Antenatal diagnosis, neonatal brain volumes, and neurodevelopment in transposition of the great arteries.

AIM: To examine whether antenatal diagnosis modifies relationships between neonatal brain volumes and 18-month neurodevelopmental outcomes in children with transposition of the great arteries (TGA). METHOD: In a retrospective cohort of 139 children with TGA (77 antenatally diagnosed), we obtained total brain volumes (TBVs) on pre- (n = 102) and postoperative (n = 112) magnetic resonance imaging. Eighteen-month neurodevelopmental outcomes were assessed using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition. Generalized estimating equations with interaction terms were used to determine whether antenatal diagnosis modified associations between TBVs and neurodevelopmental outcomes accounting for postmenstrual age at scan, brain injury, and ventricular septal defect. RESULTS: Infants with postnatal diagnosis had more preoperative hypotension (35% vs 14%, p = 0.004). The interactions between antenatal diagnosis and TBVs were significantly related to cognitive (p = 0.003) outcomes. Specifically, smaller TBVs were associated with lower cognitive scores in infants diagnosed postnatally; this association was attenuated in those diagnosed antenatally. INTERPRETATION: Antenatal diagnosis modifies associations between neonatal brain volume and 18-month cognitive outcome in infants with TGA. These findings suggest that antenatal diagnosis may be neuroprotective, possibly through improved preoperative clinical status. These data highlight the need to improve antenatal diagnosis rates. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Antenatal diagnosis of transposition of the great arteries modified relationships between neonatal brain volume and neurodevelopment. Smaller brain volumes related to poorer cognitive scores with postnatal diagnosis only. There was more preoperative hypotension in the postnatal diagnosis group.

Neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18 months of children diagnosed with CHD compared to children born very preterm.

OBJECTIVE: To compare neurodevelopmental outcomes and parent behaviour ratings of children born term with CHD to children born very preterm. METHODS: A clinical research sample of 181 children (CHD [n = 81]; very preterm [≤32 weeks; n = 100]) was assessed at 18 months. RESULTS: Children with CHD and born very preterm did not differ on Bayley-III cognitive, language, or motor composite scores, or on expressive or receptive language, or on fine motor scaled scores. Children with CHD had lower ross motor scaled scores compared to children born very preterm (p = 0.047). More children with CHD had impaired scores (<70 SS) on language composite (17%), expressive language (16%), and gross motor (14%) indices compared to children born very preterm (6%; 7%; 3%; ps < 0.05). No group differences were found on behaviours rated by parents on the Child Behaviour Checklist (1.5-5 years) or the proportion of children with scores above the clinical cutoff. English as a first language was associated with higher cognitive (p = 0.004) and language composite scores (p < 0.001). Lower median household income and English as a second language were associated with higher total behaviour problems (ps < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Children with CHD were more likely to display language and motor impairment compared to children born very preterm at 18 months. Outcomes were associated with language spoken in the home and household income.