Perceptions and Challenges of Telehealth Obstetric Clinics Among Pregnant Women in Hong Kong: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.

BACKGROUND: Integrating telehealth in an obstetric care model is important to prepare for possible infection outbreaks that require social distancing and limit in-person consultations. To ensure the successful implementation of obstetric telehealth in Hong Kong, it is essential to understand and address pregnant women's concerns. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess pregnant women's attitudes, concerns, and perceptions regarding telehealth obstetric clinic services in Hong Kong. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cross-sectional questionnaire study at Queen Mary Hospital between November 2021 and August 2022. Utilizing a 5-point rating scale, the questionnaire aimed to capture pregnant women's preferences, expectations, feasibility perceptions, and privacy concerns related to telehealth clinic services. We used statistical analyses, including chi-square tests and multinomial logistic regression, to compare questionnaire responses and investigate the association between advancing gestation and attitudes toward telehealth clinics. RESULTS: The study included 664 participants distributed across different pregnancy stages: 269 (40.5%) before 18 gestational weeks, 198 (29.8%) between 24 and 31 weeks, and 197 (29.7%) after delivery. Among them, 49.8% (329/664) favored face-to-face consultations over telehealth clinics, and only 7.3% (48/664) believed the opposite. Additionally, 24.2% (161/664) agreed that telehealth clinics should be launched for obstetric services. However, the overall preference for telehealth clinics was <20% for routine prenatal checkups (81/664, 12.2%) and addressing pregnancy-related concerns, such as vaginal bleeding (76/664, 11.5%), vaginal discharge (128/664, 19.4%), reduced fetal movement (64/664, 9.7%), uterine contractions (62/664, 9.4%), and suspected leakage of amniotic fluid (54/664, 8.2%). Conversely, 76.4% (507/664) preferred telehealth clinics to in-person visits for prenatal education talks, prenatal and postpartum exercise, and addressing breastfeeding problems. Participants were more comfortable with telehealth clinic tasks for tasks like explaining pregnancy exam results (418/664, 63.1%), self-administering urinary dipsticks at home (373/664, 56.4%), medical history-taking (341/664, 51.5%), and self-monitoring blood pressure using an electronic machine (282/664, 42.8%). %). During the postpartum period, compared to before 18 weeks of gestation, significantly more participants agreed that telehealth clinics could be an option for assessing physical symptoms such as vaginal bleeding (aOR 2.105, 95% CI 1.448-3.059), reduced fetal movement (aOR 1.575, 95% CI 1.058-2.345), uterine contractions (aOR 2.906, 95% CI 1.945-4.342), suspected leakage of amniotic fluid (aOR 2.609, 95% CI 1.721-3.954), fever (aOR 1.526, 95% CI 1.109-2.100), and flu-like symptoms (aOR 1.412, 95% CI 1.030-1.936). They were also more confident with measuring the symphysis-fundal height, arranging further investigations, and making diagnoses with the doctor via the telehealth clinic. The main perceived public health advantage of telehealth clinics was the shorter traveling and waiting time (526/664, 79.2%), while the main concern was legal issues from wrong diagnosis and treatment (511/664, 77.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Face-to-face consultation remained the preferred mode of consultation among the participants. However, telehealth clinics could be an alternative for services that do not require physical examination or contact. An increased acceptance of and confidence in telehealth was found with advancing gestation and after delivery. Enforcing stricter laws and guidelines could facilitate the implementation of telehealth clinics and increase confidence in their use among pregnant women for obstetric care.

