RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the aberration and visual quality differences between myopic and astigmatic eyes before and after contact lens application by using corneal aberrometer and low- contrast sensitivity chart. METHODS: Eighty eyes of 40 patients were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups as myopic (40 eyes, n=20) and astigmatic groups (40 eyes, n=20). We used aspheric Balafilcon A (Purevision and Purevision Toric Bausch&Lomb, Rochester, USA) lenses for each group. Corneal aberrations and low-contrast sensitivity values were measured and compared for each patient in both groups. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between myopic and astigmatic groups when we compared low-contrast sensitivity values for both on- and off-eyes. Mean total higher-order aberration (HOA) values for off-eye, were 0.29±0.10 µm, and 0.33±0.10 µm for on-eye in the myopic group, while they were 0.42±0.14 µm in off-eye and 0.37±0.23 µm in on-eye in the astigmatic group. Off-eye mean coma, irregular astigmatism and total higher-order aberration RMS (root-mean-square) values were significantly higher in the astigmatic group compared to the myopic group (p=0.006, p=0.001, p=0.001) but mean on-eye RMS values were not. CONCLUSION: Myopic and astigmatic patients differ in terms of high-order aberrations and these differences cannot be equalized after contact lens application, but visual quality can be improved in both patients by using contact lenses.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To present effectiveness of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) injection for central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC), resistant to intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injection. METHODS: Files of the patients who had the diagnosis of CSC between 2005 and 2013 were reviewed retrospectively. Eighty-five eyes of 81 patients' files have been investigated. Ten eyes of 10 patients that were resistant to IVB, with no history of photodynamic therapy, were included in to this study. Demographic details, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and central macular thickness (CMT) were studied to analyze the effectiveness of IVR. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 38.8 years (SD=4.7 years). The mean follow-up time after first IVR injection was 7.9 months (SD=1.5 months). The mean number of IVB and IVR injections was 2.0 (SD=0.7) and 1.3 (SD=0.4), respectively. The mean CMT before IVR injection was 392.4 µm (SD=66.3) and decreased to 194.1 µm (SD=9.3, P<0.001) at the last visit. The mean BCVA before IVR injection was 0.50 logMAR (SD=0.23) and improved to 0.05 logMAR (SD=0.06, P<0.001) at the last visit. In all cases after IVR injection, the subretinal fluid almost resolved completely, and leakage disappeared in fundus fluorescein angiography. CONCLUSION: Ranibizumab might be a promising option for the patients with CSC, resistant to bevacizumab in acute or early chronic stage.