Comparison of Interwoven Nitinol and Drug-Eluting Stents for Endovascular Treatment of Femoropopliteal Artery Disease.

BACKGROUND: Interwoven nitinol stents (INS) and drug-eluting stents (DES) were designed to improve the mid- and long-term results of femoropopliteal (F-P) angioplasty. The aim of this study was to systematically compare these stents. METHODS: Between 2015 and 2017, 62 patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease of the F-P segment treated by INS or DES were identified from a prospectively maintained institutional database. The primary outcome measure was one-year primary patency; secondary outcomes were in-stent restenosis (ISR), stent occlusion, target lesion revascularization (TLR) and mortality. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 26.9 ± 11.2 months. No statistically significant difference in primary patency at one year was observed (88.6% vs. 88.9%). Throughout follow-up, overall rates of ISR (5.7% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.645), stent occlusion (25.7% vs. 7.4%, p = 0.094) and TLR (25.7% vs. 18.5%, p = 0.505) were statistically equivalent between the groups. Mortality reached 14.3% in the INS group and 3.7% in the DES group, but this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.196). Multivariable analysis revealed significant correlations between ISR and stent occlusions; popliteal lesion localization (p = 0.016) and poor below the knee vessel outflow (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In the short- and mid-term, the use of an INS or DES in the F-P arterial segment did not result in a difference in primary patency rate, stent occlusion, restenosis, re-intervention or mortality. The overall data do not provide any evidence to favor one stent over the other.

Visceral Fibromuscular Dysplasia: From asymptomatic disorder to emergency.

Fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) is an idiopathic, segmental, non-atherosclerotic and non-inflammatory disease of the musculature of arterial walls, leading to stenosis of small and medium-sized arteries, mostly involving renal and cervical arteries. As a result of better and more systematic screening, it appears that involvement of the splanchnic vascular bed is more frequent than originally assumed. We review epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical picture as well as diagnosis and treatment of visceral artery (VA) FMD. The clinical picture is very diverse, and diagnosis is based on CT-, MR- or conventional catheter-based angiography. Involvement of VAs generally occurs among patients with multi-vessel FMD. Therefore, screening for VA FMD is advised especially in renal artery (RA) FMD and in case of aneurysms and/or dissections. Treatment depends on the clinical picture. However, the level of evidence is low, and much of the common practice is extrapolated from visceral atherosclerotic disease.

Short-Term Results of Eluvia™ Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent in External Iliac and Femoropopliteal Lesions.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to independently evaluate the real-world performances of Eluvia™ paclitaxel drug-eluting stents (DES) (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts) for the treatment of external iliac and femoropopliteal artery lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively collected, and retrospectively reviewed, data for all patients who underwent an endovascular treatment with an Eluvia™ DES for the treatment of an external iliac or femoropopliteal lesion. Patient demographics, concomitant procedures, arterial lesions characteristics, procedural details, and follow-up were reviewed. RESULTS: Between April and October 2016, 15 Eluvia™ DES were placed in 15 consecutive adult patients with a technical success of 100%. The treated lesions had a mean length of 93.9 ±58 mm. Sixty percent of the lesions were total occlusions and 13% were restenosis of previous stents. An additional inflow treatment was performed in 40% of the cases. At six months, two patients were lost at follow-up and one had an occluded stent. We had a primary patency rate and freedom from TLR of 92%. All remaining patients had an improved Rutherford class, improved quality of life and wound healing, and an increase in walking distance. Survival and limb salvage rates were 100%. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the good result of DES, in general, and of the Eluvia™ stent, in particular, in the treatment of external iliac and femoropopliteal arterial lesions, with a primary patency rate and a freedom from TLR of 92% at six months. A larger number of patients and longer follow-up will be required to determine the true real-world efficacy of the Eluvia™ DES, but short-term experience is encouraging.