First-trimester and early-second-trimester transvaginal cervical length before 16 weeks among women with preterm and term birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the differences in first-trimester and early-second-trimester transvaginal cervical length between patients with spontaneous preterm birth and those with term birth. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched through August 2023. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies had to include (1) transvaginal cervical length measurement before 16+0 weeks of gestation and (2) transvaginal cervical length measurement in a population of patients who delivered preterm and at term. Abstracts, studies with duplicated data, and those with cervical length measured by transabdominal ultrasound scan were excluded. METHODS: K.W.C. and J.L. searched for, screened, and reviewed the articles independently. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Mean differences were calculated using a random-effects model and pooled through a meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 5727 published articles were identified. Only 10 studies (which analyzed 22,151 pregnancies) met the inclusion criteria. All studies excluded iatrogenic preterm birth. Transvaginal cervical length was significantly shorter in women with spontaneous preterm birth than in those who delivered at term (mean difference, -0.97; 95% confidence interval, -1.65 to -0.29; P=.005; I2=69%). When a linear technique was used to measure transvaginal cervical length, a significantly shorter transvaginal cervical length was associated with spontaneous preterm birth as opposed to term birth (mean difference, -1.09; 95% confidence interval, -1.96 to -0.21; P=.02; I2=77%). A shorter transvaginal cervical length measured by other techniques was also associated with spontaneous preterm birth before 34 to 35 weeks (mean difference, -1.87; 95% confidence interval, -3.04 to -0.70; P=.002; I2=0%). When studies where interventions were given for a "short" cervix or studies with a mean transvaginal cervical length ≥40 mm were excluded, a significantly shorter transvaginal cervical length was observed among those with spontaneous preterm birth (mean difference, -1.13; 95% confidence interval, -1.89 to -0.37; P=.004; mean difference, -0.86; 95% confidence interval, -1.67 to -0.04; P=.04; respectively). The optimal transvaginal cervical length cutoff was 38 to 39 mm, yielding pooled sensitivity of 0.80, specificity of 0.45, positive likelihood ratio of 1.16, negative likelihood ratio of 0.33, diagnostic odds ratio of 5.12, and an area under the curve of 0.75. CONCLUSION: Women with spontaneous preterm birth had significantly shorter transvaginal cervical length before 16 weeks of gestation compared with those who delivered at term. The linear method and the 2-line method are acceptable techniques for measuring transvaginal cervical length.

Hemoglobin A1c in early pregnancy to identify preexisting diabetes mellitus and women at risk of hyperglycemic pregnancy complications.

BACKGROUND: Unrecognized diabetes mellitus during pregnancy could pose serious maternal and neonatal complications. A hemoglobin A1c level of ≥6.5% was used to diagnose both diabetes mellitus in nonpregnant individuals and diabetes in pregnancy. As the hemoglobin A1c level could be influenced by maternal physiological changes, the optimal cutoff in early pregnancy to detect women with diabetes in pregnancy and associated complications remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of various hemoglobin A1c levels and the optimal hemoglobin A1c cutoff to identify mothers with diabetes in pregnancy diagnosed by the gold standard 75 g oral glucose tolerance test before 24 weeks of gestation. In addition, the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes were compared using the optimal hemoglobin A1c cutoff. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was conducted between 2004 and 2019. Women with at least 1 risk factor of gestational diabetes mellitus received an oral glucose tolerance test before 24 weeks of gestation. Terminology of hyperglycemia first detected during pregnancy by oral glucose tolerance test was classified as either diabetes in pregnancy or gestational diabetes mellitus following the World Health Organization's recommendation. Women who met the diagnostic criteria of diabetes in pregnancy and early-onset gestational diabetes mellitus (ie, before 24 weeks of gestation) and had a paired hemoglobin A1c measurement within 4 weeks of their early oral glucose tolerance test were studied. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values at various hemoglobin A1c cutoffs were calculated for the detection of diabetes in pregnancy. The optimal hemoglobin A1c level was identified from the constructed receiver operating characteristic curves. Multivariate binary logistic regression analyses were performed to calculate the unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios for pregnancy complications. RESULTS: There were 63,111 deliveries, and 22,949 women underwent an oral glucose tolerance test before 24 weeks of gestation. A total of 157 and 3210 women met the diagnostic criteria of diabetes in pregnancy and early-onset gestational diabetes mellitus using an oral glucose tolerance test, respectively. Only 346 participants had a paired hemoglobin A1c and oral glucose tolerance test measurement (82 cases with diabetes in pregnancy and 264 cases with early-onset gestational diabetes mellitus). The receiver operating characteristic curve identified an optimal hemoglobin A1c cutoff of 5.7% to diagnose diabetes in pregnancy, with a sensitivity of 64.6%, specificity of 81.1%, positive predictive value of 51.5%, and negative predictive value of 88.1%. A hemoglobin A1c cutoff of either 5.9% or 6.5% could miss 47.6% or 73.2% of women with diabetes in pregnancy. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, a hemoglobin A1c level of ≥5.7% increased the risk of maternal insulin use (adjusted odds ratio, 6.69; 95% confidence interval, 3.44-12.99), macrosomia (adjusted odds ratio, 7.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.90-29.00), and shoulder dystocia (adjusted odds ratio, 6.56; 95% confidence interval, 1.161-37.03). CONCLUSION: The optimal hemoglobin A1c cutoff to detect diabetes in pregnancy diagnosed using an oral glucose tolerance test before 24 weeks of gestation was 5.7%, but this cutoff could not reliably identify diabetes in pregnancy owing to the low sensitivity. However, an early hemoglobin A1c level of ≥5.7% indicated increased risks of pregnancy and neonatal complications.

