Lung cancer in nonsmokers- A risk factor analysis.

INSTITUTIONS: STONY BROOK MEDICAL CENTERRATIONALE: Lung Cancer screening for the high-risk smoking population has been proven to save lives. However, in 2022, 20% of newly diagnosed lung cancers (47,300) were in nonsmokers. These patients were found to be diagnosed at later stages. This may be at least partly due to not meeting criteria for and participating in current lung cancer screening. This study aims to describe characteristics of a never smoker patient population to help identify common risk factors which might merit inclusion in lung cancer screening and thus improve patient outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective single center study included never-smoker patients diagnosed with lung nodules and never-smoker patients diagnosed with lung cancer from 2016 to 2022. Data was obtained from the Stony Brook Medical Center electronic medical record. 16,056 patients were identified as never-smokers who were asked by the medical assistant if they ever smoked in their lifetime. Patients were eliminated if they had any smoking history up to first diagnosis date. Demographics, radiology, histology, diagnosis dates, comorbidities, smoking status, and exposures collected through ICD10 codes and not self-reported, were investigated. RESULTS: Of 16,056 never-smoking patients, 9315 (58.02%) were females diagnosed with lung nodules and 6741 (41.98%) were males diagnosed with lung nodules. The univariate analysis showed significant differences between gender, age at nodule diagnosis, and patients with and without comorbidities including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hypertension (HTN), and family history (FHX) of lung cancer. The percentage of lung cancer patients among females was significantly higher than among males. Patients having lung cancer were older. The percentages of lung cancer patients with these comorbidities were significantly higher than those without. However, there was no significant difference found between patients with and without diabetes mellitus (DM). The multivariable logistic regression suggested that age at nodule diagnosis and comorbidities including COPD (which included asthma, emphysema and chronic bronchitis) and family history of lung cancer were significantly associated with lung cancer. Older patients and patients with those comorbidities had a higher risk of developing cancer than those who were younger or without those comorbidities. The study excluded HTN and included age at nodule diagnosis in the logistic regression model as HTN was found to be protective against lung cancer due to age at lung nodule diagnosis. Please refer to the appendix for further details. CONCLUSION: Never-smoker patients who were older and with COPD and Family History of lung cancer had higher risk of developing lung cancer than younger patients without these comorbidities. In this study, gender had no impact on outcome.

Race Does Not Affect Survival in Patients With Prostate Cancer Treated With Radiation Therapy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Recent evidence has shown that African American men with prostate cancer may have more radiosensitive disease with greater overall survival (OS) with radiotherapy compared to Caucasian men. We compared OS in African American and Caucasian men receiving radiotherapy utilizing the National Cancer Database. PATIENTS AND METHODS: African American or Caucasian men with N0M0 prostate adenocarcinoma diagnosed between 2004 and 2013 were selected and grouped into favorable and unfavorable risk based on clinical T-stage, clinical Gleason score, and prostate-specific antigen. Patients with favorable risk received brachytherapy or dose-escalated external beam radiation (EBRT); those with unfavorable risk received EBRT plus anti-androgen therapy with/without brachytherapy. African American and Caucasian men in each subgroup were propensity score-matched and analyzed for survival. Sensitivity analysis used treatment-race and age-race interaction terms. RESULTS: 27,150 patients met the inclusion criteria, with a median age of 68 (range=38-90) years and median follow-up of 59.93 (range=48-142.62) months. OS was equivalent between African American and Caucasian race in favorable risk [log-rank p=0.82; hazard ratio (HR)=0.928; 95% confidence intervaI (CI)=0.583-1.477, p=0.753] and unfavorable-risk subgroups (log-rank p=0.87, HR=1.078, 95% CI=0.843-1.379, p=0.550). No significant interaction existed between treatment and race for either cohort but there was a significant interaction between race and age in those with unfavorable risk (HR=1.046, 95% CI=1.009-1.084, p=0.015), with greater OS in those of Caucasian race ≤60 years (HR=0.320, 95% CI=0.137-0.752, p=0.009). CONCLUSION: African American and Caucasian men have similar survival when treated with risk-appropriate definitive radiotherapy. However, younger (age ≤60 years) African American men with unfavorable risk have poorer survival than their Caucasian counterparts and may harbor a significantly different biology of disease.