Cerebral embolization during percutaneous valve implantation does not occur during balloon inflation valvuloplasty: prospective diffusion-weighted brain MRI study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: The study aim was to define the timing of cerebral embolization events during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), and to determine if events were more closely associated with valve implantation or with balloon inflation. METHODS: Between January 2008 and November 2011, a total of 114 patients underwent TAVI at the author's institution. Of these patients, 44 had previously undergone imaging before and after TAVI, and were included in the study (26 transfemoral (TF); 18 transapical (TA)). Eleven patients who had only balloon valvuloplasty (BV) during the same period were included, as were 22 patients who had open aortic valve replacement (AVR), as controls. All 77 patients underwent neurological examination, and all had cerebral MRIs before and after their procedures. RESULTS: Fifty of the 77 patients who underwent postprocedural MRI had new cerebral lesions, as follows: 24/26 (92%) in TF patients; 17/18 (94%) in TA patients; 3/11 (27%) in BV patients; and 6/22 (27%) in AVR patients (TF and TA versus BV and AVR, p < 0.0001). The mean number and volume of embolic lesions per patient were respectively 5.4/438 mm3 for TF, 11.6/3414 mm3 for TA, 0.7/46 mm3 for BV, and 0.4/48 mm3 for AVR (TF versus TA and BV versus AVR, p = NS; TF and TA versus BV and AVR, p < 0.0001). No association was found between either the EuroSCORE or patient age and the number of events. CONCLUSION: In the present study, an incidence of silent cerebral embolic lesions after TAVI was identified which was significantly higher than that for BV or AVR. This indicated an association of embolism with valve implantation rather than with balloon inflation.

Aortic Coarctation Stenting in Adolescents and Adults: A Single-Center Experience.

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the short and midterm results of aortic coarctation (AoCo) stenting in an adolescent and adult population. METHODS: All patients with a AoCo older than 14 years treated by stent placement between December 2000 and November 2016 were included in this study. Twenty-eight patients with an invasive peak systolic pressure gradient >20 mmHg were identified. Number of redilations, non-invasive systolic blood pressure, peak systolic pressure gradient, antihypertensive medication intake, claudication status and complications were evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty-two covered and 6 uncovered stents were successfully placed. Peak systolic pressure gradient decreased immediately after stenting from a mean of 32 mmHg to 0 mmHg (± 7 mmHg). Mean AoCo diameter increased from 8 tot 16 mm (± 4 mm). Peripheral arterial injury was seen in 2 patients (7.1%). The mean follow-up time was 60 ± 49 months. Redilation of the stent was required in 4 patients, 2 to accommodate for growth and 2 for restenosis. Six (35%) patients could stop all antihypertensive medication. All claudicants (6/28) became and remained asymptomatic after surgery and during their follow-up. No aneurysms, stent fractures or dissections were noticed. There were 2 stent migrations during the first procedure with only 1 needing additional stent placement. CONCLUSION: Aortic coarctation stenting is a safe and effective treatment that significantly reduces the peak systolic pressure gradient. Antihypertensive medication can be reduced, and increase of walking distance in claudicants can be obtained. Younger patients may need more frequent reinterventions to accommodate for growth.

Complete Aortic Replacement in a Patient With Loeys-Dietz Syndrome.

Background: LDS is an autosomal dominant connective tissue disease. It is a rare multi-systemic disorder with serious vascular impact. Case report: We report a case of a 38-year-old male with Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS) suffering from major aortic complications. The disease initially manifested itself as a type A aortic dissection, successfully treated by open ascending aorta replacement. Ten days later, the patient developed an uncomplicated type B dissection. During follow up, the patient became symptomatic in both legs (rest pain) due to major true lumen compression. A thoracic endovascular aortic repair was performed with immediate improvement of the symptoms. During follow up, a computer tomography angiogram, showed a persistence false lumen perfusion and an aortic diameter increase. Multiple additional endovascular procedures and a final open thoracoabdominal aortic replacement were needed to exclude completely the false lumen. Conclusion: Open surgical repair is still the gold standard therapy for patients with connective tissue disease. However, with the nowadays progress, hybrid procedures could be a better option.