Characteristics of Maternal Mortality Missed by Vital Statistics in Hong Kong, 2000-2019.

Importance: Reducing maternal mortality is a global objective. The maternal mortality ratio (MMR) is low in Hong Kong, China, but there has been no local confidential enquiry into maternal death, and underreporting is likely. Objective: To determine the causes and timing of maternal death in Hong Kong and identify deaths and their causes that were missed by the Hong Kong vital statistics database. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study was conducted among all 8 public maternity hospitals in Hong Kong. Maternal deaths were identified using prespecified search criteria, including a registered delivery episode between 2000 to 2019 and a registered death episode within 365 days after delivery. Cases as reported by the vital statistics were then compared with the deaths found in the hospital-based cohort. Data were analyzed from June to July 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: The outcomes of interest were maternal mortality, defined as death during pregnancy or within 42 days after ending the pregnancy, and late maternal death, defined as death more than 42 days but less than 1 year after end of the pregnancy. Results: A total of 173 maternal deaths (median [IQR] age at childbirth, 33 [29-36] years) were found, including 74 maternal mortality events (45 direct deaths and 29 indirect deaths) and 99 late maternal deaths. Of 173 maternal deaths, 66 women (38.2%) of individuals had preexisting medical conditions. For maternal mortality, the MMR ranged from 1.63 to 16.78 deaths per 100 000 live births. Suicide was the leading cause of direct death (15 of 45 deaths [33.3%]). Stroke and cancer deaths were the most common causes of indirect death (8 of 29 deaths [27.6%] each). A total of 63 individuals (85.1%) died during the postpartum period. In the theme-based approach analysis, the leading causes of death were suicide (15 of 74 deaths [20.3%]) and hypertensive disorders (10 of 74 deaths [13.5%]). The vital statistics in Hong Kong missed 67 maternal mortality events (90.5%). All suicides and amniotic fluid embolisms, 90.0% of hypertensive disorders, 50.0% of obstetric hemorrhages, and 96.6% of indirect deaths were missed by the vital statistics. The late maternal death ratio ranged from 0 to 16.36 deaths per 100 000 live births. The leading causes of late maternal death were cancer (40 of 99 deaths [40.4%]) and suicide (22 of 99 deaths [22.2%]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of maternal mortality in Hong Kong, suicide and hypertensive disorder were the dominant causes of death. The current vital statistics methods were unable to capture most of the maternal mortality events found in this hospital-based cohort. Adding a pregnancy checkbox to death certificates and setting up a confidential enquiry into maternal death could be possible solutions to reveal the hidden deaths.