Using Real-Time Adherence Feedback to Enhance Communication About Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy: Patient and Clinician Perspectives.

New technologies for real-time adherence monitoring hold the potential to enhance antiretroviral therapy adherence interventions by providing objective information about daily medication-taking behavior. To realize this potential, we need to understand how to integrate real-time adherence feedback into existing best practices to promote antiretroviral therapy adherence at the point of care. Using in-depth interviews with 30 HIV-infected patients and 29 HIV care clinicians, our primary aims were to understand patients' and clinicians' perceptions of anticipated benefits and preferred uses of objective feedback to enhance conversations about adherence and to identify concerns about the impact of objective monitoring on patient-clinician relationships and communication. Both patients and clinicians suggested that identifying patterns of nonadherence with real-time feedback could (a) facilitate collaborative adherence problem-solving, (b) motivate patient adherence, and (c) reinforce the importance of optimal adherence. Some clinicians worried that delivery of real-time feedback could imply mistrust of patient-reported adherence and suggested careful framing of monitoring results. A few patients and clinicians were concerned that negative reactions to monitoring could discourage retention in care and reduce adherence motivation. These results indicate the potential of real-time feedback to enhance existing evidence-based adherence interventions targeting the key adherence precursors of adherence information, motivation, and behavioral skills. Guidance for the delivery of real-time adherence feedback should focus on both optimizing adherence and mitigating negative perceptions of adherence monitoring.

Patient and clinician perspectives on optimizing graphical displays of longitudinal medication adherence data.

OBJECTIVE: New pharmacological measures assessing medication adherence, including longitudinal drug levels in hair, are emerging. Little is known, however, about how best to present results from such measures to patients and clinicians in comprehensive, easy-to-understand, acceptable formats. We, therefore, developed three graphical display prototypes of hypothetical daily drug concentrations measured in hair, and assessed their acceptability among participants. METHODS: We interviewed 30 HIV-positive patients and 29 clinicians to examine perceived acceptability for each graphical display prototype. RESULTS: Patients and clinicians generally found the prototypes acceptable for facilitating understanding of patient adherence; however, areas for optimization were identified. For patients with lower health literacy, prototypes did not provide sufficient understanding of the link between medication-taking and drug concentrations in hair. These patients also preferred pictographs over bar or line graphs. Clinicians largely preferred daily drug concentration data in bar graphs with information included about the measure's accuracy. Participants questioned the utility of showing drug concentrations above a therapeutic range, though they found color-coding results acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: Assessing prototype versions of graphical displays of hypothetical longitudinal adherence data indicated ways to optimize their acceptability. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Acceptable prototype-tested graphical displays of longitudinal patient-specific drug concentrations may enhance adherence monitoring in clinical settings.

Single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of darunavir plus ritonavir and etravirine in semen and rectal tissue of HIV-negative men.

BACKGROUND: Antiretroviral therapy has become a central component of combination in HIV prevention efforts. Defining the individual exposure of commercially available antiretroviral therapy in genital secretions and vulnerable mucosal tissues is paramount to designing future prevention interventions. METHODS: A pharmacokinetic (PK) study was performed in 12 HIV-negative men receiving 600 mg of darunavir, 100 mg of ritonavir, and 200 mg of etravirine orally, twice daily for 8 days. Seven blood plasma (BP) samples were collected over 12 hours on day 1 (PK1) and days 7 and 8 (PK2). One rectal tissue (RT) sample from each subject was collected during PK1 and PK2. During PK1, 2 seminal plasma (SP) samples were collected from each subject. During PK2, 6 SP samples were collected from each subject over 2 days. RESULTS: Antiretrovirals were detected in SP and RT within 1 hour after a single dose. Over PK1 and PK2, SP exposures were lower than BP by 80%-92% (DRV), 89-95% (RTV), and 83-88% (ETR). However, protein binding in SP (14% for darunavir, 70% for ritonavir, and 97% for etravirine) was lower than in BP. Rectal tissue exposures were higher than BP by 39- to 155-fold for darunavir, 12- to 61-fold for ritonavir, and 20- to 40-fold for etravirine. CONCLUSIONS: Lower SP protein binding resulted in higher pharmacologically active darunavir and etravirine concentrations compared with BP. High RT concentrations may also be favorable for suppressing viral replication in the gastrointestinal mucosa. The high protein-unbound exposures in SP and total exposures in RT support further investigations of darunavir plus ritonavir and etravirine in secondary prevention.