Celiac artery occlusive disease: a rare but potentially critical condition in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Undiagnosed occlusive disease of celiac trunk and/or superior mesenteric artery may lead to life-threatening complications after pancreatoduodenectomy. METHODOLOGY: Retrospective analysis of a consecutive series of 171 patients scheduled for pancreatico- duodenectomy or total pancreatectomy. RESULTS: The prevalence of arterial occlusive disease was 5.9% (10 patients), including complete celiac artery occlusive disease in 2 patients (1.2%). Preoperative diagnosis was achieved in 90% of the patients by lateral-views of imaging studies. In arterial stenosis <50% (3 patients), abstention was always successful. In arterial stenosis >50%, successful treatment options included abstention (n=1), preoperative endovascular dilatation (n=1) or stenting (n=1), division of the median arcuate ligament with (n=1) or without (n=1) postoperative endovascular stenting, and aorto-hepatic bypass (2 patients). No early postoperative ischemic complications occurred. However, one patient died from late intestinal ischemia. CONCLUSIONS: Arterial occlusive disease is rare in patients undergoing pancreatico-duodenectomy but expose the patient to severe complications if undiagnosed. A tailored management according to the type of arterial stenosis, to patients' indication for surgery and to patients' arterial anatomy is indicated. Surgical and endovascular management may be successfully combined.

Comparison of different inflation times on the angiographic image after balloon angioplasty in the femoropopliteal segment: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular balloon angioplasty is a common practice to treat femoropopliteal arterial lesions. The precise balloon inflation duration to obtain the best lesion dilatation is unclear. The aim of this study was to assess angiographic images after 3- and 5-minute balloon inflation in femoropopliteal de-novo atherosclerotic lesions. METHODS: We randomly assigned 61 femoropopliteal arterial lesions to undergo balloon angioplasty for 3 and 5 minutes. The primary endpoint was the rate of favorable angiographic images after balloon angioplasty. The correlation between angiographic image and degree of calcification was studied. The secondary endpoint was the need of additional ballooning or stenting of the dilated lesion. RESULTS: Thirty-two (52%) lesions were randomized to a 3-minute inflation time and 29 (48%) lesions to a 5-minute inflation time. Median lesion length was 83±32mm in the 3-minute group and 89±31mm in the 5-minute inflation group (P=0.47). After deflation, vessel recoil was significantly higher in the 3-minute group compared to the 5-minute group (P=0.04), in mild to moderate calcified lesions, 18 (56%) and 9 (31%) cases, respectively. The angiographic result after balloon angioplasty was significantly more favorable (P=0.007) in the 5-minute group with 20 (69%) cases compared to 10 (31%) cases in the 3-minute group. An increase of vessel recoil of 62% has been seen in severe calcified lesions in the 5-minute group. Additional intervention rate was significantly higher (P=0.007) in the 3-minute group compared to the 5-minute group. CONCLUSIONS: A prolonged inflation time of 5 minutes has an overall better angiographic image in the femoropopliteal segment and especially in non- or mildly calcified lesions.

A rare case of spontaneous superficial femoral artery pseudoaneurysm in a young patient: case report and review of literature.

Spontaneous femoral artery pseudoaneurysm (PSA) is a rare disease and there are few reported cases. We report a case of a 17-year-old male with increasing left leg pain associated with swelling at the site of the pain. We observed a voluminous pulsatile mass. He had no history of trauma or surgery. Imaging confirmed a large PSA of the proximal portion of the left superficial femoral artery (SFA). The PSA was treated by resection of the aneurysm, reconstruction with inter-positional saphenous vein graft. Three months later; he came back to the emergency room for a pulsatile mass. The scan showed a PSA of his left SFA and a hematoma with active bleeding. It was treated surgically by resection of the aneurysm and reconstruction with graft.

Endovascular Repair of a Ruptured Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm With the Sandwich Technique: A Case Report.

