RESUMO
The aims of this study were to determine the effect of different compositions in transition games (TGs) on the load of soccer players and to evaluate their performance in physical tests. Using a GPS system, 18 players were monitored during: 3vs2, 2vs1 and 1vs1. Distance covered (DC), DC 18-20.9 km·h-1, 21-23.9 km·h-1,>24 km·h-1, peak speed, accelerations (Acc) and decelerations (Dec)>1.0 m·s-2 and>2.5 m·s-2 and rate of perceived exertion (RPE) were recorded. Before and after each TG, countermovement-jump (CMJ), 15- (S15) and 30 m (S30) speed tests were assessed. TG3vs2 showed greater DC and Dec>1.0 m·s-2 than TG2vs1, and DC, DC 18.0-23.9 km·h-1, Acc>1.0 m·s-2 and Dec>2.5 m·s-2 than TG1vs1 (p<0.01). TG2vs1 achieved higher DC, DC 18.0-23.9 km·h-1, and Acc>2.5 m·s-2 (p<0.01) but lower peak speed (p=0.02) and RPE (p=0.02) than TG1vs1. Post-intervention, TG1vs1 showed lower CMJ and higher S15 (p=0.02), while TG3vs2, showed improvements in CMJ (p<0.01). The three tasks showed large variations for DC>24 km·h-1, Acc>1.0 m·s-2, Dec>1.0 m·s-2 and Dec>2.5 m·s-2. The load of TGs is sensitive to their player composition.
Assuntos
Aceleração , Desempenho Atlético , Esforço Físico , Futebol , Futebol/fisiologia , Humanos , Desempenho Atlético/fisiologia , Esforço Físico/fisiologia , Masculino , Adulto Jovem , Sistemas de Informação Geográfica , Corrida/fisiologia , Teste de Esforço/métodos , DesaceleraçãoRESUMO
The aim of this study was to compare the running demands of transition games (TGs) and official matches, analysing their requirements according to the performance of each position. An observational design was used to examine the activity of 20 soccer players during official matches and TGs. GPS technology was used to monitor the total distance covered (DC), distance at speeds between 14-17.9 kmâ¢h-1, 18-21 kmâ¢h-1, and above 21 kmâ¢h-1, peak speed, accelerations and decelerations above 2.5 mâ¢s-2, and Player Load for both activities. All players were assigned to groups: centre-backs (CBs), fullbacks (FBs), defensive midfielders (DMFs), offensive midfielders (OMFs), wide midfielders (WMFs) and strikers (Ss). TGs showed greater total DC, DC 14-17.9 kmâ¢h-1, DC 18-21 kmâ¢h-1, DC >21 kmâ¢h-1, accelerations and decelerations >2.5 mâ¢s-2, and Player Load (p < 0.01). CBs, FBs and Ss showed more DC, DC 14-17.9 kmâ¢h-1, DC 18-21 kmâ¢h-1, DC >21 kmâ¢h-1, accelerations and decelerations >2.5 mâ¢s-2 and Player Load in TGs (p < 0.01). In the midfielder positions, transition game players showed greater DC 18-21 kmâ¢h-1, DC >21 kmâ¢h-1, accelerations and decelerations >2.5 mâ¢s-2 than in matches (p < 0.05). DMFs showed higher total DC (p < 0.05) and WMFs greater DC and DC 14-17.9 kmâ¢h-1 (p < 0.01) in these drills. During transition games CBs showed greater DC 14-17.9 kmâ¢h-1 than FBs, and greater DC than Ss (p < 0.05). FBs performed more decelerations >2.5 mâ¢s-2 than DMFs and OMFs (p < 0.05). TGs produced a homogenized load in soccer players, independent of their position, which exceeded the external load of official matches.