Challenging AJCC 8 Staging for Soft Tissue Sarcoma Using the NCDB.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the new American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8 grouping of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) with nodal disease (N1M0) and metastatic disease (M1) as stage IV correctly represents the prognosis of these previously separate patient groups, using the National Cancer Database. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Adults with STS identified in the 2004 to 2014 National Cancer Database, classified by the World Health Organization 2013 system into 10 histologic subgroups, were grouped according to AJCC 8 staging and analyzed according to demographic characteristics, histology, primary site, disease extent, and adjuvant treatment. Primary retroperitoneal sites, "other/unusual" histologic subgroups, and those with delays in therapy (>180 days from diagnosis) were excluded. We used χ2 tests, Cox proportional hazard models, and propensity-score matched analyses. RESULTS: Of 82,987 patients identified, 55,417 met inclusion criteria; 29,855 (53.9%) were male, and 25,262 (46.1%) were female. Median age was 60 years (range, 18-90 years). Overall survival (OS) of STS of all sites was significantly different between N1M0 and N0-1M1 patients at 5 years (34.4%; [95% confidence interval {CI}, 30.1%-38.8%] vs 10.1% [95% CI, 9%-11%], respectively) and 10 years (27.3% [95% CI, 22.5%- 32.2%] vs 5.4% [95% CI, 4.5%-6.5%], respectively; log-rank test, P < .001). For STS of trunk and extremities in N1M0 and N0-1M1 patients, the N1M0 cohort was associated with significantly greater OS on multivariate Cox proportional hazards models (hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.41-0.58; P < .001), and this OS difference remained significant for propensity-matched cohorts of all primary sites (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.44-0.64; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In adult STS, including those of the trunk and extremity, OS is superior with N1M0 compared with N0-1M1 disease. These results suggest that the AJCC 8th edition grouping of N1 and M1 patients into stage IV may obscure the more favorable prognosis of patients with N1M0 disease.

Ionizing radiation induces EphA2 S897 phosphorylation in a MEK/ERK/RSK-dependent manner.

PURPOSE: The EphA2 tyrosine kinase is frequently overexpressed in human tumors that are also treated with radiation. However, few studies have examined the effect of radiation on the EphA2 receptor itself. The purpose of this project was to investigate the impact of radiation on EphA2 to better understand mechanisms of radioresistance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cell lines were exposed to X-rays and assayed for changes in EphA2 protein levels and phosphorylation over time by Western blotting. HEK293 cells stably expressing wild-type EphA2 or the S897A mutant were analyzed for cell survival from X-rays. RESULTS: Treatment of different cancer cell lines with 2 Gy of X-rays induced the phosphorylation of EphA2 on S897 but no changes were found in EphA2 total levels or its tyrosine phosphorylation. Radiation-induced S897 phosphorylation was unaffected by an AKT inhibitor but blocked by a MEK or RSK inhibitor. HEK293 cells expressing the EphA2 S897A mutant had a nearly 2-fold lower level of cell survival from X-rays than cells expressing wild-type EphA2. CONCLUSIONS: These findings show that radiation induces S897 EphA2 phosphorylation, an event associated with increased cell survival. Therefore, targeting pathways that mediate EphA2 S897 phosphorylation may be a beneficial strategy to reduce radioresistance.

A Case of a Laryngeal MALT Lymphoma in a Patient with a History of Gastric MALT.

We are reporting a case of a 62-year-old African American woman with a history of gastric MALT lymphoma successfully treated with radiation who presented with a laryngeal MALT lymphoma 4 years after her original diagnosis. She received definitive radiation with a complete response. The case presented is unique for the rare presentation of a MALT lymphoma in the larynx, especially in light of the patient's previously treated gastric MALT lymphoma years ago.

Acupuncture for the alleviation of hot flashes in men treated with androgen ablation therapy.

PURPOSE: Hot flashes are common side effect due to androgen ablation therapy (AAT). The utility of acupuncture for hot flashes in men has not been thoroughly studied. We prospectively studied the effect of acupuncture in men with hot flashes. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The study was approved by internal review board. Seventeen men with hot flashes and history of AAT for prostate cancer were enrolled. Three men declined participation before receiving any treatment. A hot flash score (HFS) was used to measure daily hot flashes. The composite daily score was calculated as the product of frequency × severity. The baseline daily scores were compared with scores taken at 2 and 6 weeks and at 8-month average follow-up. RESULTS: No side effects were encountered during, immediately after treatment, or at 8 months. The mean initial HFS was 28.3; it dropped to 10.3 (p = 0.0001) at 2 weeks posttreatment, 7.5 (p = 0.0001) at 6 weeks, and 7.0 (p = 0.001) at 8 months. Clinical improvement for each patient is defined as the percent decrease in the mean HFS at each time point. The mean improvement at Weeks 2 and 6 was 68.4% (mean HFS decreased from 37.409 to 11.836, p = 0.001) and 89.2% (mean HFS decreased from 37.409 to 4.05, p = 0.0078) respectively. The improvement at 8 months was 80.3% (mean HFS decreased from 37.409 to 7.385, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Acupuncture provides excellent control of hot flashes in men with a history of AAT. The absence of side effects and the durable response at 8 months are likely to be appealing to patients. Prospective randomized study is warranted to further evaluate this modality against medical therapy.