INTRODUCTION: aortic aneurysms involving the renal and visceral arteries are endovascular challenges, especially for emergencies. We report a case of ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) in a morbidly obese 71-year-old man. The patient was admitted with a stable hemodynamic state. A computed tomography angiogram (CTA) revealed a contained ruptured TAAA with an occluded celiac trunk and left renal artery due to previous nephrectomy. Due to the emergency and his comorbidities, we performed an endovascular aortic repair with the sandwich technique and 2 chimneys. Two bridging stents (chimneys) were deployed between the aorta and the target vessels (superior mesenteric and right renal arteries) in a space created in-between 2 aortic straight endografts. Ten days postoperative, acute renal failure appeared and right renal stent occlusion was diagnosed on CTA. Unfortunately, no adequate kidney revascularization could be obtained, requiring permanent hemodialysis. At a 3-month follow-up visit, the patient did well with stable aneurysm dimensions. CONCLUSIONS: encouraging outcomes of chimney-EVAR techniques, comparable to those in published reports of fenestrated-EVAR and branched-EVAR, support this procedure as a valid off-the-shelf available alternative in emergency situations. Nevertheless, only few midterm results achieved are actually available and long-term outcomes are actually unknown.

Two decades of valve-sparing root reimplantation in tricuspid aortic valve: impact of aortic regurgitation and cusp repair.

OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to analyse the influence of preoperative aortic regurgitation (AR) on the necessity of cusp repair during valve-sparing reimplantation (VSR). We focused on patients with tricuspid aortic valves (TAV) and evaluated the impact of AR and cusp repair on long-term outcomes. METHODS: From March 1998 to December 2018, a total of 512 consecutive patients underwent VSR at our institution; of these, 303 had a TAV. The mean age was 53 ± 15 years, and the median follow-up was 6.12 years. The rate and type of cusp repair were analysed based on preoperative AR. Time-to-event analysis was performed, as well as risk of death, reoperation and AR recurrence. RESULTS: Cusp repair was necessary in 168 (55.4%) patients; the rate rose significantly as AR grade increased (P < 0.001). In-hospital mortality was 1% (n = 3). At 5 and 10 years, overall survival was 92 ± 2% and 75 ± 5%, respectively. Freedom from valve reoperation was 95 ± 2% and 90 ± 3%. Freedom from AR >2+ and AR >1+ at 10 years was 88 ± 4% and 70.4 ± 4.6%, respectively. Independent predictors of death included age, New York Heart Association functional class and type-A aortic dissection. Predictors of AR greater than mild included previous cardiac surgery and severe preoperative AR. CONCLUSION: In patients with TAV receiving VSR, the necessity of cusp repair increased with the degree of preoperative AR. Preoperative AR and cusp repair do not impact long-term survival and aortic valve reoperation, but severe preoperative AR and multiple cusp repair increase the risk of recurrent moderate-to-severe AR. Overall, cusp repair seems to attenuate the negative impact of preoperative AR for at least 1 decade in a majority of patients.

Long-term durability of bicuspid aortic valve repair: a comparison of 2 annuloplasty techniques.

OBJECTIVES: To compare long-term outcomes after bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) repair utilizing the Cabrol annuloplasty versus valve sparing Reimplantation technique. METHODS: From 1996 to 2018, 340 consecutive patients underwent BAV repair. Eighty underwent Cabrol annuloplasty and 189 underwent Reimplantation. Exclusion criteria were re-repairs (n = 6), active endocarditis (n = 4), no annuloplasty (n = 41) and ring or suture annuloplasty (n = 20). We compared both groups for survival, reoperations, valve related events and recurrent severe aortic regurgitation (AR > 2+). Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to balance the 2 groups. Cox regression analysis was used to identify outcome predictors. RESULTS: After weighting, pre- and intraoperative characteristics were similar between groups, except for aorta replacement techniques and operative time, which was longer in the Reimplantation group (P < 0.001). At 12 years, overall survival was similar between groups (IPW: Cabrol 97 ± 2% vs Reimplantation 94 ± 3%, P = 0.52). Freedom from reoperation and freedom from AR > 2+ were significantly lower in the Cabrol group (reoperation IPW: 69 ± 9% vs 91 ± 4%, P = 0.004 and AR > 2+ IPW: 71 ± 8% vs 97 ± 2%, P < 0.001). The Reimplantation technique was the only independent predictor of reoperation (hazard ratio 0.31; confidence interval 0.19-0.7; P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, comparing 2 annuloplasty strategies for BAV repair, we found statistically significant differences in long-term durability favouring the Reimplantation technique, and no differences in overall survival. The results support our current strategy of Reimplantation technique and repair of AR in patients with BAV. Cabrol annuloplasty is obsolete and should be generally abandoned in patients undergoing BAV repair for AR.

