniation.

Effectiveness of laparoscopic total and partial fundoplication on extraesophageal manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a randomized study.

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical effect of partial and total fundoplication on extraesophageal symptoms in a selected cohort of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Hundred patients with documented GERD were randomized to either undergo floppy Nissen (n = 50) or Toupet fundoplication (n = 50). Symptom scores of cough, asthma, hoarseness, and distortion of taste were prospectively evaluated using a standardized symptom questionnaire before surgery and at 3- and 12-month follow-up. Statistical significance was set at a P-value of 0.05. All evaluated symptoms exhibited substantial improvement after Nissen fundoplication at 3- and 12-month follow-up. Similar therapeutic results were documented for Toupet fundoplication, although statistical significance could not be reached for asthma at long-term follow-up. In conclusion, the application of laparoscopic fundoplication is justified for patients with documented GERD and atypical symptoms refractory to medical treatment. Toupet fundoplication may have a lesser effect on asthma.