Effects of preoperative aortic insufficiency on outcome after aortic valve-sparing surgery.

BACKGROUND: The presence of significant preoperative aortic insufficiency (AI) or the need for cusp repair has been suggested as a risk factor for poorer outcomes after aortic valve (AV)-sparing surgery. We analyzed the influence of these factors on the mid-term outcomes of AV surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between 1996 and 2008, 164 consecutive patients underwent elective AV-sparing surgery. Severe preoperative AI (grade > or =3+) was present in 93 patients (57%), and 54 (33%) had a bicuspid valve. Root repair was performed with either the reimplantation (74%) or the remodeling (26%) technique, and cusp repair was performed in 90 patients (55%). Mean clinical follow-up was 57 months. Hospital mortality was 0.6%. Cusp repair was required in 52% of the patients with preoperative AI < or =2+ and in 57% of those with AI > or =3+ (P=0.6). Cusp repair was required more frequently in bicuspid versus tricuspid valves (91% versus 38%, P<0.001). Overall survival at 8 years was 88+/-8%. Freedom from AV reoperation at 8 years was similar with preoperative AI < or =2+ versus preoperative AI > or =3+ (89+/-11% versus 90+/-7%, P=0.7) and with versus without cusp repair (84+/-17% versus 92+/-8%, P=0.5). Freedom from recurrent AI (grade > or =3+) at 5 years was also similar between groups (90+/-10% versus 89+/-8%, P=0.9, and 90+/-8% versus 89+/-9%, P=0.8, respectively). By multivariate analyses, predictors of recurrent AI > or =2+ were preoperative left ventricle end-diastolic diameter and AI >1+ on discharge echocardiography. CONCLUSIONS: With a systematic approach to cusp assessment and repair, AV-sparing surgery for root pathology has an acceptable mid-term outcome, irrespective of preoperative AI or need for cusp repair.

Vascular reconstruction during pancreatoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas improves resectability but does not achieve cure.

OBJECTIVE: Combined vascular and pancreatic resection improves long-term survival of patients suffering from ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. This study was designed to compare the results of surgical resection in patients with pancreatic cancer with or without vascular resection. Late 10-year disease-free survival was considered as an indicator of patients' disease cure. METHODS: A total of 149 consecutive patients have undergone pancreatoduodenectomy without vascular resection (group 1: 82 patients), with isolated venous resection (group B: 67 patients), or with arterial and/or venous resection (group C: 8 patients). RESULTS: The duration of surgery and blood losses were significantly more important in groups B and C compared with group A; however, postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were similar. R1 resection was significantly more frequent in groups B (42%) and C (50%) compared with group A (13%; p = 0.0002), but there were more advanced tumors in these groups, as demonstrated by a lower Karnowsky index, higher Ca 19-9 plasmatic level, greater tumor size, more advanced stage in the AJCC classification, and more tumor location in the uncinate process of the pancreas. Ten-year overall and disease-free survivals were significantly better in group A (19 and 20%) compared with group B (2.8 and 0%) and group C (0% and 0%). Multivariate analysis proved vascular resection and metastatic nodal status as being independent predictive factors of disease-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: Vascular resection combined to pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer increases local resectability without increasing mortality and morbidity rates but does not improve patients' disease cure rate.

Unsuccessful treatment of a collapsed thoracic stent graft by Palmaz stent.

A Gore TAG Excluder stent graft was deployed in a 35-year-old woman for an isthmic saccular aneurysm. At 12-hour follow-up, we diagnosed a proximal collapse. A Palmaz stent was used to reopen the proximal segment. Two months later, she presented with a transient ischemic attack (embolic process) related to a suboptimal apposition of the Palmaz stent in the distal aortic arch. This led to open surgical replacement of the ascending aorta and aortic arch with reimplantation of the supraaortic branches. Reopening of a stent graft collapse with a Palmaz stent might be a short-term solution; however, its presence can lead to embolic complications.

Long-term experience with valve-sparing root reimplantation surgery in tricuspid aortic valve.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze our long-term experience with valve-sparing reimplantation technique in treating aortic root aneurysm, aortic regurgitation, and aortic dissection in patients with tricuspid aortic valve. METHODS: Between March 1998 and October 2018, 303 consecutive patients underwent valve-sparing reimplantation in our institution. The mean age of this cohort was 52.9 ± 15 years. Time to event analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meier method. Risk of death, reoperation, and aortic regurgitation (AR) recurrence were analyzed using the cox-regression method. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was 1% (n = 3) of which two were admitted for acute aortic dissection. Median follow-up was 5.81 years ([IQR]: 2.8-10 years). Thirty-nine patients (14.4%) died during follow-up. At 5 and 10 years, overall survival was 92 ± 2%and 75 ± 4.9%, respectively. Seventeen patients required late aortic valve reoperation. Freedom from valve reoperation was 95 ± 2% and 90 ± 3%. Freedom from AR > 2+ and AR > 1+ at 10 years was 91 ± 4% and 71.5 ± 4.6%, respectively. Significant multivariate predictors of death included age, New York Heart Association dyspnea class (NYHA), type A acute dissection (TAAD), and preoperative left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD). Significant multivariate predictors of AR recurrence included indication for surgery, previous cardiac surgery, and presence of preoperative AR. Freedom from events like major bleeding, thromboembolic events, and infective endocarditis at 10 years were 97%, 98%, and 96%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic valve-sparing with the reimplantation technique has been performed for over two decades in our institution, and the results in patients with tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) are excellent in terms of survival and freedom from valve-related adverse outcomes including valve reoperation. These results continue supporting the use of valve sparing root replacement using the reimplantation technique (VSRR) in patients with aortic aneurysm, irrespective of whether they have preoperative AR or not. VSRR is safe, durable, and reproducible, but further follow-up, well into the second decade is still necessary.

Aortic valve repair in endocarditis: scope and results.

PURPOSE: Infective endocarditis (IE) remains a prevalent and life-threatening disease. The choice to repair or replace the infected valve still remains a matter of debate, especially in aortic valve (AV) infections. We retrospectively analyze our two decades of experience in aortic valve repair (AVr) in IE. Long-term outcomes are described with particular attention to the impact of valve configuration and the use of patch techniques. METHODS: From September 1998 to June 2017, 42 patients underwent AVr in a single center for IE. Techniques include leaflet patch repair and resuspension and aortic annulus stabilization. RESULTS: Hospital mortality was 2.4% (n = 1). The median follow-up was 90.6 months. Survival was 89 ± 9.4% and 76.6 ± 16% at 5 and 10 years, respectively, with no significant differences between tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) and bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). Freedom from reoperation was 100% and 92.9 ± 7.1% in TAV and 81.8 ± 18.2% and 46.8 ± 28.8% in BAV at 5 and 10 years, respectively (TAV vs BAV, p = 0.02). BAV, degree of preoperative aortic insufficiency, and AVr including patch were factors predicting a higher risk of reoperation during the follow-up. CONCLUSION: In our experience, AVr is a safe, feasible, and efficient choice in selected patients with healed or active IE. Durability of the repair is excellent in patients with limited lesions and in patients with TAV even with patch repair. Reoperations occurred principally in patients with BAV and severe preoperative AI, in whom patch repair was performed. In those patients, we actually recommend to replace the valve in case of active endocarditis.

Free margin length and geometric height in aortic root dilatation and leaflet prolapse: implications for aortic valve repair surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to assess the aortic leaflet free margin length (FML) and geometric height (gH) in a normal aortic valve (AV), aorta dilatation and aortic leaflet prolapse. METHODS: We measured the FML and gH intraoperatively in 132 patients operated on for aortic insufficiency, aortic dilatation, endocarditis or fibroelastoma. Patients were divided into 3 groups: normal tricuspid AV (group 1, n = 12), aortic dilatation (group 2, tricuspid = 43, bicuspid = 18) and leaflet prolapse (group 3, tricuspid = 32, bicuspid = 27). The FML and gH were compared between the groups and between the leaflets within each group. RESULTS: In a normal tricuspid AV, the mean FML and gH were 34.7 ± 3.1 mm and 18.8 ± 1.7 mm, respectively. In group 2 tricuspid, the FML and gH were greater than those in group 1 (FML 43.7 ± 4.4, P < 0.001; gH 21.2 ± 1.8, P = 0.003). In group 3, tricuspid, the FML of the prolapsing leaflet was greater than the FML of the non-prolapsing leaflet (48.3 ± 5.4 vs 42.2 ± 3.6; P < 0.001). In group 2, bicuspid, FML of both leaflets were similar in group 2, but augmented on the fused leaflet compared to the non-fused leaflet in group 3 (fused 55.4 ± 6.3; non-fused 46.2 ± 6.2; P < 0.001). In groups 2 and 3 bicuspid, the gH of the non-fused leaflet was systematically greater than the fused leaflet (group 2 non-fused 24.6 ± 2.5 vs fused 20.4 ± 2.1; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In aortic dilatation and leaflet prolapse, FML and, to a lesser extent, gH increased significantly compared to those of normal AV function. FML and gH dimensions also depended on the valve configuration (tricuspid/bicuspid). These data provide new insight into the pathomorphology of AV disease and will serve to further develop new methods of AV repair based on intraoperative measurements of the FML.

Comparison of bilateral internal thoracic artery revascularization using in situ or Y graft configurations: a prospective randomized clinical, functional, and angiographic midterm evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Bilateral internal thoracic arteries (BITA) demonstrated superiority over other grafts to the left coronary system in terms of patency and survival benefit. Several BITA configurations are proposed for left-sided myocardial revascularization, but the ideal BITA assemblage is still unidentified. METHODS AND RESULTS: From 03/2003 to 08/2006, 1297 consecutive patients underwent isolated bypass surgery in our institution. 481 patients met the inclusion criteria for randomization, and 304 (64%) were randomized. Patients were allocated to BITA in situ grafting (n=147) or Y configuration (n=152) then evaluated for clinical, functional, and angiographic outcome after 6 months and 3 years. Patient telephone interviews were conducted every 3 months and a stress test performed twice yearly under the referring cardiologist's supervision. Angiographic follow-up was performed 6 months after surgery. The primary and secondary end points were, respectively, major adverse cerebrocardiovascular events (MACCE) and the proportion of ITA grafts that were completely occluded at follow-up angiography. More arterial anastomoses were performed in patients randomized to the Y than the in situ configuration (3.2 versus 2.4; P<0.001). No significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of hospital mortality or morbidity was found. At follow-up, there was no significant difference in any MACCE rate between the 2 groups. 450 out of 464 anastomosis (97%) in the BITA Y group and 287 of 295 (97%) in the BITA in situ group were controlled patent (P=0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Excellent patency rates were achieved using both BITA configurations with no significant differences in terms of MACCE up to 19 months postoperatively, but longer-term results remain to be established.